<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>The Privacy / Rights Project</title>
	<description>General privacy resources for the individual user - proxies, privacy alerts, discussion of privacy issues, etc.</description>
	<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:42:14 -0500</pubDate>
	<ttl>15</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Time to Act on Companies Selling Mass Spy Gear to Authoritarian Regimes</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=20213</link>
		<description><![CDATA[<!--sizeo:4--><span style="font-size:14pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo-->Time to Act on Companies Selling Mass Spy Gear to Authoritarian Regimes<!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><br /><br /><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->On Wednesday, EFF will give recommendations to the European Parliament for how to combat one of the most troubling problems facing democracy activists around the world: the fact that European and American companies are providing key surveillance technology to authoritarian governments that is then being used to aid repression.<br /><br />Recent reports by the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg News have exposed the shadowy but growing industry that sells electronic spy gear to governments known for violating human rights. <br /><br />The technology’s reach is very broad: governments can listen in on cell phone calls, use voice recognition to scan mobile networks, read emails and text messages, censor web pages, track one’s every movement using GPS, and can even change email contents while en route to a recipient. <br /><br />Some tools are installed using the same type of malicious malware and spyware used by online criminals to steal credit card and banking information. They can secretly turn on webcams built into personal laptops and microphones in unused cell phones. And all of this information is filtered and organized on such a massive scale that it can be used to spy on every person in an entire country.<br /><br />Ordinary citizens, journalists, human rights campaigners and democracy advocates have all been targeted, eviscerating privacy rights and chilling free speech. Ample evidence suggests information acquired through this spy gear appears has played a role in the harassment, threats, and even torture of journalists, human rights campaigners, and democracy activists. <br /><br />Yet dozens of companies from the U.S. and E.U continue to sell this technology, including to authoritarian regimes.  The market for surveillance equipment has grown to a staggering $5 billion a year.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br /><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->We hope the EU moves quickly on this problem, as recent reports show it is only getting worse. We also hope the U.S. Congress is listening because with U.S companies sell the same equipment, they are not only undermining own foreign policy in these countries, but destroying the human rights the State Department claims it supports around the world.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br /><!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->When asked by the Guardian if he would be comfortable knowing that regimes in North Korea and Zimbabwe were purchasing this technology from the companies he does business with, Jerry Lucas, president of Telestrategies Inc., said, “That’s just not my job to determine who’s a bad country and who’s a good country. That’s not our business.”<br /><br /><b>By instituting EFF’s "know our customer" standards, we can make it their business</b>.<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd--><br /><br />Read the full article on EFF's website:<br /><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/02/time-act-companies-selling-mass-spy-gear-authoritarian-regimes" target="_blank">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/02/time-...itarian-regimes</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:05:50 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=20213</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.20: EFF Sues DoJ for Public Release of FBI Surveillance Rules</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19969</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 20  July 3, 2009  editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 513th issue:<br /><br />* EFF SUES DOJ FOR PUBLIC RELEASE OF FBI SURVEILLANCE RULES. EFF filed<br />suit against the Department of Justice this week, demanding the public<br />release of the "Domestic Investigative Operational Guidelines" that<br />govern surveillance of Americans by the FBI. "Americans have the right<br />to know the basic surveillance policies used by federal investigators<br />and how their privacy is -- or is not -- being protected," explains<br />EFF Senior Counsel David Sobel.<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/23" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/23</a><br /><br />* ASCAP MAKES OUTLANDISH COPYRIGHT CLAIMS ON CELL PHONE RING TONES.<br />EFF urged a federal court Wednesday to reject bogus copyright claims<br />in a ringtone royalty battle that could raise costs for consumers,<br />jeopardize consumer rights, and curtail new technological innovation.<br /><br />As part of a ploy to squeeze more money out of mobile phone companies,<br />the American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers (ASCAP) has<br />told a federal court that each time a phone rings in a public place,<br />the phone user has violated copyright law. Therefore, ASCAP argues,<br />phone carriers must pay additional royalties or face legal liability<br />for contributing to what they claim is cell phone users' copyright<br />infringement. In an amicus brief filed Wednesday, EFF points out that<br />copyright law does not reach public performances "without any purpose<br />of direct or indirect commercial advantage" -- clearly the case with<br />cell phone ringtones. If phone users are not infringing copyright law,<br />then mobile phone service providers are not contributing to any<br />infringement.<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/07/02" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/07/02</a><br /><br />For the blog post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/ascap-wants-be-paid-" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/ascap-wants-be-paid-</a><br /><br />For more on this case:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/cases/us-v-ascap" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/cases/us-v-ascap</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* Google and HTTPS<br />Google's announcement that it's going to be offering strong encryption<br />for gmail messages was heartening. The next step is to figure out how<br />to offer encrypted search capability!<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/several-facts-about-" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/several-facts-about-</a><br /><br />* Into the DTV Era, With No Broadcast Flag Mandate<br />Entertainment industries like to argue that they "need" DRM to make<br />works available, and policymakers have eagerly adopted this argument.<br />But when the bluff is called, it turns out that DRM wasn't so<br />necessary after all.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/dtv-era-no-broadcast" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/dtv-era-no-broadcast</a><br /><br />* Help Protesters in Iran: Run a Tor Bridge or a Tor Relay<br />Internet users in Iran are using Tor to both (a) circumvent censorship<br />systems and (<img src="http://www.bluetack.co.uk/forums/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="B)" border="0" alt="cool.gif" /> remain anonymous while reading and writing on the<br />Internet. Both are critically important to the safety of protesters,<br />many of whom fear retaliation from the government. Preliminary reports<br />indicate that use of the Tor client in Iran has increased in the days<br />after the contested election.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/help-protesters-iran-run-tor-relays-bridges" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/help-...-relays-bridges</a><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Surveillance in Iran vs. Surveillance in the US<br />Iran has an Internet monitoring center built by Nokia and Siemens AG<br />--<br />what kind of domestic spying is happening in the US?<br /><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-ostertag/how-do-you-say-overcollec_b_219258.html" target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-ostertag...c_b_219258.html</a><br /><br />~ Data Shows Music Fans Are Willing to Buy<br />TopSpin and Nettwerk have experimented with premium discs, free<br />albums,<br />and free shows and have found that fans are still more than willing to<br />pay.<br /><a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090618/1858245284.shtml" target="_blank">http://techdirt.com/articles/20090618/1858245284.shtml</a><br /><br />~ Panasonic Blocking Use of Third-Party Batteries<br />A firmware update to some Pansonic cameras is preventing consumers<br />from<br />using their choice of battery, forcing users to buy only "genuine"<br />Panasonic batteries.<br /><a href="http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/16087-Panasonic-camera-firmware-update-blocks-3rd-party-batteries.html" target="_blank">http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/16087-Panason...-batteries.html</a><br /><br />~ Endless Privacy Concerns After Clear Shuts Down<br />What happens to all the fingerprints, iris scans, and Social Security<br />numbers collected by the Clear registered traveler service?<br /><a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/06/where-will-registered-traveler-fingerprints-go-its-un-clear" target="_blank">http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/06/whe...go-its-un-clear</a><br /><br />~ Electronic Arts' New Motto: Please Pirate our Games...er,<br />Storefronts<br />The video game publisher seeks to move beyond piracy by selling games<br />that, as a rule, encourage payment for an improved experience, like<br />access to the game community and better content.<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/06/eas-new-motto-please-pirate-our-games-er-storefronts.ars" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2009/06...storefronts.ars</a><br /><br />~ Musician Makes $19k on Twitter; $0 on Major Label Solo Album<br />Amanda Palmer of the Dresden Dolls recounts recent examples of using<br />Twitter to reach out to fans directly and garner direct support for<br />her creative efforts, while her major label album sales net nothing.<br /><a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090623/2337095343.shtml" target="_blank">http://techdirt.com/articles/20090623/2337095343.shtml</a><br /><br />~ Does a Private Company Own City Bus Travel Times?<br />A controversy is brewing over NextBus Information Systems, which shut<br />down an iPhone app by claiming to have exclusive ownership of bus<br />arrival data.<br /><a href="http://sfappeal.com/news/2009/06/who-owns-sfmta-arrival-data.php" target="_blank">http://sfappeal.com/news/2009/06/who-owns-...rrival-data.php</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* Intern Opportunity!<br /><br />EFF is looking for a summer intern to help in our development and<br />media departments. This is an unpaid, full-time position.<br /><br />Projects will include:<br />-Working on our annual report and contacting major donors and<br />foundations (40% of time);<br />-Assisting with membership fulfillment and bulk mailing<br />(40% of time); and<br />-Identifying and organizing press clippings (20% of time).<br /><br />Excellent writing and editing skills, strong organizational abilities,<br />and the capacity to take instruction and run with it is a must.<br />Interest in development and/or public relations as a career is a plus,<br />as is knowledge and familiarity with EFF's issues.<br /><br />To apply, please send a cover letter, resume, and writing sample to:<br />alyssa@eff.org<br /><br />* Volunteer at EFF!<br /><br />EFF is looking for volunteers to assist with operations in our<br />membership department. If you're quick, organized, detail-oriented,<br />and looking for a hands-on way to support EFF, contact us today!<br /><br />Duties include:<br /><br />* Membership fulfillment<br />* Organizing premiums<br />* Print mailing<br />* Event assistance<br /><br />Learn about fundraising operations in the nonprofit world while<br />supporting your favorite organization in a tangible way! Interest in<br />grassroots fundraising is a plus, as is knowledge and familiarity with<br />EFF's issues. Send a letter of interest to aaron@eff.org<br /><br />* IT Equipment for EFF Offices<br /><br />We are looking for donations of computer equipment to support EFF's<br />office operations. As thanks for your donation, we can offer a free<br />membership and, of course, some cool swag.<br /><br />Requested Items:<br /><br />- 2 x 2TB external USB hard drives, preferably Western Digital. Or a<br />larger number of smaller drives with the same interface.<br /><br />- PATA IDE hard drives, 20GB or larger<br /><br />Please contact stu@eff.org if you can help!<br /><br />* Help EFF Go to DEFCON!<br /><br />EFF is looking for donations of airline tickets and hotel points for<br />the DEFCON hacking conference, as well as other conferences and<br />speaking engagements. If you have enough airline miles for a free<br />ticket and would like to send an EFF staffer to a conference, let us<br />know, and we will help you with the process of making the reservation.<br />Please note that at this time we are unable to combine miles from<br />multiple individuals.  We are also looking for hotel rewards points to<br />help reduce our overall travel costs.<br /><br />As a thanks for your donation, we can offer a free membership and a<br />mention in EFFector (if you'd like). Please contact aaron@eff.org if<br />you can help!<br /><br />* Nominate a Pioneer for EFF's 2009 Pioneer Awards!<br /><br />EFF established the Pioneer Awards to recognize leaders on the<br />electronic frontier who are extending freedom and innovation in the<br />realm of information technology. This is your opportunity to nominate<br />a deserving individual or group to receive a Pioneer Award for 2009.<br />The International Pioneer Awards nominations are open both to<br />individuals and organizations from any country. Nominations are<br />reviewed by a panel of judges chosen for their knowledge of the<br />technical, legal, and social issues associated with information<br />technology.<br /><br />How to Nominate Someone for a 2009 Pioneer Award:<br /><br />You may send as many nominations as you wish, but please use one email<br />per nomination. Please submit your entries via email to<br />pioneer@eff.org. We will accept nominations until July 15, 2009.<br /><br />Simply tell us:<br /><br />1. The name of the nominee,<br /><br />2. The phone number, email address or website by which the nominee can<br />be reached, and, most importantly,<br /><br />3. Why you feel the nominee deserves the award.<br /><br />Nominee Criteria:<br /><br />There are no specific categories for the EFF Pioneer<br />Awards, but the following guidelines apply:<br /><br />1. The nominees must have contributed substantially to the health,<br />growth, accessibility, or freedom of computer-based communications.<br /><br />2. To be valid, all nominations must contain your reason, however<br />brief, for nominating the individual or organization and a means of<br />contacting the nominee. In addition, while anonymous nominations will<br />be accepted, ideally we'd like to contact the nominating parties in<br />case we need further information.<br /><br />3. The contribution may be technical, social, economic, or cultural.<br /><br />4. Nominations may be of individuals, systems, or organizations in the<br />private or public sectors.<br /><br />5. Nominations are open to all (other than current members of EFF's<br />staff and operating board or this year's award judges), and you may<br />nominate more than one recipient. You may also nominate yourself or<br />your organization.<br /><br />6. Persons or representatives of organizations receiving an EFF<br />Pioneer Award will be invited to attend the ceremony at EFF's<br />expense.<br /><br />More on the EFF Pioneer Awards:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Eva Galperin, Referral Coordinator<br />eva@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br /><a href="http://links.eff.org/emaildonate" target="_blank">http://links.eff.org/emaildonate</a><br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:00:18 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19969</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.13, 1 July 2009</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19968</link>
		<description><![CDATA[============================================================<br /><br />            EDRi-gram<br /><br /> biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe<br /><br />     Number 7.13, 1 July 2009<br /><br /><br />============================================================<br />Contents<br />============================================================<br /><br />1. Article 29 Working Party on online social networking<br />2. Rapidshare forced by the court to filter more than 5000 tracks<br />3. Judge unbiased, no retrial for The Pirate Bay<br />4. 'Right to the silence of the chips' in the new EC Communication<br />5. Norway will not chase file-sharers<br />6. France: No to new EDVIGE!<br />7. Swedish court: IP addresses are personal data<br />8. The French Government acts like a bulldog with its three strikes law<br />9. ENDitorial: EU DP - state of the play, potential for enhancements<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />11. Agenda<br />12. About<br /><br />============================================================<br />1. Article 29 Working Party on online social networking<br />============================================================<br /><br />Article 29 Working Party issued on 22 June 2009 an opinion on how European<br />privacy laws affect social networking sites such as Facebook or Myspace.<br /><br />The opinion states the social networking sites should be responsible for the<br />compliance to European privacy laws and, on the other hand, that users of<br />such sites should upload pictures or information about other individuals<br />only with the consent of the respective individuals.<br /><br />Presently, social networking users share pictures and tag friends' images<br />without requiring a prior consent and generally, communicate publicly,<br />placing their own and others' private information on shared "walls".<br /><br />The Data Protection Authorities recommend that users are given the opt out<br />choice and are warned of the privacy risks and on the personal data that is<br />being made available to others. The opinion says that "the homepage should<br />contain a link to a complaint facility covering data protection issues for<br />both members and non-members".<br /><br />The group also draws attention to the processing of personal data on the<br />Internet for commercial purposes, recommending that before using the<br />collected data aimed for personalised advertisements, the sites should<br />obtain the prior consent of the respective users. Data on sensitive<br />topics such as race, religion or sexual orientation should not be processed<br />or passed on to advertisers and individuals should be allowed to adopt a<br />pseudonym. Special attention should be given to the processing of the<br />minors' personal data. This is an opinion that has been lately supported by<br />the European Commission which has announced future strong measures to<br />regulate online tailored ads.<br /><br />The opinion also advises imposing limits on retaining the data of inactive<br />users believing that abandoned accounts, together with their accompanying<br />data, should be deleted.<br /><br />The Article 29 Working Party's opinion is based on the principle that social<br />networking websites must be subject to the EU Data Protection Directive even<br />when their headquarters are outside the European Union space.<br /><br />The group interprets the definition of "data controller" as covering  the<br />service providers who, therefore, must adhere to<br />privacy laws. Although an exception is made for personal or "household"<br />users, when users broadcast or gather information very widely via such<br />sites, they become data controllers themselves which could affect users who<br />organise concerts, human rights letter-writing campaigns or try to sell a<br />homemade product online.<br /><br />The recommendations are not binding but show the trend in the legislative<br />measures that might be taken in the future at the national as well as EU<br />level. The group has focused lately on privacy issues related to search<br />engines and its initiatives have led to actions in this direction. The big<br />search engines such as Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!, have been pressed to<br />reduce the retention period of data collected from their users.<br /><br />The opinion has implications on the way the responsibility of social<br />networks themselves is seen in carrying images and information that could<br />breach protecting privacy and security rules.<br /><br />The European Commission has lately focused more on protecting citizens and<br />consumers' privacy and social networking websites are considered potentially<br />dangerous for inexpert users.<br /><br />Information Society Commissioner Viviane Reding has shown her support to<br />this line of action and has kept pushing the major players in this field in<br />adopting a code of conduct meant to protect young users, threatening to<br />otherwise take further action to protect privacy.<br /><br />Article 29 Data Protection Working Party - Opinion 5/2009 on online social<br />networking (12.06.2009)<br />English<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2009/wp163_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...09/wp163_en.pdf</a><br />German version<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2009_de.htm" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...ocs/2009_de.htm</a><br />French version<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2009_fr.htm" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...ocs/2009_fr.htm</a><br /><br />EU data monitors outline Facebook ground rules (25.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://euobserver.com/9/28370/?rk=1" target="_blank">http://euobserver.com/9/28370/?rk=1</a><br /><br />EU privacy regulators eye online social networks (25.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-privacy-regulators-eye-online-social-networks/article-183486" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-.../article-183486</a><br /><br />Citizens' privacy must become priority in digital age, says EU Commissioner<br />Reding (14.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/571&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en" target="_blank">http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction...;guiLanguage=en</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: Behavioural targeting at the European Consumer Summit (8.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.7/behavoural-target-eu-consumers" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.7/be...et-eu-consumers</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />2. Rapidshare forced by the court to filter more than 5000 tracks<br />============================================================<br /><br />The file-sharing site Rapidshare.de has recently lost another case to the<br />German copyright society GEMA, being ordered by the Regional Court in<br />Hamburg to "proactively filter" more than 5000 tracks from GEMA's catalogue.<br /><br />In January 2008, another regional court in Düsseldorf had already found that<br />RapidShare was responsible for what its users uploaded to the service.<br />Hence, RapidShare implemented a screening process and maintained hashes of<br />files that were pulled down for infringement but GEMA was not contented with<br />this and went back to court.<br /><br />GEMA created a software that can search web forums and extract links to<br />content that seem to infringe GEMA's copyrights but Rapidshare complained<br />that the software did not work. "It's questionable whether the application<br />can deal with mechanisms to prevent the scraping of links, open encrypted<br />files, accurately identify audio files or find links in forums that can't be<br />accessed by search engines," said Rapidshare CEO Bobby Chang.<br /><br />In October 2008, the court decided the systems implemented by Rapidshare<br />were not efficient enough considering that "a business model that doesn't<br />use common methods of prevention cannot claim the protection of the law."<br /><br />"The judgment states that the hosting service itself is now responsible for<br />making sure that none of the music tracks concerned are distributed via its<br />platform in the future. (...) This means that the copyright holder is no<br />longer required to perform the ongoing and complex checks," was GEMA's<br />statement.<br /><br />The decision may imply that, in the future, user-generated content sites<br />located in Germany will need to take proactive, efficient measures to screen<br />copyrighted material.<br /><br />"We do not consider the court's decision to be a breakthrough," said Chang,<br />who added:<br />"As other proceedings in similar disputes with GEMA have shown, there is<br />considerable disparity amongst the individual courts in some cases. Our<br />experience is that the courts of appeal tend to restrict the scope of the<br />decisions made by the lower courts."<br /><br />Rapidshare has announced that they would appeal the verdict.<br /><br />Rapidshare to appeal German court decision (29.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/18325.cfm" target="_blank">http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/18325.cfm</a><br /><br />Rapidshare stung with 24m fine (24.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/24/rapidshare_gema/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/24/rapidshare_gema/</a><br /><br />German Court Orders RapidShare to Proactively Filter Songs (23.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2009/06/23/german-court-orders-rapidshare-proactively-filter-songs" target="_blank">http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2009/06/23/ge...ly-filter-songs</a><br /><br />Achtung! RapidShare ordered to filter all user uploads (24.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/achtung-rapidshare-hit-with-24m-fine-content-filter-rules.ars" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/20...ilter-rules.ars</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: RapidShare needs to check every file for copyright infringement<br />(8.10.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.19/rapidshare-hamburg-decision" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.19/ra...amburg-decision</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />3. Judge unbiased, no retrial for The Pirate Bay<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 25 June 2009, Sweden's Court of Appeal ruled that judge Norström in The<br />Pirate Bay (TPB) case was not biased as the lawyers representing TPB<br />founders had claimed. Therefore there will be no retrial for TPB in<br />Stockholm District Court.<br /><br />The TPB lawyers had accused Norström of being in a conflict of interests as<br />he was a member of several organizations funded by the recording industry<br />organization IFPI. The Court of Appeal acknowledged that the judge was a<br />member of organisations acting in the interests of rights holders, but<br />emphasized that copyright holders benefited of constitutional protection<br />under the Swedish law. "We have reached the conclusion that we do not agree<br />with the conflict of interest claim," said appeals court judge Anders Eka to<br />news agency TT. "For a judge to back the principles on which this<br />legislation rests cannot be considered bias," said the court ruling.<br /><br />The court criticised Norström for not having stated, before the trial, that<br />he was a member of those organizations but considered this was not<br />sufficient reason to declare the district court verdict null and void.<br /><br />"This is part of a pattern. It shows that the Swedish legal system is no<br />longer to be trusted when it comes to copyright cases. It's a travesty of<br />justice quite simply", commented newly elected European Parliament member<br />Christian Engström of the Swedish Pirate Party who added: "There are<br />certainly problems with the laws too but this also shows that the courts are<br />not capable of applying the laws in a correct manner. I've been a lay judge<br />for seven years and I've never seen an indictment as bad as the Pirate Bay<br />verdict. But that didn't stop the court from setting ridiculous sentences."<br /><br />The Pirate Bay defendants can still appeal the results of the first trial.<br />One of them, Peter Sunde has stated: "The Pirate Bay will now file charges<br />against Sweden for violation for Human Rights. ... (The bias-judge is<br />himself biased...)".<br /><br />The Pirate Bay faces now another legal case brought to court by the Dutch<br />anti-piracy organization BREIN which wants to close the file-sharing site in<br />the Netherlands and see three of TPB founders to court on 21 July. As the<br />organization was unable to find the exact whereabouts of the three men, it<br />used Twitter and Facebook social networking websites to deliver the court<br />summons.<br /><br />"The internet works both for those who respect copyrights and those who<br />violate them. Now they know that the hearing will take place on July 21st in<br />Amsterdam," said BREIN CEO Tim Kuik.<br /><br />However, it remains to be seen whether the summoned founders will show up.<br />Neij who is living in Bangkok, Thailand, claimed he had seen no summons on<br />the respective sites. "I have Twitter and Facebook accounts, but I haven't<br />seen anything about it," he told the TT news agency.<br /><br />In a recent announcement posted by Thelocal.se on 30 June 2009, said that<br />The PirateBay "is set to be purchased for 60 million crowns (approx. $5.55<br />million euros) by Global Gaming Factory X (GGF), a company specializing in<br />internet café management software." GGF said in its statement that it wanted<br />content providers and copyright owners to get paid for content downloaded.<br />TPB has confirmed on their blog that they might get aquired by the above<br />mentioned company.<br /><br />No retrial in Pirate Bay case (25.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/20280/20090625/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/20280/20090625/</a><br /><br />Dutch Antipiracy Organization Takes Aim at Pirate Bay (24.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/167273/dutch_antipiracy_organization_takes_aim_at_pirate_bay.html" target="_blank">http://www.pcworld.com/article/167273/dutc...pirate_bay.html</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay served with Dutch lawsuit via Twitter and Facebook (24.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/20244/20090624/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/20244/20090624/</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay retrial denied; judge declared "unbiased"(25.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/pirate-bay-retrial-denied-judge-declared-unbiased.ars" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/20...ed-unbiased.ars</a><br /><br />Swedish IT company to buy Pirate Bay (30.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/20364/20090630/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/20364/20090630/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />4. 'Right to the silence of the chips' in the new EC Communication<br />============================================================<br /><br />A new communication from the European Commission to the other European<br />bodies on the RFID (radio-frequency identification) titled "Internet of<br />Things - An action plan for Europe" was made public on 18 June 2009.<br /><br />The communication builds on the work of the Recommendation on the use of<br />RFID published on 12 May 2009 after a fifteen-month period of consultations.<br />The communication includes a 14-point action plan to address the main issues<br />raised from the RFID usage as discussed in the working group and in the<br />consultation period.<br /><br />One of the most important action point is the launch of "a debate on the<br />technical and legal aspects of the 'right to silence of the chips', which<br />has been referred to under different names by different authors and<br />expresses the idea that individuals should be able to disconnect from their<br />networked environment at any time."<br /><br />This is one of the main actions of the plan in order to allow the usage of<br />the RFID while respecting privacy and the protection of personal data, two<br />fundamental rights of the EU.<br /><br />The communication underlines that these rights will have an influence on how<br />the Internet of Things is conceived but, at the same time, its development<br />will affect the way we understand privacy.<br /><br />The European Commission also announced that in 2010 it intends to publish a<br />broader Communication on privacy and trust in the ubiquitous information<br />society.<br /><br />The Communication makes it clear that "simply leaving the development of<br />Internet of Things to the private sector, and possibly to other world<br />regions is not a sensible option." Thus, the concept of governance of the<br />RFID usage will be initiated and promoted by the Commission in international<br />fora in order to establish a set of principles and to set up an<br />"architecture" with a sufficient level of decentralised management.<br /><br />Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament:<br />Internet of Things - An action plan for Europe (18.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/rfid/documents/commiot2009.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/po...commiot2009.pdf</a><br /><br />EU lays out plans for the "internet of things" (18.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.v3.co.uk/computing/news/2244448/eu-prepares-mass-rfid" target="_blank">http://www.v3.co.uk/computing/news/2244448...pares-mass-rfid</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: RFID and Informed Consent - Using and removing of RFID<br />functionality (5.12.2007)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.23/rfid-informed-consent" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.23/rf...nformed-consent</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: EU supports RFID with proper protection of consumers' privacy<br />(20.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.10/rfid-european-commission-recommandation" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.10/r...-recommandation</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />5. Norway will not chase file-sharers<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Norwegian data protection authority has decided that ISPs had to delete<br />all IP address-related data just 3 weeks after collection, a decision that<br />will make difficult to chase file-sharers.<br /><br />The regulator started with two ISPs, Tele2 and Lyse Tele but the decision,<br />subject by the Personal Data Act, will apply to all ISPs in Norway. As<br />Norway is not a member of the European Union, it is not bound to comply to<br />the European data retention directive which says that this type of data must<br />be held for at least 6 months. In Norway, now, data retention can go from a<br />few days to five months.<br /><br />The Norwegian telecom regulator has also recently ruled that the identity of<br />file-sharers can be disclosed to copyright holders only by court order. And<br />to make things even tougher for copyright holders, Simonsen law firm, the<br />only legal company having had a licence to track file-sharers, has seen it<br />expire with no renewal provided.<br /><br />Simonsen has had the licence since 2006 having been enabled to monitor<br />alleged pirates and collect their IP addresses. The licence was however<br />temporary and it won't be renewed due to the very little debate on the<br />matter. Data protection authorities have requested legislative clarification<br />on what the license can and cannot do, but have not received the requested<br />information from the competent authorities.<br /><br />Simonsen lawyer Espen Tøndel said that his law firm would object against the<br />non-renewal of their license. "One can not deny (the copyright holders)<br />their right to protect their interests in this way," he said.<br /><br />Anti-Piracy Lawyers Lose License To Chase Pirates (22.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-lawyers-loses-license-to-chase-pirates-090622/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-lawyer...pirates-090622/</a><br /><br />Data Protection Makes Identifying Online Pirates a Nightmare (10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/data-protection-makes-identifying-online-pirates-a-nightmare-090610/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/data-protection-ma...ghtmare-090610/</a><br /><br />Norway organises the immunity of P2Ps (only in French, 25.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13272-La-Norvege-organise-l-immunite-de-ses-P2Pistes.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13272-La-...s-P2Pistes.html</a><br /><br />Anti-Piracy Lawyers Thwarted in Norway (23.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Anti-Piracy-Twarted-Lawyers-License,news-4114.html" target="_blank">http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Anti-Piracy-Tw...,news-4114.html</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />6. France: No to new EDVIGE!<br />============================================================<br /><br />A text of a draft law on Police Files initiated by the two French deputies<br />Delphine Batho and Jacques-Alain Bénisti has been approved by the Laws<br />Commission of the National Assembly. The draft law contains a new form of<br />the EDVIGE file, nicknamed now EDVIGE 3.0.<br /><br />EDVIGE was a new database created in June 2008 with the purpose of filing<br />"individuals, groups, organisations and moral persons which, due to their<br />individual or collective activity, are likely to attempt to public order".<br />Not only these persons will be filed (without any offence committed), but<br />also "those who undertake or have undertaken direct and non fortuitous<br />relations with them." Filing was supposed to start at age 13 and the<br />database would be used by French intelligence services and the<br />administrative police. Following a massive civil society protest, the<br />database was initially revised into EDVIRSP (or so-called EDVIGE 2.0) and<br />then withdrawn in December 2008.<br /><br />Although it makes some significant progress, the text of the new law is<br />still not good enough in respecting the human rights, as underlined by a<br />common press release of several unions and civil society groups, among which<br />the EDRi-member IRIS.<br /><br />One of the major concerns that the press release highlights is the generic<br />global tendency that wants to extend the methods and tools used for serious<br />crimes and terrorism acts to the "small delinquency".<br /><br />The main step forward is that according to the new text every new Police<br />file needs to be stipulated by law. At the same time the "No to<br />EDVIGE" group considers that the law should go much further, including a<br />better democratic character of the CNIL (French Data Protection) by the<br />inclusion of some members proposed by the human rights activists. Also, the<br />new draft laws which receive a negative opinion from the CNIL should get an<br />opinion from the State Council (Conseil d'État) and all these opinions<br />need to be made public.<br /><br />The new law proposal also includes new provisions for EDVIGE 3.0 which is<br />still covers all the children above13 years old. But this proposal goes even<br />further than the two earlier versions.<br /><br />The definitions suggested in the new draft proposal introduce dangerous<br />provisions. Thus, the very large definitions of the attacks on the people's<br />security or goods cover activities of the police which are already supported<br />by other existing databases. The "No to EDVIGE" group asks for a limitation<br />of the acts of attacks to the State security and public security committed<br />with violence. Also the new file should not include minors.<br /><br />The French organisations also criticized the qualification given to other<br />files, such as STIC (Système de traitement des infractions constatées -<br />Recorded offences treatment system), a huge police database, which records<br />also data on minors, without any age limitation.<br /><br />Law proposal on Police Files: EDVIGE 3.0, still NO (only in French,<br />19.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iris.sgdg.org/info-debat/comm-fichierspolice0609.html" target="_blank">http://www.iris.sgdg.org/info-debat/comm-f...police0609.html</a><br /><br />Law proposal on Police Files (only in French, 7.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/propositions/pion1659.asp" target="_blank">http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/propo...ns/pion1659.asp</a><br /><br />The deputies want to frame the creation of police files (only in French,<br />18.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.lesechos.fr/info/france/4876857-les-deputes-veulent-encadrer-la-creation-de-fichiers-de-police.htm" target="_blank">http://www.lesechos.fr/info/france/4876857...s-de-police.htm</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: ENDitorial: Massive mobilization against EDVIGE, the new French<br />database (16.07.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.14/edvige-french-database" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.14/ed...french-database</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: French EDVIGE decree withdrawn (4.12.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number6.23/edvige-retired" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number6.23/edvige-retired</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />7. Swedish court: IP addresses are personal data<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court ruled on 18 June that the IP<br />addresses are personal data in a case regarding APB (the Swedish Anti-Piracy<br />Bureau, Antipiratbyrån), a lobby group representing copyright owners.<br /><br />However, from the comments following the judgement, it became clear that<br />this ruling will not stop the implementation of the Swedish IPRED Directive<br />or the way the copyright holder representatives record and keep IP addresses<br />in order to identify alleged file-shares. Although the ruling means that<br />APB's methods for chasing filesharers by logging their IP addresses was in<br />violation of the Personal Data Act, the new IPRED law changed the situation.<br /><br />A policy adviser at the Swedish Ministry of Justice explained to The<br />Register: "The rumours that this decision will kill off IPRED are wrong,<br />because the bill creating the law includes an exemption for rights holders -<br />they may request and keep IP numbers for this purpose."<br /><br />Jonas Agnvall, a legal adviser with the Swedish Data Inspection Board,<br />says that the new IPRED law specifically allows the activities of IP logging<br />of the APB:<br />"I have not scrutinised the directive in detail, but as I understand do they<br />no longer need the legal exception whit the implementation of the<br />IPRED-law", Jonas Agnvall says to Computer Sweden.<br /><br />He also added: "During the autumn we will inquire this and how these lobby<br />groups of copyright holders use the personal records. This we can do now<br />when it stands clear that IP addresses' really are personal records".<br /><br />A week later, on the 25 June 2009, a first ruling on the new IPRED law was<br />given by the Solna District Court which decided that an ISP must hand<br />information revealing its customers based on the IP addresses given by five<br />publishers of audiobooks who were trying to identify some alleged copyright<br />offenders.<br /><br />In this case, the Swedish broadband service provider Ephone was asked by the<br />five publishers to reveal who owned a server suspected of containing some<br />several hundred audio book titles. The ISP refused to say who was behind<br />the IP address, questioning if the matter was indeed a copyright<br />infringement since the FTP server was not publicly available and the access<br />to it was possible only to the persons that knew the password to access it.<br /><br />In the decision of the Solna District Court, the judges ordered Ephone to<br />reveal the information regarding the customers that are using several IP<br />addresses under a penalty of 750 000 Swedish crowns fine (approx. 70 000<br />euros). The company also needed to pay the publishers' court costs.<br /><br />Collecting IP Addresses Illegal in Sweden (18.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/collecting-ip-addresses-illegal-sweden-090618/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/collecting-ip-addr...-sweden-090618/</a><br /><br />Favorable court ruling do not save file-sharing (18.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.stockholmnews.com/more.aspx?NID=3440" target="_blank">http://www.stockholmnews.com/more.aspx?NID=3440</a><br /><br />Sweden: IP numbers are personal...unless you're a pirate (18.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/18/sweden_ip_law/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/18/sweden_ip_law/</a><br /><br />Publishers win anti-piracy law test case (25.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/20274/20090625/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/20274/20090625/</a><br /><br />First IPRED case settled (only in Swedish, 25.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.svd.se/naringsliv/it/artikel_3115633.svd" target="_blank">http://www.svd.se/naringsliv/it/artikel_3115633.svd</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />8. The French Government acts like a bulldog with its three strikes law<br />============================================================<br /><br />Nicolas Sarkozy and the French Government want to go on with the new three<br />strikes draft law (called also Hadopi 2) which was presented to the Council<br />of Ministers on 24 June 2009.<br /><br />The emergency procedure has been initiated and therefore the two chambers<br />will have only one reading for the text. The new text will be first<br />presented to the Senate on 8 and 9 July to be further on examined by the<br />deputies, presumably starting with 22 July.<br /><br />The draft law including now five articles stipulates, besides the<br />disconnection of the alleged infringer which has to be decided by the court,<br />fines that can amount to 1 500 euros or 3 000 euros in case of repeated<br />offences.<br /><br />The new version has reintroduced an extension previously rejected by the<br />deputies in the first text: a user can be condemned not only for "piracy"<br />through an online public communication service, but also for "piracy" by any<br />electronic communication means. This means that the judges will be able to<br />sanction "piracy" that was performed also by instant messaging services or<br />e-mails.<br /><br />And, in order to soften the censure imposed by the Constitutional Council,<br />the new text introduces a legal instrument that would allow the justice<br />system to use simplified procedures in applying sanctions "against the<br />authors of illegal downloading. A fast and efficient treatment of the cases<br />will thus be ensured by means of penal ordinances".<br /><br />So, the court can decide, by penal ordinance, to condemn an alleged<br />infringer to pay a fine in his absence. The text thus includes "Internet<br />piracy" on the same list of infringements with the use of hallucinogenic<br />drugs or violations of the traffic code.<br /><br />The infringement is established by Hadopi authority officers who then notify<br />the police. Their reports are considered "truthful until proven otherwise"<br />which actually implies there is no presumption of innocence. Unfortunately,<br />the Constitutional Court seems to have left an open door for the culpability<br />presumption by saying that the legislator can exceptionally establish such<br />presumptions under certain conditions such as the respect of the defense<br />right.<br /><br />The file is then sent to the public ministry which can choose the simplified<br />procedure and sends it to the president of the court who establishes without<br />prior debate a penal ordinance applying or not a fine. The subject of the<br />fine is never heard. The procedure gives the court president the possibility<br />to ask for a contradictory debate in which case the file is sent back to the<br />public ministry.<br /><br />The penal ordinance is given by a sole judge, which is the president of the<br />court and includes the names and coordinates of the alleged infringer, the<br />date and place of the alleged infringement and the sanctions. The sanctions<br />are then carried out by the public ministry within a period of 10 days.<br /><br />The user can make an appeal within 45 days and present himself in front<br />of a magistrate for a new judgment but the risk is that, in case the user is<br />found guilty, the sanction can be aggravated up to a maximum of 3 years in<br />prison and 300 000 euros of fine.<br /><br />Actually, the new text introduces the three-strikes in an even harder<br />version: warning, fine and then disconnection. The only improvement is that<br />the disconnection can be decided only by the court and that is also shadowed<br />by the simplified procedure allowing for the penal ordinance.<br /><br />Hadopi 2 starting on 8 July in the Senate (only in French, 26.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13283-Hadopi-2-des-le-8-juillet-au-Senat.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13283-Had...t-au-Senat.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi 2: the surveillance of e-mails is back (only in French, 25.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13273-Hadopi-2-la-surveillance-des-e-mails-fait-son-retour.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13273-Had...son-retour.html</a><br /><br />Fine for illegal downloading, how does it work ? (only in French,<br />25.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.01net.com/editorial/503828/amende-pour-telechargement-illegal-comment-ca-marche/" target="_blank">http://www.01net.com/editorial/503828/amen...ment-ca-marche/</a><br /><br />Hadopi: and now, the fines... (MAJ) (only in French, 24.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.01net.com/editorial/503668/hadopi-et-maintenant-les-amendes-(maj)/" target="_blank">http://www.01net.com/editorial/503668/hado...-amendes-(maj)/</a><br /><br />Draft law on the legal protection of literary and artistic copyright on the<br />Internet (only in French, 29.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/html/actualite/actualite_legislative/pl_protection_propriete_artist.html" target="_blank">http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/html/actuali...ete_artist.html</a><br /><br />The French Constitutional Council censures the 3 strikes law (17.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.12/3-strikes-censured-council-constitutional" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.12/3...-constitutional</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />9. ENDitorial: EU DP - state of the play, potential for enhancements<br />============================================================<br /><br />With the title "Personal data - more use, more protection?" the European<br />Commission organised on 19 and 20 May 2009 a data protection (DP) conference<br />in Brussels. The purpose of the conference was to look for new challenges<br />for privacy and to kick off a process towards a new quality of data<br />protection for the European Union. On invitation of the European Commission,<br />Andreas Krisch participated on behalf of EDRi.<br /><br />The topics of the one and a half day conference included a wide range of<br />areas related to data protection. Amongst them: data protection in the area<br />of law enforcement, data retention, the role of businesses as well as<br />supervisory authorities and consumer protection.<br /><br />Following the presentations on data retention by Kurt Alavaara (National<br />Police Board, Sweden) and Francis Stoliaroff (Ministry of Justice, France) a<br />long debate on the legitimacy of the data retention directive took place.<br />Spiros Simits (Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main) argued that data<br />retention not only is in violation of fundamental rights and against the<br />German constitution but also violates the fundamental principles of data<br />protection, especially the principle of purpose limitation.<br /><br />Panellist Douwe Korff (London Metropolitan University) concured by saying<br />that for vague purpose specifications the interpretation is different<br />in the member states. While some countries differentiate between the<br />purposes of prevention and prosecution of crimes others simply subsume these<br />with the term "police purposes" with huge implications regarding the<br />access to retained data. Furthermore, he made clear that communication<br />traffic data is personal data.<br /><br />Finally Waltraud Kotschy (Austrian Data Protection Commission) joined the<br />discussion and stated that, in her view, it will be impossible to keep the<br />access to retained data restricted to cases of terrorism and organised<br />crime. Already now there are discussions in Austria on access to data for<br />purposes of copyright enforcement. These and similar discussions will gain<br />momentum once data retention is in place.<br /><br />For all presentations and discussions of the first day of the conference a<br />webcast of 15 minutes of discussion with English, German and French<br />translations is available on the EC website and definitely worth viewing.<br /><br />The role of business and personal data protection was the title of my<br />presentation. Starting with a general overview of commercial data collection<br />on shopping and communication habits, financial, location and movement<br />information, I argued that in many cases commercial data collection leads to<br />the use of these data by the state. Examples for this include but are not<br />limited to the SWIFT case where US authorities accessed data on EU<br />financial transactions, PNR data where the EU grants the US access to<br />passenger information and plans to access these data as well, and the<br />mandatory data retention where EU member states retain and access data on<br />communications of 490 million people.<br /><br />Given these practices, the significance of commercial data collection cannot<br />be overestimated and the 1983 ruling of the German Constitutional Court<br />reasoning that "... an as such inconsequential date can get a new<br />significance;" and that "insofar there is no 'inconsequential' date anymore<br />under the conditions of modern data processing", has more relevance today<br />than ever before.<br /><br />At the same time, we see significant weaknesses at the counterparts of these<br />data controllers, the data protection authorities. On the one hand, they are<br />often confronted with very limited financial and personal resources and<br />therefore are also limited in their possibilities to enforce data protection<br />legislation. On the other hand, we also see problematic decisions - or at<br />least problematic reasoning - of data protection authorities (see Privacy<br />International on the UK Information Commissioner). In addition, it is also<br />clear that traditional means of oversight will be unable to cope with the<br />immense increase of the amount of data being processed. Present means for<br />individual data protection are also limited and often impose relatively high<br />financial risks for legal procedures in combination with relatively little<br />potential gains in individual cases.<br /><br />Improvements of data protection and data protection legislation can<br />therefore be achieved by expanding the possibilities for individual data<br />(self-)protection (e.g. easier and less risky legal procedures; evaluation<br />of current practices regarding "informed consent" of data subjects), the<br />introduction of mandatory data breach notifications and punitive damages on<br />a per data basis in cases of data leaks. With regard to the area of<br />Radio Frequency Identification and the Internet of Things it will be<br />necessary to follow the developments carefully and to evaluate if current<br />data protection concepts still provide sufficient means to address the data<br />protection challenges introduced by these technologies.<br /><br />Additionally, positive measures need to be also taken. Tools and mechanisms<br />that help businesses to prove and publicly communicate their compliance with<br />data protection legislation, like the European Privacy Seal (EuroPriSe),<br />should get a strong foundation in the European data protection legislation.<br />The introduction of mandatory data protection officers for companies would<br />not only help companies to establish data protection mechanisms in their<br />organisations and to work internally on improvements but would also bring<br />positive effects for the relationship between companies and their customers<br />by providing a competent contact person for questions related to data<br />protection.<br /><br />Finally, better educational information on data protection is needed to<br />ensure that young people have access to relevant first hand information on<br />data protection and their possibilities to protect their privacy.<br /><br />The future will show what this process towards a new quality of data<br />protection for the European Union brings. For the time being, it is to say<br />that the European Union has at least two faces when it comes to data<br />protection. On the one hand, important steps towards data protection in the<br />area of RFID and the Internet of Things are taken, but on the other hand,<br />the planned Stockholm Programme on Justice and Home Affairs policy for the<br />next five years describes the way towards a surveillance society in which<br />the floods of the digital tsunami threaten to overwhelm the data protection<br />rights of individuals in Europe.<br /><br />Conference "Personal data - more use, more protection?" (19-20.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/events/news_events_en.htm#dp_conference_2009" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/even...conference_2009</a><br /><br />Conference Programme "Personal data - more use, more<br />protection?"(19-20.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/events/conference_dp_2009/programme_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/even...rogramme_en.pdf</a><br /><br />Webcast of the discussion on data retention (Simits, Korff, Kotschy and<br />others) at the conference<br /><a href="http://webcast.ec.europa.eu/eutv/portal/jsf/_vi_fl_300_en/player/index_player.html?id=7249&pId=7239&startTime=0&locale=en#" target="_blank">http://webcast.ec.europa.eu/eutv/portal/js...&locale=en#</a><br /><br />Webcast of the presentation by Andreas Krisch "The Role of Business and<br />Personal Data Protection"<br /><a href="http://webcast.ec.europa.eu/eutv/portal/jsf/_vi_fl_300_en/player/index_player.html?id=7254&pId=7239&startTime=0&locale=en" target="_blank">http://webcast.ec.europa.eu/eutv/portal/js...0&locale=en</a><br /><br />PI calls for review of UK privacy regulator following series of failed<br />judgements (23.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd" target="_blank">http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd</a>[347]=x-347-564402<br /><br />European Privacy Seal (EuroPriSe)<br /><a href="https://www.european-privacy-seal.eu/" target="_blank">https://www.european-privacy-seal.eu/</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: Stockholm programme - the new EU dangerous surveillance system<br />(17.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.12/stockholm-programme-eu-surveillance" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.12/s...eu-surveillance</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: EU supports RFID with proper protection of consumers' privacy<br />(20.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.10/rfid-european-commission-recommandation" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.10/r...-recommandation</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: 'Right to the silence of the chips' in the new EC Communication<br />(1.07.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.13/right-silence-of-the-chips" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.13/r...ce-of-the-chips</a><br /><br />(Contribution by Andreas Krisch - EDRi)<br /><br />============================================================<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />Briefing on the Interception Modernisation Programme by the LSE Policy<br />Engagement Network<br /><a href="http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/informationSystems/research/policyEngagement/IMP_Briefing.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/informati...MP_Briefing.pdf</a><br /><br />Deep Packet Inspection and Internet Censorship: International<br />Convergence on an 'Integrated Technology of Control'<br /><a href="http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/wp-content/plugins/download-monitor/download.php?id=14" target="_blank">http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/wp-...nload.php?id=14</a><br /><a href="http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2009/06/25/study-deep-packet-inspection-and-internet-censorship/" target="_blank">http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/200...net-censorship/</a><br /><br />Final Report on the Content Online Platform<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/docs/other_actions/col_platform_report.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/docs/other_ac...form_report.pdf</a><br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/other_actions/content_online/index_en.htm" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/other_actions...ne/index_en.htm</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />11. Agenda<br />============================================================<br /><br />2-3 July 2009, Padova, Italy<br />3rd FLOSS International Workshop on Free/Libre Open Source Software<br /><a href="http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/manenti/floss/floss09.html" target="_blank">http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/...ss/floss09.html</a><br /><br />6-7 July 2009, Barcelona, Spain<br />Fifth Internet Law & Politics Conference organized by the Law and Political<br />Science Department of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya<br />The Pros and Cons of Social Networking Sites.<br /><a href="http://www.uoc.edu/symposia/idp2009/engl/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.uoc.edu/symposia/idp2009/engl/index.html</a><br /><br />13-16 August 2009, Vierhouten, The Netherlands<br />Hacking at Random<br /><a href="http://www.har2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.har2009.org/</a><br /><br />23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy<br />World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and<br />Council: "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage"<br /><a href="http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm</a><br /><br />10-12 September 2009, Potsdam, Germany<br />5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam<br />Section: Protest Politics<br />Panel: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property<br /><a href="http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp</a><br /><br />16-18 September 2009, Crete, Greece<br />World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2009<br /><a href="http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/" target="_blank">http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/</a><br /><br />17-18 September 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />Gikii, A Workshop on Law, Technology and Popular Culture<br />Institute for Information Law (IViR) - University of Amsterdam<br /><a href="http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp" target="_blank">http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp</a><br /><br />21-23 October 2009, Istanbul, Turkey<br />eChallenges 2009<br /><a href="http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp</a><br /><br />24-25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />3rd European Privacy Open Space<br /><a href="http://www.privacyos.eu" target="_blank">http://www.privacyos.eu</a><br /><br />25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />Austrian Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 21 September 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/</a><br /><br />16 October 2009, Bielefeld, Germany<br />10th German Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 15 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/</a><br /><br />13-15 November 2009, Gothenburg, Sweden<br />Free Society Conference and Nordic Summit<br /><a href="http://www.fscons.org/" target="_blank">http://www.fscons.org/</a><br /><br />15-18 November 2009, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt<br />UN Internet Governance Forum<br /><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/" target="_blank">http://www.intgovforum.org/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />12. About<br />============================================================<br /><br />EDRI-gram is a biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe.<br />Currently EDRI has 29 members based or with offices in 18 different<br />countries in Europe. European Digital Rights takes an active interest in<br />developments in the EU accession countries and wants to share knowledge and<br />awareness through the EDRI-grams.<br /><br />All contributions, suggestions for content, corrections or agenda-tips are<br />most welcome. Errors are corrected as soon as possible and visibly on the<br />EDRI website.<br /><br />Except where otherwise noted, this newsletter is licensed under the<br />Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See the full text at<br /><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</a><br /><br />Newsletter editor: Bogdan Manolea &lt;edrigram@edri.org&gt;<br /><br />Information about EDRI and its members:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/</a><br /><br />European Digital Rights needs your help in upholding digital rights in the<br />EU. If you wish to help us promote digital rights, please consider making a<br />private donation.<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram subscription information<br /><br />subscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: subscribe<br /><br />You will receive an automated e-mail asking to confirm your request.<br />unsubscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: unsubscribe<br /><br />- EDRI-gram in Macedonian<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available partly in Macedonian, with delay. Translations<br />are provided by Metamorphosis<br /><a href="http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php" target="_blank">http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram in German<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available in German, with delay. Translations are provided<br />Andreas Krisch from the EDRI-member VIBE!AT - Austrian Association for<br />Internet Users<br /><a href="http://www.unwatched.org/" target="_blank">http://www.unwatched.org/</a><br /><br />- Newsletter archive<br /><br />Back issues are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:33:56 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19968</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.19: EFF Busts Bogus Internet Subdomain Patent</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19953</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 19  June 18, 2009  editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 512th issue:<br /><br />* EFF HAS BUSTED A BOGUS INTERNET SUBDOMAIN PATENT.  U.S.<br />Patent No. 6,687,746, now held by Hoshiko, LLC, claimed to<br />cover the method of automatically assigning Internet<br />subdomains, like "action.eff.org" for the parent domain<br />"eff.org." Previous patent owner Ideaflood used this bogus<br />patent to demand payment from website hosting companies<br />offering personalized domains, such as LiveJournal.<br /><br />In the original reexamination request, EFF showed that the<br />method Ideaflood claimed to have invented was well known<br />before the patent was issued. In fact, website developers<br />were having public discussions about how to create these<br />virtual subdomains on an Apache developer mailing list and<br />on Usenet more than a year before Ideaflood filed its<br />patent application. The open source community's public<br />record of the technology development provided the linchpin<br />to EFF's patent challenge.<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/16" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/16</a><br /><br />* EFF AND PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE HAVE RELUCTANTLY DROPPED THEIR<br />LAWSUIT FOR INFORMATION ABOUT ACTA. The Obama<br />Administration's decision to support Bush-era concealment<br />policies forced the drop of the suit, which sought<br />important documents about the secret anti-counterfeiting<br />enforcement treaty that has broad implications for global<br />privacy and innovation.<br /><br />Very little is known about ACTA, currently under<br />negotiation between the U.S. and more than a dozen other<br />countries. Leaked documents indicate that it could<br />establish far-reaching customs regulations governing<br />searches of personal computers and iPods, could require<br />mandatory filtering of Internet communications for<br />potentially copyright-infringing material, and could adopt<br />"Three Strikes" policies requiring the termination of<br />Internet access after repeat allegations of copyright<br />infringement. Last year, more than 100 public interest<br />organizations around the world called on ACTA country<br />negotiators to make the draft text available for public<br />comment.<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/17" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/17</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* RIAA $1.9 Million Win in Thomas Retrial: Constitutional?<br />Given the size of the statutory damages award, Ms.<br />Thomas-Rasset's legal team is likely considering a<br />constitutional challenge to the verdict.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/record-labels-awarde" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/record-labels-awarde</a><br /><br />* Are US Regulations Hurting Free Speech in Iran?<br />EFF has been watching with concern the blocking of Web 2.0<br />sites in countries like Iran. This new threat doesn't come<br />from foreign governments: it appears to be coming from the<br />ambiguity of the United States' own export regulations.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/sanctions-and-web" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/sanctions-and-web</a><br /><br />* Into the DTV Era, With No Broadcast Flag Mandate<br />Entertainment industries like to argue that they "need" DRM<br />to make works available. And policymakers have eagerly<br />adopted this argument. But when the bluff is called, it<br />turns out that the DRM wasn't so necessary after all.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/dtv-era-no-broadcast" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/dtv-era-no-broadcast</a><br /><br />* New York Times Editorial Board Calls for Repeal of FISA<br />Responding to repeated reports that the National Security<br />Agency's surveillance dragnet is continuing to intercept<br />Americans' purely domestic communications in the millions,<br />the New York Times editorial board is calling on Congress<br />to repeal the deeply-flawed FISA Amendments Act (FAA).<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/hear-hear-new-york-t" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/hear-hear-new-york-t</a><br /><br />* More from the NYT on NSA's Domestic Spying<br />Following up on their report in April detailing the NSA's<br />systemic and significant illegal interception of Americans'<br />domestic communications, the New York Times has just<br />published a new story with even more detail about the NSA's<br />ongoing warrantless wiretapping and the concerns it is<br />raising in Congress.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/more-nyt-nsas-domest" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/more-nyt-nsas-domest</a><br /><br />* Google Considering More HTTPS, Other Services to Follow?<br />Earlier this week, privacy and security researchers urged<br />Google to improve the security of Gmail, Google Docs, and<br />Google Calendar by enabling the more secure HTTPS<br />encryption by default.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/more-https-from-google-others" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/more-...m-google-others</a><br /><br />* Amendments to CFAA a Dark Cloud with Ray of Light<br />In September of last year, Congress amended the Computer<br />Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) as part of a larger bill dealing<br />with identity theft.  Unfortunately, the amendments broaden<br />the already extensive reach of the law and fail to clarify<br />the most vexing question about the statute, the definition<br />of "unauthorized access".<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/amendments-computer-" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/amendments-computer-</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ REAL ID Revival Bill Is Another Attempt at a National ID<br />A new "PASS ID" bill seeks to create a privacy-invasive<br />national ID, just like its antecedent, REAL ID.<br /><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/06/17/is-the-real-id-revival-bill-pass-id-a-national-id/" target="_blank">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2009/06/17/...-a-national-id/</a><br /><br />~ IP Colloquium Podcast Tackles Patent Damages Reform<br />UCLA Law Professor Doug Lichtman and his guests explore the<br />contentious issues around patent reform, including the<br />difficulty of calculatingdamages and considering the many<br />possible reforms.<br /><a href="http://www.ipcolloquium.com/Programs/7.html" target="_blank">http://www.ipcolloquium.com/Programs/7.html</a><br /><br />~ Copyright in the Rye<br />J.D. Salinger has filed a copyright infringement complaint<br />against the writer of a novel attempting to chronicle the<br />later years of a character from "The Catcher in the Rye."<br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/books/17salinger.html" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/17/books/17salinger.html</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* IT Equipment for EFF Offices<br /><br />We are looking for donations of computer equipment to<br />support EFF's office operations. As thanks for your<br />donation, we can offer a free membership and, of course,<br />some cool swag.<br /><br />Requested Items:<br /><br />- 2 x 2TB external USB hard drives, preferably Western<br />Digital. Or a larger number of smaller drives with the same<br />interface.<br /><br />- PATA IDE hard drives, 20GB or larger<br /><br />Please contact stu@eff.org if you can help!<br /><br />* EFF at Velocity Conference<br /><br />We will have a table at Velocity, the O'Reilly web<br />performance and operations conference in San Jose! Come<br />check it out!<br /><br />O'Reilly Media is offering a 20% discount on Velocity<br />registration for EFF's supporters. Register here:<br /><a href="https://en.oreilly.com/velocity2009/public/register" target="_blank">https://en.oreilly.com/velocity2009/public/register</a><br />Discount Code: vel09sd20<br /><br />Location:<br />Fairmont San Jose<br />170 S. Market Street<br />San Jose, CA 95113<br /><br />Exhibit Hall Hours:<br />Tuesday, June 23: 9:45 AM - 4:30 PM<br />Tuesday Exhibit Hall Reception: 6:15 PM  7:15 PM<br />Wednesday, June 24: 9:45 AM - 4:30 PM<br /><br />For More Information:<br /><a href="http://en.oreilly.com/velocity2009" target="_blank">http://en.oreilly.com/velocity2009</a><br /><br />* Help EFF Go to DEFCON!<br /><br />EFF is looking for donations of airline tickets and hotel<br />points for the DEFCON hacking conference, as well as other<br />conferences and speaking engagements. If you have enough<br />airline miles for a free ticket and would like to send an<br />EFF staffer to a conference, let us know, and we will help<br />you with the process of making the reservation. Please note<br />that at this time we are unable to combine miles from<br />multiple individuals.  We are also looking for hotel<br />rewards points to help reduce our overall travel costs.<br /><br />As a thanks for your donation, we can offer a free<br />membership and a mention in EFFector (if you'd like).<br />Please contact aaron@eff.org if you can help!<br /><br />* Nominate a Pioneer for EFF's 2009 Pioneer Awards!<br /><br />EFF established the Pioneer Awards to recognize leaders on<br />the electronic frontier who are extending freedom and<br />innovation in the realm of information technology. This is<br />your opportunity to nominate a deserving individual or<br />group to receive a Pioneer Award for 2009.  The<br />International Pioneer Awards nominations are open both to<br />individuals and organizations from any country.<br />Nominations are reviewed by a panel of judges chosen for<br />their knowledge of the technical, legal, and social issues<br />associated with information technology.<br /><br />How to Nominate Someone for a 2009 Pioneer Award:<br /><br />You may send as many nominations as you wish, but please<br />use one email per nomination. Please submit your entries<br />via email to pioneer@eff.org. We will accept nominations<br />until July 15, 2009.<br /><br />Simply tell us:<br /><br />1. The name of the nominee,<br /><br />2. The phone number, email address or website by which the<br />nominee can be reached, and, most importantly,<br /><br />3. Why you feel the nominee deserves the award.<br /><br />Nominee Criteria:<br /><br />There are no specific categories for the EFF Pioneer<br />Awards, but the following guidelines apply:<br /><br />1. The nominees must have contributed substantially to the<br />health, growth, accessibility, or freedom of computer-based<br />communications.<br /><br />2. To be valid, all nominations must contain your reason,<br />however brief, for nominating the individual or<br />organization and a means of contacting the nominee. In<br />addition, while anonymous nominations will be accepted,<br />ideally we'd like to contact the nominating parties in case<br />we need further information.<br /><br />3. The contribution may be technical, social, economic, or<br />cultural.<br /><br />4. Nominations may be of individuals, systems, or<br />organizations in the private or public sectors.<br /><br />5. Nominations are open to all (other than current members<br />of EFF's staff and operating board or this year's award<br />judges), and you may nominate more than one recipient. You<br />may also nominate yourself or your organization.<br /><br />6. Persons or representatives of organizations receiving an<br />EFF Pioneer Award will be invited to attend the ceremony at<br />EFF's expense.<br /><br />More on the EFF Pioneer Awards:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/</a><br /><br />* Intern Opportunity!<br /><br />EFF is looking for a summer intern to help in our<br />development and media departments. This is an unpaid,<br />full-time position.<br /><br />Projects will include:<br />-Working on our annual report and contacting major donors<br />and foundations (40% of time);<br />-Assisting with membership fulfillment and bulk mailing<br />(40% of time); and<br />-Identifying and organizing press clippings (20% of time).<br /><br />Excellent writing and editing skills, strong organizational<br />abilities, and the capacity to take instruction and run<br />with it is a must. Interest in development and/or public<br />relations as a career is a plus, as is knowledge and<br />familiarity with EFF's issues.<br /><br />To apply, please send a cover letter, resume, and writing<br />sample to: alyssa@eff.org<br /><br />* Volunteer at EFF!<br /><br />EFF is looking for volunteers to assist with operations in<br />our membership department. If you're quick, organized,<br />detail-oriented, and looking for a hands-on way to support<br />EFF, contact us today!<br /><br />Duties include:<br /><br />* Membership fulfillment<br />* Organizing premiums<br />* Print mailing<br />* Event assistance<br /><br />Learn about fundraising operations in the nonprofit world<br />while supporting your favorite organization in a tangible<br />way! Interest in grassroots fundraising is a plus, as is<br />knowledge and familiarity with EFF's issues. Send a letter<br />of interest to aaron@eff.org<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br /><a href="http://links.eff.org/emaildonate" target="_blank">http://links.eff.org/emaildonate</a><br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />To unsubscribe or change your subscription preferences:<br /><a href="http://action.eff.org/site/CO?i=qpy-OcA-JXPR2rHSDhBYo6irPT8-Q4M0&cid=1041" target="_blank">http://action.eff.org/site/CO?i=qpy-OcA-JX...M0&cid=1041</a><br /><br />To change your email address:<br /><a href="http://action.eff.org/addresschange" target="_blank">http://action.eff.org/addresschange</a><br /><br />Reproduction of this publication in electronic media is<br />encouraged. This newsletter is printed on 100% recycled<br />electrons.<br /><br /><br />EFF appreciates your support and respects your privacy.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/policy" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/policy</a><br /><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:59:47 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19953</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.12, 17 June 2009</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19949</link>
		<description><![CDATA[============================================================<br /><br />            EDRi-gram<br /><br /> biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe<br /><br />     Number 7.12, 17 June 2009<br /><br /><br />============================================================<br />Contents<br />============================================================<br /><br />1. The French Constitutional Council censures the 3 strikes law<br />2. The dawning of Internet censorship in Germany<br />3. Stockholm programme - the new EU dangerous surveillance system<br />4. The telecoms ministers rejected the telecom package as adopted by the EP<br />5. Finland: Complaints not allowed for the Police child-porn censorship list<br />6. Windows 7 is launched without IE, but the Commission is not pleased<br />7. More voices in the EP for digital rights<br />8. Report: OECD Conference on Sensor Based Networks<br />9. ENDitorial: Regulating online media in Azerbaijan?<br />10. Recommended Action<br />11. Recommended Reading<br />12. Agenda<br />13. About<br /><br />============================================================<br />1. The French Constitutional Council censures the 3 strikes law<br />============================================================<br /><br />As a result of the appeal of the Socialist Party, the French Constitutional<br />Council decided on 10 June 2009 that 3 strikes (known also as Hadopi)<br />draft law was infringing the Constitution and the  Declaration of the Rights<br />of Man and of the Citizen from 1789 and rejected the most important parts of<br />the text. The graduate response was censured, the Council considering that<br />any sanction applied to Internet users could only be applied by a court.<br /><br />In the Council's opinion, the draft law infringes article 11 of the<br />Declaration which ensures the freedom of communication<br />and expression, that also applies to the online world, as the Internet is<br />nowadays a very important means of communication. The power to "limit the<br />exercise by any person of one's right to express oneself and freely<br />communicate" cannot be given to an administrative authority. "These powers<br />can only be incumbent on a judge", says the Council. This is the same<br />position expressed by several members of the European Parliament especially<br />by the introduction into the Telecom package of the well-known amendment<br />138.<br /><br />The Council also believes the law is in breach of article 9 of the same<br />Declaration that stipulates the principle of the presumption of innocence.<br />This principle was entirely ignored by the draft law where the text says<br />that a sanction can be applied to an Internet user presumed guilty: "By<br />ignoring article 9 of the Declaration of 1789, the law thus setting up, by<br />operating an inversion of the proof charge, a presumption of guilt that<br />could lead to the application to the subscriber of sanctions depriving or<br />limiting his rights".<br /><br />The Council also ruled that the method of policing the web envisaged in the<br />law was in breach of a citizen's right to privacy fact which might influence<br />future decisions on other means of restriction or limitation, such as<br />filtering projects.<br /><br />While the socialists asked the law be "completely rewritten with the double<br />aim of ensuring the financing of culture and preserving the freedom of<br />Internet users", Christine Albanel, France's culture minister, continued to<br />defend the draft bill, stating she regretted that she could not finalise<br />"the logic of 'decriminalisation of Internet users' behaviour by bringing<br />all stages of the procedure to a non-judicial authority".<br /><br />The law was promulgated by Nicolas Sarkozy on 13 June 2009 in its censored<br />form. A new text, named Hadopi 2, is to be presented to the French Council<br />of Ministers before the end of June in order to give judges the power to<br />apply sanctions. The text will have to observe the Constitutional Council's<br />opinion. In any case, the law will be deprived of its core and the graduate<br />response is crippled.<br /><br />The government may be in the position of having to consider the fine system<br />that it had rejected previously. The method has the advantage of seeing<br />immediate results and of not being in breach of fundamental rights. However,<br />even for a fine, material evidence will have to be brought in court to prove<br />an Internet user's copyright infringement, which will be rather difficult to<br />produce.<br /><br />The ruling of the Constitutional Council is in line with the arguments the<br />European Parliament which has tried to outlaw the French bill by the<br />introduction of amendment 138 into the telecom package. On 11 June, the<br />package was however rejected at the EU telecoms ministers meeting in<br />Luxembourg which means that the law will go through a conciliation process<br />mediated by the European Commission. This will begin in the autumn and the<br />legislation is expected to be passed only next year.<br /><br />French Constitutional Court - Decision n 2009-580 DC of 10 June 2009 (only<br />in French, 10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/francais/les-decisions/2009/decisions-par-date/2009/2009-580-dc/decision-n-2009-580-dc-du-10-juin-2009.42666.html" target="_blank">http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/cons...2009.42666.html</a><br /><br />The Constitutional Council censures the graduate response (only in French,<br />11.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/2009/06/10/01002-20090610ARTFIG00516-le-conseil-constitutionnel-censure-la-riposte-graduee-.php" target="_blank">http://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/2009/06/1...te-graduee-.php</a><br /><br />French anti-filesharing law overturned (10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jun/10/france-hadopi-law-filesharing" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/...law-filesharing</a><br /><br />Press Release of the French Constitutional Council on Decision n° 2009-580<br />DC (only in French, 10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/francais/les-decisions/2009/decisions-par-date/2009/2009-580-dc/communique-de-presse.42667.html" target="_blank">http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/cons...esse.42667.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi : the Constitutional Council censures the graduate response (only in<br />French, 10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2009/06/10/hadopi-le-conseil-constitutionnel-censure-la-riposte-graduee_1205290_651865.html" target="_blank">http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article...290_651865.html</a><br /><br />Sarkozy tries to rescue internet law after court decision (12.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://euobserver.com/9/28294" target="_blank">http://euobserver.com/9/28294</a><br /><br />French ruling raises hopes for EU telecoms deal (11.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/french-ruling-raises-hopes-eu-telecoms-deal/article-183124" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/fre.../article-183124</a><br /><br />Hadopi law is promulgated in its uncensored part (only in French,<br />13.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13144-La-loi-Hadopi-est-promulguee-dans-sa-partie-non-censuree.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13144-La-...n-censuree.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi 2 will be presented to the Council of Ministers by the end of the<br />month (only in French, 12.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13142-Hadopi-2-sera-presente-en-Conseil-des-ministres-a-la-fin-du-mois.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13142-Had...in-du-mois.html</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: French Government hurries to put HADOPI law into application<br />(3.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.11/hadopi-application-hurry" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.11/h...plication-hurry</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />2. The dawning of Internet censorship in Germany<br />============================================================<br /><br />Germany is on the verge of censoring its Internet: The government - a grand<br />coalition between the German social democrats and conservative party - seems<br />united in its decision: On 18 June 2009, the German Parliament is to vote on<br />the erection of an internet censorship architecture.<br /><br />The Minister for Family Affairs Ursula von der Leyen kicked off and led the<br />discussions within the German Federal Government to block Internet sites in<br />order to fight child pornography. The general idea is to build a censorship<br />architecture enabling the government to block content containing child<br />pornography. The Federal Office of Criminal Investigation (BKA) is to<br />administer the lists of sites to be blocked and the internet providers<br />obliged to erect the secret censorship architecture for the government.<br /><br />A strong and still growing network opposing these ideas quickly formed<br />within the German internet community. The protest has not been limited to<br />hackers and digital activists but rather a mainstreamed effort widely<br />supported by bloggers and twitter-users. The HashTag used by the protesters<br />is #zensursula - a German mesh up of the Ministers name and the word<br />censorship equivalent to #censursula.<br /><br />As part of the public's protest an official e-Petition directed at the<br />German parliament was launched. Within three days 50,000 persons signed the<br />petition - the number required for the petition titled "No indexing and<br />blocking of Internet sites" to be heard by the parliament. The running time<br />of an e-Petition in Germany is 6 weeks, during this time over 130 000<br />people signed making this e-Petition the most signed and most successful<br />ever.<br /><br />During the past weeks, protests became more and more creative - countless<br />blogs and twitter-users followed and commented the discussions within<br />governments and opposing arguments. Many mainstream media picked up on this<br />and reported about the protest taking place on-line. A working group on<br />censorship was founded and the protest coordinated with a wiki, mailing<br />lists, chats and of course employing twitter and blogs. One website<br />"Zeichnemit.de" created a landing page explaining the complicated<br />petitioning system and making signing the petition easier and more<br />accessible for non net-experts.<br /><br />Over 500 people attended the Government official press conference on the<br />planed internet censorship, a number of whom used this occasion to<br />demonstrate and voice their concerns. In fact, demonstrators began attending<br />some of the Minister von der Leyens public appearances, carrying banners and<br />signs to raise attention to the stifling of information freedom in Germany.<br /><br />The net community did not only oppose the governments plans, but also made<br />constructive suggestions on how to deal with the problem of child<br />pornography without introducing a censorship architecture and circumcising<br />constitutional freedoms. The working group on censorship demonstrated the<br />alternatives for instance by actually removing over 60 websites containing<br />child pornographic content in 12 hours, simply by emailing the international<br />providers who then removed this content from the net. The sites were<br />identified through the black lists of other countries documented on<br />Wikileaks. This demonstration underlines the protesters' main arguments:<br />instead of effectively investing time and efforts to have illegal content<br />removed from the internet, the German government is choosing censorship and<br />blocking, an easy and dangerous way out. The greatest fear of the<br />protesters is that once in place, the infrastructure will be used to censor<br />other forms of unwanted content, not only child pornography. German<br />politicians already seem to be lining up with their wish-list of content to<br />be censored in future - the suggestions ranging form gambling sites,<br />islamist web pages, first person shooters, and the music industry cheering<br />up with the thought of finally banning Pirate Bay and p2p.<br /><br />More information and linklist (only in German)<br /><a href="http://netzpolitik.org/2009/kommentierte-zensursula-linkliste/" target="_blank">http://netzpolitik.org/2009/kommentierte-z...sula-linkliste/</a><br /><br />Links, banners and more (16.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://netzpolitik.org/2009/the-dawning-of-internet-censorship-in-germany/" target="_blank">http://netzpolitik.org/2009/the-dawning-of...hip-in-germany/</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: German Government forces ISPs to put web filters (22.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.8/web-filters-isp-germany" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.8/we...ers-isp-germany</a><br /><br />Internet filtering type Loppsi creates polemics in Germany(only in French,<br />17.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13167-Le-filtrage-du-net-facon-Loppsi-fait-polemique-en-Allemagne.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13167-Le-...-Allemagne.html</a><br /><br />(contribution by Markus Beckedahl, EDRi-member NNM- Germany, Thanks to<br />Geraldine de Bastion for the translation)<br /><br />============================================================<br />3. Stockholm programme - the new EU dangerous surveillance system<br />============================================================<br /><br />Civil rights groups are worried about a new EU proposal that would enhance a<br />"dangerously authoritarian" European surveillance and security system that<br />will include ID card register, Internet surveillance systems, satellite<br />surveillance, automated exit-entry border systems operated by machines<br />reading biometrics and risk profiling systems.<br /><br />On 15 June 2009, EU justice ministers discussed on the so called<br />Stockholm programme trying to set up the first EU "domestic security<br />strategy for the EU", by the end of this year. The 'Stockholm Programme' is<br />the Swedish EU Presidency's proposed legislative agenda in the area of<br />justice and home affairs for the 2009-2014 period.<br /><br />According to the Swedish Presidency, the Stockholm Programme aims to "define<br />the framework for EU police and customs cooperation, rescue services,<br />criminal and civil law cooperation, asylum, migration and visa policy".<br /><br />"National frontiers should no longer restrict our activities," said Jacques<br />Barrot, the European justice and security commissioner on 9 June when he<br />presented the EU priorities in the justice area for the next five years. The<br />measures include increased security co-operation and improved immigration<br />management.<br /><br />The paper presented by the commissioner calls for stricter border controls,<br />a better exchange of information on criminal and security issues between the<br />member states and an increased police co-operation.<br /><br />European Commission President José Manuel Barroso said that "in future, EU<br />action must aim above all at delivering the best possible service to the<br />citizen in an area of freedom, security and justice more tangible for the<br />citizens".<br /><br />"We want to promote citizens' rights, make their daily lives easier and<br />provide protection, and this calls for effective and responsible European<br />action in these areas. In this context, I consider immigration policy<br />particularly important. This is the vision the Commission is presenting to<br />the Council and Parliament for debate, with a view to the adoption of the<br />new Stockholm Programme by the European Council in December 2009," he added.<br /><br />But civil liberties advocates commented in a different way the<br />proposal: "What stands out are the proposals related to the Future Group<br />report. A promise to balance better data protection and EU standards for<br />'Privacy Enhancing Technology' with the law enforcement agencies demands for<br />access to all information and communications. An 'information system<br />architecture' to bring about the sharing of all data across the EU. The use<br />of 'security technologies' to harness the 'digital tsunami' to gather<br />through mass surveillance personal data on peoples' everyday activities<br />through public-private partnerships.<br />What is new is the clear aim of creating the surveillance society and the<br />database state. Future generations, for whom this will be a fully developed<br />reality, will look back at this era and rightly ask, why did you not act to<br />stop it." said Tony Bunyan from Statewatch.<br /><br />The paper reintroduces proposals related to immigration and asylum,<br />insisting on "burden-sharing and solidarity" between member states as<br />regards asylum seekers and stating legal migrants should have the same<br />status across the EU and that they should have easier access to the job<br />market. Frontex, the external borders agency should be given more powers in<br />preventing human traffic and irregular immigrations at the EU borders.<br /><br />In the opinion of liberty advocates, these plans will only get us closer to<br />a surveillance type of society. "An increasingly sophisticated internal and<br />external security apparatus is developing under the auspices of the EU,"<br />commented Tony Bunyan.<br /><br />One of the main concerns is the intention of standardising European police<br />surveillance techniques and of creating common data gathering systems<br />operated at the EU level. A particularly worrying statement of the proposal<br />is: "The SIS II and VIS information systems will have to enter their fully<br />operational phase. An electronic system for recording entry and exit and a<br />registered traveller programme must be established. The usefulness of a<br />system of prior travel authorisation must be examined."<br /><br />The plans have in view an extension of the sharing of the present DNA and<br />fingerprint databases stored for new digital ID cards to CCTV video footage<br />and material gathered from Internet surveillance.<br /><br />The Daily Telegraph stated they had information from EU officials that the<br />new plans would need the coverage of the Lisbon Treaty presently stopped by<br />the Irish referendum in 2008 and waiting for a second Irish vote this<br />autumn. The Treaty stipulates the creation of a Standing Committee for<br />Internal Security to co-ordinate policy between national forces and EU<br />organisations such as Europol, the Frontex, the European Gendarmerie Force<br />and the Brussels intelligence.<br /><br />The Stockholm programme will be discussed at the informal ministerial<br />meeting in Stockholm in July 2009, to be further on examined by the European<br />Parliament in November with the hope that it would be approved at the Summit<br />in December 2009, under the Swedish presidency.<br /><br />EC proposals for the Stockholm Programme (COM(2009) 262/4)<br />English<br /><a href="http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/jun/eu-com-stockholm-prog.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/jun/eu...ckholm-prog.pdf</a><br />German<br /><a href="http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/jun/eu-com-stockholm-german.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/jun/eu...holm-german.pdf</a><br />French<br /><a href="http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/jun/eu-com-stockholm-french.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/jun/eu...holm-french.pdf</a><br /><br />EU security proposals are 'dangerously authoritarian' (10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/5496912/EU-security-proposals-are-dangerously-authoritarian.html" target="_blank">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/...horitarian.html</a><br /><br />Brussels outlines justice priorities for next 5 years (10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://euobserver.com/9/28283" target="_blank">http://euobserver.com/9/28283</a><br /><br />Sweden's EU immigration plans facing headwinds (11.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/opinion/sweden-eu-immigration-plans-facing-headwinds/article-183119" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/opinion/sweden-.../article-183119</a><br /><br />Justice and Home Affairs - Stockholm Programme<br /><a href="http://www.se2009.eu/en/the_presidency/about_the_eu/justice_and_home_affairs/1.1965" target="_blank">http://www.se2009.eu/en/the_presidency/abo..._affairs/1.1965</a><br /><br />Closer cooperation between EU countries on the agenda for justice and home<br />affairs. - Freedom, justice, security: a balancing act (10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/news/justice/090610_en.htm" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/news/justice/090610_en.htm</a><br /><br />European Commission outlines its vision for the area of  Freedom, Security<br />and Justice in the next five years (10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/int" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/int</a><br /><br />European Commission - Communication - An evaluation of the Hague Programme<br />and Action Plan (10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/doc_centre/doc/com_2009_263_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/doc_centr...2009_263_en.pdf</a><br /><br />Statewatch Observatory<br />The "Stockholm Programme" - "The Shape of Things to Come"<br /><a href="http://www.statewatch.org/future-group.htm" target="_blank">http://www.statewatch.org/future-group.htm</a><br /><br />European Civil Liberties Network - Oppose the "Stockholm Programme"<br />(04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ecln.org/ECLN-statement-on-Stockholm-Programme-April-2009-eng.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ecln.org/ECLN-statement-on-Stoc...il-2009-eng.pdf</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />4. The telecoms ministers rejected the telecom package as adopted by the EP<br />============================================================<br /><br />The European Commission continues to pressure the Council and the new<br />European Parliament to rapidly adopt the telecoms package without a proper<br />scrutiny of the law or any consideration of the implications of Amendment<br />138.<br /><br />At the Luxembourg meeting on 11 June 2009, the telecoms ministers decided to<br />reject the telecom package in the form adopted by the European Parliament in<br />the second reading on 6 May 2009, thus proposing a new round of<br />negotiations.<br /><br />The ministers consider the Parliament has breached the earlier compromise<br />reached with the Council on the telecoms package as a whole, obviously the<br />main issue under question being the controversial issue of copyright<br />protection and users' rights. And with the new decision of the French<br />Constitutional Council against the French three strikes law, the European<br />Parliament will probably insist in its position.<br /><br />On a press conference on 11 June, the position of the European Commission<br />was expressed by Viviane Reding's spokesman Martin Selmayr who stated that<br />the issue of Amendment 138 had been dealt with at the national level (thus<br />referring to the French Constitutional Council decision) and therefore<br />should no longer be a European matter. Which, obviously, means that the<br />Commission wants the amendment dropped from the telecom package.<br /><br />Reding, which has lately been supporting France's position for the graduate<br />response, made an appeal to EU lawmakers urging them to finalise the<br />discussions on the package. "I call on all political players to do their<br />best in the next days and weeks to settle the last pending issue. Critics<br />often lament about Europe's lack of competitiveness, because of the alleged<br />length of the EU's decision-making processes. In the next days and weeks,<br />Council and Parliament have the unique opportunity to prove these critics<br />wrong."<br /><br />The deadline for the European Parliament to send its position to the Council<br />on the telecoms package is 19 June. After this, there are several options<br />for the telecoms ministers. One is to adopt the text as voted by the<br />Parliament but this is unlikely having in view their position on Amendment<br />138, especially the position of France in the matter.<br /><br />Another option is to adopt a counter-proposal restating the Council's<br />initial line which will formally start the negotiation procedure to take<br />place under the new Swedish presidency. In this case, the Parliament will<br />have to create a conciliation committee including 27 newly elected members<br />representing all the EU countries. A formal agreement could be reached by<br />the end of the year.<br /><br />EU Council could also reopen the entire case asking for negotiations on the<br />core of the text which could lead to other debates with unpredictable<br />duration and results.<br /><br />A technical possibility could be to split the package but this is unlikely<br />as the ministers have already stated they did not want to take that road.<br />As the text is interlinked, splitting it would mean bringing modifications<br />to a large part of the text.<br /><br />The European Parliament's schedule is to have a trialogue on 29 September<br />with a final vote on 15 December which would give time for discussion of the<br />issues raised by Amendment 138 and for the new MEPs to get familiarised with<br />these issues.<br /><br />French ruling raises hopes for EU telecoms deal (11.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/french-ruling-raises-hopes-eu-telecoms-deal/article-183124" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/fre.../article-183124</a><br /><br />Commission steps up pressure on Telecoms Package (10.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=358&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...58&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />Reding: don't involve EU in fundamental rights (12.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=360&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...60&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />Telecoms package remains hostage of political row (12.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/telecoms-package-remains-hostage-political-row/article-183137?Ref=RSS" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/tel...-183137?Ref=RSS</a><br /><br />Ministers braced for final round of telecoms talks (11.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/ministers-braced-final-round-telecoms-talks/article-183089" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/min.../article-183089</a><br /><br />Presidency Press Statement on the state of play regarding the 'telecoms<br />package' (12.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.eu2009.cz/en/news-and-documents/news/presidency-press-statement-on-the-state-of-play-regarding-the-_telecoms-package_-25123/" target="_blank">http://www.eu2009.cz/en/news-and-documents...package_-25123/</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: European Parliament votes against the 3 strikes. Again<br />(6.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.9/ep-plenary-votes-against-3-strikes" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.9/ep...ainst-3-strikes</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />5. Finland: Complaints not allowed for the Police child-porn censorship list<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Helsinki Administrative court decided on 20 May 2009 that complaints<br />lodged in regards to the child-porn censorship list maintained by the<br />Finnish Police are not allowed.<br /><br />The case originates from one Finnish activist's "battle" against the<br />censorship list maintained by the Finnish police and originally the<br />censorship law passed by the Finnish Parliament in 2006, meant to combat<br />child pornography. The list works in the manner that in conjunction with the<br />ISPs the Finnish Police is able to bock access to certain sites deemed as<br />having child pornography content and thus illegal.<br /><br />However what the activist Matti Nikki contests is that although the list is<br />maintained for a good cause, many sites including Mr. Nikki's own site<br />lapsiporno.info (translated as childporn.info) meant to display parts of the<br />Police's censorship list end up as being blocked in an arbitrary manner by<br />the Police. This is shown by the way in which the Finnish Police acted in<br />relation to Mr. Nikki, after he started a direct debate with the Finnish<br />Police; the Police stepped in and included Nikki's site onto the censorship<br />list, after which Mr. Nikki was interrogated by the Police and the Finnish<br />Attorney General deliberated whether Mr. Nikki should be prosecuted for<br />distribution of child pornography. No action of prosecution followed, and<br />Mr. Nikki asked that his site be removed from the list of censored sites.<br />The Finnish Central Criminal Police decided not to release lapsiporno.info.<br />Mr. Nikki appealed to the Helsinki Administrative Court, which gave its<br />decision in May 2009.<br /><br />The decision of the Helsinki Administrative Court states that Mr. Nikki's<br />site is being censored, however the most worrying aspect is that while the<br />court admits that the case is in fact about censoring Mr. Nikki's personal<br />site, it totally walks over the Finnish constitution and the rights<br />enshrined in it in relation to freedom of speech, without even giving any<br />reasoning why it has done so. This is a grave violation of Article 10 of the<br />European Convention on Human Rights.<br /><br />Mr. Nikki, who is represented by the Helsinki - based law firm Turre Legal,<br />will appeal the decision to the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland<br />during June 2009.<br /><br />Decision of the Helsinki Administrative Court (only in Finnish, 20.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://hack.fi/~muzzy/lapsiporno/files/hao-09-0704-3.pdf" target="_blank">http://hack.fi/~muzzy/lapsiporno/files/hao-09-0704-3.pdf</a><br /><br />(contribution by Markku Räsänen - Summer Associate, Turre Legal, Finland)<br /><br />============================================================<br />6. Windows 7 is launched without IE, but the Commission is not pleased<br />============================================================<br /><br />Although until recently Microsoft was claiming that Internet Explorer (IE)<br />browser was an integrant part of Windows operating system, on 11 June 2009<br />the company stated it would launch its new version of operating system for<br />the European market, Windows 7, without Internet Explorer. The decision<br />comes as a result of a Statement of Objections sent to Microsoft in January<br />2009 by the European Commission regarding competition concerns related to<br />the bundling of the browser to the operating system. However, the European<br />Commission has not welcomed the new decision.<br /><br />A Statement of Objections is a formal step in Commission antitrust<br />investigations by means of which the parties concerned are informed in<br />writing of the objections raised against them. Microsoft replied to the this<br />step on 28 April 2009 and the Commission is presently considering<br />Microsoft's reply and any additional evidence in the case.<br /><br />According to the Commission, by bundling Internet Explorer to Windows,<br />Microsoft is using its dominant position in the operating system market to<br />block competition in the browser market. Microsoft was already fined in<br />EU in 2007 for bundling its media player to Windows.<br /><br />Waiting for the decision of the Commission but wishing to observe its<br />launching targets for the new version of its operation system, Microsoft<br />decided to offer this European version without IE. "We're committed to<br />making Windows 7 available in Europe at the same time that it launches in<br />the rest of the world, but we also must comply with European competition law<br />as we launch the product. Given the pending legal proceeding, we've decided<br />that instead of including Internet Explorer in Windows 7 in Europe, we will<br />offer it separately and on an easy-to-install basis to both computer<br />manufacturers and users. This means that computer manufacturers and users<br />will be free to install Internet Explorer on Windows 7, or not, as they<br />prefer. Of course, they will also be free, as they are today, to install<br />other Web browsers," stated Deputy General Counsel Dave Heiner in a blog<br />post on the company website.<br /><br />In response to this statement, on 12 June, the European regulators showed<br />they were not pleased with Microsoft's decision as they had suggested that<br />the company offer a selection of browsers on its operating system to open up<br />choice for consumers and not a complete lack of options.<br /><br />"Microsoft has apparently decided to supply retail consumers with a version<br />of Windows without a web browser at all. Rather than more choice, Microsoft<br />seems to have chosen to provide less," said the Commission in its statement.<br /><br />The reaction is explainable as after Microsoft had decided to sell a version<br />of Windows without its Media Player after the fine received in 2007, it<br />succeeded in going around the Commission's restrictions by selling an<br />alternative version of Windows equipped for free with the Media Player,<br />which was obviously preferred by the consumers.<br /><br />A potential solution considered in the Commission' Statement of Objections<br />would be to allow consumers to choose from different web browsers presented<br />to them through a 'ballot screen' in Windows. Thus, the Commission might<br />force Microsoft to include other browsers with its operating system which<br />will probably help competitive browser companies such as Mozilla's Firefox ,<br />Opera, Google's Chrome and Apple's Safari.<br /><br />EU unconvinced by Microsoft Internet browser offer (12.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-unconvinced-microsoft-internet-browser-offer/article-183146?Ref=RSS" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-...-183146?Ref=RSS</a><br /><br />Antitrust: Commission statement on Microsoft Internet Explorer announcement<br />(12.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/09/272&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en" target="_blank">http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction...;guiLanguage=en</a><br /><br />Working to Fulfill our Legal Obligations in Europe for Windows 7<br />(11.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://microsoftontheissues.com/cs/blogs/mscorp/archive/2009/06/11/working-to-fulfill-our-legal-obligations-in-europe-for-windows-7.aspx" target="_blank">http://microsoftontheissues.com/cs/blogs/m...-windows-7.aspx</a><br /><br />Brussels threatens Microsoft with fresh fine (19.01.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/brussels-threatens-microsoft-fresh-fine/article-178587" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/bru.../article-178587</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />7. More voices in the EP for digital rights<br />============================================================<br /><br />The recent elections have brought more seats for parties supporting digital<br />rights in the European Parliament (EP), such as the Greens, UK Independence<br />Party or the Liberal Democrats. The Swedish Pirate Party has succeeded in<br />getting a seat as well.<br /><br />The Pirate Party has succeeded in obtaining 7% of the votes in Sweden, thus<br />winning one representative in the EP. In case the Lisbon Treaty is adopted,<br />it might even get one more seat. The success of the party is due to two<br />recent events: the EU's intellectual property enforcement directive which<br />asks that ISPs turn over traffic data to copyright holders who are trying to<br />track down filesharers and which was brought into force by the Swedish<br />Government in April 2009 and the result of the Pirate Bay trial. The party's<br />success has proven that privacy rights and fair copyright systems matter to<br />Swedish people.<br /><br />Ray Corrigan, senior lecturer in ­technology at the Open University,<br />explains: "A lot of IP laws are being driven through because they are off<br />most people's cognitive agendas. If you start knocking people off the<br />internet for ­allegedly infringing copyright those numbers start to grow<br />into the thousands, or tens of thousands, very quickly. It has a direct<br />impact on their children's education and some people may need the internet<br />for their job."<br /><br />The Pirate Party will join either the Green or the Liberal groupings in the<br />European Parliament. "There have been no formal discussions, but we have<br />been invited by a few groups for informal talks," said Christian Engstroem,<br />a computer programmer and the candidate heading the party's list who also<br />said that the party would join the one grouping that will be the closest to<br />the party's positions on Internet freedoms.<br /><br />The Pirate Party presence may bring new debates on the issues of patents and<br />copyright and privacy. Their position is for a five year copyright term, a<br />file sharing exception and the abolishment of patents.<br /><br />EDRi-member Open Rights Group considers that the Pirate Party has some<br />positions that are a little extreme but the party's cultural flat rate<br />proposal might be something similar to a payment made in exchange for a file<br />sharing exception. While the Pirate Party advocates for a 5-year term<br />copyright, many copyright academics feel the economically optimal term is<br />rather 15 years than the life plus 70 years that is now in force.<br /><br />Sweden is not the only country where digital rights supporters have<br />succeeded in making their voice heard. The German pirate party,<br />Piratenpartei Deutschland, won close to 1% of the vote. And registered<br />"Pirate Parties" now exist in Austria, Denmark, Finland, Poland and Spain.<br />Similar groups are attempting to register as political parties in the UK and<br />the US as well.<br /><br />"My view is that IP is a good and necessary thing. I'm not in favour of a<br />free-for-all but I do think that there are many important questions that<br />need to be addressed. I think it's a good thing that you are getting<br />representatives in parliament who wish to challenge the established view,"<br />stated Andrew Dearing, secretary general of the European Industrial<br />Research ­Management Association.<br /><br />A new and fresh breath of air will be beneficial for the atmosphere in the<br />European Parliament that relies more on the Internet as a source of<br />information, but also as a communication tool with its voters. A survey<br />carried out by Fleishman-Hillard during 1 April to 1 May 2009 shows that<br />although most MEPs largely use the Internet, it seems most of them still<br />believe traditional forms of communication, such as television or<br />newspapers, are more effective. About 75 percent of the MEPs use a web page<br />to communicate with their voters, 93% use search engines daily to understand<br />legislative<br />issues. Still, many of them have to open up to social online media as only<br />thirty-three percent of them use the social media networks "extensively", 20<br />percent occasionally, but 29 percent "do not use them or do not plan to use<br />them."<br /><br />"Members of the European Parliament recognise that EU citizens go online and<br />that they therefore need a web presence. However, the majority of MEPs do<br />not currently take full advantage of social media tools as a means to engage<br />with voters and drive them to their websites," the survey said.<br /><br />Pirates to join Green or Liberal groups in EU parliament (3.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://euobserver.com/883/28237" target="_blank">http://euobserver.com/883/28237</a><br /><br />Majority of MEPs do not 'tweet' (4.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://euobserver.com/883/28238" target="_blank">http://euobserver.com/883/28238</a><br /><br />Sweden's Pirate party sails to success in European elections (11.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jun/11/pirate-party-sweden" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/...te-party-sweden</a><br /><br />What do the EU results and Pirate Party mean for digital rights? (9.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/06/what-do-the-eu-results-and-pirate-party-mean-for-digital-rights/" target="_blank">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/06/wha...digital-rights/</a><br /><br />EDRIgram: The Pirate Bay asks for retrial claiming conflict of interest<br />(6.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.9/pirate-bay-mistrial" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.9/pirate-bay-mistrial</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />8. Report: OECD Conference on Sensor Based Networks<br />============================================================<br /><br />"Using Sensor-based Networks to Address Global Issues: Policy Opportunities<br />and Challenges" was the title of an experts conference the OECD organised on<br />08 and 09 June 2009, hosted by Portugal, in Lisbon. Andreas Krisch<br />participated in the conference on behalf of EDRi and CSISAC.<br /><br />The goal of the Conference was to help policy makers:<br />a. understand Sensor-Based Networks and their potential contribution to<br />economic and social welfare,<br />b. identify how to further stimulate innovation in this area and foster<br />the development of these technologies where they are needed the most and are<br />the most promising.<br /><br />During the one and a half day event, the potentials of sensor based networks<br />in the areas of health and elderly care, protection of the environment and<br />transportation were discussed. Presentations on different research and<br />commercial projects illustrated current and potential future uses of sensor<br />networks. The presented applications ranged from humidity sensors used for<br />the reduction of water consumption in agriculture via sensor networks used<br />to support elderly care at home to traffic control systems for highways<br />based on information gathered from vehicle on-board computers.<br /><br />In the last session privacy protection and information security dominated<br />the discussion on policy options. Panellists made quite clear that, in their<br />opinion, a widespread use of sensor networks and related technologies will<br />only be possible in future, when a sufficient level of trust can be<br />achieved. For this, privacy protection and information security are key.<br /><br />For a more detailed report on the conference see<br /><a href="http://csisac.org/2009/06/csisac_oecd_rfid.php" target="_blank">http://csisac.org/2009/06/csisac_oecd_rfid.php</a><br /><br />CSISAC<br /><a href="http://csisac.org/" target="_blank">http://csisac.org/</a><br /><br />Conference website<br /><a href="http://www.oecd.org/sti/ict/sensors" target="_blank">http://www.oecd.org/sti/ict/sensors</a><br /><br />Presentations, session summaries, conclusions<br /><a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/41/0,3343,en_2649_34223_42616233_1_1_1_1,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.oecd.org/document/41/0,3343,en_...1_1_1_1,00.html</a><br /><br />(contribution by Andreas Krisch - EDRi)<br /><br />============================================================<br />9. ENDitorial: Regulating online media in Azerbaijan?<br />============================================================<br /><br />I was invited last week to a meeting in Baku, Azerbaijan by the Council of<br />Europe that organized together with the local National TV and Radio Council<br />in order to discuss some issues related to the regulation of online media.<br /><br />The meeting took place on 4 June 2009 and the first part was dedicated to<br />the local authorities (Ministry of Communication and Information<br />Technologies or National TV and Radio Council) local Internet actors (The<br />online news agency lent.az, or APA news agency) and NGOs (such as Azerbaijan<br />Internet Forum or IREX Azerbaijan).<br /><br />Although the authorities and private partners sat at the same table, there<br />was a huge difference in speeches. While the Deputy Minister of<br />Communications and Information Technologies Iltimas Mammadov talked about<br />2000 km optic cable already deployed and measures for using Internet in the<br />cars via WiMax, the private sector claimed that 95% of the population used<br />dial-up or similar connections and that the average cost of a 1Mb/s monthly<br />connection was between 60-120 manats (approx. 53-107 Euro), which is a huge<br />price for an average person in Azerbaijan.<br /><br />While the authorities claimed that anyone can start an ISP, the private<br />sector insisted that, basically, the backbone connectivity could be bought<br />only from a "special" ISP - Delta Telecom. The high final prices and<br />allegation of some content being blocked by the authorities could thus be<br />explained.<br /><br />Talking about regulating online media, the voices seem to converge in asking<br />for a definition of "electronic media". Strangely in my opinion, the private<br />sector representatives asked for a clarification in this respect, seeming to<br />want such a registration for the electronic media (which is in fact more a<br />notification). But this could be explained by the fact that otherwise you<br />are not invited to press conferences or able to get an interview from an<br />official.<br /><br />In a country where you need to register your off-line publication with the<br />Ministry of Justice or your TV or radio station with the National Television<br />and Radio Council, most of the speakers seem to claim that the regulation<br />should be the rule to protect others' privacy or honour, to prevent<br />pro-aggressive war speech (this part may be a result of the war on<br />Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia) or hacking of websites (?!?).<br /><br />Another interesting aspect is that the present mass-media law from 2009<br />lists the Internet as a mass-medium.<br /><br />The European experience presented by Mr Marcel Betzel, a policy adviser from<br />the Dutch Media Authority and by myself was focused on whether any<br />regulation was needed in the new online environment and whether such a<br />regulation would be feasible.We also tried to emphasise with concrete<br />examples the importance of self-regulation and its results.<br /><br />I have specifically explained why a registration of online media could be<br />seen as a potential infringement of the freedom of expression if we take<br />into consideration the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.<br />Also why we need to consider whether a new legislation is feasible in terms<br />of its application and whether it will just send the unwanted content hosted<br />in another country.<br /><br />Mr. Betzel also presented the difficulties of implementing the new European<br />Audiovisual Media Services Directive and identifying which site can be<br />considered web TV or Internet radio, according to the new rules.<br /><br />Taking into consideration the traditional IT development skills of the<br />Azeri, the Internet has a lot of place to grow, but for now, it is hard to<br />estimate what the future actions of the Azeri authorities will be, if any,<br />for a "better regulation" of the online media.<br /><br />Regulation of Online Media in Azerbaijan<br /><a href="http://www.coe.az/Latest-News/159.html" target="_blank">http://www.coe.az/Latest-News/159.html</a><br /><br />Conference on the theme "Regulation of Internet media in Azerbaijan" takes<br />place (4.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=103237" target="_blank">http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=103237</a><br /><br />Azerbaijan - OpenNet Initiative Profile<br /><a href="http://opennet.net/research/profiles/azerbaijan" target="_blank">http://opennet.net/research/profiles/azerbaijan</a><br /><br />(contribution by Bogdan Manolea - EDRi-member APTI - Romania)<br /><br />============================================================<br />10. Recommended Action<br />============================================================<br /><br />Cloud Privacy - An open letter to Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt<br />This six page letter (pdf) to Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, is signed by 38<br />researchers and academics in the fields of computer science, information<br />security and privacy law. Together, they ask Google to honor the important<br />privacy promises it has made to its customers and protect users'<br />communications from theft and snooping by enabling industry standard<br />transport encryption technology (HTTPS) for Google Mail, Docs, and Calendar.<br /><a href="http://www.cloudprivacy.net/letter/" target="_blank">http://www.cloudprivacy.net/letter/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />11. Recommended Reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />Reykjavik conference maps out future Council of Europe work on media and the<br />Internet<br /><a href="https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1452361" target="_blank">https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1452361</a><br />Political Declaration and resolutions<br /><a href="http://www.coe.int/t/dc/press/source/20090529_final_declaration_iceland_en.doc" target="_blank">http://www.coe.int/t/dc/press/source/20090..._iceland_en.doc</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />12. Agenda<br />============================================================<br /><br />28-30 June 2009, Turin, Italy<br />COMMUNIA Conference 2009: Global Science & Economics of Knowledge-Sharing<br />Institutions<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009</a><br /><br />2-3 July 2009, Padova, Italy<br />3rd FLOSS International Workshop on Free/Libre Open Source Software<br /><a href="http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/manenti/floss/floss09.html" target="_blank">http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/...ss/floss09.html</a><br /><br />6-7 July 2009, Barcelona, Spain<br />Fifth Internet Law & Politics Conference organized by the Law and Political<br />Science Department of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya<br />The Pros and Cons of Social Networking Sites.<br /><a href="http://www.uoc.edu/symposia/idp2009/engl/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.uoc.edu/symposia/idp2009/engl/index.html</a><br /><br />13-16 August 2009, Vierhouten, The Netherlands<br />Hacking at Random<br /><a href="http://www.har2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.har2009.org/</a><br /><br />23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy<br />World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and<br />Council: "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage"<br /><a href="http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm</a><br /><br />10-12 September 2009, Potsdam, Germany<br />5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam<br />Section: Protest Politics<br />Panel: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property<br /><a href="http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp</a><br /><br />16-18 September 2009, Crete, Greece<br />World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2009<br /><a href="http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/" target="_blank">http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/</a><br /><br />17-18 September 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />Gikii, A Workshop on Law, Technology and Popular Culture<br />Institute for Information Law (IViR) - University of Amsterdam<br />Call for papers by 1 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp" target="_blank">http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp</a><br /><br />21-23 October 2009, Istanbul, Turkey<br />eChallenges 2009<br /><a href="http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp</a><br /><br />24-25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />3rd European Privacy Open Space<br /><a href="http://www.privacyos.eu" target="_blank">http://www.privacyos.eu</a><br /><br />25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />Austrian Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 21 September 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/</a><br /><br />16 October 2009, Bielefeld, Germany<br />10th German Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 15 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/</a><br /><br />13-15 November 2009, Gothenburg, Sweden<br />Free Society Conference and Nordic Summit<br /><a href="http://www.fscons.org/" target="_blank">http://www.fscons.org/</a><br /><br />15-18 November 2009, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt<br />UN Internet Governance Forum<br /><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/" target="_blank">http://www.intgovforum.org/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />13. About<br />============================================================<br /><br />EDRI-gram is a biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe.<br />Currently EDRI has 29 members based or with offices in 18 different<br />countries in Europe. European Digital Rights takes an active interest in<br />developments in the EU accession countries and wants to share knowledge and<br />awareness through the EDRI-grams.<br /><br />All contributions, suggestions for content, corrections or agenda-tips are<br />most welcome. Errors are corrected as soon as possible and visibly on the<br />EDRI website.<br /><br />Except where otherwise noted, this newsletter is licensed under the<br />Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See the full text at<br /><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</a><br /><br />Newsletter editor: Bogdan Manolea &lt;edrigram@edri.org&gt;<br /><br />Information about EDRI and its members:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/</a><br /><br />European Digital Rights needs your help in upholding digital rights in the<br />EU. If you wish to help us promote digital rights, please consider making a<br />private donation.<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram subscription information<br /><br />subscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: subscribe<br /><br />You will receive an automated e-mail asking to confirm your request.<br />unsubscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: unsubscribe<br /><br />- EDRI-gram in Macedonian<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available partly in Macedonian, with delay. Translations<br />are provided by Metamorphosis<br /><a href="http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php" target="_blank">http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram in German<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available in German, with delay. Translations are provided<br />Andreas Krisch from the EDRI-member VIBE!AT - Austrian Association for<br />Internet Users<br /><a href="http://www.unwatched.org/" target="_blank">http://www.unwatched.org/</a><br /><br />- Newsletter archive<br /><br />Back issues are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram</a><br /><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:09:10 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19949</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[EFFector 22.18: EFF Challenges Government's "Back Door Wiretap"]]></title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19934</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 18  June 12, 2009  editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 512th issue:<br /><br />* EFF HAS CHALLENGED GOVERNMENT'S "BACK DOOR WIRETAP,"<br />urging the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hold that<br />the government's seizure of defendant Stephen Warshak's<br />email without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment and<br />federal privacy statutes, as well as the Justice<br />Department's own surveillance manual. The government<br />accomplished this "back door wiretap" by illegally ordering<br />Warshak's email provider to prospectively "preserve" copies<br />of his future emails, a misuse the Stored Communications<br />Act, which is only supposed to be used for obtaining emails<br />already in storage with a provider.<br /><br />In an amicus brief filed earlier this week, EFF argues that<br />the government's seizure violated federal privacy laws and<br />Warshak's Fourth Amendment expectation of privacy in his<br />email. As a result, the illegally seized emails should have<br />been suppressed by the district court where Warshak was<br />tried. All told, the government acquired over 27,000 emails<br />spanning over six months from Warshak's email provider, all<br />without probable cause.<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/11" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/11</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* France Declares Three Strikes Unconstitutional<br />The Conseil Constitutionnel has declared the most important<br />parts of HADOPI unconstitutional and invalidated the<br />legislation's authority to issue termination orders to<br />ISPs.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/three-strikes-dead-in-france" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/three...-dead-in-france</a><br /><br />* China's Spy in the Home<br />The Chinese Ministry of Industry and IT's announcement that<br />all PCs sold in China must include government-approved<br />filtering software is a profoundly worrying development for<br />online privacy and free speech in that country.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/chinas-spy-home" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/chinas-spy-home</a><br /><br />* Google Book Search Settlement: Foster Competition<br />What would create an eBook marketplace with an opportunity<br />for real competition? Escrow the scans.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/should-google-have-s" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/should-google-have-s</a><br /><br />* Cookies Crumbling<br />YouTube takes a small step to increase privacy of<br />Whitehouse.gov visitors by essentially ignoring account<br />cookies for videos viewed on Whitehouse.gov.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/cookies-crumbling" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/cookies-crumbling</a><br /><br />* EFF Comments on Child Safe Viewing Act<br />Recently, EFF filed comments with the FCC in connection<br />with the Child Safe Viewing Act of 2007, which requires the<br />FCC to conduct a study of V-chip-like blocking technologies<br />that might apply to more than just television viewing<br />such as Internet access.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/eff-comments-child-s" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/eff-comments-child-s</a><br /><br />* The Child Safe Viewing Act and Another DMCA Victim<br />TVGuardian and companies like it are unexpected victims of<br />DRM and the DMCA, but the conflict between copyright law<br />and companies that try to edit or block "offensive"<br />language or images in movies is nothing new.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/child-safe-viewing-a" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/child-safe-viewing-a</a><br /><br />* Hollywood Drives Us into the "Analog Sunset"<br />The AACS licensing authority has released the "Final<br />Adopter Agreement" it plans to enforce against consumer<br />electronics companies that make BluRay players (and any<br />other AACS devices that come along)<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/hollywood-drives-us-" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/hollywood-drives-us-</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Zotero Suit Dismissed<br />The legal battle between the proprietary EndNote academic<br />citation software and the open-source Zotero software has<br />ended.<br /><a href="http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3810/judge-dismisses-software-licensing-case-against-george-mason-u" target="_blank">http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/3...-george-mason-u</a><br /><br />~ Swedish Pirate Party Gains Seat in EU Parliament<br />The Pirate Party received a reported 7.1% of the votes in<br />Swedish elections, giving the party representation at the<br />European Parliament.<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-party-wins-and-enters-the-european-parliament-090607/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-party-wins-...liament-090607/</a><br /><br />~ RIP: A Remix Manifesto Showing and Panel in NYC<br />This buzz-worthy documentary about remix and participatory<br />creativity is making its debut in New York City on Friday,<br />June 19.<br /><a href="http://www.opensourcecinema.org/remixnyc" target="_blank">http://www.opensourcecinema.org/remixnyc</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* IT Equipment for EFF Offices<br /><br />We are looking for donations of the following new hard<br />drives to support EFF's office operations.  As thanks for<br />your donation, we can offer a free membership and, of<br />course, some cool swag.<br /><br />Requested Items:<br /><br />- 2 x 2TB external USB hard drives, preferably Western<br />Digital. Or a larger number of smaller drives with the same<br />interface.<br /><br />- PATA IDE hard drives, 20GB or larger<br /><br />Please contact stu@eff.org if you can help!<br /><br />* EFF at RoboGames in San Francisco<br /><br />See EFF this weekend at the 2009 International RoboGames at<br />Ft. Mason's Festival Pavilion in San Francisco! Stop by and<br />say hello!<br /><br />Booth Hours:<br />Friday, June 12: 12 PM - 6 PM<br />Saturday, June 13:  2 PM - 6 PM<br />Sunday, June 14: 12 PM - 6 PM<br /><br />For more information:<br /><a href="http://robogames.net" target="_blank">http://robogames.net</a><br /><br />* Help EFF Go to DEFCON!<br /><br />EFF is looking for donations of airline tickets and hotel<br />points for the DEFCON hacking conference, as well as other<br />conferences and speaking engagements. If you have enough<br />airline miles for a free ticket and would like to send an<br />EFF staffer to a conference, let us know, and we will help<br />you with the process of making the reservation. Please note<br />that at this time we are unable to combine miles from<br />multiple individuals.  We are also looking for hotel<br />rewards points to help reduce our overall travel costs.<br /><br />As a thanks for your donation, we can offer a free<br />membership and a mention in EFFector (if you'd like).<br />Please contact aaron@eff.org if you can help!<br /><br />* Nominate a Pioneer for EFF's 2009 Pioneer Awards!<br /><br />EFF established the Pioneer Awards to recognize leaders on<br />the electronic frontier who are extending freedom and<br />innovation in the realm of information technology. This is<br />your opportunity to nominate a deserving individual or<br />group to receive a Pioneer Award for 2009.  The<br />International Pioneer Awards nominations are open both to<br />individuals and organizations from any country.<br />Nominations are reviewed by a panel of judges chosen for<br />their knowledge of the technical, legal, and social issues<br />associated with information technology.<br /><br />How to Nominate Someone for a 2009 Pioneer Award:<br /><br />You may send as many nominations as you wish, but please<br />use one email per nomination. Please submit your entries<br />via email to pioneer@eff.org. We will accept nominations<br />until July 15, 2009.<br /><br />Simply tell us:<br /><br />1. The name of the nominee,<br /><br />2. The phone number, email address or website by which the<br />nominee can be reached, and, most importantly,<br /><br />3. Why you feel the nominee deserves the award.<br /><br />Nominee Criteria:<br /><br />There are no specific categories for the EFF Pioneer<br />Awards, but the following guidelines apply:<br /><br />1. The nominees must have contributed substantially to the<br />health, growth, accessibility, or freedom of computer-based<br />communications.<br /><br />2. To be valid, all nominations must contain your reason,<br />however brief, for nominating the individual or<br />organization and a means of contacting the nominee. In<br />addition, while anonymous nominations will be accepted,<br />ideally we'd like to contact the nominating parties in case<br />we need further information.<br /><br />3. The contribution may be technical, social, economic, or<br />cultural.<br /><br />4. Nominations may be of individuals, systems, or<br />organizations in the private or public sectors.<br /><br />5. Nominations are open to all (other than current members<br />of EFF's staff and operating board or this year's award<br />judges), and you may nominate more than one recipient. You<br />may also nominate yourself or your organization.<br /><br />6. Persons or representatives of organizations receiving an<br />EFF Pioneer Award will be invited to attend the ceremony at<br />EFF's expense.<br /><br />More on the EFF Pioneer Awards:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/</a><br /><br />* Intern Opportunity!<br /><br />EFF is looking for a summer intern to help in our<br />development and media departments. This is an unpaid,<br />full-time position.<br /><br />Projects will include:<br />-Working on our annual report and contacting major donors<br />and foundations (40% of time);<br />-Assisting with membership fulfillment and bulk mailing<br />(40% of time); and<br />-Identifying and organizing press clippings (20% of time).<br /><br />Excellent writing and editing skills, strong organizational<br />abilities, and the capacity to take instruction and run<br />with it is a must. Interest in development and/or public<br />relations as a career is a plus, as is knowledge and<br />familiarity with EFF's issues.<br /><br />To apply, please send a cover letter, resume, and writing<br />sample to: alyssa@eff.org<br /><br />* Volunteer at EFF!<br /><br />EFF is looking for volunteers to assist with operations in<br />our membership department. If you're quick, organized,<br />detail-oriented, and looking for a hands-on way to support<br />EFF, contact us today!<br /><br />Duties include:<br /><br />* Membership fulfillment<br />* Organizing premiums<br />* Print mailing<br />* Event assistance<br /><br />Learn about fundraising operations in the nonprofit world<br />while supporting your favorite organization in a tangible<br />way! Interest in grassroots fundraising is a plus, as is<br />knowledge and familiarity with EFF's issues. Send a letter<br />of interest to aaron@eff.org<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br /><a href="http://links.eff.org/emaildonate" target="_blank">http://links.eff.org/emaildonate</a><br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />To change your email address:<br /><a href="http://action.eff.org/addresschange" target="_blank">http://action.eff.org/addresschange</a><br /><br />Reproduction of this publication in electronic media is<br />encouraged. This newsletter is printed on 100% recycled<br />electrons.<br /><br /><br />EFF appreciates your support and respects your privacy.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/policy" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/policy</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:31:56 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19934</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fact Sheets and PRC Privacy Updates</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=1567</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Fact Sheet 18: Online Privacy<br /><a href="http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs18-cyb.htm" target="_blank">http://www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs18-cyb.htm</a><br /><br />Copyright 1995-2003. Utility Consumers' Action Network / Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.<br />June 1995. Revised August 2003<br /><br />This copyrighted document may be copied and distributed for nonprofit, educational purposes only. The text of this document may not be altered without express authorization of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. This fact sheet should be used as an information source and not as legal advice. PRC fact sheets contain information about federal laws as well as some California-specific information. Laws in other states may vary. But in general, our fact sheets are applicable to consumers nationwide. This publication was originally developed under the auspices of the University of San Diego.<br /><br />Privacy Rights Clearinghouse<br />3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B<br />San Diego, CA 92103<br />Voice: (619) 298-3396<br />Fax: (619) 298-5681<br />Contact Us: www.privacyrights.org/inquiryform.html<br />Web: www.privacyrights.org<br /><br /><br />--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />Privacy in Cyberspace:<br />Rules of the Road for the Information Superhighway<br /><br /> <br /><br />If you have access to a computer and a modem, you are licensed to drive on the information superhighway. And you are one of a growing number of online participants. <br /><br />The Internet offers many benefits. Web sites provide a vast world of information, entertainment, and shopping at our fingertips. Electronic mail, instant messaging, and chat rooms enable us to communicate with friends, family, and strangers in ways we never dreamed of a decade ago. <br /><br />But the Internet also creates many threats to our personal privacy. Unless you know the "rules of the road," your online activity may lead to significant privacy problems.<br /><br />This guide is divided into four sections: <br /><br />Part one: Expectations of privacy in cyberspace <br />Part two: Online tracking and monitoring <br />Part three: Tips for safeguarding your privacy online <br />Part four: Additional resources<br /><br />PART ONE: EXPECTATIONS OF PRIVACY IN CYBERSPACE<br /><br />What are "online communications?"<br /><br />"Online communications" are communications over telephone, cable networks, or wireless systems using computers. Examples of online communications include connecting to the Internet through an Internet Service Provider (ISP) such as America Online or Earthlink, or accessing the Internet from a public library or community computer center. Mobile access to the Internet is increasing via hand-held PDAs, pagers, and other devices. (For a directory of ISPs, see Additional Resources at the end of this guide.)<br /><br />The Internet raises some unique privacy concerns. Information sent over this vast global network may pass through dozens of different computer systems on the way to its destination. Each of these systems is operated by its own administrator and may be capable of capturing and storing online communications. Furthermore, your online activities can potentially be monitored by your Internet Service Provider (ISP) and by web sites that you visit.<br /><br /><br />What level of privacy can I expect in my online activity?<br /><br />Often the level of privacy you can expect from an online activity will be clear from the nature of that activity. Sometimes, however, an activity that appears to be private may not be. There are virtually no online activities or services that guarantee absolute privacy. This guide informs you about ways to maximize the privacy of your online activities and avoid common pitfalls. <br /><br />Public Activities<br /><br />Many online activities are open to public inspection. Engaging in these types of activities does not normally create an expectation of privacy. In fact, according to federal law, it is not illegal for anyone to view or disclose an electronic communication if the communication is "readily accessible" to the public (Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC § 2511(2)(g)(I)).<br /><br />Newsgroups. For example, a message you post to a public newsgroup or forum is available for anyone to view, copy, and store. In addition, your name, electronic mail (e-mail) address, and information about your service provider are usually available for inspection as part of the message itself. <br /><br />Most public postings made on the Internet are archived in searchable files, for example, <a href="http://groups.google.com" target="_blank">http://groups.google.com</a>. Thus, on the Internet, your public messages can be accessed by anyone at anytime -- even years after the message was originally written. Before you post a message to a public forum, ask yourself if want an employer or family member to be able to read your posting in years to come. (See Additional Resources at the end of this guide.)<br /><br />Listserves. Other public activities may allow your message to be sent to multiple recipients. Online newsletters and "listserves" are sent to a mailing list of subscribers. If you wish to privately reply to an individual who has posted a message in an online newsletter or listserve, be sure you address it specifically to that person's address, not to the newsletter address. Otherwise, you might find that your message has been sent to everyone on the mailing list.<br /><br />Subscriber directories. You should not assume that your service account information will be kept private. Most ISPs provide online member directories that publicly list all subscribers to the service. Some of these directories may list additional personal information. Most service providers will allow users to remove their information from these directories upon request. Be aware that some service providers may sell their membership lists to direct marketers. <br /><br />Domain registration. Many individuals obtain their own website name, called domain names, for example, www.XYZfamily.org. Domain registrations are public information. Anyone can look up the owner of a domain name online by using a service such as www.checkdomain.com or www.internic.net/whois.html. To see how easy it is to find out who owns a web address, use this service to check our domain name, privacyrights.org. Don’t use personal e-mail or home address information when you register for a personal domain name. Just be sure you can be reached when the service sends you the annual reminder to update the domain name. <br /><br />"Semi-Private" Activities<br /><br />The presence of security or access safeguards on forums or services can lead you to believe that communications made within these services are private. Some forums are restricted to users who have a password. While communications made in these forums may initially be read only by the members with access, there is nothing preventing those members from recording the communications and later transmitting them elsewhere.<br /><br />One example of this kind of activity is the real-time "chat" conference, in which participants type live messages directly to the computer screens of other participants. Often these activities are described as "private" by the service provider. However, chat room users may capture, store, and transmit these communications to others outside the chat service. Additionally, these activities are subject to the same monitoring exceptions that apply to "private" e-mail (see next section). For chat safety tips, visit the Cyber Angels web site at www.cyberangels.org/101/chat/<br /><br />"Private" Services<br /><br />Virtually all online services offer some sort of "private" activity that allows subscribers to send personal e-mail messages to others. The federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) makes it unlawful under certain circumstances for someone to read or disclose the contents of an electronic communication (18 USC § 2511). This law applies to e-mail messages.<br /><br />But, ECPA is a complicated law and contains many exceptions. It makes a distinction between messages in transit and those stored on computers. Stored messages are generally given less protection than those intercepted during transmission. Here are some exceptions to the ECPA:<br /><br />The online service may view private e-mail if it suspects the sender is attempting to damage the system or harm another user. However, random monitoring of e-mail is generally prohibited.<br />  <br />The service may legally view and disclose private e-mail if either the sender or the recipient of the message consents to the inspection or disclosure. Many ISPs require a consent agreement from new members when signing up for the service. <br />  <br />If the e-mail system is owned by an employer, the employer may inspect the contents of employee e-mail on the system. Therefore, any e-mail sent from a business location is probably not private. Several court cases have determined that employers have a right to monitor e-mail messages of their employees. (See PRC Fact Sheet 7 on employee monitoring, www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs7-work.htm.) <br />  <br />Services may be required to disclose private information in response to a court order or subpoena.<br />  <br />The USA PATRIOT Act, passed by Congress after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, reduces the checks and balances of ECPA regarding law enforcement access to records about online activity. And it expands the types of records that can be sought without a court order. For additional information about the USA PATRIOT Act, visit the web sites of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, www.eff.org, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, www.epic.org, the Center for Democracy and Technology, www.cdt.org, and the American Civil Liberties Union, www.aclu.org. <br />To summarize: Your e-mail message may be handled by several different online services during delivery. The administrator of each of these systems may view e-mail under the exceptions to the ECPA, explained above. Law enforcement can access your online records without your consent. Additionally, an e-mail message may be disclosed to the ISP if either the sender or recipient consents. <br /><br /><br />PART TWO: ONLINE TRACKING AND MONITORING<br /><br />Can online services track and record my activity?<br /><br />Yes. Many people expect that their online activities are anonymous. They are not. It is possible to record virtually all online activities, including which newsgroups or files a subscriber accesses and which web sites are visited. This information can be collected by a subscriber's own ISP and by web site operators. <br /><br />Cookies. When you "surf" the web, many web sites deposit data about your visit, called "cookies," on your hard drive When you return to that site, the cookie data will reveal that you’ve been there before. The web site might offer you products or ads tailored to your interests, based on the contents of the cookie data. <br /><br />Most cookies are used only by the web site that placed it on your computer. But some, called third-party cookies, communicate data about you to an advertising clearinghouse which in turn shares that data with other online marketers. Your web browser and some software products enable you to detect and delete cookies, including third-party cookies. (For additional information about cookie blocking, see Additional Resources at the end of this guide.)<br /><br />Web Bugs. A web bug is a graphic in a web site or an "enhanced" e-mail message that enables a third party to monitor who is reading the page or message. The graphic may be a standard size image that is easily seen, or it may be a nearly invisible one-pixel graphic. E-mail messages that include graphic displays like web sites are known as enhanced messages, also called stylized or HTML e-mail. The web bug can confirm when the message or web page is viewed and record the IP address of the viewer. The IP address is a multi-digit number that uniquely identifies a computer or other hardware device (such as a printer) attached to the Internet.<br /><br />You can defeat web-bugs by reading your email while offline, an option on most email programs. You can also install a software program that detects web bugs. To learn more about web bugs, visit www.bugnosis.org. This site offers a free bug detection program. Many software products that detect and delete third-party cookies are also able to detect web bugs. The latest version of Microsoft Internet Explorer enables users to turn off third-party cookies and disable web bugs.                            <br /><br />Marketing uses and "spam." Records of browsing patterns are a potentially valuable source of revenue for online services and commercial web site operators. Direct marketers can use such data to develop targeted lists of online users with similar likes and behaviors. Such data can also lead to unsolicited e-mail, known as "spam." Additionally, browsing data may prove embarrassing for users who have accessed sensitive or controversial materials online.<br /><br />Browsers. It’s important to be aware of the information transmitted to remote computers by the software you use to browse web sites. The major browsers are Netscape Navigator and Microsoft Internet Explorer. <br /><br />Most web browsers invisibly provide web site operators with information about your ISP as well as information about other web sites you have visited. Some web browsers, particularly if they have not been updated with security fixes, may be tricked into reporting the user’s default e-mail address, phone number, and other information in the "address book" if the browser also handles your e-mail. (See the demonstration in Additional Resources to learn more about the information transmitted by your browser.)<br /><br />Privacy policies and web seals. The Federal Trade Commission urges commercial web site operators to spell out their information collection practices in privacy policies posted on their web sites. Most commercial web sites now post policies about their information-collection practices. Look for a privacy "seal of approval," such as TRUSTe (www.truste.org), on the first page of the web site. TRUSTe participants agree to post their privacy policies and submit to audits of their privacy practices in order to display the logo.<br /><br />Other seals of approval are offered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus (BBB), www.bbbonline.org, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, WebTrust, www.cpawebtrust.org, and the Entertainment Software Rating Board, www.esrb.org/privacy.<br /><br /><br />Workplace monitoring. Individuals who access the Internet from work should know that employers are increasingly monitoring the Internet sites that an employee visits. Be sure to inquire about your employer's online privacy policy. If there is none, recommend that such a policy be developed. (See the PRC Fact Sheet 7 on employee monitoring, www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs7-work.htm, and Fact Sheet 12 on responsible information-handling practices, www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs12-ih2.htm.) <br /><br />Law enforcement access. In order for law enforcement officials to gain access to subscriber transactional records, they usually must obtain a court order demonstrating that the records are relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation (Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, 18 USC § 2703(d)). This provision prevents "fishing expeditions" by government officials, hoping to find evidence of crimes by accident. But, as described in Section One above, the USA PATRIOT Act, passed into law in November 2001 in the aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks, has weakened these provisions. <br /><br />Can an online services access information stored in my computer without my knowledge?<br /><br />Yes. Many of the commercial online services such as AOL automatically download graphics and program upgrades to the user's home computer. The subscriber is notified of these activities. But other intrusions are not so evident. News reports have documented that some services have admitted to both accidental and intentional prying into the memory of personal computers. Companies typically explain that they collect information such as users’ hardware, software and usage patterns to provide better customer service.<br /><br /><br />It is difficult to detect these types of intrusions. You should be aware of this potential privacy abuse and investigate new services thoroughly before signing on. Always read the privacy policy and the service agreement of any online service you intend to use. <br /><br />Can hackers get into my computer?<br /><br />An increasing number of users are accessing the Internet via high-speed cable modems and telephone-based DSL connections. When you are using a broadband "always-on" service, you are particularly vulnerable to attacks by hackers. We advise that you install a firewall device that monitors your network activity and allows only the activities you have authorized. You should also check with your provider’s website for instructions on securing your computer by removing unnecessary services and installing security updates to protect your computer. A free firewall software product is provided by Zonelabs, www.zonelabs.com. <br /><br />What is spyware and how can I know if it’s on my computer?<br /><br />Spyware is any software or hardware device that reports your activity. "Adware" spyware is installed by software companies as an additional source of income. "Monitoring" spyware was originally intended for parents and employers to monitor computer activity, including file access and keystroke logging, to protect against improper usage by children and employees. "Diagnostic" spyware is used by software companies to log errors and usage habits to improve the next generation of software. The user is usually not aware that spyware has been installed – hence, its name. The Additional Resources section at the end of this guide lists programs that locate and remove spyware.<br /><br />What about cybercafes, airports, and other publicly-available Internet terminals? <br /><br />We advise that you do not use public terminals to access your bank account, check your credit card statement, pay bills, or access any other personally or financially sensitive information. Publicly-available Internet terminals are not likely to be closely supervised to ensure online privacy and security. They are used by many individuals every day. Ask the company that operates the public terminal how often they check their computers for spyware. Find out if they have installed a program that clears Internet caches, deletes cookies, erases surfing history, and removes temporary files. If the program does not automatically activate when users logoff, find out how you can run the program before you end your session.<br /><br />PART THREE: TIPS FOR SAFEGUARDING YOUR PRIVACY ONLINE<br /><br />What can I do to protect my privacy in cyberspace?<br /><br />When you are sitting alone at your computer, "surfing the Net", sending electronic mail messages and participating in online forums, it's easy to be lulled into thinking that your activities are private. Be aware that at any step along the way, your online messages could be intercepted and your activities monitored in the vast untamed world of cyberspace.<br /><br />1. Your account is only as secure as its password. Create passwords with nonsensical combinations of upper and lower case letters, numbers and symbols, for example tY8%uX. Do not use the same or variations of the same password for different applications. One way to create a password that is easier to remember is to use the first or last letters in a favorite line of poetry. Intermingle these letters with numbers and punctuation marks. "Mary had a little lamb" becomes m*ha2ll or y!dae5b. <br /><br />Change your password often. Don't let others watch you log in. Don’t print your password on a post-it note and attach it to your video monitor. If you must write down or record your password, take steps to secure or disguise the information. <br /><br />2. Look for the privacy policy of the online services you use. Most Internet Service Providers (ISP) have adopted privacy policies that they post on their web sites and other user documentation. When you surf the web, look for the privacy policies posted on the web sites you visit. Also look for a privacy "seal" such as TRUSTe or BBBOnline. If you are not satisfied with the policy, or if there is no policy or seal logo posted, avoid using the site. <br /><br />3. Check your browser’s cookie settings. We’ve come a long way from the days when browsers hid their cookie activity and gave users no options. Now you may accept or reject all cookies, or you may allow only those cookies generated by the website you are visiting. Be aware that when you use cookie management options, you might delete cookies for websites you trust. You may want to set a security level for trusted websites while blocking cookie activity for all others.<br /><br />4. Shop around. Investigate new services before using them. Post a question about a new service in a dependable forum or newsgroup. Use a search engine such as <a href="http://groups.google.com" target="_blank">http://groups.google.com</a> to find archived discussions and newsgroup postings about the service that you are considering. Bad reputations get around quickly in cyberspace. If others have had negative experiences with a service, you should get the message.<br /><br />5. Assume that your online communications are not private unless you use encryption software. But most encryption programs are not user-friendly and can be inconvenient to use. If you do not use encryption, at least take the following precautions: Do not provide sensitive personal information (phone number, password, address, credit card number, Social Security number, your health information, date of birth, vacation dates, etc.) in chat rooms, forum postings, e-mail messages, or in your online biography.<br /><br />6. Be cautious of "start-up" software that registers you as a product user and makes an initial connection to the service for you. Typically, these programs require you to provide financial account data or other personal information, and then upload this information automatically to the service. These programs may be able to access records in your computer without your knowledge. Contact the service for alternative subscription methods. <br /><br />7. Note that public postings made on the Internet are often archived and saved for posterity. It is possible to search and discover the postings an individual has made to Usenet newsgroups and blogs (web logs). (See <a href="http://groups.google.com.)" target="_blank">http://groups.google.com.)</a> Ask yourself if you want an employer, family member, or a marketer to be able to link you to your public postings. Use a pseudonym and a nondescriptive e-mail address when you participate in public forums. Consider obtaining an e-mail address from one of the free web-based e-mail services such as www.hotmail.com or www.yahoo.com. Create a non-identifying e-mail address and use it when you participate in newsgroups and other public forums. <br /><br />8. The "delete" command does not make your e-mail messages disappear. They can still be retrieved from back-up systems. Software utility programs can retrieve deleted messages from your hard drive. If you are concerned about permanently deleting messages and other files on your program, you should use a file erasing program such as the freeware program at <a href="http://cleanup.stevengould.org" target="_blank">http://cleanup.stevengould.org</a> or the cleanup features of general utility software such as Norton's (http://www.symantec.com/sabu/ncs/) CleanSweep.<br /><br />9. Your online biography, if you create one, may be searched system-wide or remotely "fingered" by anyone. If for any reason you need to safeguard your identity, don't create an online "bio." Ask the system operator of your ISP to remove you from its online directory. <br /><br />10. If you publish information on a personal web page, note that marketers and others may collect your address, phone number, e-mail address and other information that you provide. If you are concerned about your personal privacy, be discreet in your personal web site.<br /><br />11. Be aware of the possible social dangers of being online: harassment, stalking, being "flamed" (emotional verbal attacks), or "spamming" (being sent unsolicited messages). Women can be vulnerable if their e-mail addresses are recognizable as women's names. Consider using gender-neutral e-mail addresses and pseudonyms.<br /><br />12. If your children are online users, teach them about appropriate online privacy behavior. Caution them against revealing information about themselves and your family. (See the Additional Resources section at the end for details.)<br /><br />13. Use only secure web sites when you transmit sensitive personal information over the Internet. When you provide your credit card account number to a shopping site, for example, be sure that the transmission is secure. Look for the unbroken padlock at the bottom right of the screen. Also make sure the web address has the letter ‘s’ after http in the address bar at the top of the page. For additional online shopping tips, read the PRC’s e-commerce guide at www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs23-shopping.htm <br /><br />14. Be aware that online activities leave electronic footprints for others to see. Your own ISP can determine what search engine terms you use, what web sites you visit, and the dates, times, and durations of your online sessions. Web site operators can often track the activities you engage in by placing "cookies" on your computer. They can learn additional information if they ask you to register on their site. Your web browser also can transmit information to web sites. <br /><br />You can avoid leaving tracks when you surf the web by using "anonymizing" services. Take advantage of privacy protection tools, often called privacy-enhancing technologies (PET). Discussed here are encryption, anonymous remailers, anonymous surfing services, and storage protection software. You can find Additional Resources at the end of this guide. <br /><br />Encryption. Encryption is a method of scrambling an e-mail message or file so that it is gibberish to anyone who does not know how to unscramble it. The privacy advantage of encryption is that anything encrypted is virtually inaccessible to anyone other than the designated recipient. Thus, private information may be encrypted and then transmitted, stored, or distributed without fear that it will be read by others. Strong encryption programs such as PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) are available online. <br /><br />Anonymous remailers. It is relatively easy to determine the name and e-mail address of anyone who sends e-mail or who posts messages on public forums. Anonymous remailers are intermediaries that receive e-mail, strip off all identifying information, then forward the mail to the appropriate address. <br /><br />Anonymous surfing services. By combining the functions of remailers, disposable email addresses, and proxy servers, these ISP services mask your identity by acting as an agent to transfer data between an Internet website and your browser.<br /><br />Storage security and protection software. Software security programs help prevent unauthorized access to files on your personal computer. For example, one program encrypts every directory with a different password so only the person who knows the password can open it. These programs may include an "audit trail" that records all activity on the computer's drives. Steganos Security Suite is an example, at www.steganos.com/en/sss/features.htm<br /><br /><br />PART FOUR: ADDITIONAL RESOURCES <br /><br />Several nonprofit public interest groups advocate on behalf of online users. They also provide extensive information about privacy issues on their web sites. <br /><br />Center for Democracy and Technology<br />1634 I St. N.W. #1100, Washington, DC 20006<br />Voice: 202-637-9800.<br />E-mail: info@cdt.org.<br />Web: www.cdt.org<br />  <br />Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility<br />P.O Box 717, Palo Alto, CA 94302<br />Voice: 415-322-3778<br />E-mail: cpsr@cpsr.org <br />Web: www.cpsr.org.<br />  <br />Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />454 Shotwell St., San Francisco, CA 94110<br />Voice: 415-436-9333<br />E-mail: eff@eff.org <br />Web: www.eff.org.<br />  <br />Electronic Privacy Information Center<br />1718 Connecticut Ave. N.W., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20009<br />Voice: 202-483-1140<br />E-mail: info@epic.org <br />Web: www.epic.org.<br /><br />PrivacyActivism<br />Voice: 415-225-1730<br />E-mail: info@privacyactivism.org <br />Web: www.privacyactivism.org<br />  <br />Privacy Foundation<br />University of Denver, Mary Reed Bldg.<br />2199 South University Blvd.<br />Denver, CO 80208<br />Voice: 303-871-4971<br />E-mail: info@privacyfoundation.org <br />Web: www.privacyfoundation.org<br />  <br />Privacy Rights Clearinghouse<br />3100 - 5th Ave., Suite B, San Diego, CA 92103<br />Voice: 619-298-3396<br />Contact Us: www.privacyrights.org/inquiryform.html<br />Web: www.privacyrights.org. <br />The Federal Trade Commission is the federal government’s primary agency for online privacy oversight. Its web site provides a great deal of information on public policy matters as well as consumer tips.<br /><br />Federal Trade Commission<br />600 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W.<br />Washington, DC 20580<br />Web: www.ftc.gov/privacy/index.html<br />Federal government consumer web site: www.consumer.gov <br />Several public interest groups have sponsored the online Computer Privacy Guide at www.consumerprivacyguide.org. This site offers extensive tips, a glossary of terms, and video tutorials with step-by-step instructions on how to take advantage of privacy settings for the programs you use online. <br /><br />Free online newsletters discuss a wide variety of cyberspace privacy issues: <br /><br />Computer Privacy Digest: CPD can be read as a Usenet newsgroup, comp.society.privacy. Or to receive CPD via e-mail, send a request to the newsletter's moderator at: comp-privacy-request@uwm.edu. Visit its web site, www.uwm.edu/Org/comp-privacy.<br />  <br />Privacy Forum: For subscription information, send an e-mail message to privacy-request@vortex.com. Put the words "subscribe privacy" in the body of the message. Visit its web site at www.vortex.com/privacy. <br />  <br />Several of the above-listed public interest groups offer free online newsletters with information about legislative issues, the latest news, publications, international topics, and more. You can subscribe to their newsletters at their web sites as follows: <br /> <br />Center for Democracy and Technology, www.cdt.org/publications <br />Electronic Frontier Foundation, www.eff.org/effector <br />Electronic Privacy Information Center, www.epic.org/alert/subscription.html <br />The following web sites contain additional information on online privacy:<br /><br />Anonymous remailers. For information about anonymous remailers, the following online resource is helpful: "Anonymous Remailers FAQ," compiled by Andre Bacard, www.andrebacard.com/remail.html.<br /><br />Anonymous surfing. Several commercial services offer anonymous web-surfing tools, including: www.anonymizer.com, www.freedom.net, and www.ultimate-anonymity.com. These services are reviewed at www.Webveil.com. <br /><br />Children. If your children are online users, request the free brochure, "Child Safety on the Information Highway," from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Phone: 800-843-5678. Web: www.safekids.com. <br /><br />Learn more about "parental control" software by visiting the web site "Resources for Internet Parents," www.netparents.org. <br /><br />The Federal Trade Commission offers extensive resources for children and parents. Visit www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/kidzprivacy/index.html. To learn more about the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, go to www.ftc.gov/privacy/index.html. See also PRC Fact Sheet 21, "Children in Cyberspace" at www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs21-children.htm. <br /><br />Cookies. To learn more about cookies blockers and other types of online filters, visit www.junkbusters.com, www.consumerprivacyguide.org, www.cookiecentral.com, and www.spamblocked.com/proxomitron. <br /><br /><br />Demonstration. To see a demonstration of the kind of information that can be captured about your computer via your browser when you surf the web, visit www.privacy.net/analyze. <br /><br />Encryption. To learn more about the commercial encryption program PGP, visit www.pgp.com. For PGP freeware information visit the MIT Distribution Center at <a href="http://web.mit.edu/network/pgp.html" target="_blank">http://web.mit.edu/network/pgp.html</a> and the International PGP Home Page at www.pgpi.org. <br /><br />Glossary. For a comprehensive dictionary of online terms, visit the Center for Democracy and Technology’s www.consumerprivacyguide.org/glossary. The Privacy Foundation web site also provides a glossary of terms, www.privacyfoundation.org/resources/glossary.asp. <br /><br />Internet Service Providers. For a directory of ISPs, see Boardwatch’s Directory of Internet Service Providers at www.boardwatch.com/ASP/Search/NationalISP.asp.<br /><br />Opting out. To opt-out of the sharing of cookie data with advertisers, visit the Network Advertising Initiative web site at www.networkadvertising.org. <br /><br />Privacy-enhancing technologies. The EPIC web site provides a section on software products that you can use to add extra layers of protection when you surf the web, www.epic.org/privacy/tools.html. Also, visit the Privacy Links page of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse for more software tools and products, www.privacyrights.org/links.htm. <br /><br />Search Engines. Search engines include: www.google.com, www.northernlight.com, www.dogpile.com, www.lycos.com and www.yahoo.com. They enable you to find a "needle in the haystack" by searching web sites using subject words, personal names, and organization names. To find public forum postings, visit Google to search a 20-year archive of Usenet postings, <a href="http://groups.google.com" target="_blank">http://groups.google.com</a>. The web site www.paml.net provides a search engine for many other mail discussion lists that are not necessarily considered public. Participants of such lists are not always aware that their postings are being archived. <br /><br />Spam. Find tips on how to reduce unsolicited e-mail messages at www.spamcop.net or www.stop-spam.org. The PRC’s Fact Sheet 20 provides a list of additional web sites that provide spam-fighting tips, www.privacyrights.org/fs/fs20-spam.htm. To learn about state spam laws, go to www.spamlaws.com. <br /><br />Spyware. The Ad-Aware product is a free spyware removal utility that scans your computer’s memory, registry, and hard drives for known spyware components and lets you remove them, www.lavasoftusa.com. Other spyware-fighting tools can be found at the PRC’s links page, www.privacyrights.org/links.htm#tools. <br /><br />Articles of Interest<br /><br />    Americans and Online Privacy:  The System is Broken -- June 2003<br />    www.appcpenn.org/reports/2003/turow-privacy-no-cover.pdf <br />Please note: We have provided the names and web addresses of several commercial and freeware products in this guide. Such mention does not imply endorsement. <br /> <br />Privacy Rights Clearinghouse]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:29:04 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=1567</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.17: EFF to Appeal Dismissal of Warrantless Spying Cases</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19913</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 17  June 5, 2009  editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 511th issue:<br /><br />* EFF IS PLANNING NEW LEGAL ACTION after dozens of spying<br />cases were dismissed Wednesday as a result of the<br />"telecom immunity" included in the FISA Amendments Act<br />passed by Congress in 2008. While EFF is deeply<br />disappointed by the dismissal of the cases against the<br />telecoms, EFF and the ACLU are planning to appeal. In<br />addition, the ruling leaves the door open for other legal<br />challenges to warrantless spying, meaning EFF will<br />continue litigating Jewel v. NSA -- EFF's lawsuit against<br />the government for illegal surveillance.<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/03" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/03</a><br /><br />* EFF HAS CREATED A TOOL to help you keep track of the<br />policies that determine how Internet businesses interact<br />with you and use your personal information. These terms<br />of service (TOS) agreements change all the time and have<br />tremendous influence on the freedoms you have while using<br />those services. TOSback tracks changes on some of the<br />most popular websites, with information about what<br />changed and when.<br /><br />For TOSBack:<br /><a href="http://www.TOSBack.org" target="_blank">http://www.TOSBack.org</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* Enter Stage Right: The "Cyber Czar"<br />President Obama made initial progress towards improving<br />federal cybersecurity while avoiding the pitfalls of some<br />recent legislation.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/enter-stage-right-cy" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/enter-stage-right-cy</a><br /><br />* Apple Rejects EFF Updates Application<br />A fleeting  curse word in a subtitle of a video embedded<br />in an EFF blog post led to the rejection of the iPhone<br />application.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/oh-come-apple-reject" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/oh-come-apple-reject</a><br /><br />* Taking Copyright Education Seriously<br />Significant shortcomings in the educational materials<br />produced by the film, music, and software industries led<br />EFF to want to provide an alternative.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/copyright-education" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/copyright-education</a><br /><br />* Why DRM on e-Books Will Fail<br />Conducting optical character recognition on e-books turns<br />out to be about as easy as scanning in text from paper<br />books.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/why-drm-will-fail-e-" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/06/why-drm-will-fail-e-</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Craigslist Censorship Causes Uptick for Newspapers<br />Newspapers are reporting significant gains in adult<br />classified ad sales after Craigslist was pressured into<br />taking boring ads offline.<br /><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/06/craigslists-forced-censorship-of-boring-ads-saves-journalism-industry/" target="_blank">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/06/c...alism-industry/</a><br /><br />~ Travel Documents Now Required to Exit U.S.<br />Federal regulations effective June 1, 2009, require<br />government-issued travel documents, frequently featuring<br />RFIDs, for exit from as well as entry to the U.S.<br /><a href="http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2009/06/01/today-were-all-prisoners-in-the-usa/" target="_blank">http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2009/06/01/...ers-in-the-usa/</a><br /><br />~ Cybersecurity Plans Could Threaten Anonymity<br />"Identity Management" plans suggested by Obama echo a long<br />history of efforts to curb flexibility of identity online.<br /><a href="http://www.alternet.org/media/140370/does_obama_want_to_replace_your_facebook_profile_with_your_social_security_card/" target="_blank">http://www.alternet.org/media/140370/does_..._security_card/</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* EFF at RoboGames in San Francisco<br /><br />See EFF next weekend at the 2009 International RoboGames at<br />Ft. Mason's Festival Pavilion, San Francisco! Stop by and<br />say hello!<br /><br />Booth Hours:<br />Friday, June 12: 12 PM - 6 PM<br />Saturday, June 13:  2 PM - 6 PM<br />Sunday, June 14: 12 PM - 6 PM<br /><br />For more information:<br /><a href="http://robogames.net" target="_blank">http://robogames.net</a><br /><br />* Help EFF Go to DEFCON!<br /><br />EFF is looking for donations of airline tickets and hotel<br />points for the DEFCON hacking conference, as well as other<br />conferences and speaking engagements. If you have enough<br />airline miles for a free ticket and would like to send an<br />EFF staffer to a conference, let us know, and we will help<br />you with the process of making the reservation. Please note<br />that at this time we are unable to combine miles from<br />multiple individuals.  We are also looking for hotel<br />rewards points to help reduce our overall travel costs.<br /><br />As a thanks for your donation, we can offer a free<br />membership and a mention in EFFector (if you'd like).<br />Please contact aaron@eff.org if you can help!<br /><br />* Nominate a Pioneer for EFF's 2009 Pioneer Awards!<br /><br />EFF established the Pioneer Awards to recognize leaders on<br />the electronic frontier who are extending freedom and<br />innovation in the realm of information technology. This is<br />your opportunity to nominate a deserving individual or<br />group to receive a Pioneer Award for 2009.  The<br />International Pioneer Awards nominations are open both to<br />individuals and organizations from any country.<br />Nominations are reviewed by a panel of judges chosen for<br />their knowledge of the technical, legal, and social issues<br />associated with information technology.<br /><br />How to Nominate Someone for a 2009 Pioneer Award:<br /><br />You may send as many nominations as you wish, but please<br />use one email per nomination. Please submit your entries<br />via email to pioneer@eff.org. We will accept nominations<br />until July 15, 2009.<br /><br />Simply tell us:<br /><br />1. The name of the nominee,<br /><br />2. The phone number, email address or website by which the<br />nominee can be reached, and, most importantly,<br /><br />3. Why you feel the nominee deserves the award.<br /><br />Nominee Criteria:<br /><br />There are no specific categories for the EFF Pioneer<br />Awards, but the following guidelines apply:<br /><br />1. The nominees must have contributed substantially to the<br />health, growth, accessibility, or freedom of computer-based<br />communications.<br /><br />2. To be valid, all nominations must contain your reason,<br />however brief, for nominating the individual or<br />organization and a means of contacting the nominee. In<br />addition, while anonymous nominations will be accepted,<br />ideally we'd like to contact the nominating parties in case<br />we need further information.<br /><br />3. The contribution may be technical, social, economic, or<br />cultural.<br /><br />4. Nominations may be of individuals, systems, or<br />organizations in the private or public sectors.<br /><br />5. Nominations are open to all (other than current members<br />of EFF's staff and operating board or this year's award<br />judges), and you may nominate more than one recipient. You<br />may also nominate yourself or your organization.<br /><br />6. Persons or representatives of organizations receiving an<br />EFF Pioneer Award will be invited to attend the ceremony at<br />EFF's expense.<br /><br />More on the EFF Pioneer Awards:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/</a><br /><br />* Intern Opportunity!<br /><br />EFF is looking for a summer intern to help in our<br />development and media departments. This is an unpaid,<br />full-time position.<br /><br />Projects will include:<br />-Working on our annual report and contacting major donors<br />and foundations (40% of time);<br />-Assisting with membership fulfillment and bulk mailing<br />(40% of time); and<br />-Identifying and organizing press clippings (20% of time).<br /><br />Excellent writing and editing skills, strong organizational<br />abilities, and the capacity to take instruction and run<br />with it is a must. Interest in development and/or public<br />relations as a career is a plus, as is knowledge and<br />familiarity with EFF's issues.<br /><br />To apply, please send a cover letter, resume, and writing<br />sample to: alyssa@eff.org<br /><br />* Volunteer at EFF!<br /><br />EFF is looking for volunteers to assist with operations in<br />our membership department. If you're quick, organized,<br />detail-oriented, and looking for a hands-on way to support<br />EFF, contact us today!<br /><br />Duties include:<br /><br />* Membership fulfillment<br />* Organizing premiums<br />* Print mailing<br />* support Event assistance<br /><br />Learn about fundraising operations in the nonprofit world<br />while supporting your favorite organization in a tangible<br />way! Interest in grassroots fundraising is a plus, as is<br />knowledge and familiarity with EFF's issues. Send a letter<br />of interest to aaron@eff.org<br /><br />* Open Video Conference in NYC<br /><br />The upcoming Open Video Conference, taking place June 19-20<br />in New York City, plans to tackle a range of issues<br />surrounding online video -- from codecs to content, to fair<br />use, and beyond. Recent developments like Hulu are pretty<br />good for the user -- but Internet video should be more than<br />just "TV on demand." Internet video has the potential to be<br />a far more dynamic medium that invites clipping, archival,<br />remix, collage, repurposing, and many other uses. Featured<br />speakers include: NYU's Clay Shirky, Harvard's Yochai<br />Benkler, Boing Boing's Xeni Jardin, DVD Jon, Free Press'<br />Josh Silver, EFF's Corynne McSherry, and many more.<br /><br />For the full agenda:<br /><a href="http://openvideoconference.org/agenda/" target="_blank">http://openvideoconference.org/agenda/</a><br /><br />To register for the Open Video Conference:<br /><a href="http://openvideoconference.org/registration/" target="_blank">http://openvideoconference.org/registration/</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /> <a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br /> sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br /> membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br /> <a href="http://secure.eff.org/donate" target="_blank">http://secure.eff.org/donate</a><br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br /> information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /> <a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a> <br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:41:02 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19913</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFF and ACLU Planning to Appeal Dismissal of Dozens of Spying Cases</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19905</link>
		<description><![CDATA[June 3rd, 2009<br />EFF and ACLU Planning to Appeal Dismissal of Dozens of Spying Cases<br />Judge Rules Telecoms Have Immunity Under Unconstitutional FISA Amendments Act<br /><br />San Francisco - A federal judge today dismissed dozens of lawsuits over illegal domestic surveillance of American citizens, ruling that telecommunications companies had immunity from liability under the controversial FISA Amendments Act (FISAAA). The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) California and Illinois affiliates are planning to appeal the decision to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that FISAAA is unconstitutional.<br /><br />"We're deeply disappointed in Judge Walker's ruling today," said EFF Legal Director Cindy Cohn. "The retroactive immunity law unconstitutionally takes away Americans' claims arising out of the First and Fourth Amendments, violates the federal government's separation of powers as established in the Constitution, and robs innocent telecom customers of their rights without due process of law."<br /><br />Signed by President Bush in 2008, the FISAAA allowed for the dismissal of the lawsuits over the telecoms' participation in the warrantless surveillance program if the government secretly certifies to the court that the surveillance did not occur, was legal, or was authorized by the president. Then-Attorney General Michael Mukasey filed that classified certification with the court in September and demanded that the cases be dismissed.<br /><br />"The immunity legislation that the court upheld today gives the telephone companies a free pass for flouting the law and violating the privacy rights of millions of their customers," said Ann Brick, ACLU of Northern California staff attorney.<br /><br />In today's ruling, Judge Walker left the door open to accountability for the government, holding that "plaintiffs retain a means of redressing the harms alleged in their complaints by proceeding against governmental actors and entities who are, after all, the primary actors in the alleged wiretapping activities." EFF is also suing the government for the illegal surveillance in a separate case, Jewel v. NSA.<br /><br />EFF and the ACLU are co-coordinating counsel for all 46 outstanding lawsuits concerning the government's warrantless surveillance program. Additionally, EFF is representing the plaintiffs in Hepting v. AT&T, a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of millions of AT&T customers whose private domestic communications and communications records were illegally handed over to the National Security Agency.<br /><br />"By passing the retroactive immunity for the telecoms' complicity in the warrantless wiretapping program, Congress abdicated its duty to the American people," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kurt Opsahl. "Now it is up to the Court of Appeals to stand up for the Constitution, and reverse today's decision."<br /><br />For the full order from Judge Walker:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/att/orderhepting6309_0.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/att/orderhepting6309_0.pdf</a><br /><br />Contacts:<br /><br />Rebecca Jeschke<br />Media Relations Director<br />Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />press@eff.org<br /><br />Rebecca Farmer<br />Media Relations Director<br />ACLU of Northern California<br />rfarmer@aclunc.org<br /><br /><br />link:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/03" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/06/03</a><br /><br /><br />related information below<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/att/orderhepting6309_0.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/att/orderhepting6309_0.pdf</a><br /><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 05:18:36 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19905</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.11, 3 June 2009</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19901</link>
		<description><![CDATA[============================================================<br /><br />            EDRi-gram<br /><br /> biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe<br /><br />     Number 7.11, 3 June 2009<br /><br /><br />============================================================<br />Contents<br />============================================================<br /><br />1. The French Government wants to spy on electronic communications<br />2. Pressure of the record companies on The Pirate Bay<br />3. Open source supporters criticize European govts for favouring MS<br />4. DRI against the Irish law on the interception of communications<br />5. French Government hurries to put HADOPI law into application<br />6. WIPO: Visually impaired treaty proposal<br />7. EU will examine Google Books project<br />8. Deutsche Telecom investigating the sexual life of job applicants<br />9. Recommended Action<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />11. Agenda<br />12. About<br /><br />============================================================<br />1. The French Government wants to spy on electronic communications<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 27 May 2009, the law on orientation and programming for the performance<br />of the domestic security (Loppsi) was presented by Michèle Alliot-Marie to<br />the French Council of Ministers.<br /><br />The law will give the French police the possibility to physically or<br />remotely install spying software to listen to electronic communications and<br />introduces the Internet filtering by administrative decision.<br /><br />According to the text, the Criminal Investigation Police will be allowed to<br />place on a suspect's computer a sort of internal or external USB key which<br />will send data to the computers of the authorities. The police may also<br />remotely install Trojans which will give access to all the data in a<br />computer in real time.<br /><br />The police will be allowed to make use of these tools only in "the most<br />severe cases" which however include "support given to the illegal entry and<br />residence of a foreigner". Under the control of an examining magistrate<br />(juge d'instruction), the investigating authority will have to justify the<br />use of the technique by declaring the infringement investigated, the place<br />where the investigation will take place and its duration. The spyware can be<br />installed for a four-month period that can be renewed once.<br /><br />The examining magistrate's control would be a positive thing as the<br />examining magistrates are independent from the Ministry of Justice and are<br />free to take decisions, in terms of the gravity of the investigation.<br />However, if the justice reform project of the French Government comes into<br />being, the examining magistrates will disappear which means that the<br />responsibility to authorize spyware will come to the prosecutor of the<br />Republic.<br /><br />The law also obliges ISPs to block access, "without delay", to sites<br />included on a list drafted under the authority of the Ministry of Internal<br />Affairs. The list will not be made public and therefore it will be<br />impossible to contest and this will create the risk of abuses.<br /><br />In order to prevent contestations, for the beginning, the law will target<br />the paedophilic contents with the declared purpose to "protect the Internet<br />users from child pornography images". The operators will have to introduce<br />in their network software that will stop any connection to sites having a<br />pedophile character that will be listed by the police. The French Government<br />will always be able to extend the target by a simple decree.<br /><br />The text also stipulates severe sanctions for the ISPs that do not observe<br />the law providing  a fine up to 75 000 euro and a year of imprisonment.<br /><br />Loppsi : the sneaks under the authority of an endangered judge (only in<br />French, 25.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12976-Loppsi-les-mouchards-sous-l-autorite-d-un-juge-en-voie-de-disparition.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12976-Lop...isparition.html</a><br /><br />Loppsi wants to "protect the Internet users" by filtering (only in<br />French, 27.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13010-La-Loppsi-veut-proteger-les-internautes-avec-le-filtrage.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13010-La-...e-filtrage.html</a><br /><br />The police will be able to pirate the computers of the yobs (only in French,<br />25.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2009/05/24/01016-20090524ARTFIG00098-la-police-va-pouvoir-pirater-les-ordinateurs-des-voyous-.php" target="_blank">http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/20...des-voyous-.php</a><br /><br />Loppsi: ISPs will have to "block access without delay" (MAJ) (only in<br />French, 27.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13004-Loppsi-les-FAI-devront-empecher-l-acces-sans-delai-MAJ.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13004-Lop...-delai-MAJ.html</a><br /><br />Loppsi presented this Wednesday in the Council of Ministers (MAJ) (only in<br />French, 27.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13002-La-Loppsi-presentee-ce-mercredi-en-conseil-des-ministres.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13002-La-...-ministres.html</a><br /><br />Draft law on the orientation and programming for the performance of the<br />domestic security<br /><a href="http://static.pcinpact.com/pdf/Loppsi_projet_loi.pdf" target="_blank">http://static.pcinpact.com/pdf/Loppsi_projet_loi.pdf</a><br /><br />Decrypting: Sarkozy and his work of controlling the Internet (only in<br />French, 20.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12948-Decryptage-Sarkozy-et-son-oeuvre-de-controle-du-net.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12948-Dec...ole-du-net.html</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />2. Pressure of the record companies on The Pirate Bay<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Swedish court has denied the request of four major record companies to<br />fine The Pirate Bay (TPB) for being still operational.<br /><br />At the middle of May 2009, Universal, EMI, Sony and Warner asked the Swedish<br />District Court to apply penalties to the operators of TPB for every day they<br />continue to operate the site. The plaintiffs claimed TPB was an "infringing<br />service" as they had been able to download through it 467 music albums to<br />which they owned the copyright. They also asked that the four operators of<br />TPB take measures so that the works for which they own the copyright could<br />not be downloaded by Internet users via the site.<br /><br />Moreover, the recording companies seem to have asked the ISP "Black<br />Internet" to stop providing services to TPB. Additionally, they asked the<br />court to apply the penalties even before the District Court ruled on it and<br />without hearing the four defendants.<br /><br />On 25 May 2009, the District Court denied the demands stating they wanted to<br />hear the defendants first and gave the Pirate Bay operators a few weeks to<br />state their position in the matter. The record companies were also given a<br />week to decide whether they wanted to appeal the decision to the Court of<br />Appeal.<br /><br />"I don't think these are circumstances where the case must be tried<br />immediately. Usually you get to make your statement before a demand like<br />this is granted" said judge Caroline Hindmarsh who reviewed the demands and<br />made the decision.<br /><br />IT security expert André Rickardsson said to DN.se that the demand of the<br />record companies was surprising. "Swedish law applies in Sweden and their<br />Internet service isn't even in Sweden. I don't understand why the district<br />court has anything to do with this. The Pirate Bay operates in countries<br />where the activity is permitted," said the expert.<br /><br />Peter Sunde, one of the defendants, has stated that the record companies<br />have never asked TPB to remove any of the torrents the plaintiffs refer to<br />in their request to the District Court and accused the record companies of<br />being more interested in money and power than in the artists they should<br />represent.<br /><br />In the meantime, TPB is searching for unbiased judges after they filed,<br />along with the appeal to the High Court of Justice, accusations against<br />Judge Tomas Norström for conflict of interest due to its membership with<br />associations such as the Swedish Copyright Association.<br /><br />Judge Ulrika Ihrfeldt was appointed to investigate the conflict of interest<br />but, soon after that, the judge also revealed having been a member of the<br />Swedish Copyright Association and was removed from the case. The next judge<br />appointed to lead the investigation, Anders Eka, appears to be connected to<br />the Stockholm Center for Commercial Law, where lawyers Monique Wadsted and<br />Peter Danowsky representing the record companies in TPB trial also are<br />involved.<br /><br />Although Eka said he had no personal relationships with the plaintiffs'<br />lawyers and that he had no background in copyright law, he acknowledged<br />however he might be suspected for potential bias.<br /><br />Court President Fredrik Wersäll Wersäll stated that the investigation of<br />Norström's potential conflict of interest would be finished in a few weeks.<br />If Norström is found biased, the case will be sent back to the District<br />Court. In case the judge is cleared of the accusation, the High Court of<br />Justice will deal with the main appeal of the verdict and decide on<br />whether to hold a new trial.<br /><br />Pirate Bay Money Squeeze Rejected by Court (25.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-money-squeeze-rejected-by-court-090525/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-money-s...y-court-090525/</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay: In search of an unbiased judge (23.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10248264-38.html?tag=mncol;title" target="_blank">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10248264...tag=mncol;title</a><br /><br />Record Labels Increase Legal Pressure on Pirate Bay (19.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/record-labels-increase-legal-pressure-on-pirate-bay-090519/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/record-labels-incr...ate-bay-090519/</a><br /><br />Court rejects lawyers' call to gag Pirates (25.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/19656/20090525/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/19656/20090525/</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: The Pirate Bay asks for retrial claiming conflict of interest<br />(6.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.9/pirate-bay-mistrial" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.9/pirate-bay-mistrial</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />3. Open source supporters criticize European govts for favouring MS<br />============================================================<br /><br />Recent governmental plans in several European countries to buy proprietary<br />software for public administration or education have caused concerns over<br />the methods used and the lack of public discussion over the decisions.<br /><br />18 open source companies (including Red Hat) have challenged successfully in<br />the Federal court a three-year contract between the Swiss Federal Bureau for<br />Building and Logistics (BBL) and Microsoft for the provisions of Windows<br />desktops and applications, including support and maintenance. The total<br />value of the contract was estimated at about 27.8 million euro.<br /><br />The preliminary ruling of the Federal court from 28 May 2009 was based on<br />the fact that the BBL disregarded the procurement rules and did not issue a<br />call for tender. A future final positive decision of the court could mean<br />that the contract will be canceled and a public auction call needs to be<br />made.<br /><br />Just a few days before the court decision, another similar case was raised<br />by the Swiss open source advocacy group ch/open. They have presented the<br />situation in the Bern canton, where a 18 million euro contract was<br />attributed directly for Microsoft software licences, without a public<br />auction.<br /><br />Ch/open criticized the lack of transparency of the deal and explained the<br />current action: "Without any public process, contracts are awarded to a<br />proprietary software vendor. This makes public administration increasingly<br />dependent on Microsoft, giving it again no other option in eight years<br />time."<br /><br />This deal will be debated in the canton's Parliament by the parliamentary<br />group on digital sustainability that has the main scope to increase the use<br />of open source by Swiss public bodies.<br /><br />Another government-related project that created rumors was the Spain<br />government decision to install Microsoft software on the 420 000 laptops for<br />students. After the Spanish Socialist Party supported the idea that laptops<br />should be equipped with Open Source software, the Microsoft's chaiman Bill<br />Gates and Spain's Prime Minister José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero met on 26 May<br />2009 to decide on the new software for this project.<br /><br />The project was criticized even earlier this year by open source<br />organisations such as Hispalinux that pointed out that there was no public<br />tender on this topic.<br /><br />Similarly, in a different corner of Europe, the Romanian Government has<br />announced that it has mandated the Ministry of Communications to buy<br />Microsoft licences of 100 million euros for the Ministries and<br />Governmental Agencies in the period 2009-2012. Although the government<br />press release talks about obtaining these licences through a possible<br />auction, there is a clear-cut signal on who will be the winner.<br /><br />"The Romanian Government seems out of touch with reality" has been the harsh<br />comment by Lucian Savluc, the organizer of the third national open source<br />conference eLiberatica that took place in Bucharest in the second part of<br />May 2009.<br /><br />Georg Greve, the president of Free Software Foundation Europe and a speaker<br />at the same event, commented on the situation:<br />"Microsoft's deals in new EU member states have raised concerns over<br />corruption before, e.g. in Bulgaria. But while Microsoft seems to raise such<br />questions more often than others, it should be noted that the problem of<br />illegal procurement is larger and not limited to Microsoft. Nor is the<br />problem limited to the new EU member states, as the recent irregularities<br />and resulting antitrust complaint filed in Switzerland demonstrate. (...)<br />It seems ironic that the European Commission has to fine Microsoft<br />repeatedly over sustained monopoly abuse, then transfers part of that money<br />to Romania, which enjoyed the highest level of financial support ever<br />granted to a candidate country in the history of the European Union, and the<br />Romanian government then decides to return part of that money to Microsoft<br />with close to no tangible benefit for Romania."<br /><br />CH: Court scraps federal no-bid software licence deal  (28.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.osor.eu/news/ch-court-scraps-federal-no-bid-software-licence-deal" target="_blank">http://www.osor.eu/news/ch-court-scraps-fe...re-licence-deal</a><br /><br />CH: Protests over no-bid software contract in Bern  (28.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.osor.eu/news/ch-protests-over-no-bid-software-contract-in-bern" target="_blank">http://www.osor.eu/news/ch-protests-over-n...ontract-in-bern</a><br /><br />Bill Gates, pleased with the announcement of Zapatero of giving laptops to<br />students (only in Spanish, 26.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/470593/0/zapatero/gates/reunion/" target="_blank">http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/470593/0/z.../gates/reunion/</a><br /><br />Hispalinux censorship financial costs and technological dependence of the<br />"solution" for Microsoft Education (only in Spanish, 27.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.hispalinux.es/minipc-primaria" target="_blank">http://www.hispalinux.es/minipc-primaria</a><br /><br />ES: Gates and Zapatero weigh in on debate over school laptops (29.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.osor.eu/news/es-gates-and-zapatero-weigh-in-on-debate-over-school-laptops" target="_blank">http://www.osor.eu/news/es-gates-and-zapat...-school-laptops</a><br /><br />My official position - The Romanian government is about to spend millions of<br />euro on proprietary software. (27.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.cianblog.com/2009/05/27/my-official-position-the-romanian-government-is-about-to-spend-millions-of-euro-on-proprietary-software/" target="_blank">http://www.cianblog.com/2009/05/27/my-offi...etary-software/</a><br /><br />Minister of Communications - mandated to pay 100 million euro for Microsoft<br />licences (only in Romanian, 1.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.mediafax.ro/economic/ministerul-comunicatiilor-mandatat-sa-achite-100-milioane-euro-pentru-licente-microsoft.html" target="_blank">http://www.mediafax.ro/economic/ministerul...-microsoft.html</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />4. DRI against the Irish law on the interception of communications<br />============================================================<br /><br />Digital Rights Ireland has lodged a formal complaint with the European<br />Commission against Ireland over the Irish law on the interception of<br />communications.<br /><br />The Irish law, which is governed by the Interception of Postal Packets and<br />Telecommunications Messages (Regulation) Act 1993, applies only<br />to telecommunications providers who operate under a licence or general<br />authorisation. Consequently, the vast majority of internet communication<br />services (such as VOIP providers, webmail and instant messaging services)<br />are not covered, so the interception of communications on those services is<br />unregulated.<br /><br />This is in breach of Art. 5 of the e-Privacy Directive (Directive<br />2002/58/EC) which requires member states to "prohibit listening,<br />tapping, storage or other kinds of interception or surveillance of<br />communications and the related traffic data by persons other than users,<br />without the consent of the users concerned, except when legally authorised<br />to do so (by) legislative measures (which are) necessary, appropriate and<br />proportionate within a democratic society".<br /><br />Complaint to European Commission over Irish Interception Laws (28.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/05/28/complaint-to-european-commission-over-irish-interception-laws/" target="_blank">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/05/28/com...erception-laws/</a><br /><br />(contribution by EDRi-member Digital Rights Ireland DRI)<br /><br />============================================================<br />5. French Government hurries to put HADOPI law into application<br />============================================================<br /><br />No sooner has the three strikes law been adopted that the French government<br />issued CCAPs (special administrative specifications) and CCTPs (special<br />technical specifications) which were sent by the Ministry of Culture to the<br />candidate enterprises to put into function the information system of HADOPI.<br /><br />The call for tenders was sent since the beginning of the year even before<br />the Hadopi law was adopted, the notification date having been set for 5 June<br />2009 with a deadline on 1 July 2009 for a first prototype of the graduate<br />response system. A draft calendar foresees the application of the Hadopi law<br />in stages starting with 5 June 2009 until 31 March 2010.<br /><br />In the beginning, Hadopi will send only written recommendations by e-mail at<br />a rate of about 100 infringing cases per day after which, when the treatment<br />is completely automatic probably in September 2009, the number of cases will<br />increase to 1000 per day reaching 10 000 when the prototype is finalised in<br />2010.<br /><br />A calendar of actions is left however at the choice of the candidates, the<br />CCTP mentioning that "the offers will be assessed in terms of the closeness<br />of the proposed calendar as compared to the target calendar". The ministry<br />is not concerned with costs or means but only with speed. The candidates<br />will have a rather difficult task as the beta-test will last only two weeks<br />before the first warnings and the blocking bugs will have to be corrected in<br />one day, otherwise they will face sanctions. There is also the result<br />obligation, the operator taking the responsibility in case of problems and<br />having to compensate Hadopi in case of delays or malfunctions.<br /><br />There is no provision for the moment that Hadopi makes sure, before issuing<br />a warning or a sanction, that illegal downloading has effectively taken<br />place from the IP address of a suspected Internet subscriber. It appears<br />that between the IP address collection phase and the warning or sanction<br />phase there will be a "notarisation and sampling" phase.<br /><br />The notarisation phase means the "qualification of the data and the<br />recording of essential elements of the transaction from a trustworthy third<br />party" meaning the recording of all the elements proving the downloading or<br />rather making copyrighted material available. "The content, origin,<br />receiving date, the sender's identification key and the destination of the<br />file are essential elements" says the CCTP.<br /><br />Sampling means Hadopi would retain only some of the complaints received in<br />order to deal mostly with those of higher interest. An algorithmic system<br />will allow targeting potential recidivists as a priority.<br /><br />Hadopi does not take into account the presumption of innocence and only<br />needs to be certain of the reliability of the IP address lists on the basis<br />of which it would give warnings and sanctions. Hence the provision of<br />attaching a "chunk" of the file to every submission of a case in court which<br />would be a material proof of the infringing. However, such a provision<br />raises practical and economical problems.<br /><br />The CCAP and CCTP do not precise either the criteria based on which Hadopi<br />will decide on recidivism in order to send another e-mail, registered letter<br />or give sanctions. It is only mentioned that a "study of the reiterations<br />is carried out so as to bring out the following elements for each<br />subscriber: infringement stage (1st, 2nd, 3rd.); type of actions taken or<br />sanctions given by the High Authority: time interval between each<br />infringement; and type of works concerned".<br /><br />There are also very little details as to what are the means of appeal for<br />the sanctioned Internet users. It is provided that an appeal can be made by<br />means of an electronic form or by mail and that the appeal may lead to<br />informing the ISP of the obligation to re-establish a suspended<br />subscription. On the other hand, no observations can be brought by a<br />subscriber before the sanction stage.<br /><br />For the time being, Hadopi continues to be criticised and contested. On 15<br />June, a concert evening against the graduate response will take place with<br />several groups of artists supported by Numerama, co-organised by Réseau des<br />Pirates and Owni.fr, in partnership with Vendredi Hebdo and International<br />and supported also by Slate, Agoravox, LePost, Ivox, 22mars, Social Média<br />Club, j'affiche and ZikNation.<br /><br />The evening will include the projection on films dealing with Hadopi, the<br />new models to remunerate artists, the protection of numerical freedoms, a<br />debate on the topics as well as music moments.<br /><br />"The problem with HADOPI is triple: it does not bring more money to artists,<br />it touches the fundamental rights and finally it opens a breach into net<br />neutrality allowing private interests to get hold of a judge in order to<br />oblige an access provider to censure part of the net. This law stigmatises<br />the Net which is however an incredible chance for the music to get renewed.<br />(...) A new model must be invented and the technological evolution must be<br />accompanied rather than rowing against it. This is what the public politics<br />serve for, not to protect an industry where 5 multinationals make a trust of<br />the entire market and refuse in a single voice to accept the challenge," was<br />the statement of Flowers From The Man Who Shot Your Cousin / Waterhouse<br />Records that will participate in the event.<br /><br />Exclusive: Hadopi will target as a priority the potential recidivists!<br />(only in French, 20.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12960-Exclusif-l-Hadopi-ciblera-en-priorite-les-recidivistes-potentiels.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12960-Exc...potentiels.html</a><br /><br />Exclusive: Hadopi will not collect material evidence... for the moment<br />(only in French, 27.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13006-Exclusif-l-Hadopi-ne-collectera-pas-de-preuve-materielle-pour-l-instant.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13006-Exc...-l-instant.html</a><br /><br />Concert-Evening "Hadopi has killed me" Monday 15 June in Paris (only in<br />French, 26.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12998-Soiree-Concert-Hadopi-m-a-Tuer-le-lundi-15-juin-a-Paris.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12998-Soi...in-a-Paris.html</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />6. WIPO: Visually impaired treaty proposal<br />============================================================<br /><br />The WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR) met from<br />25 to 29 May in Geneva. This time, the main points on the agenda were the<br />survey on limitations and exceptions and the visually impaired treaty<br />proposal introduced by Brazil Ecuador and Paraguay (BEP proposal).<br /><br />As usual, the committee also briefly dealt with the situation pertaining<br />broadcaster's rights and audiovisual protection but since the national<br />positions are not moving, no real progress was made.<br /><br />The most interesting part of the meeting was the discussion about the<br />BEP proposal. The treaty was strongly supported by the South American<br />countries and it was also seen in a favourable light by most of the African<br />representatives (which would like to see even wider support for access to<br />information, though) and Asian delegates.<br /><br />However, group B and the European Union did their best to derail the process<br />of getting the treaty under serious consideration. The given reasons for<br />this were rather perplexing e.g. "the matter is so complex" (unlike the<br />broadcast treaty?) and "there's need for more fact-finding" (there's lot of<br />published research by both WIPO and WBU). In reality, the civil servants<br />from Germany, France etc. want to oppose categorically any instrument which<br />would give rights to the users. However, since it is not politically<br />possible to oppose helping visually impaired persons such poor excuses are<br />needed.<br /><br />EDRi also stressed in its intervention the fact that EU is ready to use a<br />"hard law" approach to help elder stage musicians so it would be very<br />unsincere to oppose the same approach for blind persons.<br /><br />WIPO Limitations & Exceptions Treaty Advances; Audiovisual Treaty Gets New<br />Life (30.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/05/30/wipo-limitations-audiovisual-treaty-gets-new-life/" target="_blank">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/05/30/...-gets-new-life/</a><br /><br />SCCR to Expedite Work in Favor of Reading Impaired (2.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2009/article_0012.html" target="_blank">http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/...ticle_0012.html</a><br /><br />(Contribution by Ville Oksanen, EDRI-member EFFI)<br /><br />============================================================<br />7. EU will examine Google Books project<br />============================================================<br /><br />The German delegation submitted at the European Council meeting held in<br />Brussels on 28 and 29 May 2009, an information note asking EU to take action<br />against Google's online library project, Google Books, a project targeting<br />the scanning of entire book collections of major libraries.<br /><br />"This move has an impact on cultural and media policy that we need to put on<br />a European level," said Culture Minister Bernd Neumann.<br /><br />There is already a dispute between Google and US authors and publishers as<br />the publishing industry is concerned by the fact that scanning books without<br />authors' permission is a violation of copyright laws.<br /><br />Germany's information note argues that many of the rights holders having<br />works that are scanned by Google are in the EU and that European copyright<br />law differs from the US one. The German delegation considers that Google is<br />using the excuse of a fair use exception to face copyright claims, an<br />exemption which doesn't exist in EU member states.<br /><br />The main concern is related to the necessity of obtaining consent given by<br />authors before scanning their works. "Google's actions are irreconcilable<br />with the principles of European copyright law, according to which the<br />consent of the author must be obtained before his or her works may be<br />reproduced or made publicly available on the Internet" says the note.<br /><br />Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier has shown concerns regarding<br />competitivity issues: "Through digitalising millions of books without right<br />holders' permission, Google has already gained a competitive advantage<br />against similar projects like Europeana and libreka.de - who unlike<br />Google respect European copyright laws."<br /><br />The EU has immediately confirmed the launching of a formal inquiry which<br />will apparently focus on copyright matters and will look into the settlement<br />Google has with publishers and authors.<br /><br />After Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers filed a law<br />suit against Google in 2004 arguing the giant was violating copyright by<br />displaying excerpts of books without the permission of the copyright<br />holders, a settlement reached in October 2008 raised criticism and is now<br />investigated by the US Justice Department on anti-trust grounds.<br /><br />The settlement would let Google sell to other libraries access to its online<br />books and subscriptions to its entire library and the revenues would go to<br />Google, publishers and authors. The settlement gives authors until early<br />January to adhere to it and hence receive money for having their books<br />scanned or to opt out of the system by September 2009.<br /><br />Anne Bergman-Tahon, director of the FEP believes that "millions of works<br />will never be claimed because these 300 pages of settlement are so<br />complicated." Therefore, critics argue that when copyright holders do not<br />come forward, Google alone will have the rights to "orphan books" which,<br />according to a recent article in the Wall Street Journal newspaper are<br />estimated at 50 to 70 percent of books published after 1923. Google will<br />hold monopoly under the circumstances and will be in the position to charge<br />as much as it wants for access to books.<br /><br />On the other hand, Google stated that by its project it was giving an<br />eternal digital life to millions of books which are now out of print and<br />that it was "happy to engage in any constructive dialogue about the future<br />of books and copyright."<br /><br />EU may flex regulatory muscles against Google book deal (1.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/eu-may-flex-regulatory-muscles-against-google-book-deal.ars" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/20...e-book-deal.ars</a><br /><br />Germany wants EU to fight Google Books project (2.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20090602-19649.html" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20090602-19649.html</a><br /><br />Council calls on Commission to examine Google Books project (2.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://euroalert.net/en/news.aspx?idn=8811" target="_blank">http://euroalert.net/en/news.aspx?idn=8811</a><br /><br />EU states concerned over Google library plans (27.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://euobserver.com/19/28193" target="_blank">http://euobserver.com/19/28193</a><br /><br />EU confirms Google investigation (31.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/news/86904-page.htm" target="_blank">http://www.thebookseller.com/news/86904-page.htm</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />8. Deutsche Telecom investigating the sexual life of job applicants<br />============================================================<br /><br />According to German newspaper Handelsblatt, Deutsche Telecom was keeping<br />records about personal details of job applicants, including details about<br />their sexual life. Similar records on potential employees were also kept in<br />Macedonia, Croatia, Slovenia and Hungary.<br /><br />An anonymous security consultant who used to work for Deutsche Telecom<br />stated for the German newspaper that this was actually a common practice of<br />the company.<br /><br />According to Handelsblatt, the German Telecom hired private detectives from<br />Germany who were collecting data about potential employees by eavesdropping<br />phone conversations, investigating their bank accounts and intimate, sexual<br />life, explaining that this way they could know who they were dealing with.<br /><br />This was revealed soon after Deutsche Telecom confirmed the information that<br />it was spying on the directors in its companies and on journalists, in order<br />to determine where the information was leaking from.<br /><br />The company announced that it did not order regular reports on the<br />private life of the potential employees. The people from Macedonian<br />Telecommunications say that this was not, is not and will not be a practice<br />of their company.<br /><br />"These allegations are absolutely wrong, unserious and unsubstantiated.<br />Such practice is prohibited by the Law on personal data protection.<br />Everybody knows what information should be submitted by the applicant; first<br />and last name, address, education, previous work experience, recommendations<br />and a motivation letter" claim the representatives of T-Mobile and T-Home,<br />companies owned by Deutsche Telecom.<br /><br />"All of the employment applications can be found on the company's<br />website" say the representatives from Macedonian Telecom.<br /><br />The representatives of the Croatian T-Com stated that they did not<br />know anything about the spying, and if the investigation proves that this<br />really happened, the responsible persons will have to bear the consequences.<br /><br />According to the reports to which the newspaper had access, a woman<br />that was applying for a job in the Croatian telecom - a branch of DT, is<br />described as an experienced sexual partner with a rich imagination. The<br />partners of the candidate allegedly said that she was a "female predator"<br />with a big sexual urge and that she prefered older men. In another report,<br />which was allegedly prepared by the German counterintelligence service BND,<br />a candidate is described as an alcoholic, and another one as a corrupted old<br />man.<br /><br />Deutsche Telecom claims it did not order reports with personal data of<br />the candidates.<br /><br />"Deutsche Telecom is not analyzing the private life of the applicants.<br />DT doesn't need any information about the private life of the candidates"<br />stated Philip Blank, the company's spokesman.<br /><br />According to AFP, this is one of the several scandals that broke out<br />in Deutsche Telecom and the company also admitted to have spied on<br />journalists and members of the supervisory board in order to find the source<br />of the media. DT also admitted that in 2006 it was checking the bank<br />accounts of more than 100 000 workers to determine whether any of them were<br />involved in corruption.<br /><br />Deutsche Telecom investigating the sexual life of job applicants<br />(26.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/en/news/world/1498-dojce-telekom-go-proveruval-seksualniot-zivot-na-kandidatite-za-rabota" target="_blank">http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/en/news/wo...atite-za-rabota</a><br /><br />(contribution by Kire Dimik - EDRi-member Metamorphosis - Macedonia)<br /><br />============================================================<br />9. Recommended Action<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 26 May 2009 the European Commission opened a consultation on the<br />conclusions of the online commerce roundtable on the online distribution of<br />music. The consultation will close on 30 June 2009.<br /><a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/832&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en" target="_blank">http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction...;guiLanguage=en</a><br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultations/2009_online_commerce/roundtable_report_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultati...e_report_en.pdf</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />Ethnic Profiling in the European Union: Pervasive, Ineffective, and<br />Discriminatory (26.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.soros.org/initiatives/osji/articles_publications/publications/profiling_20090526" target="_blank">http://www.soros.org/initiatives/osji/arti...filing_20090526</a><br /><br />Constitutional complaint against Hadopi (only in French, 19.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.lesechos.fr/medias/2009/0519//300350517.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.lesechos.fr/medias/2009/0519//300350517.pdf</a><br /><br />The German constitutional court published its 2008-ruling that created a<br />"fundamental right to the guarantee of the confidentiality and integrity of<br />information technology systems" in English (27.02.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.bverfg.de/en/decisions/rs20080227_1bvr037007en.html" target="_blank">http://www.bverfg.de/en/decisions/rs200802...vr037007en.html</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />11. Agenda<br />============================================================<br /><br />1-4 June 2009, Washington, DC, USA<br />Computers Freedom and Privacy 2009<br /><a href="http://www.cfp2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.cfp2009.org/</a><br /><br />5 June 2009, London, UK<br />The Second Multidisciplinary Workshop on Identity in the Information<br />Society (IDIS 09): "Identity and the Impact of Technology"<br /><a href="http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/" target="_blank">http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/</a><br /><br />10 June 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />The Global Enforcement Agenda of copyright, patents and other IPRs: Some<br />consumer perspectives<br />Organized by TransAtlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD), Knowledge Ecology<br />International (KEI) and Health Action International Europe (HAI-E)<br /><a href="http://www.tacd-ip.org/blog/2009/05/29/tacd-kei-and-hai-e-host-event-on-enforcement-agenda-of-copyright-patents-and-other-iprs-in-brussels/" target="_blank">http://www.tacd-ip.org/blog/2009/05/29/tac...rs-in-brussels/</a><br /><br />28-30 June 2009, Torino, Italy<br />COMMUNIA Conference 2009: Global Science & Economics of Knowledge-Sharing<br />Institutions<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009</a><br /><br />2-3 July 2009, Padova, Italy<br />3rd FLOSS International Workshop on Free/Libre Open Source Software<br /><a href="http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/manenti/floss/floss09.html" target="_blank">http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/...ss/floss09.html</a><br /><br />13-16 August 2009, Vierhouten, The Netherlands<br />Hacking at Random<br /><a href="http://www.har2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.har2009.org/</a><br /><br />23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy<br />World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and<br />Council: "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage"<br /><a href="http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm</a><br /><br />10-12 September 2009, Potsdam, Germany<br />5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam<br />Section: Protest Politics<br />Panel: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property<br /><a href="http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp</a><br /><br />16-18 September 2009, Crete, Greece<br />World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2009<br /><a href="http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/" target="_blank">http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/</a><br /><br />17-18 September 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />Gikii, A Workshop on Law, Technology and Popular Culture<br />Institute for Information Law (IViR) - University of Amsterdam<br />Call for papers by 1 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp" target="_blank">http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp</a><br /><br />21-23 October 2009, Istanbul, Turkey<br />eChallenges 2009<br /><a href="http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp</a><br /><br />24-25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />3rd European Privacy Open Space<br /><a href="http://www.privacyos.eu" target="_blank">http://www.privacyos.eu</a><br /><br />25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />Austrian Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 21 September 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/</a><br /><br />16 October 2009, Bielefeld, Germany<br />10th German Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 15 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/</a><br /><br />13-15 November 2009, Gothenburg, Sweden<br />Free Society Conference and Nordic Summit<br /><a href="http://www.fscons.org/" target="_blank">http://www.fscons.org/</a><br /><br />15-18 November 2009, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt<br />UN Internet Governance Forum<br /><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/" target="_blank">http://www.intgovforum.org/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />12. About<br />============================================================<br /><br />EDRI-gram is a biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe.<br />Currently EDRI has 29 members based or with offices in 18 different<br />countries in Europe. European Digital Rights takes an active interest in<br />developments in the EU accession countries and wants to share knowledge and<br />awareness through the EDRI-grams.<br /><br />All contributions, suggestions for content, corrections or agenda-tips are<br />most welcome. Errors are corrected as soon as possible and visibly on the<br />EDRI website.<br /><br />Except where otherwise noted, this newsletter is licensed under the<br />Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See the full text at<br /><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</a><br /><br />Newsletter editor: Bogdan Manolea &lt;edrigram@edri.org&gt;<br /><br />Information about EDRI and its members:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/</a><br /><br />European Digital Rights needs your help in upholding digital rights in the<br />EU. If you wish to help us promote digital rights, please consider making a<br />private donation.<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram subscription information<br /><br />subscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: subscribe<br /><br />You will receive an automated e-mail asking to confirm your request.<br />unsubscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: unsubscribe<br /><br />- EDRI-gram in Macedonian<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available partly in Macedonian, with delay. Translations<br />are provided by Metamorphosis<br /><a href="http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php" target="_blank">http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram in German<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available in German, with delay. Translations are provided<br />Andreas Krisch from the EDRI-member VIBE!AT - Austrian Association for<br />Internet Users<br /><a href="http://www.unwatched.org/" target="_blank">http://www.unwatched.org/</a><br /><br />- Newsletter archive<br /><br />Back issues are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:30:21 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19901</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[EFFector 22.16: EFF Launches "Teaching Copyright" Curriculum]]></title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19893</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 16  May 29, 2009  editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 510th issue:<br /><br />* EFF LAUNCHED THE "TEACHING COPYRIGHT" CURRICULUM THIS<br />WEEK to counter misleading educational materials produced<br />by the entertainment industry -- materials that typically<br />try to scare students into believing that making copies<br />is wrong. In contrast, Teaching Copyright is designed to<br />encourage students to make full and fair use of new<br />technology while recognizing their rights and<br />responsibilities. In addition, Teaching Copyright<br />spotlights various stakeholders in the copyright debate,<br />allowing students to better understand the controversies<br />and make informed choices about where they stand.<br /><br />Please spread the word and pass the link to teachers,<br />librarians, media specialists, and technology instructors.<br />They won't get to use it if they don't know about it! And<br />please support EFF in our efforts to present balanced<br />information about rights and responsibilities online.<br /><br />For the "Teaching Copyright" website:<br /><a href="http://www.teachingcopyright.org/" target="_blank">http://www.teachingcopyright.org/</a><br /><br />For the press release announcing the launch:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/05/27" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/05/27</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* When Fair Use Is Fairly Difficult<br />EFF Board Chairman Brad Templeton decided to make a remix<br />video and found that the legal boundaries made it far<br />harder than it ought to be.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/when-fair-use-fairly" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/when-fair-use-fairly</a><br /><br />* Two New Books On Innovation Colliding With Law<br />EFF Senior Staff Attorney Fred von Lohmann comments on two<br />new books that explore the legal issues attendant to being<br />an innovator.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/two-new-books-innova" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/two-new-books-innova</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Sotomayor's Cyberlaw Record<br />President Obama's nomination to the Supreme Court, Sonia<br />Sotomayor, is the first nominee with a cyberlaw record.<br /><a href="http://pblog.bna.com/techlaw/2009/05/judge-sotomayor-is-first-nominee-with-cyberlaw-record.html" target="_blank">http://pblog.bna.com/techlaw/2009/05/judge...law-record.html</a><br /><br />~ FCC's New Deal for Rural Internet<br />Ars Technica reviews the FCC's Rooseveltian proposal for<br />how to deliver broadband to the rural public.<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/05/the-fccs-new-deal-for-rural-internet.ars" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/20...al-internet.ars</a><br /><br />~ Honolulu's Internet Vote<br />The nation's first all-digital election took place in<br />Honolulu, where voters made their choices for neighborhood<br />council online and via phone.<br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/23/AR2009052301455.html" target="_blank">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...9052301455.html</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* Help EFF Go to DEFCON!<br /><br />EFF is looking for donations of airline tickets and hotel<br />points for the DEFCON hacking conference, as well as other<br />conferences and speaking engagements. If you have enough<br />airline miles for a free ticket and would like to send an<br />EFF staffer to a conference, let us know, and we will help<br />you with the process of making the reservation. Please note<br />that at this time, we are unable to combine miles from<br />multiple individuals. We are also looking for hotel rewards<br />points to help reduce our overall travel costs.  As a<br />thanks for your donation, we can offer a free membership<br />and a mention in EFFector (if you'd like).  Please contact<br />aaron@eff.org if you can help!<br /><br />* EFF at Maker Faire Bay Area<br /><br />EFF will have a table at Maker Faire Bay Area. Come say<br />hello!  <a href="http://www.makerfaire.com/" target="_blank">http://www.makerfaire.com/</a><br /><br />May 30-31<br />San Mateo County Expo Center & Fairgrounds<br />San Mateo, California<br /><br />Expo Hours<br />Saturday, May 30: 10am - 8pm<br />Sunday, May 31: 10am - 6pm<br /><br />Also, be sure to check out artist and EFF supporter Suzanne<br />Forbes at the Steampunk Encampment.<br /><a href="http://www.makerfaire.com/pub/e/2440" target="_blank">http://www.makerfaire.com/pub/e/2440</a><br /><br />* Nominate a Pioneer for EFF's 2009 Pioneer Awards!<br /><br />EFF established the Pioneer Awards to recognize leaders on<br />the electronic frontier who are extending freedom and<br />innovation in the realm of information technology. This is<br />your opportunity to nominate a deserving individual or<br />group to receive a Pioneer Award for 2009.  The<br />International Pioneer Awards nominations are open both to<br />individuals and organizations from any country.<br />Nominations are reviewed by a panel of judges chosen for<br />their knowledge of the technical, legal, and social issues<br />associated with information technology.<br /><br />How to Nominate Someone for a 2009 Pioneer Award:<br /><br />You may send as many nominations as you wish, but please<br />use one email per nomination. Please submit your entries<br />via email to pioneer@eff.org. We will accept nominations<br />until July 15, 2009.<br /><br />Simply tell us:<br /><br />1. The name of the nominee,<br /><br />2. The phone number, email address or website by which the<br />nominee can be reached, and, most importantly,<br /><br />3. Why you feel the nominee deserves the award.<br /><br />Nominee Criteria:<br /><br />There are no specific categories for the EFF Pioneer<br />Awards, but the following guidelines apply:<br /><br />1. The nominees must have contributed substantially to the<br />health, growth, accessibility, or freedom of computer-based<br />communications.<br /><br />2. To be valid, all nominations must contain your reason,<br />however brief, for nominating the individual or<br />organization and a means of contacting the nominee. In<br />addition, while anonymous nominations will be accepted,<br />ideally we'd like to contact the nominating parties in case<br />we need further information.<br /><br />3. The contribution may be technical, social, economic, or<br />cultural.<br /><br />4. Nominations may be of individuals, systems, or<br />organizations in the private or public sectors.<br /><br />5. Nominations are open to all (other than current members<br />of EFF's staff and operating board or this year's award<br />judges), and you may nominate more than one recipient. You<br />may also nominate yourself or your organization.<br /><br />6. Persons or representatives of organizations receiving an<br />EFF Pioneer Award will be invited to attend the ceremony at<br />EFF's expense.<br /><br />More on the EFF Pioneer Awards:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/</a><br /><br />* Intern Opportunity!<br /><br />EFF is looking for a summer intern to help in our<br />development and media departments. This is an unpaid,<br />full-time position.<br /><br />Projects will include:<br />-Working on our annual report and<br />contacting major donors and foundations (40% of time);<br />-Assisting with membership fulfillment and bulk mailing<br />(40% of time); and<br />-Identifying and organizing press<br />clippings (20% of time).<br /><br />Excellent writing and editing skills, strong organizational<br />abilities, and the capacity to take instruction and run<br />with it is a must. Interest in development and/or public<br />relations as a career is a plus, as is knowledge and<br />familiarity with EFF's issues.<br /><br />To apply, please send a cover letter, resume, and writing<br />sample to: alyssa@eff.org<br /><br />* Volunteer at EFF!<br /><br />EFF is looking for volunteers to assist with operations in<br />our membership department. If you're quick, organized,<br />detail-oriented, and looking for a hands-on way to support<br />EFF, contact us today!<br /><br />Duties include:<br /><br />* Membership fulfillment<br />* Organizing premiums<br />* Print mailing<br />* support Event assistance<br /><br />Learn about fundraising operations in the nonprofit world<br />while supporting your favorite organization in a tangible<br />way! Interest in grassroots fundraising is a plus, as is<br />knowledge and familiarity with EFF's issues. Send a letter<br />of interest to aaron@eff.org<br /><br />* Open Video Conference in NYC<br /><br />The upcoming Open Video Conference, taking place June 19-20<br />in New York City, plans to tackle a range of issues<br />surrounding online video -- from codecs to content, to fair<br />use, and beyond. Recent developments like Hulu are pretty<br />good for the user -- but Internet video should be more than<br />just "TV on demand." Internet video has the potential to be<br />a far more dynamic medium that invites clipping, archival,<br />remix, collage, repurposing, and many other uses. Featured<br />speakers include: NYU's Clay Shirky, Harvard's Yochai<br />Benkler, Boing Boing's Xeni Jardin, DVD Jon, Free Press'<br />Josh Silver, EFF's Corynne McSherry, and many more.<br /><br />For the full agenda:<br /><a href="http://openvideoconference.org/agenda/" target="_blank">http://openvideoconference.org/agenda/</a><br /><br />To register for the Open Video Conference:<br /><a href="http://openvideoconference.org/registration/" target="_blank">http://openvideoconference.org/registration/</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /> <a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br /> sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br /> membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br /> secure.eff.org/donate<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br /> information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /> <a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:34:05 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19893</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.15: Judge Rules Dorm Room Search for Evidence Illegal</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19876</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 15  May 22, 2009 editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 509th issue:<br /><br />* A JUDGE HAS ORDERED POLICE TO RETURN A LAPTOP AND OTHER<br />PROPERTY SEIZED FROM A BOSTON COLLEGE COMPUTER SCIENCE<br />STUDENT'S DORM ROOM after finding there was no probable<br />cause to search the room in the first place. The police<br />were investigating whether the student sent hoax emails<br />about another student.<br /><br />EFF and Boston law firm Fish and Richardson are<br />representing the computer science student, who was forced<br />to complete much of the final month of the semester without<br />his computer, phone, and network access in the wake of the<br />now-rejected search.<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/05/22" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/05/22</a><br /><br />For more on this case:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/mass-sjc-tosses-calixte-warrant" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/mass-...calixte-warrant</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* Six Simple Steps You Can Take to Protect Your Gripe Site<br />EFF has released a guide to help critics and parodists, who<br />are all too often struck down by the targets of their<br />parody with accusations of copyright or trademark<br />infringement.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/six-simple-steps-you" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/six-simple-steps-you</a><br /><br />* Recommendations for Web Measurement on Government<br />Websites<br />The Center for Democracy and Technology and EFF have<br />released a document recommending repairs to the federal<br />guidelines that regulate the use of cookies and other<br />"persistent tracking technologies" on government websites.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/recommendations-web" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/recommendations-web</a><br /><br />* Administration Introduces New Websites<br />The Obama Administration has launched several websites to<br />further its commitment to improving transparency and<br />encouraging citizen participation in government.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/administration-open-government-websites" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/admin...rnment-websites</a><br /><br />* Victory for Location Privacy in New York GPS Tracking<br />Case<br />The highest court in New York has ruled that police may not<br />use a GPS device to track the movements of your vehicle<br />without first getting a warrant.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/victory-location-pri" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/victory-location-pri</a><br /><br />* 3 Strikes for Print: A Modest Proposal From Ed Felten<br />In the tradition of Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal,"<br />EFF board member and Princeton Computer Science Prof. Ed<br />Felten has written an essay in response to the recently<br />passed "3 strikes" legislation in France.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/3-strikes-modest-pro" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/3-strikes-modest-pro</a><br /><br />* Right-to-Repair Law Proposed ... for Cars<br />The problem that the new law attempts to fix is the direct<br />result of the use of computers in cars, accompanied by<br />proprietary diagnostic tools and "lock-out codes." Sound<br />familiar?<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/right-repair-law-pro" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/right-repair-law-pro</a><br /><br />* Danger Mouse Releases a Blank CD-R<br />Danger Mouse is apparently counting on the fact that it's<br />the fans, not record labels like EMI, who have the upper<br />hand in the digital age.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/danger-mouse-inducem" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/danger-mouse-inducem</a><br /><br />* Apple vs. Blasphemy (and Innovation)<br />Two more interesting applications have been blocked by<br />Apple in its quixotic quest to police what users can think<br />and do while using their iPhones.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/apple-vs-blasphemy" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/apple-vs-blasphemy</a><br /><br />* Craigslist Demands Apology<br />Craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster posted a strongly-worded<br />response to South Carolina Attorney General Henry<br />McMaster's ongoing legally-baseless threats to bring<br />criminal charges against him and founder Craig Newmark.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/craigslist-demands-apology" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/craig...demands-apology</a><br /><br />* AGs' Bogus Threats Hit Their Mark<br />Disappointingly, craigslist has given in to pressure from<br />law enforcement officials and agreed to remove the "boring<br />services" section from its site.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/ags-bogus-threats-hi" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/ags-bogus-threats-hi</a><br /><br />* Why Video Remix Creators Need a DMCA Exemption<br />If you are a vidder, a movie trailer mashup creator,<br />YouTube movie critic, or anyone else who needs to take<br />clips from DVDs in order to make an original remix video,<br />you might be interested in the hearings held last week<br />before the U.S. Copyright Office.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/why-video-remix-crea" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/why-video-remix-crea</a><br /><br />* White House Photos Update<br />The photos by official White House photographer Pete Souza<br />are now identified on Flickr as "United States Government<br />Works," along with a link to the U.S. Copyright Office page<br />quoting Title 17 of the United States Code.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/white-house-photos-u" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/white-house-photos-u</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ The FCC's Warrantless Searches<br />Wired's Threat Level reports that the FCC claims the right<br />to enter and inspect any wireless device.<br /><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/fcc-raid/" target="_blank">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/05/fcc-raid/</a><br /><br />~ IBM Unveils Real-Time Datamining Software<br />The new software does "stream processing," allowing<br />researchers to combine data from various sources to find<br />patterns.<br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/technology/business-computing/21stream.html" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/technolo...g/21stream.html</a><br /><br />~ Protect Newspapers -- by Destroying the Internet?<br />A recent Washington Post opinion piece argued that the<br />searching and indexing of newspaper articles amounts to<br />copyright infringement. Art Brodsky begs to differ.<br /><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/art-brodsky/oh-the-hypocrisy-first-am_b_204809.html" target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/art-brodsky/...m_b_204809.html</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* Help EFF Go to DEFCON!<br /><br />EFF is looking for donations of airline tickets and hotel<br />points for the DEFCON hacking conference, as well as other<br />conferences and speaking engagements. If you have enough<br />airline miles for a free ticket and would like to send an<br />EFF staffer to a conference, let us know, and we will help<br />you with the process of making the reservation. Please note<br />that at this time, we are unable to combine miles from<br />multiple individuals.  We are also looking for hotel<br />rewards points to help reduce our overall travel costs.<br /><br />In exchange for a ticket or hotel stay, we can offer a free<br />membership and a mention in EFFector (if you'd like).<br />Please contact aaron@eff.org if you have a ticket to<br />donate.<br /><br />* EFF at Maker Faire Bay Area<br />EFF will have a table at Maker Faire Bay Area. Come say<br />hello!<br /><a href="http://www.makerfaire.com/" target="_blank">http://www.makerfaire.com/</a><br /><br />May 30-31<br />San Mateo County Expo Center & Fairgrounds<br />San Mateo, California<br /><br />Expo Hours<br />Saturday, May 30: 10am - 8PM<br />Sunday, May 31: 10am - 6PM<br /><br />Also, be sure to check out artist and EFF supporter Suzanne<br />Forbes at the Steampunk Encampment.<br /><a href="http://www.makerfaire.com/pub/e/2440" target="_blank">http://www.makerfaire.com/pub/e/2440</a><br /><br />* Nominate a Pioneer for EFF's 2009 Pioneer Awards!<br /><br />EFF established the Pioneer Awards to recognize leaders on<br />the electronic frontier who are extending freedom and<br />innovation in the realm of information technology. This is<br />your opportunity to nominate a deserving individual or<br />group to receive a Pioneer Award for 2009.<br /><br />The International Pioneer Awards nominations are open both<br />to individuals and organizations from any country.<br />Nominations are reviewed by a panel of judges chosen for<br />their knowledge of the technical, legal, and social issues<br />associated with information technology.<br /><br />How to Nominate Someone for a 2009 Pioneer Award:<br /><br />You may send as many nominations as you wish, but please<br />use one email per nomination. Please submit your entries<br />via email to pioneer@eff.org. We will accept nominations<br />until July 15, 2009.<br /><br />Simply tell us:<br /><br />1. The name of the nominee,<br /><br />2. The phone number, email address or website by which the<br />nominee can be reached, and, most importantly,<br /><br />3. Why you feel the nominee deserves the award.<br /><br />Nominee Criteria:<br /><br />There are no specific categories for the EFF Pioneer<br />Awards, but the following guidelines apply:<br /><br />1. The nominees must have contributed substantially to the<br />health, growth, accessibility, or freedom of computer-based<br />communications.<br /><br />2. To be valid, all nominations must contain your reason,<br />however brief, for nominating the individual or<br />organization and a means of contacting the nominee. In<br />addition, while anonymous nominations will be accepted,<br />ideally we'd like to contact the nominating parties in case<br />we need further information.<br /><br />3. The contribution may be technical, social, economic, or<br />cultural.<br /><br />4. Nominations may be of individuals, systems, or<br />organizations in the private or public sectors.<br /><br />5. Nominations are open to all (other than current members<br />of EFF's staff and operating board or this year's award<br />judges), and you may nominate more than one recipient. You<br />may also nominate yourself or your organization.<br /><br />6. Persons or representatives of organizations receiving an<br />EFF Pioneer Award will be invited to attend the ceremony at<br />EFF's expense.<br /><br />More on the EFF Pioneer Awards:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/awards/pioneer/</a><br /><br />* Intern Opportunity!<br />EFF is looking for a summer intern to help in our<br />development and media departments.  This is an unpaid,<br />full-time position.<br /><br />Projects will include:<br />-Working on our annual report and contacting major donors<br />and foundations (40% of time);<br />-Assisting with membership fulfillment and bulk mailing<br />(40% of time); and<br />-Identifying and organizing press clippings (20% of time).<br /><br />Excellent writing and editing skills, strong organizational<br />abilities, and the capacity to take instruction and run<br />with it is a must. Interest in development and/or public<br />relations as a career is a plus, as is knowledge and<br />familiarity with EFF's issues.<br /><br />To apply, please send a cover letter, resume, and writing<br />sample to: alyssa@eff.org<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br />secure.eff.org/donate<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 00:26:35 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19876</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Must Read Stories On Internet Fraud And Beyond</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=2244</link>
		<description><![CDATA[++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br />Staged Auto Accidents -- Reaching Epidemic Proportions<br />++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br /><br />This scam is somewhat surprising in its scope and danger.<br /><br />In this scam, fraudsters maneuver innocent drivers into auto<br />accidents. The accident may be small or large -- but the<br />claims for auto damage and fake injuries are always large.<br /><br />These accidents are often staged by organized crime rings and<br />they are now rampant.<br /><br />Unfortunately, these scams can impact you in at least three<br />ways:<br /><br />1. Victims have been injured, terrorized, and even killed. A<br />71-year-old grandmother was killed in Bayside, NY, and an entire<br />family (including a baby) was killed when one of these staged<br />accidents went wrong.<br /><br />2. Victims' insurance rates often rise -- often by hundreds of<br />dollars -- because of a costly claim on your record.<br />Sometimes, an auto policy may not even be renewed.<br /><br />3. Victims waste a lot of time dealing with police reports, car<br />repairs, claim settlements, and sometimes lawsuits.<br /><br />These staged auto accidents have reached epidemic proportions<br />in Florida, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, and other<br />states.<br /><br /><br />How this scam works<br /><br />There are at least four variants of this scam:<br /><br />1. "Swoop and Squat." The scammer swoops in front of you, jams<br />on the brakes, and you hit them from the rear. Inside the<br />scammer's car are passengers who then pretend to have severe<br />and painful injuries, even if the collision was at a very low<br />speed.<br /><br />2. "Drive Down." As you are merging into traffic, the scammer<br />slows down and waves you forward. He then rams into your car<br />and denies waving you into traffic, and of course, blames the<br />accident entirely on you.<br /><br />3. "Sideswipe." At a busy intersection with a dual left-turn<br />lane, the scammer deliberately sideswipes you if you<br />accidentally drift into the outer lane while completing the<br />turn.<br /><br />4. "Shady Helpers." Whether you've had a legitimate or staged<br />accident, a stranger approaches you to convince you to use a<br />specific auto-body shop, doctor or chiropractor, or lawyer. It<br />may be a setup: you could easily get poor and overpriced work<br />done, shoddy or no treatment, or bad legal advice.<br /><br /><br />What to do<br /><br />Here are six suggestions for how to protect yourself and fight<br />back:<br /><br />1. Don't tailgate, which helps reduce the chance of "swoop and<br />squat."<br /><br />2. Always keep a pen and paper and inexpensive camera in your<br />glove compartment so you can be prepared if you're ever in an<br />accident. Write down all the important info immediately if<br />you're in an accident: license plate number, insurance info,<br />etc. Take pictures of the damage done to both cars and the<br />passengers.<br /><br />3. If you're in a collision, count the number of passengers in<br />the other car and get their names, phone numbers, and driver's<br />license numbers. That way, people not in the car cannot make<br />claims against you.<br /><br />4. Call the police immediately even if there is just minor<br />damage. Get a police report, including the officer's name.<br />Make sure it accurately describes the degree of damage.<br /><br />5. Watch how the people in the other car behave. If they stand<br />around joking until the police come -- and then all of a sudden<br />complain loudly about pain -- you know something isn't right.<br /><br />6. Only use medical, car repair and legal professionals you<br />trust.<br /><br />For more information on this scam, visit:<br /><br />==&gt; <a href="http://www.insurancefraud.org/protect_yourself_set.html" target="_blank">http://www.insurancefraud.org/protect_your...urself_set.html</a>]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2004 17:35:59 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=2244</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.10, 20 May 2009</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19862</link>
		<description><![CDATA[============================================================<br /><br />            EDRi-gram<br /><br /> biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe<br /><br />     Number 7.10, 20 May 2009<br /><br /><br />============================================================<br />Contents<br />============================================================<br /><br />1. France: Three strikes law voted for good<br />2. EP limits data breach notification<br />3. EU supports RFID with proper protection of consumers' privacy<br />4. Goggle's Street View contested in Europe<br />5. Lucky win for the Swiss biometric passports<br />6. Another open door for software patents in EU<br />7. French courts give clear decisions for hosted content<br />8. UK creative industries want the disconnection of file sharers<br />9. Recommended Action<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />11. Agenda<br />12. About<br /><br />============================================================<br />1. France: Three strikes law voted for good<br />============================================================<br /><br />After long debates, on 12 May 2009 the French deputies adopted with 296<br />votes against 233 the three strikes law, with very few modifications. The<br />following day the Senate also voted the law with 189 against 14 with<br />socialist senators having decided not to participate in the vote.<br /><br />During the discussions, most of the amendments introduced by the opposition<br />were rejected. The Internet users deemed of illegally downloaded content<br />will have their connection cut off while continuing to pay for the service<br />(the so called double pain). The amendment by which the users should have<br />not been sanctioned for downloading music that was unavailable on legal<br />platforms was also rejected just like the one extending from 30 days to 2<br />months the period over which a user could make appeal. The law as is now<br />ignores the presumption of innocence and the allows disclosure of personal<br />information without any control from a court.<br /><br />Senator Samia Ghali was the only one from the socialist group who voted<br />against the article creating Hadopi authority, expressing her opinion that<br />the project was "inefficient, outdated, too complex, archaic, liberticidal<br />and old-fashioned".<br /><br />On 19 May, the socialist deputies filed an appeal to the Constitutional<br />Council which will have to give its decision by 19 June. The Constitutional<br />Council already censored the graduate response introduced by the DADVSI law<br />in 2006, considering it was not in agreement with the equality principle of<br />the criminal law for making Internet counterfeiting a special case.<br /><br />MEP Guy Bono, the author of the amendment against graduated response<br />(amendment 138) in the Telecom Package, said that in case the French<br />Constitutional Council does dot censure the Hadopi law, he will appeal to<br />the European Court of Justice. He considers the Frenchlaw is infringing the<br />amendment already adopted by the European Parliament<br />at the beginning of May. The amendment says that a user's access to the<br />Internet can be cut only by court decision. Bono considers the adoption of<br />the Hadopi law as a "total disrespect to Europe and its citizens three weeks<br />before the European elections".<br /><br />Bono is also shocked by the statement of European Commissioner Viviane<br />Reding who, in an attempt to gain France's favours before the European<br />elections, said that although Hadopi may face some problems at the national<br />level, she saw no indication of infringements of the European community<br />law and "nothing in amendment 138 that might modify this situation".<br /><br />La Quadrature du Net believes that the Hadopi law is legally dead because<br />"it opposes to fundamental principles of French and European law, including<br />the respect of a fair trial, principle of proportionality and separation of<br />powers." In the group's opinion, it is also technically dead because "it<br />entirely relies on identifying users through their IP address that can be<br />altered or high-jacked in many ways As a consequence, innocents will<br />inevitably be sanctioned. Circumvention techniques are also already largely<br />available." It is politically dead because "this text is a ball and<br />chain" that will be dragged "along for a long time." And finally the Hadopi<br />law is dead for the media "because government's propaganda didn't stand for<br />long under close scrutiny from citizens over the net" and "60% of the French<br />reject this text according to an IFOP poll (33% only agree to the scheme)<br />and a wide opposition includes independent movie theatres, hundreds of<br />independent labels, science-fiction authors and performing artists."<br /><br />Hadopi law is adopted according to the Senate (189 votes against 14) (only<br />in French, 13.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12890-La-loi-Hadopi-est-adoptee-conforme-au-Senat-189-voix-contre-14.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12890-La-...-contre-14.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi: the appeal to the Constitutional Council filed on Tuesday (only in<br />French, 18.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12939-Hadopi-le-recours-au-Conseil-constitutionnel-depose-ce-mardi.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12939-Had...e-ce-mardi.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi law adopted, what now? (only in French, 14.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.01net.com/editorial/502369/loi-hadopi-adoptee-et-maintenant/" target="_blank">http://www.01net.com/editorial/502369/loi-...-et-maintenant/</a><br /><br />Guy Bono "appalled" by Viviane Reding's remarks (only in French, 13.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12897-Guy-Bono-34consterne34-par-les-propos-de-Viviane-Reding.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12897-Guy...ane-Reding.html</a><br /><br />In campaign, Viviane Reding believes Hadopi does not infringe the European<br />law (only in French, 13.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12896-En-campagne-Viviane-Reding-estime-que-l-Hadopi-ne-viole-pas-le-droit-europeen.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12896-En-...t-europeen.html</a><br /><br />Anti-piracy law: "make your computer Hadopi-compatible" (only in French,<br />15.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.01net.com/editorial/500262/loi-antipiratage-rendre-votre-ordinateur-hadopi-compatible/" target="_blank">http://www.01net.com/editorial/500262/loi-...opi-compatible/</a><br /><br />Solemn burial for HADOPI in French National Assembly (13.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/solemn-burial-for-hadopi-in-french-national-assembly" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/en/solemn-buri...tional-assembly</a><br /><br />EDRIgram: Three strikes law in France - Second attempt (6.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.9/three-strikes-law-france-second" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.9/th...w-france-second</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />2. EP limits data breach notification<br />============================================================<br /><br />The modification of the Privacy and Electronic Communication directive voted<br />by the European Parliament (EP) on 6 May 2009, as part of second reading of<br />the telecom package, limits the data breach notification only to the<br />electronic communications service providers.<br /><br />Initially, in its first reading of the telecom package last year, the<br />European Parliament insisted to expand the data breach notification beyond<br />the initial provision, to online services or even public administration.<br />This idea was supported by privacy experts such as Peter Hustinx, the<br />European Data Protection Supervisor who insisted to apply the system not<br />only to "providers of public electronic communication services in<br />public networks but also to other actors, especially to providers of<br />information society services which process sensitive personal data (e.g.<br />online banks and insurers, on-line providers on health services etc.)."<br /><br />But in the negotiations with the Council and the European Commission on this<br />point the EP diluted its initial claims. Thus, the adopted text<br />includes a mandatory obligation only for ISPs and telecoms. For the rest of<br />the categories the Commission just takes note of the EP will and says that<br />it will "initiate the appropriate preparatory work, including consultation<br />with stakeholders, with a view to presenting proposals in this area, as<br />appropriate, by the end of 2011. In addition, the Commission will consult<br />with the European Data Protection Supervisor on the potential for the<br />application, with immediate effect, in other sectors of the principles<br />embodied in the data breach notification rules in Directive 2002/58/EC,<br />regardless of the sector or type of data concerned."<br /><br />The adopted text includes a similar recital that notes the "general interest<br />for users to be notified is clearly not limited to the electronic<br />communications sector and therefore explicit, mandatory notification<br />requirements applicable to all sectors should be introduced at the Community<br />level as a matter of priority."<br /><br />According to the text of the Directive approved by the EP in the case of a<br />personal data breach, the telecom operator or ISP has the obligation to<br />notify the personal data breach right away to the competent national<br />authority. The text also says that if the data breach "is likely to<br />adversely affect the personal data and privacy of a subscriber or an<br />individual, the provider shall also notify the subscriber or individual of<br />the breach without undue delay."<br /><br />The EDPS considered the voted text as "a satisfactory approach". He<br />also noted that it is good to see the mandatory notification for personal<br />data breaches in the final text, which is one of the core elements<br />of the Directive. However, he expressed his regrets that "its application is<br />limited to ISPs and network operators. One would hope that the Commission,<br />in consultation with the EDPS, will soon put forward proposals setting up<br />mandatory notification requirements applicable to all sectors, as the<br />Commission has undertaken to do in a declaration annexed to the text adopted<br />by the EP."<br /><br />The European Parliament rejected on 6 May the telecom package, due to the 3<br />strikes-related article, that was presented in extenso in the past EDRi-gram<br />issue. Now the package needs to be negotiated again with the other EU<br />institutions, but it is hard to believe that the data breach notification<br />provisions will be modified.<br /><br />Modification of the E-privacy Directive - adopted text (6.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2009-0360+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN#title2" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc...guage=EN#title2</a><br /><br />European Parliament abandons plan to extend data breach notification law<br />(13.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=10010" target="_blank">http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=10010</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: Data breach notification - different opinions in EU bodies ?<br />(19.11.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number6.22/data-breach-ec" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number6.22/data-breach-ec</a><br /><br />EDPS endorses data breach notification provision in ePrivacy Directive<br />(23.04.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.8/edps-data-breach-notification" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.8/edp...ch-notification</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />3. EU supports RFID with proper protection of consumers' privacy<br />============================================================<br /><br />The European Commission issued on 12 May 2009 a recommendation on the use of<br />RFID (radio-frequency identification) after a fifteen-month period of<br />consultations with supplying and using industries, standardisation bodies,<br />consumers' organisations, civil society groups and trade unions.<br /><br />Having in view the high continuous development of the smart chips industry,<br />the Commission drafted the recommendation to help in ensuring the protection<br />of the citizens' fundamental rights to privacy and data protection as<br />stipulated in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union<br />proclaimed on 14 December 2007.<br /><br />The non biding recommendation will ask retailers using RFID tags to store<br />and track products to deactivate them at the point of sale thus avoiding<br />potential privacy and security problems. The wish of the privacy protection<br />groups for opt-in principle is included in the recommendation thus giving<br />customers the possibility to agree to keep their tags active if they wish<br />to. This could be useful to identify a product found to be dangerous and to<br />retrieve it. Tags are to be deactivated should customers fail to opt-in.<br /><br />The Commission recommends organisations using RFID systems to assess the<br />possible impact on privacy and data protection before using them, to act in<br />order to minimise "any risk of infringing people's rights", to inform<br />people who may be affected that the systems are in use by means of an<br />established logo that can be defined by standardisation organisations and to<br />inform the operators of the RFID systems on their purpose.<br /><br />According to the recommendation, the national authorities should do their<br />best to increase the awareness of the public and small businesses on the<br />matter and to encourage research and development for more secure and privacy<br />friendly RFID systems.<br /><br />Retailers are expected to use an established logo indicating the use of a<br />RFID tag on a product, to deactivate and remove such a tag in case of risks<br />to customers' privacy or personal data security and even offer to do so even<br />if there is no such risk.<br /><br />EDRi's President and member of the EC RFID expert group, Andreas Krisch,<br />qualified the Recommandation as "a first important step towards the right<br />direction", but "for the time being it is important that the privacy impact<br />assessments are carried out properly to determine the risks for individuals<br />personal data. In the retail sector RFIDs should be deactivated at check-out<br />since this is the point where they leave the control of the retail company<br />and they constitute a risk to individuals privacy when being kept active."<br /><br />He also insisted on the necesary next steps: "The success of this process<br />will depend on the ability of all stakeholders to continue the dialog that<br />was started with the RFID Expert Group. Member states now have an important<br />role to play in implementing the recommendation. They should actively<br />initiate a dialogue between DPAs, companies and civil society."<br /><br />The recommendation was also welcomed by BEUC, the European consumers'<br />organisation which considers it "an important first step towards finally<br />addressing some of the core consumer concerns linked to RFID".<br /><br />The opinion of the retailers is however divided. While the European Retail<br />Round Table representing big chains believes the recommendation<br />achieves the necessary balance between the benefits brought by RFID and the<br />provision of the highest standards of privacy and data protection, "allowing<br />the technology to develop while ensuring that those who use the technology<br />will use it responsibly and sensibly", EuroCommerce believes the Commission<br />did not take into consideration " practical consequences. On the contrary,<br />by adding constraints on operators, it will reduce the attractiveness of the<br />new technology for them. This will inevitably be reflected in the costs. If<br />RFID is to develop its full potential, and to contribute to European<br />competitiveness, it must be made easy, cheap and attractive, both to develop<br />and to use."<br /><br />In two years, Member States are to inform the Commission on the measures<br />they intend to take in order to meet the objectives of the Recommendation<br />and within two-three years, the Commission will report on the<br />Recommendation's implementation including an impact analyisis on citizens as<br />well as companies and public authorities using smart chips.<br /><br />EU pushes for smart tag revolution (12.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-pushes-smart-tag-revolution/article-182203" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-.../article-182203</a><br /><br />Small chips with big potential: New EU recommendations make sure 21st<br />century bar codes respect privacy (12.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/740" target="_blank">http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction...rence=IP/09/740</a><br /><br />Recommendation of the Commission of the European Communities on the<br />implementation of privacy and data protection principles in applications<br />supported by radio-frequency identification (12.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/rfid/documents/recommendationonrfid2009.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/po...nonrfid2009.pdf</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />4. Goggle's Street View contested in Europe<br />============================================================<br /><br />Google continues to face problems with its Street View service. The Greek<br />data protection agency has banned Street View until it receives<br />"additional information" from Google. The agency wishes to know the duration<br />for which the images are kept on Google's database and what measures the<br />company will take to make people aware of privacy rights.<br /><br />Google does not appear worried by the action of the Greek authority stating<br />they do not consider it a banning. "We have received a request for further<br />information and we are happy to continue discussing these issues with them.<br />We will discuss with them whether it is appropriate for us to continue<br />driving in the meantime. Although that dialogue is ongoing, we believe that<br />launching in Greece will offer enormous benefits to both Greek users and the<br />people elsewhere who are interested in taking a virtual tour of some of its<br />many tourist attractions."<br /><br />At the same time, the company wished to reiterate its commitment to take<br />measures to protect citizens' privacy: "Google takes privacy very seriously,<br />and that's why we have put in place a number of features, including the<br />blurring of faces and licence plates, to ensure that Street View will<br />respect local norms when it launches in Greece."<br /><br />Simon Davies, director of Privacy International considers the Greek action<br />as a very good precedent. "This is fantastic news. The Greek regulators<br />understand the risks of future technology creep. They have watched what has<br />happened in the US and UK very carefully and will be familiar with the<br />arguments on both sides. This highlights the difference between regulators -<br />some will allow the public space to be exploited, others acknowledge that<br />people's privacy needs to be protected. Now we wait for the domino effect,<br />as the Greek decision sets an example that others may follow - we will see<br />what happens next in Central Europe."<br /><br />In the meantime, Street View has become active in Prague while the service's<br />legality in the Czech Republic is still unclear. Filip Pospísil, a privacy<br />expert with EDRi-member Iuridicum Remedium believes blurring techniques are<br />not sufficient as there are still concerns related to the angles and<br />distances of the pictures.<br /><br />Street View as well as also other new Internet services is bringing up<br />certain discrepancies between privacy laws and the technological advances.<br />"As is usual, everyday reality and technical progress is ahead of the<br />legislator," said Milana Chamberlain, a partner at law firm Norton Rose. In<br />her opinion, the relevant legislation should be amended to cope with the<br />progress of the technology.<br />"In our view the borderline (between personal freedoms and protection of<br />privacy) is very subjective and depends on when people start to feel<br />offended by the fact that their face appears on the internet without their<br />consent or when they suffer harm because somebody saw them where they did<br />not want to be seen," said Chamberlain.<br /><br />Facing complaints about privacy invasion with Street View in Japan, Google<br />stated it would re-shoot all Japanese pictures by using lower camera angles<br />so that images from private properties might not appear in pictures. And<br />although Google also said it has blurred car number plates in the pictures<br />as it has done in Europe, Japanese privacy campaigners are still concerned<br />about Street View system shooting images unselectively.<br /><br />Greece puts brakes on Street View (12.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8045517.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8045517.stm</a><br /><br />Google's snapshots of Prague raise privacy issues (21.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.cbw.cz/en/article/googles-snapshots-of-prague-raise-privacy-issues-.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.cbw.cz/en/article/googles-snaps...cy-issues-.aspx</a><br /><br />Google re-shoots Japan scenes after privacy complaints (13.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090513.wgoogle0513/BNStory/Technology/home" target="_blank">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/sto...Technology/home</a><br /><br />UK: Google's Street View does not breach the Data Protection Act (6.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.9/uk-google-street-view-ok" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.9/uk...-street-view-ok</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />5. Lucky win for the Swiss biometric passports<br />============================================================<br /><br />A referendum that took place in Switzerland on Sunday, 17 May 2009 was in<br />favour of the biometric passports law by a very narrow margin. Thus the<br />official results show that 50.14% of the voters approved the law, with just<br />5 504 votes separating the two sides.<br /><br />With one of the closest results in recent Swiss history, the vote on the law<br />was influenced by the low turnout (38%) and by the number of Swiss citizens<br />who voted from abroad for such a project. 14 cantons (including Bern, Geneva<br />or Basel City) voted against the biometric passports. Howevere, the Swiss<br />living abroad were probably seduced by the rhetoric of the Ministry of<br />Justice Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf who insisted that the biometric passports<br />are necessary so that Switzerland may enjoy the EU visa policy and enter US<br />without a visa.<br /><br />For example in Geneva, 52.9% people voted against the law, but 55.6% of the<br />Geneva residents that were abroad supported the project.<br /><br />The biometric passport law was voted in March 2008 by the Swiss Parliament.<br />According to the law, the new passport will be equipped with an electronic<br />chip containing a portrait picture and two fingerprints of the holder. One<br />of the most controversial provision was to store fingerprints in a central<br />database.<br /><br />Some considered that the main reason behind such a fingerprint register is<br />the access for police investigations, but the justice minister dismissed<br />these allegations.<br /><br />Widmer-Schlumpf pledged in a press conference to take opponents' concerns<br />seriously: "We will do our best to ensure that personal data in the<br />fingerprint register is secure". She also promised that the ID card would<br />not contain biometric identifiers.<br /><br />Most of the Swiss newspapers interpreted the final result as a sign of<br />scepticism from the population on the new passports and that the final vote<br />was just lucky.<br /><br />"It is a slap in the face for the political establishment that includes the<br />government and long-established parliamentarians. They have to thank lady<br />luck that they do not belong to the losers," commented the Aargauer Zeitung<br /><br />A chance majority (only in French, 18.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.letemps.ch/Page/Uuid/0620df5e-4323-11de-b8d1-5bf7dceb4670/Une_majorit%C3%A9_de_hasard" target="_blank">http://www.letemps.ch/Page/Uuid/0620df5e-4...C3%A9_de_hasard</a><br /><br />"Lady luck" helps government win vote (18.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/internal_affairs/Lady_luck_helps_government_win_vote.html?siteSect=1511&sid=10710317" target="_blank">http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/inter...mp;sid=10710317</a><br /><br />Federal voting: the biometric passport accepted by a hairbreadth. Eveline<br />Widmer-Schlumpf relieved (only in French, 17.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.tsr.ch/tsr/index.html?siteSect=200002&sid=10707597&cKey=1242575472000" target="_blank">http://www.tsr.ch/tsr/index.html?siteSect=...y=1242575472000</a><br /><br />Passport vote wins majority and puzzles experts (17.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/internal_affairs/Passport_vote_wins_majority_and_puzzles_experts.html?siteSect=1511&sid=10709166" target="_blank">http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/inter...mp;sid=10709166</a><br /><br />Biometric passport scrapes through at ballot box (17.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/internal_affairs/Biometric_passport_scrapes_through_at_ballot_box.html?siteSect=1511&sid=10708166" target="_blank">http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/inter...mp;sid=10708166</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />6. Another open door for software patents in EU<br />============================================================<br /><br />A new international treaty United Patent Litigation System (UPLS) that may<br />create an centralised trusted patent court is the new open door for software<br />patents in the European Union.<br /><br />The draft UPLS is inspired from the now defunct European Patent Litigation<br />Agreement (EPLA) and is estimated to creat a new international patent court.<br />As FFII (Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure) points out, the<br />system will by-pass the national courts. This court system would be shielded<br />against any review by the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Thus, hand-picked<br />patent judges will have the last word on software patents, meaning that will<br />have the ultimate power to interpret patent law.<br /><br />After the Recommendation of 24 March 2009 of the European Commission to<br />the Council that would provide the Commission with negotiating directives<br />for the conclusion of an agreement creating the UPLS, the Competitiveness<br />Council of EU Ministers of 28-29 May will request a legal opinion to the ECJ<br />about potential conflicts of the UPLS with the EU treaties.<br /><br />The UPLS will not be a EU institution (the same as for the present European<br />Patent Office - EPO) and thus will exceed the competence of the European<br />Court of Justice that will only "rule on preliminary questions asked by the<br />court structure established in the framework of the Unified Patent<br />Litigation System, (...) on the interpretation of EC law and on the validity<br />and interpretation of acts of the institutions of the Community."<br /><br />Benjamin Henrion, President of the FFII and leader of its litigation working<br />group, explains: "A central patent court forbidding any petition right for<br />review to the ECJ means the patent court has the last word over software<br />patents. The Agreement is drafted in a way to avoid the ECJ intervention on<br />substantive patent law."<br /><br />Brian Kahin, senior fellow of the Computer & Communications Industry<br />Association, underlines that the US experience proves that "it is clear that<br />the European Court of Justice needs to be able to oversee the evolution of<br />patent law. Otherwise, there is constant danger that a self-interested<br />patent community will successfully press to expand the scope, volume, and<br />power of the patent system."<br /><br />The UPLS carries the risk that specialized patent courts will have the last<br />word for important questions such as limits of patentability. This is<br />what typically happens in Germany where the Senate of the Federal Patent<br />Court should refer basic questions to the Supreme Court but do not do this.<br /><br />European Commission pushes for software patents via a trusted court<br />(12.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/European_Commission_pushes_for_software_patents_via_a_trusted_court" target="_blank">http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/Europ...a_trusted_court</a><br /><br />Patents: Commission sets out next steps for creation of unified patent<br />litigation system (24.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/460&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en" target="_blank">http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction...;guiLanguage=en</a><br /><br />Recommendation from the Commission to the Council to authorise the<br />Commission to open negotiations for the adoption of an Agreement creating a<br />Unified Patent Litigation System (20.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/docs/patent/recommendation_sec09-330_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indpro...ec09-330_en.pdf</a><br /><br />"Council seeks to legalise software patents with the Community Patent" says<br />French expert (11.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://stopsoftwarepatents.org/forum/t-129596/council-seeks-to-legalise-software-patents-with-the-community-patent-says-french-expert" target="_blank">http://stopsoftwarepatents.org/forum/t-129...s-french-expert</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />7. French courts give clear decisions for hosted content<br />============================================================<br /><br />Several decisions taken by the French courts lately recognize the principle<br />of non-liablilty of some web 2.0 sites for the content hosted. The new<br />interpretation is putting things back on track, after some earlier strange<br />decisions of the lower courts.<br /><br />Dailymotion, the French video sharing site, has recently benefited of three<br />decisions in its favour, in each case the site being considered as a mere<br />hosting site and thus not liable for copyright infringement. On 30 April<br />2009, the site was cleared in the case filed by comedian Roland Magdane and<br />his production company Matex, for illegal video sharing of 31 sketches and<br />unfair competition. The court decided the site was only a hosting site, the<br />respective videos having been posted on personal users' accounts.<br />"Dailymotion offers its users an architecture and the technical means<br />allowing a classification of contents, availability to these contents,<br />without a prior intervention of the company on these contents that are<br />supplied by its users who bear their sole responsibility, independently from<br />the host which is in no way (...) an editor" was the decision of the court.<br /><br />In April 2008, Dailymotion was also brought to court by production companies<br />Davis Films, Davis Films Productions, Nouvelles Editions de Films on the one<br />side and distributor Metropolitan Filmexport on the other for illegal<br />sharing of movie Le Parfum. The plaintiffs contested the hosting status of<br />the site considering Dailymotion had an active role in the treatment of the<br />contents, the classifications being made on commercial criteria and not on<br />functional or technical ones. Also, the plaintiffs considered that the<br />notification stipulated by LCEN for the warning of a site on allegdly<br />illegal hosted content was not mandatory.<br /><br />However, the court decided Dailymotion was simply a hosting site as users<br />are those posting contents and choosing the key words. It also ruled that<br />the notification of illegal content was definitely mandatory. Dailymotion<br />was therefore exonerated of any guilt and the plaintiffs are to pay 10 000<br />euros as legal expenses.<br /><br />In another case, the site was condemned on 13 July 2007 for counterfeiting<br />by the High Instance Court of Paris for illegally sharing online the movie<br />"Joyeux Noël" and required to pay damages to the producers and the<br />exploitation company. At that time, the judges, although acknowledging<br />DailyMotion as a hosting provider and not a publisher, decided however that<br />the site was liable for copyright infringement, as it was aware of the<br />presence of illegal contents on its site. But on 6 May 2009, the appeal<br />court of Paris confirmed the hosting status of Dailymotion cancelling the<br />previous financial sanctions.<br /><br />The major online auction site eBay had its share of French trials. Thus, in<br />september 2007 it was taken to court by l'Oreal cosmetic company in France,<br />Belgium, Spain and UK under the accusation of allowing counterfeit goods to<br />be traded and asked for about 3.5 million euro in damages.<br /><br />In August 2008, eBay was already cleared of accusations in Belgium. In UK a<br />verdict on the matter is expected soon while in Spain the matter has not yet<br />been heard. The French court decided that the auction site is only a hosting<br />site as defined by the French law on implementing the e-commerce directive<br />(LCEN - loi pour la confiance dans l'économie numérique) and not an editor<br />and therefore it is not liable for the content on its website. The court<br />also considered that eBay has put into force significant means to fight<br />against online counterfeiting and thus "fulfilled its obligations of loyalty<br />to other operators on the market."<br /><br />The court has also asked both parties to closely collaborate in order to<br />find adequate measures to fight counterfeiting perfumes and cosmetics and<br />suggested a mediator between the two, a hearing being scheduled for 25 May<br />on the issue. L'Oréal accepted the decision and welcomed the mediation<br />solution. In its turn, eBay was pleased with the outcome considering the<br />fight against counterfeiting should be a shared responsibility and the<br />various involved parties should work together in this matter.<br /><br />Dailymotion escapes two convictions in ten days (only in French, 11.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.01net.com/editorial/502200/dailymotion-echappe-a-deux-condamnations-en-dix-jours/" target="_blank">http://www.01net.com/editorial/502200/dail...s-en-dix-jours/</a><br /><br />Counterfeiting : L'Oréal dismissed in its pursue of eBay (only in French,<br />13.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.01net.com/editorial/502228/contrefacon-loreal-deboute-de-ses-poursuites-contre-ebay/" target="_blank">http://www.01net.com/editorial/502228/cont...es-contre-ebay/</a><br /><br />Judge sides with eBay in L'Oreal fake goods case (13.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10239629-38.html" target="_blank">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10239629-38.html</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: France: Linking can be damaging to your pockets (9.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.7/linking-decison-france" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.7/lin...-decison-france</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: France considering new rules for web 2.0 (23.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.8/france-rules-web2.0" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.8/france-rules-web2.0</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />8. UK creative industries want the disconnection of file sharers<br />============================================================<br /><br />An alliance of eight UK creative industries and five trade unions want the<br />government to force Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to disconnect<br />persistent alleged illegal file sharers from the Internet and have issued a<br />set of "urgent recommendations" they want to be included in the government's<br />Digital Britain manifesto.<br /><br />The group considers that more than 50% of the net traffic in the UK is<br />illegal content, situation which puts jobs in the creative industries at<br />risk. "The growing threat of illegal P2P (peer to peer) file-sharing<br />threatens (the creative industries), as films go unmade, DVD sales<br />deteriorate and jobs are lost in production and distribution of content,"<br />said John Woodward, head of the UK Film Council.<br /><br />In 2008, the UK Government urged ISPs to take measures to prevent illegal<br />downloading but refrained from introducing legislation that would force ISPs<br />to disconnect file sharers. Some of the UK's biggest internet providers<br />accepted a voluntary scheme and sent warning letters to thousands of users<br />suspected of illegally sharing music.<br /><br />The Internet Services Providers' Association (ISPA) considers however that<br />disconnections could be challenged by users in court and that, for the time<br />being, the standard of the technology available for monitoring and detecting<br />illegal sharers was not one to be admissible as evidence in court. In ISPA's<br />opinion, the rights holders should rewrite their licensing agreements so as<br />to take into consideration the "new models of online content distribution".<br />ISPA's secretary general, Nicholas Lansman, said to BBC: "ISPA recognises<br />that there is a problem with unlawful P2P file sharing, but it is important<br />to recognise that a major part of the solution lies in licensing reform and<br />the availability of legal content online."<br /><br />Woodward agreed the film industry had to introduce radical new business<br />models and needed to work more closely with ISPs in this digital era. "There<br />needs to be a better relationship between content providers, ISPS and<br />consumers." In his opinion, ISPs might consider a graduated response system<br />if they were "incentivised to tackle piracy" by the content providers paying<br />distribution fees to ISPs.<br /><br />UK's Intellectual Property minister David Lammy said earlier this year<br />that the government would not force ISPs to pursue file sharers. "We can't<br />have a system where we're talking about arresting teenagers in their<br />bedrooms," he told The Times newspaper.<br /><br />Barbara Follett, Minister for the creative industries, also said at a<br />conference of industry executives in London that the UK government was more<br />in favour of sending warning letters to offenders threatening with legal<br />actions rather than taking steps to slow or stop users' connections. "We<br />propose a requirement for ISPs to notify their customers that are engaging<br />in unlawful file-sharing and notify them in such a way that any further<br />action would have consequences," she said adding that the Digital Britain<br />report in June will include details related to the types of legal action to<br />be taken.<br /><br />Call to 'disconnect file-sharers' (12.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8044251.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8044251.stm</a><br /><br />UK Govt. to hear calls to disconnect file sharers (12.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2009/05/12/uk-govt-to-hear-calls-to-disconnect-file-sh/1" target="_blank">http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2009/05/12/uk...nnect-file-sh/1</a><br /><br />Net firms reject 'policing role' (12.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8046028.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8046028.stm</a><br /><br />British ISPs warn Internet downloaders on the risk of being prosecuted<br />(18.06.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.12/british-isp-virgin-letters" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.12/br...-virgin-letters</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />9. Recommended Action<br />============================================================<br /><br />End Software Patents launched a wiki to document the case against software<br />patents. Over 100 articles are being written to give an idea of the scope<br />and structure of the wiki.<br /><a href="http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Main_Page" target="_blank">http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Main_Page</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />The world is going Flat-rate<br /><a href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/05/11/the-world-is-going-flat-rate/" target="_blank">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/05/11/...oing-flat-rate/</a><br /><br />3 Strikes for Print: A Modest Proposal From Ed Felten<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/3-strikes-modest-pro" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/3-strikes-modest-pro</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />11. Agenda<br />============================================================<br /><br />22-23 May 2009, Florence, Italy<br />E-privacy: Towards total control<br /><a href="http://e-privacy.winstonsmith.info/" target="_blank">http://e-privacy.winstonsmith.info/</a><br /><br />23 May 2009, Florence, Italy<br />Big Brother Award Italia 2009<br /><a href="http://bba.winstonsmith.info/" target="_blank">http://bba.winstonsmith.info/</a><br /><br />24-28 May 2009, Venice, Italy<br />ICIMP 2009, The Fourth International Conference on Internet Monitoring<br />and Protection<br /><a href="http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html" target="_blank">http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html</a><br /><br />1-4 June 2009, Washington, DC, USA<br />Computers Freedom and Privacy 2009<br /><a href="http://www.cfp2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.cfp2009.org/</a><br /><br />5 June 2009, London, UK<br />The Second Multidisciplinary Workshop on Identity in the Information<br />Society (IDIS 09): "Identity and the Impact of Technology"<br /><a href="http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/" target="_blank">http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/</a><br /><br />28-30 June 2009, Torino, Italy<br />COMMUNIA Conference 2009: Global Science & Economics of Knowledge-Sharing<br />Institutions<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009</a><br /><br />2-3 July 2009, Padova, Italy<br />3rd FLOSS International Workshop on Free/Libre Open Source Software<br /><a href="http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/manenti/floss/floss09.html" target="_blank">http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/...ss/floss09.html</a><br /><br />13-16 August 2009, Vierhouten, The Netherlands<br />Hacking at Random<br /><a href="http://www.har2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.har2009.org/</a><br /><br />23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy<br />World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and<br />Council: "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage"<br /><a href="http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm</a><br /><br />10-12 September 2009, Potsdam, Germany<br />5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam<br />Section: Protest Politics<br />Panel: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property<br /><a href="http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp</a><br /><br />16-18 September 2009, Crete, Greece<br />World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2009<br /><a href="http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/" target="_blank">http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/</a><br /><br />17-18 September 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />Gikii, A Workshop on Law, Technology and Popular Culture<br />Institute for Information Law (IViR) - University of Amsterdam<br />Call for papers by 1 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp" target="_blank">http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp</a><br /><br />21-23 October 2009, Istanbul, Turkey<br />eChallenges 2009<br /><a href="http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp</a><br /><br />24-25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />3rd European Privacy Open Space<br /><a href="http://www.privacyos.eu" target="_blank">http://www.privacyos.eu</a><br /><br />25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />Austrian Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 21 September 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/</a><br /><br />16 October 2009, Bielefeld, Germany<br />10th German Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 15 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/</a><br /><br />13-15 November 2009, Gothenburg, Sweden<br />Free Society Conference and Nordic Summit<br /><a href="http://www.fscons.org/" target="_blank">http://www.fscons.org/</a><br /><br />15-18 November 2009, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt<br />UN Internet Governance Forum<br /><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/" target="_blank">http://www.intgovforum.org/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />12. About<br />============================================================<br /><br />EDRI-gram is a biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe.<br />Currently EDRI has 29 members based or with offices in 18 different<br />countries in Europe. European Digital Rights takes an active interest in<br />developments in the EU accession countries and wants to share knowledge and<br />awareness through the EDRI-grams.<br /><br />All contributions, suggestions for content, corrections or agenda-tips are<br />most welcome. Errors are corrected as soon as possible and visibly on the<br />EDRI website.<br /><br />Except where otherwise noted, this newsletter is licensed under the<br />Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See the full text at<br /><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</a><br /><br />Newsletter editor: Bogdan Manolea &lt;edrigram@edri.org&gt;<br /><br />Information about EDRI and its members:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/</a><br /><br />European Digital Rights needs your help in upholding digital rights in the<br />EU. If you wish to help us promote digital rights, please consider making a<br />private donation.<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram subscription information<br /><br />subscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: subscribe<br /><br />You will receive an automated e-mail asking to confirm your request.<br />unsubscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: unsubscribe<br /><br />- EDRI-gram in Macedonian<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available partly in Macedonian, with delay. Translations<br />are provided by Metamorphosis<br /><a href="http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php" target="_blank">http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram in German<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available in German, with delay. Translations are provided<br />Andreas Krisch from the EDRI-member VIBE!AT - Austrian Association for<br />Internet Users<br /><a href="http://www.unwatched.org/" target="_blank">http://www.unwatched.org/</a><br /><br />- Newsletter archive<br /><br />Back issues are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram</a><br /><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:48:24 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19862</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.14: Fight Government Secrecy and Reform the State Secrets Privilege!</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19840</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 14  May 8, 2009 editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 508th issue:<br /><br />* FIGHT GOVERNMENT SECRECY AND REFORM THE STATE SECRETS<br />PRIVILEGE! For years, the state secrets privilege was a<br />favorite tool of the Bush Administration. They used it to<br />avoid accountability for both the NSA's warrantless<br />wiretapping program and the CIA's "special rendition"<br />program. Recently, the Obama Administration has begun to<br />use the same tactic -- most notably, to attempt to dismiss<br />Jewel v. NSA, EFF's lawsuit against the NSA for warrantless<br />wiretapping.<br /><br />In light of this continuing abuse, members of Congress have<br />introduced bills to ensure meaningful judicial oversight of<br />state secrets claims. The Senate version of the bill,<br />sponsored by Senators Leahy, Specter, Feingold and Kennedy,<br />will likely be facing a critical vote in the Senate<br />Judiciary Committee any day now. Your support could be the<br />deciding factor!<br /><br />To take action:<br /><a href="https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=431" target="_blank">https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=di...tion&id=431</a><br /><br />* THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS STILL WITHHOLDING A THOUSAND<br />PAGES OF MATERIAL regarding the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade<br />Agreement (ACTA).  Although the United States Trade<br />Representative (USTR) released 36 pages of material in<br />April, most contain no substantive information, and there<br />are still a thousand pages that need to be released.<br /><br />One of the documents released implies that treaty<br />negotiators are zeroing in on Internet regulation. Other<br />publicly available information shows that the treaty could<br />establish far-reaching customs regulations over Internet<br />traffic in the guise of anti-counterfeiting measures.<br /><br />Litigation to get the rest of the pages continues, with the<br />USTR asking U.S. District Judge Rosemary M. Collyer to<br />uphold its decision to conceal virtually all of the<br />information that EFF seeks concerning the ACTA<br />negotiations.<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/05/06" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/05/06</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* YouTube Restores a Fair Use<br />YouTube has restored another fair use video, this time<br />without keeping it off-line for the standard 10-14 business<br />day counter notice period.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/youtube-restores" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/youtube-restores</a><br /><br />* AGs v. Craigslist: Putting the Bully Back in Bully Pulpit<br />On Tuesday, South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster<br />notified craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster that unless<br />craigslist removes its boring services section within 10<br />days, "craigslist management may be subject to criminal<br />investigation and prosecution."<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/ags-v-craigslist-put" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/ags-v-craigslist-put</a><br /><br />* Apple's Censorship Makes Case for DMCA Exemptions<br />Trent Reznor's latest version of his Nine Inch Nails-themed<br />application for the iPhone has been rejected by Apple on<br />the grounds that it contained "objectionable content."<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/apples-censorship" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/apples-censorship</a><br /><br />* White House Photos: Does the Public Need a License to Use?<br />The White House should reconsider its Creative Commons<br />licensing approach and work with Flickr to instead flag its<br />photo stream as work in the public domain.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/white-house-photos" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/white-house-photos</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Justice Department Finds Flaws in FBI Terror List<br />Surprise! The exponential growth of the terror watch list<br />has led to errors - including 24,000 names included on the<br />basis of outdated or irrelevant information.<br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/07/us/07terror.html" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/07/us/07terror.html</a><br /><br />~ Libraries Raise Concerns About GoogleBooks<br />Librarians submitted a letter to the court overseeing the<br />Google Book Settlement that raised concerns about how<br />Google's plans for digital books will affect privacy and<br />censorship.<br /><a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/libraries-warn-of-censorship-privacy-cost-in-googles-digital-library/" target="_blank">http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/lib...igital-library/</a><br /><br />~ CAIR Defends Savage<br />When shock jock Michael Savage was banned from the UK for<br />allegedly hateful comments about muslims, an Islamic group<br />he had previously maligned came to his defense - on free<br />speech grounds.<br /><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/05/06/MN3617FA8K.DTL" target="_blank">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?.../MN3617FA8K.DTL</a><br /><br />~ Facebook's E-mail Censorship Legally Dubious, Experts Say<br />Does Facebook's decision to block Pirate Bay features for<br />their site violate wiretapping laws?<br /><a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/facebooks-e-mail-censorship-is-legally-dubious-experts-say/" target="_blank">http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/05/fac...us-experts-say/</a><br /><br />For more miniLinks:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/minilinks-2009-05-08" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/05/minilinks-2009-05-08</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* EFF's Web 2.0 Compliance Bootcamp<br /><br />Does your company have to contend with the maze of laws<br />dealing with user privacy and publishing user content? Want<br />to do the right thing by the online community that gives<br />your business value yet fulfills your legal obligations?<br /><br />On May 11, 2009, EFF will reprise its successful one-day<br />session for Internet companies that handle issues arising<br />from users and user-generated content. From DMCA to CDA to<br />ECPA, the law surrounding Internet content can be<br />confusing, especially for the folks who have to decide on<br />the fly whether to let something stay up or take it down,<br />or whether to give their customer's name to the FBI agent<br />on the phone. We will also have additional sessions on open<br />source licensing and employment law for start-ups and small<br />Internet companies. The event is co-sponsored by the Golden<br />Gate University School of Law Intellectual Property Law<br />Center.<br /><br />Topic areas include:<br />* Defamation, harassment, and other accusations of bad<br />behavior<br />* Fair use, free culture, and the right to remix<br />* Copyright take-downs and put-backs<br />* How to respond to cops, crooks, and courts who want your<br />customers' communications and other private information<br />* Anonymous speakers<br />* Porn, predators, and the pressure to police<br />* Open source issues<br />* Employment basics for start-ups<br /><br />Where:<br />Golden Gate University School of Law<br />536 Mission Street<br />San Francisco CA, 94105-2968<br /><br />How much:<br />$300. Scholarships may be available.<br /><br />For more information:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/bootcamp/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/bootcamp/</a><br /><br />To sign up:<br /><a href="http://secure.eff.org/bootcamp" target="_blank">http://secure.eff.org/bootcamp</a><br /><br />* Send EFF to a Conference!<br /><br />EFF is looking for donations of airline tickets for the<br />Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference and other<br />conferences and speaking engagements. If you have enough<br />airline miles for a free ticket and would like to send an<br />EFF staffer to a conference, let us know, and we will help<br />you with the process of making the reservation. Please note<br />that at this time, we are unable to combine miles from<br />multiple individuals.<br /><br />In exchange for a ticket, we can offer a free membership<br />and a mention in EFFector (if you'd like). Please contact<br />aaron@eff.org if you have a ticket to donate.<br /><br />Thank you to Yost Engineering, whose airline mile donation<br />is helping us to fight for your rights across the country.<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br />secure.eff.org/donate<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 11:14:54 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19840</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.9, 6 May 2009</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19837</link>
		<description><![CDATA[============================================================<br /><br />            EDRi-gram<br /><br /> biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe<br /><br />     Number 7.9, 6 May 2009<br /><br /><br />============================================================<br />Contents<br />============================================================<br /><br />1. European Parliament votes against the 3 strikes. Again<br />2. The Pirate Bay asks for retrial claiming conflict of interest<br />3. EP passes performers' copyright term extension directive in first reading<br />4. Three strikes law in France - Second attempt<br />5. UK: Google's Street View does not breach the Data Protection Act<br />6. Reclaim your DNA from the UK database<br />7. WIPO Committee on Development and Intellectual Property: Third meeting<br />8. Recommended Action<br />9. Recommended Reading<br />10. Agenda<br />11. About<br /><br />============================================================<br />1. European Parliament votes against the 3 strikes. Again<br />============================================================<br /><br />Today, 6 May 2009, in the second reading of the Telecom Package, the<br />European Parliament (EP) voted again for the initial amendment 138, with an<br />overwhelming majority of 407 votes for and just 57 against the proposal.<br />However, on this same occasion, the EP rejected the amendments that<br />would make "network neutrality" principles mandatory.<br /><br />Although initially MEP Catherine Trautmann's report included the original<br />amendment 138/46 as adopted in the first reading by the European Parliament,<br />after the opaque negotiations with the EU Council from the past 2 weeks<br />this amendment had been changed in a weaker version. The initial text<br />"without a prior ruling of the judicial authorities, notably in accordance<br />with Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights" was replaced by "and<br />the right to a judgement by an independent and impartial tribunal<br />established by law and acting in respect of due process in accordance with<br />Article 6 of the ECHR."<br /><br />Although the new French authority (called Hadopi) that could be established<br />by the three strikes French draft law can't be considered a "tribunal<br />established by art 6 of ECHR", the text left room to more fuzzy<br />interpretations by removing the wording "prior ruling". Thus the compromise<br />text could be interpreted that such an authority could take a decision of<br />cutting one's access to Internet, but one would be allowed to go to court to<br />challenge this decision.<br /><br />But the EP decided that the initial amendment 138 needed to be supported<br />once again. The battle was not easy, though. MEP Rebecca Harms insisted in<br />the plenary for the change in the voting list and for having the original<br />amendment 138 first . Her position was supported by MEP Alexander Alvaro and<br />disagreed by the Rapporteur MEP Catherine Trautmann. The Chairwomen Diana<br />Wallis agreed to go on first with the vote on the Amendment 138. 407 votes<br />from MEPs supported the amendment, thus saying NO to 3 strikes in Europe.<br />Again.<br /><br />Also the report of Malcolm Harbour (PPE/ED - UK) changed the initial<br />amendment 166 adopted in the first reading by the EP that established a<br />clear principle of the Internet neutrality. Now the main protection left is<br />customer information through contracts, but consumer and competition law<br />cannot regulate fundamental rights.<br /><br />The new compromise with the Council that includes the text "limitations on<br />access to and/or use of services and applications" is far from the initial<br />amendment 166 that was clear: "Member States shall ensure that any<br />restrictions on the rights of users to access content, services and<br />applications, if such restrictions are necessary, are implemented by<br />appropriate measures, in accordance with the principles of proportionality,<br />effectiveness and dissuasiveness"<br /><br />In fact, Mr. Harbour, in an interview published one day before the final<br />vote on the European Parliament website, described as "pure fantasy"  the<br />statement that new rules would allow conditional access. "There is<br />absolutely nothing in this proposal that says anything about that," he<br />claimed.<br /><br />But Mr Harbour was contradicting himself just a couple of weeks earlier when<br />he declared publicly that there were service limitations in his own report:<br />"On the question of network neutrality, so called, which I think has been<br />vastly over-inflated in all of this debate, the Commission has quite rightly<br />identified the fact that there is a potential  - a potential - for operators<br />to use differing quality of service provision in a discriminatory way, for<br />example,  by giving a higher capacity or better service quality to their own<br />services as opposed to those of competitors. The commission made a proposal,<br />the council amended that and we agreed.<br /><br />But the fact remains that any other service limitations which are<br />anti-competitive, and they could certainly include restrictions on access to<br />competitive services like voice over IP, have and can be dealt with by the<br />regulators under the existing framework of competition and access<br />regulation. And that is clear. But what is fundamental is that customer<br />needs to  know if there are service limitations and customers may wish to<br />buy a package with service limitations if it is cheaper...There is nothing<br />illegal about service limitations, provided they are not<br />anti-competitive..."<br /><br />The initial amendments voted in the first reading by the EP, were back on<br />the European Parliament agenda under the name of Citizens Rights Amendments<br />proposed by Eva-Britt Svensson on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group together with<br />other support from other MEPs.<br /><br />But besides the amendment that re-instated article 138, all the other<br />citizen rights amendments were rejected by the plenary of the EP. Thus, the<br />Harbour report was adopted and the Trautmann report was rejected.<br /><br />The discussions with the Council will continue and should lead to a third<br />reading at least for the Trautmann Report. But at the same time, there are<br />little chances for something to be changed in relation with the articles on<br />"network neutrality", that would become part of the directive.<br /><br />"Internet has to be free, but not regulation free" - Harbour on telecoms<br />package (5.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/elections2009/welcome/headlines.htm" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/elections200...e/headlines.htm</a><br /><br />Ask MEPs to adopt Citizens' Rights Amendments on 6 May (5.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/" target="_blank">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/</a><br /><br />Citizens rights amendements<br /><a href="http://werebuild.eu/wiki/index.php/Citizens%27_Rights_Amendments" target="_blank">http://werebuild.eu/wiki/index.php/Citizen...ghts_Amendments</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: European Parliament ITRE committee votes against the 3 strikes<br />(22.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.8/amendment-138-adopted-itre" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.8/am...38-adopted-itre</a><br /><br />Telecoms Package: When rapporteurs betray EU citizens. (30.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/telecoms-package-when-rapporteurs-betray-eu-citizens" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/en/telecoms-pa...ray-eu-citizens</a><br /><br />Agreement on a new version of amendment 46/138 in Brussels. The European<br />parliament accepted a weaker text. (29.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/new-version-of-amendment-138-46-agreed-weaker-version" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/en/new-version...-weaker-version</a><br /><br />Telecoms Package - a licence to chill (4.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=332&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...32&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />Amendment 138/46 adopted again. Internet is a fundamental right in Europe<br />(6.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/amendment-138-46-adopted-again" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/en/amendment-1...6-adopted-again</a><br /><br />European Parliament rejects Telecoms Package (6.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=338&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...38&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />2. The Pirate Bay asks for retrial claiming conflict of interest<br />============================================================<br /><br />According to Sweden's national radio station, Thomas Norström, the judge in<br />The Pirate Bay trial was a member of pro-copyright groups just like several<br />of the main figures in The Pirate Bay case representing the entertaiment<br />industry or prosecution side.<br /><br />Apparently, Norström is a member of the Swedish Copyright Association<br />(Svenska föreningen för upphovsrätt), together with Henrik Pontén, Peter<br />Danowsky and Monique Wadsted, three representatives of the entertainment<br />industry in the case against The Pirate Bay. The judge also belongs to the<br />board of the Swedish Association for the Protection of Industrial Property<br />(Svenska föreningen för industriellt rättsskydd), which is lobbying for<br />tougher copyright laws. Peter Althin, Peter Sunde's lawyer, stated on 23<br />April that he intended to ask for a retrial. "I will point that out in my<br />appeal, then the court of appeal will decide if the district court decision<br />should be set aside and the case revisited."<br /><br />Judge Norström denied the fact that his involvement with the two<br />pro-copyright organisations constituted a "conflict of interest" in The<br />Pirate Bay trial as the verdict against the site was decided by both the<br />judge and jury.<br /><br />Former Chief Prosecutor Sven-Erik Alhem considers that the situation will be<br />harmful for the image of the Swedish courts internationally as well as at<br />the domestic level casting doubt over the judicial neutrality and safety of<br />the Swedish judicial system.<br /><br />Rickard Falkvinge, Pirate Party chairman, has called for the annulment of<br />the verdict considering it is a case of "corruption and miscarriage of<br />justice" adding that "the copyright lobby has really managed to bring<br />corruption to Sweden."<br /><br />On 18 April, the Pirate Party organized demonstrations against the decision<br />of the court in The Pirate Bay case, in several cities of Sweden, with more<br />than 1 000 supporters demonstrating in Stockholm for The Pirate Bay<br />defendants and file sharing. The decision of the court has also led to a<br />significant increase of the Pirate Party membership.<br /><br />Pirate Bay judge and pro-copyright lobbyist accused of bias (23.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/23/pirate_bay_judge_accused_of_bias/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/23/pi...ccused_of_bias/</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay lawyer calls for retrial (23.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/19028/20090423/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/19028/20090423/</a><br /><br />Judge In Pirate Bay Trial Biased (23.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1209143&cid=27686249" target="_blank">http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12...mp;cid=27686249</a><br /><br />Swedes demonstrate in support of Pirate Bay (19.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/18954/20090419/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/18954/20090419/</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay judge denies 'conflict of interest' (23.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/apr/23/pirate-bay-judge" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/apr/23/pirate-bay-judge</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: The Pirate Bay founders considered guilty by the first Swedish<br />court (22.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.8/the-pirate-bay-court-decision" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.8/th...-court-decision</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />3. EP passes performers' copyright term extension directive in first reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />Although largely opposed by some EU Member States in the Council, criticized<br />by the consumers' organizations and strongly opposed by 4 out of the 7 main<br />political groups (ALDE, GREENS/EFA, NGL, IND/ DEM) in the European<br />Parliament (EP), the directive on performers copyright term extension was<br />passed by the MEPs in the first reading on 23 April 2009.<br /><br />Besides the four groups, there were other national delegations and key MEPs<br />who joined the fight to reject the directive, but the final vote was 317 in<br />favour, 178 against, 37 abstentions.<br /><br />The report by Irish MEP Brian Crowley proposed the extension of the term<br />from 50 to 70 years for performers and recording companies, while the<br />initial proposal of the European Commission was to extend the term up to 95<br />years. The extension by 20 years seems to be a compromise to acknowledge the<br />disapproval of some of the Member States.<br /><br />"The current differences in term of protection, particularly between Europe<br />and the US, cause legal uncertainty and piracy, especially in the digital<br />environment, where there are no boundaries," said Brian Crowley who added:<br />"The extended term would also benefit the record producers. It would<br />generate additional revenue from the sale of records in shops and on the<br />Internet."<br /><br />The new text provides a dedicated fund for session musicians having given up<br />their rights when signing contracts for their performances. The fund is to<br />be financed by contributions from producers who would be obliged to put<br />aside for this at least 20% of the revenues resulted from the extended term,<br />at least once a year. The collective societies are given the right to manage<br />the additional remuneration. A key amendment to ensure benefits accrued only<br />to performers was, unfortunately, rejected.<br /><br />The initial text has also been modified so as to prevent previous contract<br />terms to deduct money from the additional revenues for performers. Also, an<br />approved amendment allows performers to renegotiate contracts concluded<br />before the entry into force of this legislation. "Use it or lose it" clause<br />says that in case the producers do not make the recording available to the<br />public within a year after the 50-year period has ended, their rights expire<br />and performers can be transferred the rights for the respective recording.<br /><br />MEPs ask the Commission to launch by January 2010 an impact assessment of<br />the situation in the European audiovisual sector in order to decide<br />whether a similar copyright extension would be beneficial for that area as<br />well. Member States will have two years to transpose the new legislation.<br /><br />Professor Bernt Hugenholtz, Director of the University of Amsterdam's<br />Institute for Information Law (IViR) criticized the Commission for not<br />having taken into consideration the finding of the two commissioned studies<br />carried out by IViR on the extension of the copyright term. In an open<br />letter addressed in August 2008, he accused the Commission of "wilfully<br />ignoring scientific analysis and evidence".<br /><br />Monique Goyens, director-general of European consumer organisation BEUC, has<br />also criticised the proposed legislation summarising the present situation<br />as follows: "The technology is of the 21st century, the legislation is of<br />the 19th century and the right holder organisations are of the Middle Age."<br /><br />The directive is now being sent to the EU Council of Ministers for first<br />reading, where it is currently blocked by several member states.<br /><br />Parliament buckles: copyright extension goes through to Council of Ministers<br />(23.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/04/23/parliament-buckles-copyright-extension-goes-through-to-council-of-ministers/" target="_blank">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/04/23/...l-of-ministers/</a><br /><br />European Parliament backs 70-year copyright term for sound recordings<br />(27.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.out-law.com/page-9973" target="_blank">http://www.out-law.com/page-9973</a><br /><br />Music copyright still divisive, despite MEPs' backing (29.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/innovation/music-copyright-divisive-despite-meps-backing/article-181703" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/innovation/musi.../article-181703</a><br /><br />Music copyright to be extended to 70 years for performers (23.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/058-54192-111-04-17-909-20090422IPR54191-21-04-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/.../default_en.htm</a><br /><br />IViR Open Letter to Jose Manuel Barroso, President of the European<br />Commission (28.08.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.ivir.nl/news/Open_Letter_EC.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ivir.nl/news/Open_Letter_EC.pdf</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: Extended copyright term for sound recordings pushed back<br />(8.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.7/extended-copyright-no" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.7/ex...ed-copyright-no</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />4. Three strikes law in France - Second attempt<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Hadopi (or three strikes) law saga continues with the second reading of<br />the draft law in the French National Assembly having started on 29 April<br />2009.<br /><br />After the unexpected rejection of the text in the lower chamber on 9 April<br />2009, the majority came this time decided to pass the law no matter what.<br />The pressure was mainly due to the present discussion in the European<br />Parliament for the adoption of the Telecom Package which would put the<br />French law in a critical position. The French Government has tried its best<br />to push the three strikes law to be voted by the National Assembly as fast<br />as possible.<br /><br />"We will be careful so that you don't go to sleep as we are going to vote<br />this very evening" said deputy Jean-François Copé on 29 April. The entire<br />fight around the draft law seems to have turned into a political debate.<br />This time, present in a large number, the majority members succeeded in<br />rejecting the opposition's proposal to send back the text to the mixed joint<br />commission (commission mixte paritaire).<br /><br />Frank Riester, rapporteur of the text, asked for the rejection of "any<br />amendment that puts into question the compromise of the mixed joint<br />commission" that is the toughest form of the text, thus shown the intention<br />of the majority to pass the draft law as it was before its rejection on 9<br />April.<br /><br />Fears appear to have existed that the government might make use of the<br />unique (or so called blocked) vote which would have given thepossibility of<br />voting the entire text as a single item instead of voting every single<br />amendment. However, this did not happen and the large number of<br />amendments, especially introduced by the opposition, made it impossible for<br />the Assembly to finalise the discussions and vote by the evening of 5 May.<br />That morning, there were still 160 amendments to examine out of the total of<br />214. The vote was therefore postponed till 12 Ma, a decision which is<br />definitely disappointing for Nicolas Sarkozy who wanted to get the vote on<br />the law before a final decision of the EP on the Telecom Package.<br /><br />According to Jérémie Zimmermann, spokesman for La Quadrature du Net, "The<br />HADOPI law will be undoubtedly voted by a blocked majority, on order. But it<br />will remain a political failure for the government and a democratic as well<br />as technological aberration. HADOPI is a warning signal inviting everybody<br />to rise against the harmful consequences of a regulation sacrificing the<br />citizens and the Internet to the out-of-date interests of some".<br /><br />In the mean time, the opposition movements continue. Sci-fi writer Roland<br />Wagnerhas has organised a "Sci-fi against HADOPI" group while an anti-Hadopi<br />march was organised on 1 May 2009 by several organisations at the initiative<br />of Libre Accès and the French Data Network in Paris. Also, an important<br />initiative has been taken by consumers groups including La Quadrature du Net<br />and UFC Que Choisir who have launched the project Création Public Internet<br />(Internet Public Creation), a project meant to find new business models and<br />solutions for important issues related to cultural creation and artists'<br />income.<br /><br />After the vote in the National Assembly, the Hadopi text will go back to the<br />Senate for a new reading and in the unlikely case the text of the Senate<br />differs from the one voted by the Assembly, the last word will belong to the<br />deputies.<br /><br />Hadopi: towards a unique vote? (only in French, 4.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ecrans.fr/Hadopi-vers-un-vote-unique,7054.html" target="_blank">http://www.ecrans.fr/Hadopi-vers-un-vote-unique,7054.html</a><br /><br />HADOPI: in the wall, honking (only in French, 30.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/fr/hadopi-dans-le-mur-en-klaxonnant" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/fr/hadopi-dans...r-en-klaxonnant</a><br /><br />Hadopi (S2E02): politics first, Hadopi after (only in French, 30.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12795-Hadopi-S2E02-la-politique-d-abord-l-Hadopi-apres.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12795-Had...dopi-apres.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi (S2E01): the majority shows its muscles to the opposition (only in<br />French, 29.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12794-Hadopi-S2E01-la-majorite-montre-ses-muscles-a-l-opposition.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12794-Had...opposition.html</a><br /><br />France reintroduces three-strikes law, clash with EU likely (29.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/04/france-reintroduces-three-strikes-law-as-protests-mount.ars" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/20...tests-mount.ars</a><br /><br />FDN and Libres Accès Appeal to manifest against Hadopi (only in French,<br />28.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.fdn.fr/" target="_blank">http://www.fdn.fr/</a><br /><br />Hadopi: the vote of the draft law reported till Tuesday 12 May (only in<br />French, 5.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12830-Hadopi-le-vote-du-projet-de-loi-reporte-au-mardi-12-mai.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12830-Had...rdi-12-mai.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi: the vote reported by a week (only in French, 5.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/2009/05/05/01002-20090505ARTFIG00423-hadopi-le-vote-reporte-d-une-semaine-.php" target="_blank">http://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/2009/05/0...ne-semaine-.php</a><br /><br />EDRIgram: Three strikes law rejected by the French deputies (22.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.8/3-strikes-france-rejects" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.8/3-...-france-rejects</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />5. UK: Google's Street View does not breach the Data Protection Act<br />============================================================<br /><br />In response to a complaint filed by Privacy International, the UK Data<br />Protection Authority, Information Commissioner's Office, found Google's<br />Street View service clear of any breach of the Data Protection Act, as<br />revealed in a public statement on 23 April 2009.<br /><br />After the service was introduced in UK on 20 March 2009, Privacy<br />International filed a complaint against Google arguing that the company<br />needed the consent of the communities it was photographing, before setting<br />up Street View system. Also, on 3 April the residents of Broughton,<br />Buckinghamshire, made a barricade to prevent the Google car from entering<br />their village because they considered that images presented by Street View<br />could easily be used by burglers, thus facilitating their actions.<br /><br />Privacy International complained by the fact that Google had not performed<br />safeguards to the technology to the extent promised and that the service had<br />created numerous instances of embarrassment and distress for citizens. "We<br />also believe that the technology has created substantial threat to a number<br />of individuals and that the extent of intrusion into the homes of some<br />complainants is unlawful. In such cases, Google should have acquired consent<br />from individuals before images were captured," said the complaint.<br /><br />The ICO ruled against Privacy International's action. "It is important to<br />highlight that putting images of people on Google Street View is very<br />unlikely to formally breach the Data Protection Act," stated David Evans,<br />the Senior Data Protection Practice Manager of the ICO adding: "Watch the TV<br />news any day this week and you will see people walking past reporters in the<br />street. Some football fans' faces will be captured on Match of the Day and<br />local news programmes this weekend - without their consent, but perfectly<br />legally."<br /><br />While acknowledging having received numerous complaints from people who have<br />found their image on Google Street View, ICO considers however that the<br />removal of an entire service would be "disproportionate to the relatively<br />small risk of privacy detriment".<br /><br />The ICO has expressed satisfaction for Google having put in place adequate<br />safeguards to minimise the risks to the individuals' privacy and safety and<br />stated it would be watching closely so that Google should continue to<br />respond quickly to complaints and deletion requests. "As a regulator we take<br />a pragmatic and common sense approach. Any images of people's faces or<br />number plates should be blurred. We emphasised the importance of blurring<br />these images to protect people's privacy and limit privacy intrusion. Google<br />must respond quickly to deletion requests and complaints, as it is doing at<br />the moment. We will be watching closely to make sure this continues to be<br />achieved in practice," said Evans.<br /><br />Privacy International had a very strong reaction to ICO's ruling. Its<br />director Simon Davies declared for The Times that ICO "has entirely<br />misrepresented Privacy<br />International's concerns and complaint. We never sought the shutdown of<br />Google Street View, as this ruling implies. We wanted to get Google to focus<br />on the technological solutions and to get the commissioner to uphold the<br />principles behind the law. Instead, he has sacrificed principles for<br />pragmatism, an approach we believe has already been responsible for many of<br />the privacy invasions in Britain."<br /><br />Davis considers there are dysfunctions in the Commission's handling<br />complaints and technological advice would be necessary. Therefore, Privacy<br />International is "for the creation of a technological advice office, and for<br />greater rigour to be applied to the ICO's relations with companies and<br />government."<br /><br />Davis also expects a different reaction from Christopher Graham, director<br />general of the Advertising Standards Authority, who is expected to become<br />the next UK Information Commissioner after Richard Thomas, the present ICO,<br />retires on 30 June. "We challenge the incoming commissioner to find the<br />courage to defend the legal principle of privacy and thus restore public<br />trust in his office," he said.<br /><br />Street View ruling angers privacy campaigners (23.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article6154092.ece" target="_blank">http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/ne...icle6154092.ece</a><br /><br />Google wins battle with British weather to launch Street View in UK<br />(20.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article5938017.ece" target="_blank">http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/ne...icle5938017.ece</a><br /><br />PI files complaint about Google Street View (23.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd" target="_blank">http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd</a>[347]=x-347-564039<br /><br />Privacy International slams ICO ruling on Google Street View (24.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/04/24/235779/privacy-international-slams-ico-ruling-on-google-street.htm" target="_blank">http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/200...ogle-street.htm</a><br /><br />PI calls for review of UK privacy regulator following series of failed<br />judgements (23.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd" target="_blank">http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd</a>[347]=x-347-564402<br /><br />EDRIgram: Privacy complaints related to Google's Street View (16.07.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.14/privacy-street-view" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.14/privacy-street-view</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />6. Reclaim your DNA from the UK database<br />============================================================<br /><br />A coallition of Human rights groups in UK has launched "Reclaim your DNA"<br />website that helps innocent people contact the police to seek destruction of<br />their DNA and database records. Five months after the European Court of<br />Human Rights decision in the case Marper vs UK, no bill has been introduced<br />in the Parliament to deal with this situation. However, in a recent<br />statement, the UK home secretary Jacqui Smith said that the plans for<br />destruction of the DNA profiles of the innocent people stored by the Police<br />would be published soon.<br /><br />The website "Reclaim your DNA" was launched on 27 April 2009 by several<br />human rights groups in UK: GeneWatch UK, NO2ID, Black Mental Health UK, ARCH<br />and EDRi-member Open Rights Group.<br /><br />Dr Helen Wallace, Director of GeneWatch UK, said: "If Scotland can remove<br />innocent people from the DNA database, why can't this happen everywhere?<br />It's time for people in the rest of Britain to demand their rights".<br />GeneWatch has already warned that the health and drug companies will want<br />access to the samples in order to create profiles to predict who is<br />genetically susceptible to different illnesses and diseases.<br /><br />The website explains the procedure of deleting the DNA from the National DNA<br />Database in case you haven't been convicted. It is estimated that at least<br />800 000 people are in this situation. The coalition presents the arguments<br />for such an action: "Your computer record on the<br />National DNA database can be used to trace you or your relatives. A sample<br />of your DNA, containing your personal genetic information, will also be<br />stored by one of the commercial laboratories that do work for the police.<br />Your DNA sample contains some private information about your health."<br /><br />"We have human rights: we need to exercise them if we want to successfully<br />defend them. The digital age means data is constantly easier to collect,<br />store, and analyse, so when government goes too far, it is vital citizens<br />act to defend their right to privacy" points Jim Killock, Executive Director<br />of Open Rights Group making reference also to the European Court of Human<br />Rights decision that considered it is illegal for the government to keep all<br />this personal information belonging to innocent people.<br /><br />The UK government stalled for nearly 5 months and initial plans seamed to<br />try not to implement directly the judgement. But a statement from the UK<br />home secretary Jacqui Smith insisted on 3 May 2009 that the plans would be<br />presented this week and will also include the destruction of all physical<br />samples, such as mouth swabs, hair and blood. It is estimated that a<br />consultation paper would be released by the UK government to detail all the<br />actions to deal with the destruction of the DNA profiles of the innocent<br />people.<br /><br />But the civil rights groups remain cautious on the decision. Simon Davies<br />from Privacy International: "The DNA database is already too big.We would<br />argue that the samples of anyone convicted of even minor offences should be<br />removed."<br /><br />Reclaim your DNA !<br /><a href="http://reclaimyourdna.org/" target="_blank">http://reclaimyourdna.org/</a><br /><br />The UK Police National DNA Database<br /><a href="http://www.genewatch.org/sub-539478" target="_blank">http://www.genewatch.org/sub-539478</a><br /><br />GeneWatch PR: Innocent urged to reclaim their DNA (27.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.genewatch.org/article.shtml?als" target="_blank">http://www.genewatch.org/article.shtml?als</a>[cid]=563486&als[itemid]=564430<br /><br />Step-by-step guide to reclaim your DNA (27.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://gizmonaut.net/blog/uk/reclaim_your_dna_launch.html" target="_blank">http://gizmonaut.net/blog/uk/reclaim_your_dna_launch.html</a><br /><br />Jacqui Smith says DNA database profiles of 800,000 innocent people will be<br />axed (3.05.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/03/police-dna-database-jacqui-smith" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/ma...se-jacqui-smith</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram:ECHR decided against the UK DNA Database (17.12.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number6.24/echr-marper-case-dna-uk" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number6.24/e...per-case-dna-uk</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />7. WIPO Committee on Development and Intellectual Property: Third meeting<br />============================================================<br /><br />The central issues in the third meeting of the World Intellectual Property<br />Organization (WIPO) Committee on Development and Intellectual Property<br />(CDIP) seemed to be the creation of centralized databases to collect<br />traditional cultural expressions, traditional knowledge, genetic material<br />and public domain material - and to close the digital divide between<br />(post-)industrialized nations and economies in transition, developing<br />countries (DCs) and the least developed countries (LDCs).<br /><br />Because Public Domain (PD) is decidedly different in different countries, it<br />was proposed that a study on what does PD entail in different countries be<br />undertaken by WIPO. From this study, a database should be created for the<br />use of different actors that need to know what actually belongs to PD.<br />Another central concern expressed by DCs and LDCs during the meeting was<br />that PD should not only be mapped and preserved, but also enriched when<br />possible. On the other hand, DCs and LDCs were worried that traditional<br />cultural expressions, traditional knowledge and genetic material would be<br />presumed to automatically belong to PD. Although direct concerns were not<br />mentioned with all three areas, it was apparent that with the first, the<br />worry was the westernization of traditional music, texts, behavior patterns<br />etc. and with the second, that traditional knowledge about herbs and<br />medicines as well as treatments would be enclosed by western multinational<br />corporations without benefit to the local tribes and people who actually<br />found them (CDIP/3/3, Recommendation 20)<br /><br />A clear tension between (post-) industrialized countries and DCs, LDCs and<br />economies in transition was appearant. The latter often promoted  to each<br />other innovative and situational suggestions taking multiple views into<br />account. The industrialized countries' representatives, more often than not,<br />attempted to preserve the status quo, although as exceptions to this rule<br />Japan and the Republic of South Korea  must be mentioned. Japan had<br />innovative ideas on E-SPEED database from which the member states, their<br />patent and registering officials and stakeholders could observe various<br />kinds of cases and how Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) in different<br />countries are handled (CDIP/3/8). Republic of Korea suggested doing a study<br />in Fair Trade practices in different market areas - how to strengthen these<br />and make them more widely used and available (CDIP/3/7). Some industrialized<br />countries representatives expressed doubt on whether these proposals would<br />be feasible in this economical environment, but, of course, this was also<br />met with some skepticism by DCs and LDCs. After all, the kinds of economic<br />problems western countries suffer from are in no way comparable of the<br />normal situation DCs and LDCs face.<br /><br />Most EU and Group B representatives seemed satisfied with the fairly few<br />comments made by the Czech Republic (in the name of EC and its 27 member<br />states) and Germany. These representatives mainly commented on certain<br />technical issues in the proposed projects execution, whereas the US<br />representative tended to be more vocal and a stronger proponent of the<br />status quo by more often than not referring to practices which would slow<br />and hinder the proposed changes to the projects. As an interesting side<br />topic, the one time the UK representative used an intervention, he mentioned<br />(freely quoting) that as he was representing the UK population as a whole,<br />also Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) constituency not just the<br />government and rights holders, therefore the need for NGO interventions was<br />not all that necessary. Let us hope that the UK delegate really does<br />represent all the stakeholders in UK, although it remains unclear when these<br />stakeholders have the opportunity to be heard by this representative in<br />relation to WIPO CDIP.<br /><br />NGOs, DCs and LDCs were all worried specifically about the end of the<br />projects - would the projects carry on after the funding for them by WIPO<br />ended? If a project for setting up a center for certain IPR policy lasted 5<br />years, would it actually be run after this? What would happen to the<br />hardware bought? It would at that stage be old and in need of replacement,<br />at least some of the personnel trained would be offered work elsewhere both<br />during and after the project ended and the state would not necessarily have<br />the funds to keep the project going on their own.<br /><br />Worries were also presented on the transparency and wider use of WIPO<br />prepared material. Even though a large part of it is available, either for<br />free or at a reasonable price, if there is no infrastructure in place to<br />facilitate the use, it doesn't mean much.<br /><br />The meeting was a positive experience compared to previous CDIP meetings<br />from the point of view of NGOs. The representatives of NGOs were offered far<br />more possibilities to comment on the items at the agenda than in previous<br />meetings. Especially The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)<br />did a lot of work for this to happen. The representative for CIEL talked<br />with various member states representatives, the chair and the secretariat -<br />with good results. NGOs had their traditional possibility to offer views and<br />point out specifically important topics during the opening session, but the<br />chair also attended the NGO meeting Wednesday morning.<br /><br />After that meeting, he offered the NGOs a possibility to give short<br />statements both during Thursday and Friday. The first time this possibility<br />was offered, only Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) and Electronic<br />Frontier Foundation (EFF) were able to use this to their advantage.<br /><br />During Friday, the NGOs were more prepared for this possibility and more of<br />them, and in more depth towards the topics under handling, were able to use<br />the possibility and various short comments were heard.<br /><br />During Monday's opening statements, Library Copyright Alliance (LCA) and<br />Electronic Information for Libraries (eIFL.net) presented their concerns<br />about libraries using electronic materials in DCs and LDCs . There are<br />problems with this even in industrialized nations, thus they were concerned<br />that in states with less developed practices this would especially cause<br />lots of problems. As an example, the use of orphan works is troublesome even<br />in the industrialized countries: how to handle potential payments if the<br />rights holders are found, how to find out whether the rights holder is known<br />when concentrated databases of e.g. copyright holders do not exist, etc.<br />Licensing practices are also unclear in many DCs and LDCs, and often do not<br />offer any possibilities for libraries to offer electronic materials to be<br />loaned outside specific contracts (see especially CDIP/3/5 and<br />CDIP/3/INF/2).<br /><br />During Thursday, FSFE brought to attention the advantages free software and<br />open standards would offer in many situations. The free software and open<br />standards advantages (e.g. possibility to translate software instead of<br />relying on the good will of the software producers) enable more democratic<br />innovation models than traditional propietary software, thus allowing<br />developing countries to reap considerable benefits from using free software<br />and relying on open standards.<br /><br />CIEL was instrumental in getting the possibility for the NGOs to be active<br />during the Friday session. The CIEL representative saw it essential that the<br />databases containing technical information on IPRs (see e.g. CDIP/3/INF/2,<br />Annex II, Recommendation 5) should include model solutions. If possible,<br />they should also be updated in real time instead of in batches. All surveys<br />and studies ought to be based on empirical studies and statistical analysis<br />performed by independent researchers rather than on rights holder<br />associations' or purely theoretical ones, which often seems to be the case.<br />Finally, the results from these studies and surveys should be available to<br />all, not just WIPO member states.<br /><br />On top of what was presented in the official meetings, the political play in<br />the corridors of power were interesting to follow. Who eats lunch with whom,<br />what was said, but especially what was not said, what kinds of<br />presuppositions were brought to discussions depending on the member state or<br />group of the representative. The decision making cannot be considered open,<br />transparent and democratic, even in good will, but progress towards more<br />open and enabling discussions can be, none the less, seen.<br /><br />Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) : Third Session<br /><a href="http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=17382" target="_blank">http://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/details.jsp?meeting_id=17382</a><br /><br />Center for International Environmental Law<br /><a href="http://www.ciel.org/" target="_blank">http://www.ciel.org/</a><br /><br />EFF<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/</a><br /><br />Library Copyright Alliance (LCA)<br /><a href="http://www.librarycopyrightalliance.org/" target="_blank">http://www.librarycopyrightalliance.org/</a><br /><br />Electronic Information for Libraries<br /><a href="http://www.eifl.net/cps/sections/home" target="_blank">http://www.eifl.net/cps/sections/home</a><br /><br />FSF Europe<br /><a href="http://fsfeurope.org/projects/wipo/" target="_blank">http://fsfeurope.org/projects/wipo/</a><br /><br />(contribution by Kai K. Kimppa - Lecturer, Information Systems, University<br />of Turku - Finland)<br /><br />============================================================<br />8. Recommended Action<br />============================================================<br /><br />The European Commission has launched a new online tool offering practical<br />advice on the digital rights consumers have under EU law<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/eyouguide" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/eyouguide</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />9. Recommended Reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />European Parliament study: A Review of the increased use of CCTV and<br />video-surveillance for crime prevention purposes in Europe by Clive Norris<br /><a href="http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/apr/ep-study-norris-cctv-video-surveillance.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/apr/ep...urveillance.pdf</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />10. Agenda<br />============================================================<br /><br />11 May 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />GigaNet is organizing the 2nd international academic workshop on Global<br />Internet Governance: An Interdisciplinary Research Field in Construction.<br /><a href="http://giganet.igloogroups.org/publiclibr/giganetcos/2009brusse" target="_blank">http://giganet.igloogroups.org/publiclibr/...tcos/2009brusse</a><br /><br />13-14 May 2009 Uppsala, Sweden<br />Mashing-up Culture: The Rise of User-generated Content<br /><a href="http://www.counter2010.org/workshop_call" target="_blank">http://www.counter2010.org/workshop_call</a><br /><br />19-20 May 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />Personal data - more use, more protection?<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/events/news_events_en.htm#dp_conference_2009" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/even...conference_2009</a><br /><br />22-23 May 2009, Florence, Italy<br />E-privacy: Towards total control<br /><a href="http://e-privacy.winstonsmith.info/" target="_blank">http://e-privacy.winstonsmith.info/</a><br /><br />23 May 2009, Florence, Italy<br />Big Brother Award Italia 2009<br /><a href="http://bba.winstonsmith.info/" target="_blank">http://bba.winstonsmith.info/</a><br /><br />24-28 May 2009, Venice, Italy<br />ICIMP 2009, The Fourth International Conference on Internet Monitoring<br />and Protection<br /><a href="http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html" target="_blank">http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html</a><br /><br />1-4 June 2009, Washington, DC, USA<br />Computers Freedom and Privacy 2009<br /><a href="http://www.cfp2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.cfp2009.org/</a><br /><br />5 June 2009, London, UK<br />The Second Multidisciplinary Workshop on Identity in the Information<br />Society (IDIS 09): "Identity and the Impact of Technology"<br /><a href="http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/" target="_blank">http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/</a><br /><br />28-30 June 2009, Torino, Italy<br />COMMUNIA Conference 2009: Global Science & Economics of Knowledge-Sharing<br />Institutions<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009</a><br /><br />2-3 July 2009, Padova, Italy<br />3rd FLOSS International Workshop on Free/Libre Open Source Software<br /><a href="http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/manenti/floss/floss09.html" target="_blank">http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/...ss/floss09.html</a><br /><br />13-16 August 2009, Vierhouten, The Netherlands<br />Hacking at Random<br /><a href="http://www.har2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.har2009.org/</a><br /><br />23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy<br />World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and<br />Council: "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage"<br /><a href="http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm</a><br /><br />10-12 September 2009, Potsdam, Germany<br />5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam<br />Section: Protest Politics<br />Panel: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property<br /><a href="http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp</a><br /><br />16-18 September 2009, Crete, Greece<br />World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2009<br /><a href="http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/" target="_blank">http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/</a><br /><br />17-18 September 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />Gikii, A Workshop on Law, Technology and Popular Culture<br />Institute for Information Law (IViR) - University of Amsterdam<br />Call for papers by 1 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp" target="_blank">http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp</a><br /><br />21-23 October 2009, Istanbul, Turkey<br />eChallenges 2009<br /><a href="http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp</a><br /><br />24-25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />3rd European Privacy Open Space<br /><a href="http://www.privacyos.eu" target="_blank">http://www.privacyos.eu</a><br /><br />25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />Austrian Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 21 September 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/</a><br /><br />16 October 2009, Bielefeld, Germany<br />10th German Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 15 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/</a><br /><br />15-18 November 2009, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt<br />UN Internet Governance Forum<br /><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/" target="_blank">http://www.intgovforum.org/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />11. About<br />============================================================<br /><br />EDRI-gram is a biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe.<br />Currently EDRI has 29 members based or with offices in 18 different<br />countries in Europe. European Digital Rights takes an active interest in<br />developments in the EU accession countries and wants to share knowledge and<br />awareness through the EDRI-grams.<br /><br />All contributions, suggestions for content, corrections or agenda-tips are<br />most welcome. Errors are corrected as soon as possible and visibly on the<br />EDRI website.<br /><br />Except where otherwise noted, this newsletter is licensed under the<br />Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See the full text at<br /><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</a><br /><br />Newsletter editor: Bogdan Manolea &lt;edrigram@edri.org&gt;<br /><br />Information about EDRI and its members:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/</a><br /><br />European Digital Rights needs your help in upholding digital rights in the<br />EU. If you wish to help us promote digital rights, please consider making a<br />private donation.<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram subscription information<br /><br />subscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: subscribe<br /><br />You will receive an automated e-mail asking to confirm your request.<br />unsubscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: unsubscribe<br /><br />- EDRI-gram in Macedonian<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available partly in Macedonian, with delay. Translations<br />are provided by Metamorphosis<br /><a href="http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php" target="_blank">http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram in German<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available in German, with delay. Translations are provided<br />Andreas Krisch from the EDRI-member VIBE!AT - Austrian Association for<br />Internet Users<br /><a href="http://www.unwatched.org/" target="_blank">http://www.unwatched.org/</a><br /><br />- Newsletter archive<br /><br />Back issues are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram</a><br /><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 10:54:51 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19837</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.13: EFF Files Suit Against Apple Computer, Inc., to Defend the First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19800</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 13  May 1, 2009 editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 508th issue:<br /><br />* EFF HAS FILED SUIT AGAINST APPLE COMPUTER, INC., TO<br />DEFEND THE FIRST AMENDMENT rights of an operator of a<br />public Internet "wiki" site known as BluWiki. The site is<br />entirely noncommercial, operated by OdioWorks as a public<br />service.<br /><br />Late last year, Apple lawyers demanded removal of some of<br />the content on BluWiki, alleging that the discussions<br />constituted copyright infringement and a violation of the<br />DMCA's prohibition on circumventing copy protection<br />measures. The discussions in question focused on how<br />hobbyists might enable iPods and iPhones to work with<br />desktop media management software other than Apple's own<br />iTunes software, such as WinAmp and Songbird. Fearing legal<br />action by Apple, OdioWorks took down the discussions from<br />the BluWiki site.<br /><br />OdioWorks filed the lawsuit in order to vindicate its right<br />to restore those discussions. The suit seeks a declaratory<br />judgment that the discussions do not violate any of the<br />DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions and do not infringe<br />any copyrights owned by Apple.<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/27" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/27</a><br /><br />For more on this case:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/cases/odioworks-v-apple" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/cases/odioworks-v-apple</a><br /><br />* EFF HAS CALLED ON CONGRESS TO EXAMINE THE INVESTIGATIVE<br />DATA WAREHOUSE (IDW) -- a massive FBI data-mining project<br />that includes a billion records, many of which contain<br />personal information on American citizens. Supporting its<br />request, EFF provided Congress with its new report on IDW,<br />published this week with information obtained through<br />Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation.<br /><br />In August 2006, EFF sought documents about the IDW under<br />the Freedom of Information Act, but the agency has withheld<br />important details about the collection, maintenance, and<br />use of personal information contained in the huge database.<br />The Department of Justice recently told the court that no<br />additional material will be disclosed, despite the Obama<br />administration's new policies on open government.<br /><br />The IDW contains at least 53 datasets and includes more<br />than four times as many unique documents as the Library of<br />Congress.<br /><br />For the press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/28" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/28</a><br /><br />For the blog post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/eff-issues-report-fb" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/eff-issues-report-fb</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* Ninth Circuit Issues State Secrets Opinion<br />The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the<br />Government's expansive view of the state secrets privilege<br />this week, allowing an "extraordinary rendition" case<br />against Jeppesen Dataplan to proceed.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/ninth-circuit-allows" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/ninth-circuit-allows</a><br /><br />* Hearings on Phone Unlocking, Jailbreaking, DVD Clipping<br />Today the U.S. Copyright Office comes to Stanford Law<br />School to hold hearings on proposed exemptions to the<br />DMCA's prohibition on circumventing technical protection<br />measures.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/dmca-hearings-phone-" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/dmca-hearings-phone-</a><br /><br />* RealDVD v. DVD-CCA: The Duel Begins In Earnest<br />Opening shots were fired last week in the RealNetworks v.<br />DVD-CCA case. Unfortunately, the public was excluded from<br />key parts of the battle, when the presiding judge, Marilyn<br />Hall Patel, granted DVD-CCA's request to close the<br />courtroom.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/realdvd-v-dvd-cca-du" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/realdvd-v-dvd-cca-du</a><br /><br />* Google Book Search Settlement<br />In recent weeks, there have been a number of important<br />developments relating to the Google Book Search settlement,<br />currently awaiting approval before a court in New York.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/google-book-search-s" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/google-book-search-s</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Rep. Boucher Pushes Internet Privacy Legislation<br />The Virginia Congressman wants legislation that will<br />protect the public against behavioral advertising and other<br />new technologies.<br /><a href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docid=news-000003103117" target="_blank">http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?doci...ws-000003103117</a><br /><br />~ Obama's First 100 Days: High Marks for Science, Low for<br />Privacy<br />Wired's Threat Level blog grades the Obama administration<br />on issues of copyright, cyber security, transparency and<br />privacy.<br /><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/04/obama-100-days" target="_blank">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/04/obama-100-days</a><br /><br />~ Lessig Video Gets DMCA Takedown<br />Warner Music issued a DMCA takedown against a video by<br />copyright and DMCA law expert Lawrence Lessig.<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/04/lessig-presentation-on-youtube-hit-with-dmca-takedown-notice.ars" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/20...down-notice.ars</a><br /><br />For more miniLinks:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/minilinks-2009-04-30" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/minilinks-2009-04-30</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* Send EFF to CFP!<br /><br />EFF is looking for donations of airline tickets for the<br />Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference and other<br />conferences and speaking engagements. We need at least one<br />round trip ticket from San Francisco to Washington, D.C.,<br />for CFP, and we'll certainly need additional tickets<br />throughout the year. If you have enough airline miles for a<br />free ticket and would like to send an EFF staffer to a<br />conference, let us know, and we will help you with the<br />process of making the reservation. Please note that at this<br />time, we are unable to combine miles from multiple<br />individuals.<br /><br />In exchange for a ticket, we can offer a free membership<br />and a mention in EFFector (if you'd like). Please contact<br />info@eff.org if you have a ticket to donate.<br /><br />Thank you Doug Faunt for donating tickets!<br /><br />* EFF's Web 2.0 Compliance Bootcamp<br /><br />Does your company have to contend with the maze of laws<br />dealing with user privacy and publishing user content? Want<br />to do the right thing by the online community that gives<br />your business value, and still fulfill your legal<br />obligations?<br /><br />On May 11, 2009, EFF will reprise its successful one-day<br />session for Internet companies that handle issues arising<br />from users and user-generated content. From DMCA to CDA to<br />ECPA, the law surrounding Internet content can be<br />confusing, especially for the folks who have to decide on<br />the fly whether to let something stay up or take it down,<br />or whether to give their customer's name to the FBI agent<br />on the phone. We will also have additional sessions on open<br />source licensing and employment law for start-ups and small<br />Internet companies. The event is co-sponsored by the Golden<br />Gate University School of Law Intellectual Property Law<br />Center.<br /><br />Topic areas include:<br />* Defamation, harassment, and other accusations of bad<br />behavior<br />* Fair use, free culture, and the right to remix<br />* Copyright take-downs and put-backs<br />* How to respond to cops, crooks, and courts who want your<br />customers' communications and other private information<br />* Anonymous speakers<br />* Porn, predators, and the pressure to police<br />* Open source issues<br />* Employment basics for start-ups<br /><br />Where:<br />Golden Gate University School of Law<br />536 Mission Street<br />San Francisco CA, 94105-2968<br /><br />How much:<br />$300. Google has generously offered to sponsor some<br />attendees who cannot afford the $300 price. Please send a<br />short paragraph about why you need the scholarship<br />assistance to bootcamp@eff.org. We will evaluate all<br />applicants and get back to you a week before the event.<br /><br />For more information:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/bootcamp/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/bootcamp/</a><br /><br />To sign up:<br /><a href="http://secure.eff.org/bootcamp" target="_blank">http://secure.eff.org/bootcamp</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br />secure.eff.org/donate<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 02:03:55 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19800</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Jacqui Smith scraps plan for email database</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19792</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Jacqui Smith scraps plan for email database<br /><br /><br />Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary has ditched plans for a giant Government database tracking all emails, phone calls and internet activity.<br /> <br /><br />Last Updated: 4:17PM BST 27 Apr 2009<br /><br /><br />Ms Smith said a central store of electronic data was an "extreme" solution and would have undermined privacy.<br /><br />Records of every electronic communication made by Britons will instead be held by private companies at a cost of around £2 billion.<br /><br />nternet firms will be asked to collect and store vast amounts of data, including from social networking sites such as Facebook.<br /><br />Launching the proposals on Monday, Ms Smith acknowledged concerns over privacy.<br /><br />She said: "My key priority is to protect the citizens of the UK, and communications data is an essential tool for law enforcement agencies to track murderers and paedophiles, save lives and tackle crime.<br /><br />"Advances in communications mean that there are ever more sophisticated ways to communicate and we need to ensure that we keep up with the technology being used by those who would seek to do us harm.<br /><br />"It is essential that the police and other crime-fighting agencies have the tools they need to do their job. However, to be clear, there are absolutely no plans for a single central store.<br /><br />"We recognise that there is a delicate balance between privacy and security, but to do nothing is not an option as we would be failing in our duty to protect the public."<br /><br />She added: "There were two elements that I think people could be concerned about. One was the state holding the data. The other was the data all being concentrated in one place.<br /><br />"It is to overcome those concerns about privacy that the proposal involves Communication Service Providers retaining the data that comes from them and passes across their networks."<br /><br />Under the plans, every internet user will be given a unique ID code and all their data stored in one place.<br /><br />Government agencies such as the police and security services will access the data to investigate suspected criminals and terrorists.<br /><br />But it could also be accessed by local authorities and other Government agencies.<br /><br />Ministers stress the content of messages and online profiles will not be stored.<br /> <br /><br /> link:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/5230123/Jacqui-Smith-scraps-plan-for-email-database.html" target="_blank">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...l-database.html</a>  <br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:45:51 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19792</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.12: EFF Urges the Kentucky Supreme Court to Uphold Free Speech and Due Process</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19786</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 12  April 24, 2009 editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 507th issue:<br /><br />* EFF URGES THE KENTUCKY SUPREME COURT TO UPHOLD FREE<br />SPEECH AND DUE PROCESS in a friend-of-the-court brief filed<br />last week. The brief, filed jointly with other leading<br />public interest and industry trade groups, advocates that<br />the Kentucky Supreme Court uphold an appeals court ruling<br />that blocked state officials from ordering out-of-state<br />registrars to turn over control of over 100 overseas<br />Internet domain names accused of violating state gambling<br />laws.<br /><br />The case began in September when the commonwealth of<br />Kentucky convinced a state court judge to order the seizure<br />of 141 domain names, claiming that the names were "gambling<br />devices" banned under Kentucky law. A Kentucky appeals<br />court later overturned the ruling, but state officials<br />appealed the order. EFF and others argue that the<br />commonwealth's attempt to regulate overseas websites is<br />fatally flawed and, if successful, would violate the First<br />Amendment, the Commerce Clause, and the Due Process Clause.<br /><br />For the press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/20" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/20</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* Obama's Transparency Promise: We're Still Waiting<br />The FBI's failure to change course in the Investigative<br />Data Warehouse case is not the only situation in which the<br />Obama administration's actions are not yet living up to its<br />pro-transparency rhetoric.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/obamas-transparency-" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/obamas-transparency-</a><br /><br />* Government Rules that Proxies Don't Merit Extra Jail Time<br />The Sentencing Commission has decided, at least for now,<br />not to classify the use of proxies as a sign of<br />sophistication.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/us-governmentt-rules-use-proxies-does-not-merit" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/us-go...-does-not-merit</a><br /><br />* Rep. Jane Harman Changes Her Tune on Wiretapping<br />When countless ordinary Americans are being wiretapped<br />without warrants, Harman declares the program "both<br />necessary and legal." But when Harman herself is victim to<br />a court-approved wiretap, she decides it's "a gross abuse<br />of power"?<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/harman-changes-tune" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/harman-changes-tune</a><br /><br />* Specter: "The Need to Roll Back Presidential Power Grabs"<br />Senator Arlen Specter published a detailed opinion column<br />proposing "legislation to keep the courts open to suits<br />filed against several major telephone companies that<br />allegedly facilitated the Bush administration's warrantless<br />wiretapping program."<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/senator-specter-need" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/senator-specter-need</a><br /><br />* Testing YouTube's Audio Content ID System<br />An enterprising YouTube user has completed a fascinating<br />set of tests to figure out how sensitive the audio<br />fingerprinting tools are in YouTube's Content ID system.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/testing-youtubes-aud" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/testing-youtubes-aud</a><br /><br />* Wikipedia Threatens Artists for Fair Use<br />Wikipedia has demanded that a group of artists give up<br />their domain name (wikipediaart.org) peaceably or it will<br />attempt to take it by (legal) force.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/wikipedia-threatens-" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/wikipedia-threatens-</a><br /><br />* LA Times on Latest Congressional P2P Witch Hunt<br />The L.A. Times Technology Blog hits the nail on the head in<br />responding to government employees and contractors who use<br />P2P software accidentally sharing information on networks<br />like Lime Wire.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/la-times-latest-cong" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/la-times-latest-cong</a><br /><br />* Doctorow's Law: Who Benefits from DRM?<br />Cory Doctorow recently appeared before leaders of the<br />publishing industry to explain why DRM on digital books is<br />bad for customers, bad for authors, and bad for business.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/doctorows-law" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/doctorows-law</a><br /><br />* Remembering First Amendment Champion Judith Krug<br />The free expression community lost a giant with the passing<br />last weekend of Judith Krug, longtime director of the<br />American Library Association's Office of Intellectual<br />Freedom.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/remembering-first-amendment-champion-judith-krug" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/remem...ion-judith-krug</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ EU Parliament Approves 70 Year Copyright for Recordings<br />Sound recordings would be copyrighted for 70 years under a<br />new proposal passed by the parliament -- not the 95 years<br />that had been sought -- but the Council of Ministers has<br />yet to agree.<br /><a href="http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/17744.cfm" target="_blank">http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/17744.cfm</a><br /><br />~ Where's the Downloadable Movie Service?<br />The technology exists, the demand exists. So why aren't<br />most movies available for instant download for a monthly<br />fee? Slate explains the issue.<br /><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2216328/" target="_blank">http://www.slate.com/id/2216328/</a><br /><br />~ Why Open Source Is More Secure<br />Sun Federal COO Bill Vass explains why organizations that<br />require security are turning to open source operating<br />systems.<br /><a href="http://blogs.sun.com/BVass/entry/the_no_1_reason_to" target="_blank">http://blogs.sun.com/BVass/entry/the_no_1_reason_to</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* Send EFF to CFP!<br /><br />EFF is looking for donations of airline tickets for the<br />Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference and other<br />conferences and speaking engagements. We need at least one<br />round trip ticket from San Francisco to Washington, D.C.,<br />for CFP, and we'll certainly need additional tickets<br />throughout the year. If you have enough airline miles for a<br />free ticket and would like to send an EFF staffer to a<br />conference, let us know, and we will help you with the<br />process of making the reservation. Please note that at this<br />time, we are unable to combine miles from multiple<br />individuals.<br /><br />In exchange for a ticket, we can offer a free membership<br />and a mention in EFFector (if you'd like). Please contact<br />info@eff.org if you have a ticket to donate.<br /><br />* Seth Schoen at LinuxFest Northwest<br /><br />EFF Technologist Seth David Schoen will be speaking at the<br />10th Anniversary of LinuxFest Northwest in Bellingham, WA!<br />Seth will be giving two talks (see below) so be sure to<br />stop by and find out what EFF is up to!  Event admission is<br />free and open to the public.<br /><br />Saturday, April 25: 1:30-2:15<br />"Information Security Discovers Physics"<br />Details:<br /><a href="http://blug.org/fest2009/spkr-record.dxp?id=10" target="_blank">http://blug.org/fest2009/spkr-record.dxp?id=10</a><br /><br />Sunday, April 26: 1:30-2:15<br />"An EFF Update"<br />Details: <a href="http://blug.org/fest2009/spkr-record.dxp?id=81" target="_blank">http://blug.org/fest2009/spkr-record.dxp?id=81</a><br /><br />For more information: <a href="http://linuxfestnorthwest.org" target="_blank">http://linuxfestnorthwest.org</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br />secure.eff.org/donate<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:26:25 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19786</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.8, 22 April 2009</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19779</link>
		<description><![CDATA[============================================================<br /><br />            EDRi-gram<br /><br /> biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe<br /><br />     Number 7.8, 22 April 2009<br /><br /><br />============================================================<br />Contents<br />============================================================<br /><br />1. European Parliament ITRE committee votes against the 3 strikes<br />2. Three strikes law rejected by the French Parliament<br />3. The Pirate Bay founders considered guilty by the first Swedish court<br />4. German Government forces ISPs to put web filters<br />5. Finnish e-voting results annulled by the Supreme Administrative Court<br />6. Launch of the first European Civil Liberties Day<br />7. Infringement procedure against UK for lack of privacy protection<br />8. EDRi supports a petition for Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group<br />9. Dutch Government on data retention<br />10. Creative Commons licences launched in Czech Republic<br />11. Are anonymous electronic services to be prohibited by the EC?<br />12. ENDitorial: Why "Olivennes Bill" wouldn't work in Italy<br />13. Recommended Action<br />14. Recommended Reading<br />15. Agenda<br />16. About<br /><br />============================================================<br />1. European Parliament ITRE committee votes against the 3 strikes<br />============================================================<br /><br />The ITRE - Industry, Research and Energy Committee of the European<br />Parliament (EP) has voted in the evening of 21 April 2009 on the Trautmann<br />report and has reintroduced amendment 138. However some of the amendments<br />approved by the ITRE committee are still endangering the network neutrality<br />principle.<br /><br />The ITRE Committee reinstated by 40 votes in favour with four votes against<br />the Parliament's first-reading amendment 138 that now has been renumbered as<br />amendment 46 that states that "no restriction may be imposed on the<br />fundamental rights and freedoms of endusers, without a prior ruling by the<br />judicial authorities, notably in  accordance with Article 11 of the Charter<br />of Fundamental Rights of the European Union on freedom of expression and<br />information, save when public security is threatened in which case the<br />ruling may be subsequent."<br /><br />This vote means that there is a clear disagreement on this topic between the<br />EP and the Council and, after the plenary vote on 5 May, a third reading<br />might be necessary after the European elections. Also the negotiations<br />between MEPs and the Czech Presidency to reach an agreement on this issue<br />will continue.<br /><br />The success of the European Parliament's Committe is putting pressure on the<br />French government that will find it more difficult to push its 3 strikes law<br />against a European directive ready to be adopted by the European Parliament.<br />According to Jérémie Zimmermann, co-founder of La Quadrature du Net: "The<br />European citizens will remember this courageous stand. Members of the<br />European parliament honoured their mandates by standing courageously for<br />citizens' rights and freedoms. This is one more blow to Nicolas Sarkozy's<br />'three strikes' or 'HADOPI' law in France, and a strong sign that nobody in<br />Europe will want to pass such a stupid legislation going against progress,<br />citizens' rights and common sense."<br /><br />MEP Guy Bono also rejected the French Government position: "If the French<br />Government wants a deal on the Telecom Package, it has to give up, in the<br />name of the general European interest, to the liberticide provisions of the<br />draft Hadopi Law".<br /><br />But the ITRE committee also voted some amendments that endanger the<br />network neutrality without any relevant debate. As Monica Horten from<br />Iptegrity.com explains: "the UK government's amendments which seek to permit<br />broadband providers to place restrictions on their networks, and offer<br />preferential services without any oversight by the regulator, have found<br />their way into Mrs Trautmann's final draft."<br /><br />These amendments contain the text: "any conditions limiting access to and/or<br />use of services and applications where such conditions are allowed by Member<br />states in conformity with Community law"<br /><br />Ms. Horten highlights: "Article 9.1 Access directive and Annexe 1 point 19<br />Authorisation directive are about limiting users access to the Internet.<br />Article 8.2 and 8.4 support these provisions, by weaking users rights -<br />indeed, it is no longer a right, rather users may simply be offered the<br />ability to choose, which could be interpreted that they have the ability to<br />choose between different packages of limitations."<br /><br />The deadlock on amendment 138 could mean that a third reading might be<br />required and that would provide more comments and debates on those<br />amendments that endanger the network neutrality. But this depends also on<br />the plenary amendments that need to be presented by 29 April and on the vote<br />of the plenary which could take place on 5 May.<br /><br />If you want to support the network neutrality please contact your MEPs<br />before the plenary vote and support the Open Letter that EDRi has signed in<br />order to keep the principle of no discrimination between Internet traffic<br />data, based on content, services or applications.<br /><br />Open letter to the European Parliament - Telecom Package (17.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/campaigns/open-letter-telecom-package" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/campaigns/ope...telecom-package</a><br /><br />Trautmann Report<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/pr/770/770260/770260en.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/200...60/770260en.pdf</a><br /><br />Telecom markets: still no overall agreement with Council presidency<br />(21.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/058-54125-111-04-17-909-20090421IPR54124-21-04-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/.../default_en.htm</a><br /><br />Amendment 138 saved - but not the Internet (21.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=321&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...21&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />Victory for EU Citizens! Amendment 138 was voted again. (21.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/victory-for-eu-citizens-amendement-138-was-voted-again" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/en/victory-for...was-voted-again</a><br /><br />Bono amendment finally reintroduced in the Telecom Package! (only in French,<br />21.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12699-L-amendement-Bono-finalement-reintroduit-au-Paquet-Telecom.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12699-L-a...et-Telecom.html</a><br /><br />Trautmann: "I assure you I am not ready to give up" (only in French,<br />21.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12698-Trautmann-Je-vous-assure-que-je-ne-suis-pas-prete-a-lacher-MAJ.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12698-Tra...lacher-MAJ.html</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />2. Three strikes law rejected by the French deputies<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 9 April 2009, the French Parliament voted against the so called Hadopi<br />law introducing the graduate response, against the recommendation of the<br />Joint Mixed Commission (CMP - Commission Mixte Paritaire). The law had been<br />voted by the National Assembly on 2 April, supported by CMP on 7 April and<br />further on voted by the Senate.<br /><br />In an unexpected move, the deputies, however, decided to reject the draft<br />law considering the text to be too hard especially by the introduction by<br />CMP of what the opponents called the "double pain". The text was stipulating<br />that the Internet users allegdly found to illegally download copyrighted<br />material, after receiving two warnings, would continue to pay the access<br />subscription while having their access cut off, for a period from two months<br />to one year.<br /><br />"This is an extraordinary victory for the citizens. This vote proves it is<br />still possible to be heard. It is a fantastic example of the use of Net to<br />counter those who attempt to control it," said Jérémie Zimmermann, co-fonder<br />and spokesman of La Quadrature du Net.<br /><br />The French Government intends to reintroduce the text to the General<br />Assembly and the Senate. Only, it will have to change the text as it was<br />before being introduced to the CMP.<br /><br />The Government would certainly wish to preserve the double pain measure in<br />order to avoid having to pay compensations to the ISPs in case of access<br />suspension.<br /><br />In the mean time, Nicolas Sarkozy, the initiator of the three strikes<br />measure, makes pressure to block the Bono amendment from of the Telecom<br />Package in the European Parliament. However, the ITRE committee in the EP<br />has reintroduced the amendement, thus leaving the plenary with the final<br />decision.<br /><br />The Hadopi law will be reexamined by the French National Assembly only on 29<br />April probably after a final decision on Bono amendment is taken, hence<br />Sarkosy's high pressure on blocking it. The new text of the draft law is<br />available on the National Assembly website.<br /><br />The Parliament rejects the draft law on illegal downloading (only in French,<br />9.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/fr/hadopi-rejetee-a-lassemblee" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/fr/hadopi-rejetee-a-lassemblee</a><br /><br />Hadopi rejected in the Assembly! (only in French, 9.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article/2009/04/09/le-parlement-rejette-le-projet-de-loi-creation-et-internet_1178838_651865.html" target="_blank">http://www.lemonde.fr/technologies/article...838_651865.html</a><br /><br />Downloading: the draft law rejected (only in French, 9.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2009/04/09/01011-20090409FILWWW00451-telechargement-le-projet-de-loi-rejete.php" target="_blank">http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2009/04/...-loi-rejete.php</a><br /><br />New Draft Hadopi Law (only in French, 20.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/projets/pl1618.asp" target="_blank">http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/projets/pl1618.asp</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: French National Assembly votes for the three strikes law<br />(8.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.7/france-adopts-3-strikes-law" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.7/fr...s-3-strikes-law</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />3. The Pirate Bay founders considered guilty by the first Swedish court<br />============================================================<br /><br />The verdict of the Swedish court in The Pirate Bay (TBP) trial was given on<br />17 April 2009 with the four defendants, Fredrik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm<br />Warg, Peter Sunde and Carl Lundström, found guilty and sentenced each to one<br />year in prison and to pay together about 2.7 million euro in damages. The<br />defendents already announced that they would appeal the court decision.<br /><br />The Court stated to the media: "By providing a website with ...<br />well-developed search functions, easy uploading and storage possibilities,<br />and with a tracker linked to the website, the accused have incited the<br />crimes that the filesharers have committed." The court also said that the<br />four defendants had been aware of the fact that copyrighted material was<br />shared with the help of their site. The prison sentence was justified by<br />"extensive accessibility of others' (copy)rights and the fact that the<br />operation was conducted commercially and in an organized fashion."<br />Therefore, the court has drawn the conclusion that not only the defendants<br />had been aware of illegal downloading through their site but that they had<br />taken financial advantage of it.<br /><br />The judgement "is just a footnote in a long process of destruction where<br />there won't be any winners," commented Swedish newspaper Vestmanlands Läns<br />Tidning.<br /><br />Privacy advocates consider the court's decision as a wrong and dangerous<br />movement. Christian Engström, a candidate for the European Parliament from<br />the Pirate Party said: "The Pirate Bay is a unique platform for<br />distributing culture between regular people and independent artists, and<br />that's something we want to preserve."<br /><br />Mark Mulligan, a music industry blogger and analyst, believes that the<br />ruling will not stop illegal file sharing, pointing out that the technology<br />is moving on and people are more and more sharing files through emails,<br />Instant Messenger, blogs, newsgroups or iPods.<br /><br />Some believe the verdict may have implications for Google and its YouTube<br />subsidiary. Newspaper Sundsvalls Tidning expects that after the David and<br />Goliath (TPB and the recording industry) battle, a legal action between<br />Goliath and Goliath (the industry and Google) would occur. The entertainment<br />industry representatives however say that Google or eBay will not be<br />affected as the former only returns some links to infringing content and<br />the latter only hosts some auctions for pirated goods but that does not make<br />their operations illegal.<br /><br />On 18 April, The Pirate Party organized protests that were attended by<br />hundreds of people in Stockholm, Goteborg, Karlstad and Lund against the<br />decision of the court. "The establishment and the politicians have declared<br />war against our whole generation," said Rickard Falkvinge, Pirate Party<br />chairman and founder at the rally in Stockholm.<br /><br />Mikko Valimaki from EDRi-member Electronic Frontier Finland (EFFi),<br />commented for EDRi-gram the court decision, taking into consideration the<br />legal similarities between Finland and Sweden and the EFFi and the local<br />bittorrent-case Finreactor: "The Pirate Bay was not surprising to anyone<br />familiar with our laws. The  verdict goes according to the Swedish criminal<br />law. There is not much to argue about. The only open legal issue was<br />basically whether the acts of administrators were criminal "aiding" or<br />"preparation" to user infringements. The district court bought the aiding<br />theory and thus dismissed the preparation (which would have resulted<br />probably in less damages and shorter sentences). The higher courts may<br />disagree."<br /><br />Valimaki also explained the differences in judging these cases in different<br />parts of Europe:<br />"What is interesting here is that while we don't have indirect secondary<br />liability doctrines in copyright law in Europe - US has for example<br />contributory infringement and active inducement doctrines - our criminal<br />laws can in practise create secondary liability against acts like the<br />administration of a file sharing network. The problem is that European<br />criminal law doctrines are not in harmony like the copyright laws are.<br />Thus, a file sharing operator may be liable according to Finnish or<br />Swedish criminal law but not according to say Spanish criminal law (in<br />Spain, some file sharing operators have escaped from liability)."<br /><br />The ruling has not affected the PirateBay site which is still in operation<br />and the defendants expressed their clear intention of appealing the decision<br />which means that it might take a few years before a final decision in the<br />matter is taken.<br /><br />Swedish press: file sharing still ahead of the law (18.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/18938/20090418/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/18938/20090418/</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay guilty (17.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/18908.html" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/18908.html</a><br /><br />Entertainment industry hails Pirate Bay guilty verdict (17.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20090417-18703.html" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20090417-18703.html</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay operator faces new probe (20.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/18974/20090420/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/18974/20090420/</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay: A treasure chest of post-verdict news (20.94.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/20/pirate_bay_legal_analysis/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/20/pi...legal_analysis/</a><br /><br />The Pirate Bay loads cannon with official appeal (20.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/20/pirate_bay_aftermath/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/20/pi..._bay_aftermath/</a><br /><br />Swedes demonstrate in support of Pirate Bay (19.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/18954/20090419/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/18954/20090419/</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: Swedish Pirate Bay trial waiting now for the decision<br />(11.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.5/pirate-bay-trial" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.5/pirate-bay-trial</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />4. German Government forces ISPs to put web filters<br />============================================================<br /><br />The German Government, through Germany's family minister Ursula von der<br />Leyen as well as the head of the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), Jörg<br />Ziercke, signed on 17 April 2009 "voluntary" contracts with 5 large ISPs<br />(Deutsche Telekom, Vodafone/Arcor, Hanse Net, Kabel Deutschland and<br />Telefonica O2 that have 75 per cent of the German Internet access market)<br />for child pornograph filtering via DNS.<br /><br />At the same time, a draft bill on the same topic has been initiated by the<br />Minister for Economics, Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, who is in charge of the<br />telemedia law that makes things even worst than anticipated. The bill was<br />approved today, 22 April 2009, by the German Government. The text shows that<br />the ISPs will be "allowed" to log who tried to access a site on the<br />blacklist and that the police can request this information. Moreover, the<br />blacklist can also contain sites that only link to child porn, but do not<br />host any content themselves.<br /><br />The German Federal Criminal Police Office  will be in charge of creating<br />those lists and the new law obliges all providers with more than 10 000<br />customers (approx. 97% of all ISPs) to block porn sites on the lists. Their<br />content will not be made public, thus leaving no possibility to check their<br />correctness. Those who will try to access the pages from the blacklist will<br />just see a stop sign.<br /><br />The Ministry of Family Affairs is estimating that the list will be "at<br />least thousand" Web pages. The Minister has confirmed some time ago<br />that the censorship could be extended to exclude other content from the<br />Internet, stating: "child pornography is a problem issue and clearly<br />identifiable," but "you can not exclude what the federal government may<br />want to exclude in the future."<br /><br />However, the measure is illusory as explained by the 500 protesters that<br />gathered in Berlin on Friday, 17 April 2009, to protest against this measure<br />which is considered just a first step to political censorship on the web.<br /><br />EDRi-member Ralf Bendrath explains on netzpolitik.org the main problems of<br />the measure: "The web filters are not just a tool to remove illegal content<br />from the net. Web filters are a tool of censorship. If you want illegal<br />content removed from the Internet write an email to the hosting company and<br />with hours it will be removed. If you just put it on an Internet censorship<br />list, you will precisely NOT remove it. Moreover, the government ignores the<br />facts. According to scientific studies, there is no mass market for child<br />porn on websites, and most of the material is exchanged through private<br />networks, filesharing sites or offline. We therefore see these activities as<br />only symbolic and part of the beginning federal election campaign, while at<br />the same time they are establishing a dangerous general censorship<br />infrastructure."<br /><br />The DNS filtering does not work, as explained by EDRi-member Chaos Computer<br />Club. "It will be very easy to evade this filter," said a club spokesman,<br />Matthias Mehldau. Any user that wants to bypass the Stop sign, would just<br />need to change its DNS servers to one of the OpenDNS servers freely<br />available on several websites.<br /><br />Thus, the protesters explained that in fact the money and energy spent on<br />creating blacklists would be much better used in getting the people who are<br />offering child porn via their servers. Also it seems that the major<br />providers are "blackmailed" by the government to sign the "voluntary"<br />contract, so they shouldn't be associated in connection with child<br />pornography.<br /><br />Five German online companies agree to obstruct child porn (19.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://silverscorpio.com/five-german-online-companies-agree-to-obstruct-child-porn/" target="_blank">http://silverscorpio.com/five-german-onlin...uct-child-porn/</a><br /><br />German Cabinet approves new law to ban child pornography Internet sites<br />(22.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.dailypress.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-eu-germany-child-pornography,0,5826391.story" target="_blank">http://www.dailypress.com/news/nationworld...0,5826391.story</a><br /><br />Opinion on Germany's possible internet censorship (17.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.matejunkie.com/opinion-on-germanys-possible-internet-censorship/" target="_blank">http://www.matejunkie.com/opinion-on-germa...net-censorship/</a><br /><br />Hundreds protested in the early morning against Internet censorship (only in<br />German, 17.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://netzpolitik.org/2009/hunderte-protestierten-am-fruehen-morgen-gegen-internet-zensur/" target="_blank">http://netzpolitik.org/2009/hunderte-prote...nternet-zensur/</a><br /><br />BKA filters the Web (only in German, 17.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,619509,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,619509,00.html</a><br /><br />The arguments for child porn-blocking run into the void (only in German ,<br />17.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,619505,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,619505,00.html</a><br /><br />Providers may log user requests (only in German, 20.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Kinderporno-Sperren-Provider-sollen-Nutzerzugriffe-loggen-duerfen--/meldung/136450" target="_blank">http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Kinderporno.../meldung/136450</a><br /><br />Draft law on child pornography on the Internet (only in German, 22.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Redaktion/PDF/Gesetz/entwurf-gesetzes-zur-bekaempfung-der-kinderpornographie-in-kommunikationsnetzen,property=pdf,bereich=bmwi,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.bmwi.de/BMWi/Redaktion/PDF/Gese...de,rwb=true.pdf</a><br /><br />Thoughts on the media perception & Bill on Wednesday (only in German,<br />20.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://netzpolitik.org/2009/gesetzentwurf-gedanken-zur-medialen-wahrnehmung/" target="_blank">http://netzpolitik.org/2009/gesetzentwurf-...en-wahrnehmung/</a><br /><br />Alternative DNS<br /><a href="http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Alternative_DNS" target="_blank">http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Alternative_DNS</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />5. Finnish e-voting results annulled by the Supreme Administrative Court<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court has ruled on the municipal<br />elections of 2008, in which an e-voting system was piloted.<br /><br />In its decision, the court sided with the complainants, overturning an<br />earlier decision of Helsinki Administrative Court and the decisions of the<br />municipal central elections committees to confirm the election results. As a<br />result, the three municipalities that took part in the Finnish e-voting<br />pilot must now hold new elections as soon as possible. As the e-voting pilot<br />has ended and the law authorizing e-voting expired in December 2008, the new<br />elections will use a traditional paper ballot system.<br /><br />The Supreme Administrative Court decision was based on two issues: first,<br />the voting instructions that the voters had received by mail were incorrect,<br />and second, the user interface of the e-voting terminals was deemed to be<br />flawed. The voting process utilized a smart card given to each voter, and<br />upon premature removal of the card, the voting terminals gave no indication<br />that the vote was not cast. As the system did not use a voter-verified paper<br />ballot, voters might have been left with an impression that the vote had in<br />fact been cast.<br /><br />It is notable that the Court did not address the general lawfulness of<br />e-voting. According to the Finnish law authorizing e-voting, electronic<br />ballot boxes would need to be archived until the next election. These<br />electronic ballot boxes contain encrypted information on who voted and how.<br />This poses a risk to voter secrecy. However, the Court declined to rule on<br />whether this is unlawful, or whether the electronic ballot box would need to<br />be destroyed.<br /><br />In addition, the Court did not address the question of whether an e-voting<br />system would need to be more transparent. A significant amount of system<br />design in the Finnish e-voting pilot was declared 'trade secret', and the<br />system source code is closed. The Court decision still leaves an open<br />question whether paperless, 'black box' e-voting systems could be fielded in<br />the future.<br /><br />Electronic Frontier Finland (Effi) press release on the Court decision (only<br />in Finnish, 9.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.effi.org/julkaisut/tiedotteet/lehdistotiedote-2009-04-09.html" target="_blank">http://www.effi.org/julkaisut/tiedotteet/l...2009-04-09.html</a><br /><br />E-voting appeal won: we have new elections! (9.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.turre.com/2009/04/e-voting-appeal-won/" target="_blank">http://www.turre.com/2009/04/e-voting-appeal-won/</a><br /><br />Effi's e-voting 'shadow report' in English (1.09.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.effi.org/blog/2008-09-01-evoting-report-in-english.html" target="_blank">http://www.effi.org/blog/2008-09-01-evotin...in-english.html</a><br /><br />Finnish e-voting system must not stay a trade secret (11.02.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.effi.org/system/files?file=FinlandEVotingTradeSecret_20080211.txt" target="_blank">http://www.effi.org/system/files?file=Finl...et_20080211.txt</a><br /><br />Council of Europe report on the Finnish e-voting pilot (1.12.2008)<br /><a href="https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1380337&Site=Congress" target="_blank">https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1380337&Site=Congress</a><br /><br />Supreme Administrative Court decision (only in Finnish, 9.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.kho.fi/paatokset/46372.htm" target="_blank">http://www.kho.fi/paatokset/46372.htm</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: An error margin of 2% in municipal elections ruled acceptable in<br />Finland (11.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/evoting-finland-2percent" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/ev...inland-2percent</a><br /><br />(contribution by EDRi-member Electronic Frontier Finland)<br /><br />============================================================<br />6. Launch of the first European Civil Liberties Day<br />============================================================<br /><br />Earlier this month, over a hundred politicians, journalists and campaigners<br />attended the launch of the first European Civil Liberties Day - 15 April at<br />the European Parliament. Organised by the Liberals and Democrats group<br />(ALDE), the event featured speeches from MEPs and NGOs on human rights and<br />the protection of minority groups such as Roma and lesbian, gay and<br />transgender Europeans.<br /><br />Event organiser Alexander Alvaro MEP and ALDE leader Graham Watson MEP both<br />spoke of government attempts to "encroach on the liberty, privacy and choice<br />that all free citizens should enjoy." Katarina Kresal, the Slovenian<br />Minister of Interior, described her conviction that freedom must be a<br />central concern of governments. Responses came from campaigners of th<br />International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH), the European Newspaper<br />Publishers´ Associations, the European Roma Policy Coalition, ILGA Europe<br />and EDRI, whose speech you can read below.<br /><br />There is much more information available from the ALDE website on the day<br />and the group's plans to campaign for human rights and fundamental freedoms.<br />With the European elections only 6 weeks away, this is a critical moment for<br />voters who want to see human rights strongly supported in the next European<br />Parliament.<br /><br />EDRI speech, given by Ian Brown (EDRI-members FIPR and Open Rights Group):<br /><br />It's great to see today's launch of European Civil Liberties day. Coming<br />from the UK, which Privacy International now rates as the worst surveillance<br />state in the EU, I need all the optimism I can get. We have millions of CCTV<br />cameras; an illegal DNA database of over 5m profiles including nearly<br />100,000 under-13s; and out-of-control Internet surveillance with 519,000<br />government accesses in 2007 to people's communications records.<br /><br />The UK and its allies have been pushing this surveillance agenda at the<br />European level, most noticeably with the Data Retention Directive but more<br />subtly with the exchange of travel records with the US and a "principle of<br />availability" that allows law enforcement databases to be shared across the<br />EU.<br /><br />Some of the member states are looking forward to much, much more electronic<br />surveillance of their citizens. The Portuguese presidency in 2007 envisaged<br />a "digital tsunami", where "Every object the individual uses, every<br />transaction they make and almost everywhere they go will create a detailed<br />digital record. This will generate a wealth of information for public<br />security organisations". The former UK intelligence coordinator Sir David<br />Omand recently added: "The realm of intelligence operations is of course a<br />zone to which the ethical rules that we might hope to govern private conduct<br />as individuals in society cannot fully apply."<br /><br />This surveillance on steroids is being pushed by governments with little<br />evidence it will prevent terrorism or reduce serious crime. Detailed<br />criminological studies have found that CCTV cameras reduce crime levels by<br />only around 2%, except in very specific circumstances such as indoor car<br />parks. The US National Research Council recently concluded that "there is<br />not a consensus within the relevant scientific community nor on the<br />committee regarding whether any behavioral surveillance or physiological<br />monitoring techniques are ready for use at all in the counterterrorist<br />context given the present state of the science."<br /><br />Liberals and democrats should campaign for a different kind of information<br />society, where the human rights of citizens remain centre-stage, as they<br />have been in Europe for the last sixty years and as they are proudly<br />proclaimed in the EU's new Charter of Fundamental Rights. Members of<br />Parliament must continue to stand up for citizens' rights in the face of<br />anti-democratic attempts by some Council members to turn the EU into a<br />surveillance society. Today's launch is a very positive step in that effort.<br /><br />Liberalism, democracy and privacy in Europe (16.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://dooooooom.blogspot.com/2009/04/liberalism-democracy-and-privacy-in.html" target="_blank">http://dooooooom.blogspot.com/2009/04/libe...privacy-in.html</a><br /><br />ALDE Civil Liberties<br /><a href="http://civiliberties.eu/" target="_blank">http://civiliberties.eu/</a><br /><br />(contribution by Ian Brown - EDRI-members FIPR and Open Rights Group - UK)<br /><br />============================================================<br />7. Infringement procedure against UK for lack of privacy protection<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 14 April 2009, Viviane Reding, the European Union's Commissioner for<br />Information Society and Media, reasserted the intention of the European<br />Commission to take action if EU Member States failed to ensure the right of<br />the citizens to control how their personal information is used by new<br />technologies such as behavioural advertising (e.g. Phorm, Radio Frequency<br />Identification (RFID) chips or online social networking).<br /><br />Viviane Reding warned that RFID chips integrated in products to send radio<br />signals, should be used "by the consumer and not on the consumer. No<br />European should carry a chip in one of their possessions without being<br />informed precisely what they are used for, with the choice to remove or<br />switch it off at any time."<br /><br />The Commissioner also asked the social networking companies which she<br />considered businesses based on the use of information considered private, to<br />reinforce privacy protection online: "Privacy must in my view be a high<br />priority for social networking providers and their users. I firmly believe<br />that at least the profiles of minors must be private by default and<br />unavailable to internet search engines. The European Commission has already<br />called on social networking sites to deal with minors' profiles carefully,<br />by means of self-regulation. I am ready to follow this up with new rules if<br />I have to."<br /><br />The EU Commission has also decided to start infringement proceedings against<br />the UK as a result of the complaints about the Phorm interception and<br />profiling technology. The Commission's action does not only refer to the<br />Phorm case but addresses several problems with UK's implementation of EU<br />ePrivacy and personal data protection rules, that have occurred during the<br />Commission's inquiry on Phorm secret trials made in UK by BT. After having<br />sent several letters to the UK authorities since July 2008 asking for<br />clarifications on the Phorm case, the Commission considered the answers of<br />the UK Government as unsatisfactory.<br /><br />"We have been following the Phorm case for some time and have concluded that<br />there are problems in the way the UK has implemented parts of EU rules on<br />the confidentiality of communications. I call on the UK authorities to<br />change their national laws and ensure that national authorities are duly<br />empowered and have proper sanctions at their disposal to enforce EU<br />legislation on the confidentiality of communications. This should allow the<br />UK to respond more vigorously to new challenges to ePrivacy and personal<br />data protection such as those that have arisen in the Phorm case. It should<br />also help reassure UK consumers about their privacy and data protection<br />while surfing the internet," stated Reding.<br /><br />According to the UK law, it is an offence to unlawfully intercept<br />communications but the scope of the offence is limited to "intentional"<br />interception and the interception is considered lawful when the interceptor<br />has "reasonable grounds for believing" that consent to interception has been<br />given.<br /><br />The Commission is also concerned by the fact that the UK does not have an<br />independent national supervisory authority dealing with such interceptions.<br />It asked that the UK change its legislation to protect communications from<br />surveillance or interception more in line with European Union directives on<br />the issues.<br /><br />"Technologies like internet behavioural advertising can be useful for<br />businesses and consumers but they must be used in a way that complies with<br />EU rules. These rules are there to protect the privacy of citizens and must<br />be rigorously enforced by all Member States," said the Commissioner.<br /><br />The UK has been given two months to react to this stage of the infringement<br />proceeding, and in case there is no reply or the answer is not satisfactory,<br />the Commission may consider issuing a reasoned opinion (the second stage in<br />an infringement proceeding). If, further on, the UK still fails to fulfil<br />its obligations under the EU law, the Commission will then refer the case to<br />the European Court of Justice.<br /><br />Citizens' privacy must become priority in digital age, says EU Commissioner<br />Reding (14.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/571" target="_blank">http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction...rence=IP/09/571</a><br /><br />EU Commissioner threatens action on social networking, RFID privacy<br />(15.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9948" target="_blank">http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9948</a><br /><br />EU targets online behavioural adverts (15.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-targets-online-behavioural-adverts/article-181258" target="_blank">http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-.../article-181258</a><br /><br />UK's privacy laws illegally inadequate, says Europe (14.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.out-law.com/default.aspx?page=9945" target="_blank">http://www.out-law.com/default.aspx?page=9945</a><br /><br />Commission launches case against UK over privacy and personal data<br />protection (14.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/570&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en" target="_blank">http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction...;guiLanguage=en</a><br /><br />Phorm, Commission v. UK - Implications for Ireland? (15.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.tjmcintyre.com/2009/04/phorm-commission-v-uk-implications-for.html" target="_blank">http://www.tjmcintyre.com/2009/04/phorm-co...ations-for.html</a><br /><br />EDRIgram: Phorm - under scrutiny at the European level (8.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.7/phorm-eu-scrutiny" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.7/phorm-eu-scrutiny</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />8. EDRi supports a petition for Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 15 April 2009 EDRi signed, together with other 50 organisations<br />representing the civil society from around the world, the Global Civil<br />Society Statement in support of Petition for a Non-Commercial Stakeholders<br />Group (NCSG) at ICANN.<br /><br />The petition sent by the Non-Commercial User Constituency (NCUC)  will<br />create an organizational structure that can accommodate the full breadth and<br />diversity of non-commercial interests concerned with domain name policy.<br />The NCSG petition encourages inclusiveness and cooperation among different<br />viewpoints, facilitates minority representation, fosters the generation of<br />new policy proposals, and establishes councilors and officers that are<br />representative of and serve the needs of the entire Stakeholder Group<br />membership. The NCSG petition also maintains a light-weight and adaptable<br />framework as is required for effective policy development at ICANN.<br /><br />The statement forsees support for the proposed NCUC NCSG Charter and asks<br />the ICANN Board of Directors to encourage wider non-commercial civil society<br />participation in ICANN.<br /><br />Global Civil Society Statement in Support of Petition for a Non-Commercial<br />Stakeholders Group at ICANN (15.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://ipjustice.org/wp/2009/04/15/global-civil-society-statement-in-support-of-petition-for-a-non-commercial-stakeholders-group-at-icann/" target="_blank">http://ipjustice.org/wp/2009/04/15/global-...group-at-icann/</a><br /><br />NCUC petition for a Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG)<br /><a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg-petition-charter.pdf" target="_blank">http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg...ion-charter.pdf</a><br /><br />The Executive Summary of the NCUC petition<br /><a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/executive-summary-ncsg-proposal.pdf" target="_blank">http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/exec...sg-proposal.pdf</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />9. Dutch Government on data retention<br />============================================================<br /><br />The answers of the Dutch Government to the additional set of questions sent<br />by the Dutch Senate about the implementation of the Data Retention Directive<br />reveal some interesting opinions. At the end of 2008 the Dutch Senate held a<br />hearing with technical experts and a plenary debate about the implementation<br />proposal later is expected this Spring.<br /><br />The Dutch Government sees the current proposal for data retention as being<br />of a limited nature. It already points to a possible extension of data<br />retention at the European level, in particular a drastic extension of data<br />retention obligations with regard to online communications, as well as its<br />term.<br /><br />Also the Government downplays the interference with fundamental rights:<br />"The risk of the interference with the private life of data subjects<br />consists primarily of the image that these data provide of communicative<br />behavior. On that point, there is little difference with the specified bills<br />that telecom providers offer as an extra service. In addition, there is a<br />risk of linking the data to criminal activity of persons. However, a similar<br />risk is also present in the context of requests for license plate<br />information by the police. The Criminal Procedural Code stipulates strict<br />conditions for the access to data by law enforcement officials. The above<br />does not alter the fact that subjects have a right that the data about their<br />communications are being processed with exceptional care."<br /><br />No responsibility is taken by the Dutch government to legitimate the<br />interference with fundamental rights but points towards the European<br />legislature: "With regard to the necessity of the interference in a<br />democratic society, there is a margin of appreciation for the member states.<br />The data retention obligation, however, follows from a European directive<br />and the (Dutch) data retention term falls within the limitations of the<br />Directive."<br /><br />At the same time, the government endorses the judgement of the ECJ and gives<br />the primary argument why the Court should have struck it down. The<br />government states explicitly why differences between data retention<br />obligations between the member states cannot harm the competitiveness within<br />the internal market. There is still a level playing field. The negative<br />effects on the internal market were the reason why the directive was legally<br />adopted (in the ECJ's eyes).<br /><br />Another interpretation of the data retention directive is given in a recent<br />answer from the European Commission to a question asked by MEP Alexander<br />Alvaro which shows that the data retention directive does not cover services<br />provided free of charge. The answer points to the wording of Article 50 of<br />the Treaty establishing the European Community that "does not require that<br />the remuneration for the service is charged to the user or<br />subscriber of the service; it covers also cases where remuneration is paid<br />by a third party. The definition covers in particular services of a<br />commercial character. On the other hand, an activity which is not of an<br />economic or commercial character itself or linked to such an activity does<br />not constitute a service in the meaning of the Treaty" and thus is not<br />subject to the directive provisions.<br /><br />Dutch Government already thinks about extending data retention at European<br />level (14.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.jorisvanhoboken.nl/?p=269" target="_blank">http://www.jorisvanhoboken.nl/?p=269</a><br /><br />Answers from the Dutch Government (only in Dutch, 9.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.eerstekamer.nl/behandeling/20090409/nadere_memorie_van_antwoord" target="_blank">http://www.eerstekamer.nl/behandeling/2009...ie_van_antwoord</a><br /><br />Written question by Alexander Alvaro (ALDE) to the Commission: Subject:<br />Services provided free of charge in the context of data retention<br />(18.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+E-2009-0969+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc...+DOC+XML+V0//EN</a><br /><br />E-0969/09EN - Answer given by Mr Barrot on behalf of the Commission<br />(16.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2009-0969&language=EN" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAll...amp;language=EN</a><br /><br />(Thanks to EDRi-member Joris van Hoboken - Netherlands)<br /><br />============================================================<br />10. Creative Commons licences launched in Czech Republic<br />============================================================<br /><br />The localized version of the Creative Commons licences was launched on 15<br />April in the Czech Republic, which has become the fifty-second jurisdiction<br />worldwide to offer localized Creative Commons licenses.<br /><br />Following extensive consultation with local and international legal experts<br />and in close collaboration with Creative Commons International, Creative<br />Commons Czech ported the licenses and celebrated their launch at an<br />event during the Multiplace festival in Prague on 16 April 2009..<br /><br />CC Czech has gathered a lot of supporters since its inception last year.<br />Besides the project institutional hosts, EDRi-member Iuridicum Remedium<br />(IuRe), the National Library in the Czech Republic and the Union of<br />Independent Authors, CC Czech has also received endorsement from the<br />Copyright Department of the Ministry of Culture and Faculty of Philosophy<br />and Arts, Charles University of Prague.<br /><br />The team reports: "The joint forces of lawyers, librarians, musicians,<br />teachers, artists, geeks, journalists and other specialists delivered not<br />only what we were aiming for - the localized CC deeds and legal codes - but<br />also proof that the ideas behind CC echo in many areas both professional and<br />amateur. From archiving original Czech web content to educational<br />materials and works from independent music producers and performers, CC<br />opens up a wide spectrum of possibilities. There is no doubt the today's<br />launch is only the beginning of the Czech Creative Commons story."<br /><br />Marek Tichy from IuRe commented: "Common people are more and more becoming<br />creative. Many of them write and post their works on the Internet. The<br />copyright has been rather constricting with this easy distribution of<br />creative works."<br /><br />Creative Commons - Czech Republic<br /><a href="http://www.creativecommons.cz/" target="_blank">http://www.creativecommons.cz/</a><br /><br />Creators Celebrate Local Creative Commons Licenses in the Czech Republic<br />(15.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://creativecommons.org/press-releases/entry/14018" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/press-releases/entry/14018</a><br /><br />Select a CC Licence (in Czech)<br /><a href="http://staging.creativecommons.org/license/?lang=cs" target="_blank">http://staging.creativecommons.org/license/?lang=cs</a><br /><br />Creative Commons licences available in Czech Republic (17.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://praguemonitor.com/2009/04/17/creative-commons-licences-available-czech-republic" target="_blank">http://praguemonitor.com/2009/04/17/creati...-czech-republic</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />11. Are anonymous electronic services to be prohibited by the EC?<br />============================================================<br /><br />Having in view the data retention law requirements and the fact that data<br />retention can be avoided by the use of anonymous services, the question<br />arises whether anonymous electronic systems will be prohibited as well by<br />the European Commission (EC).<br /><br />In this sense, Swedish MEP Jens Holm has recently addressed this issue to<br />the Commission as he considers reliable systems are necessary in order for<br />private individuals or companies to be able to provide anonymous information<br />in relation to criminal or financial crime trials. Some individuals may not<br />dare to contact the police or the mass media, preferring to send anonymous<br />emails with important information they may hold.<br /><br />Holm asked the EC whether it intended to prepare a proposal to prohibit such<br />services within certain fields, whether the Commission believed the Member<br />States had the right to prohibit such services and whether it considered<br />that the right to electronic anonymity should be guaranteed in the EU.<br /><br />EC Vice-President Jacques Barrot, Responsible of Justice, Freedom and<br />Security answered on behalf of EC stating that there were no current plans<br />for the EC to submit a proposal to prohibit the use of anonymising services<br />but that the Commission was studying the impact of such services "on the<br />ability of law enforcement bodies to provide security to the citizens in the<br />EU."<br /><br />While the need to maintain the possibility of providing information<br />anonymously to the relevant organizations had to be considered, in EC's<br />opinion, the Member States had the responsibility to safeguard their<br />internal security. In case anonymising services might limit their<br />possibility to do so, "they may consider regulating the use of these<br />services, while respecting the European Convention on Human Rights and other<br />principles and guarantees regarding civil liberties in Europe and their<br />obligations under the Treaties. Any such measures must be duly justified and<br />must be proportionate and limited to what is necessary in a democratic<br />society."<br /><br />Barrot answered that the EU legislation provides for the fundamental right<br />to protection of personal data and that "personal data must be processed<br />fairly and lawfully, including the data minimisation principle. This<br />principle may be furthered by the use of anonymous data wherever possible."<br />However, the EC leaves room for future restrictive actions. "Member<br />States may adopt measures to restrict the scope of these principles which<br />are necessary to safeguard important public interests such as national<br />security or law enforcement, including combating terrorism or fighting<br />cybercrime."<br /><br />European Commission position on anonymisers (12.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.tjmcintyre.com/2009/04/european-commission-position-on.html" target="_blank">http://www.tjmcintyre.com/2009/04/european...osition-on.html</a><br /><br />Written Question by Jens Holm (GUE/NGL) to the Commission - Anonymity<br />services<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=WQ&reference=E-2009-0897&language=EN" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc...amp;language=EN</a><br /><br />Parliamentary questions- Answer given by Mr Barrot on behalf of the<br />Commission (3.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAllAnswers.do?reference=E-2009-0897&language=EN" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getAll...amp;language=EN</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />12. ENDitorial: Why "Olivennes Bill" wouldn't work in Italy<br />============================================================<br /><br />"Olivennes Bill" (named after the French lobbyist who proposed it, also<br />known as Hadopi law or 3 strikes law) on copyright protection has been<br />blocked by the French Parliament a couple of days ago (but there is little<br />doubt that French Government will try to have it approved ASAP). If<br />(better, when) passed, this bill would have enforced a "parallel indictment<br />system" handled by an "independent" authority called HADOPI acting as an<br />actual Justice Court, that is given the power to decide, without a fair<br />trial, whether a person deserves to be disconnected by the Internet after<br />being warned twice by copyright holder through the concerned Internet Access<br />Provider.<br /><br />Entertainment Industry lobbyists like this approach very much and are<br />pushing hard to have Italy enforce it too. "The Problem" is - fortunately -<br />that Olivennes Bill Italian version would be affected by serious legal<br />and Constitutional flaws, thus making it impossible to pass, for a number of<br />reasons.<br /><br />First, the Italian Code of electronic communication (L.259/03) sect. 4 para<br />I letters f) g) and h) make network neutrality mandatory. To impose over<br />Access Providers' shoulder filtering duties or any other technological<br />activity limiting the way Italian Public Network (rete pubblica di<br />comunicazioni) works, would be what the Code calls "discrimination among<br />specific technologies" and "forcing the use of a particular technology<br />against others".<br /><br />Second, the Access Providers would be forced to report to the Public<br />Authorities their users' criminal behaviour by fault of cross-combination<br />between legislative decree 70/2003 (enforcing EU directive 31/00 on<br />e-commerce and access/content providers online liability) and sect. 171 bis<br />et al.of Law 633/41(Italian Copyright Law). Legislative Decree 70/2003, in<br />fact, makes an Access Provider non-automatically accountable for its users'<br />actions, provided that it doesn't willingly become part of those actions.<br /><br />Furthermore, the Decree says that the Access Provider must report to the<br />police forces any criminal misconducts as soon as he's been given sound<br />evidence of a criminal behaviour committed by an Internet user, thus forcing<br />the prosecutor to start a criminal investigation. All this is possible<br />because Italian Copyright infringement provisions are "designed" to be<br />mandatorily investigated by the Public Prosecutor. Then, should Italy<br />enforce an Olivennes-like legislation, there would be a "double trial" for<br />the same (alleged) fact: the first - real - under a Court scrutiny, the<br />second - "mock" - run by an "independent" authority, leading to a conflict<br />of public powers.<br /><br />Third, as a side question, nobody told Mr. Olivennes that his bill is oddly<br />similar to ancient Western Europe Barbarian laws, where it didn't matter who<br />the actual culprit was, because the victim had the right to retaliate<br />against any other culprit's family member. This is what Mr. Olivennes<br />proposes: to seclude a whole family or company from the Internet for the<br />(alleged) wrongdoing of a single member.<br /><br />Not bad, as an exercise on democracy.<br /><br /><a href="http://blog.andreamonti.eu/?p=140" target="_blank">http://blog.andreamonti.eu/?p=140</a><br /><br />(contribution by Andrea Monti - EDRi-member ALCEI - Italy)<br /><br />============================================================<br />13. Recommended Action<br />============================================================<br /><br />The European Parliament will vote tomorrow, 23 April 2009, in the plenary on<br />the copyright term extension directive.<br /><br />A cross party platform of MEPs have tabled an amendment to reject the<br />proposal to extend the term of sound copyrights beyond 50 years. Contact<br />your MEPs in Strasbourg and ask them to support the rejection amendment<br />tabled by Sharon Bowles, Andrew Duff and Olle Schmidt ALDE, Guy Bono, PSE,<br />Christofer Fjellner, Zuzana Roithova, Anna Ibrisagic EPP.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.soundcopyright.eu/act" target="_blank">http://www.soundcopyright.eu/act</a><br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/reject-term-extention-directive" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/reject-term-extention-directive</a><br /><a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/04/17/european-parliament-votes-on-copyright-extension-next-thursday/" target="_blank">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/04/17/...-next-thursday/</a><br /><a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/04/21/last-day-to-tell-your-mep-do-not-enclose-the-cultural-commons/" target="_blank">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/04/21/...ltural-commons/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />14. Recommended Reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />The ACTA Threat To The Future Of WIPO (14.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/04/14/the-acta-threat-to-the-future-of-wipo/" target="_blank">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/04/14/...future-of-wipo/</a><br /><br />Presentations - Second PrivacyOS Conference<br /><a href="https://www.privacyos.eu/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id=5&Itemid=54" target="_blank">https://www.privacyos.eu/index.php?option=c...5&Itemid=54</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />15. Agenda<br />============================================================<br /><br />23-24 April 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />The future of intellectual property - Creativity and innovation in the<br />digital era<br /><a href="http://www.intellectualproperty-conference.eu" target="_blank">http://www.intellectualproperty-conference.eu</a><br /><br />23-24 April 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />Second European Licensing and Legal Workshop organized by Free Software<br />Foundation Europe<br /><a href="http://www.fsfeurope.org/news/2009/news-20090323-01.en.html" target="_blank">http://www.fsfeurope.org/news/2009/news-20090323-01.en.html</a><br /><br />11 May 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />GigaNet is organizing the 2nd international academic workshop on Global<br />Internet Governance: An Interdisciplinary Research Field in Construction.<br /><a href="http://giganet.igloogroups.org/publiclibr/giganetcos/2009brusse" target="_blank">http://giganet.igloogroups.org/publiclibr/...tcos/2009brusse</a><br /><br />13-14 May 2009 Uppsala, Sweden<br />Mashing-up Culture: The Rise of User-generated Content<br /><a href="http://www.counter2010.org/workshop_call" target="_blank">http://www.counter2010.org/workshop_call</a><br /><br />19-20 May 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />Personal data - more use, more protection?<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/events/news_events_en.htm#dp_conference_2009" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/news/even...conference_2009</a><br /><br />22-23 May 2009, Florence, Italy<br />E-privacy: Towards total control<br /><a href="http://e-privacy.winstonsmith.info/" target="_blank">http://e-privacy.winstonsmith.info/</a><br /><br />23 May 2009, Florence, Italy<br />Big Brother Award Italia 2009<br /><a href="http://bba.winstonsmith.info/" target="_blank">http://bba.winstonsmith.info/</a><br /><br />24-28 May 2009, Venice, Italy<br />ICIMP 2009, The Fourth International Conference on Internet Monitoring<br />and Protection<br /><a href="http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html" target="_blank">http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html</a><br /><br />1-4 June 2009, Washington, DC, USA<br />Computers Freedom and Privacy 2009<br /><a href="http://www.cfp2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.cfp2009.org/</a><br /><br />5 June 2009, London, UK<br />The Second Multidisciplinary Workshop on Identity in the Information<br />Society (IDIS 09): "Identity and the Impact of Technology"<br /><a href="http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/" target="_blank">http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/</a><br /><br />28-30 June 2009, Torino, Italy<br />COMMUNIA Conference 2009: Global Science & Economics of Knowledge-Sharing<br />Institutions<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009</a><br /><br />2-3 July 2009, Padova, Italy<br />3rd FLOSS International Workshop on Free/Libre Open Source Software<br /><a href="http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/manenti/floss/floss09.html" target="_blank">http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/...ss/floss09.html</a><br /><br />13-16 August 2009, Vierhouten, The Netherlands<br />Hacking at Random<br /><a href="http://www.har2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.har2009.org/</a><br /><br />23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy<br />World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and<br />Council: "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage"<br /><a href="http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm</a><br /><br />10-12 September 2009, Potsdam, Germany<br />5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam<br />Section: Protest Politics<br />Panel: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property<br /><a href="http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp</a><br /><br />16-18 September 2009, Crete, Greece<br />World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2009<br /><a href="http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/" target="_blank">http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/</a><br /><br />17-18 September 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />Gikii, A Workshop on Law, Technology and Popular Culture<br />Institute for Information Law (IViR) - University of Amsterdam<br />Call for papers by 1 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp" target="_blank">http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp</a><br /><br />21-23 October 2009, Istanbul, Turkey<br />eChallenges 2009<br /><a href="http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp</a><br /><br />24-25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />3rd European Privacy Open Space<br /><a href="http://www.privacyos.eu" target="_blank">http://www.privacyos.eu</a><br /><br />25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria<br />Austrian Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 21 September 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/</a><br /><br />16 October 2009, Bielefeld, Germany<br />10th German Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 15 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/</a><br /><br />15-18 November 2009, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt<br />UN Internet Governance Forum<br /><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/" target="_blank">http://www.intgovforum.org/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />16. About<br />==============================]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:20:22 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19779</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[EFFector 22.11: Student's Computer and Cell Phone Seized for Allegedly Sending Email]]></title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19768</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 11  April 17, 2009 editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 506th issue:<br /><br />* A BOSTON COLLEGE STUDENT'S COMPUTER, CELL PHONE, AND<br />OTHER PROPERTY WERE SEIZED as part of an investigation into<br />who sent an e-mail to a school mailing list identifying<br />another student as gay. Not only is there no indication<br />that any crime was committed, the support for the search<br />warrant is at times laughable. Some of the supposedly<br />suspicious activities listed include: the student being<br />seen with "unknown laptop computers," which he "says" he<br />was fixing for other students; the student uses multiple<br />names to log on to his computer; and the student uses two<br />different operating systems, including one that is not the<br />"regular B.C. operating system" but instead has "a black<br />screen with white font which he uses prompt commands on."<br /><br />During its March 30th search, police seized (among other<br />things) the student's computers, storage drives, cell<br />phone, iPod Touch, flash drives, digital camera, and Ubuntu<br />Linux CD. None of these items have been returned. His<br />personal documents and information are in the hands of the<br />state police, which continue to examine them without<br />probable cause, searching for evidence to support<br />unsupportable criminal allegations.<br /><br />For the full blog post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/boston-college-prompt-commands-are-suspicious" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/bosto...-are-suspicious</a><br /><br />For the press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/13" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/13</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* Wanted: Your Stories of Disability Versus Copyright Law<br />In preparation for WIPO's initiative on Exceptions &<br />Limitations to Copyright, the US Copyright Office is<br />currently soliciting comments on the topic of "facilitating<br />access to copyrighted works for the blind or persons with<br />other disabilities.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/wanted-your-stories-disability" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/wante...ries-disability</a><br /><br />* NY Times Reports New Revelations About Wiretapping Program<br />The New York Times reported this week that the NSA "had<br />been engaged in 'over-collection' of domestic<br />communications of Americans."<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/ny-times-reports-new-revelations-about-wiretapping" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/ny-ti...out-wiretapping</a><br /><br />* New Wiretapping Revelations Should Prompt New Action<br />The revelations about the NSA's activities in this week's<br />NY Times article underline the need for new action on NSA<br />surveillance abuses, both from Congress and from the White<br />House.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/new-revelations" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/new-revelations</a><br /><br />* Federal Authority Over the Internet?<br />There's a new bill working its way through Congress that is<br />cause for some alarm: the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 risks<br />giving the federal government unprecedented power over the<br />Internet without necessarily improving security.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/cybersecurity-act" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/cybersecurity-act</a><br /><br />* New Scholarship on Copyright Damages<br />Copyright scholars Pamela Samuelson and Tara Wheatland have<br />published a paper arguing that large statutory damage<br />awards in copyright cases violate Congressional intent and<br />basic rights of due process.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/new-scholarship-statutory-damages" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/new-s...atutory-damages</a><br /><br />* Jewel v. NSA Media Roundup<br />The Obama Administration's decision to assert Bush-era<br />arguments in its motion to dismiss EFF's case, Jewel v.<br />NSA, has gotten a lot of attention from the mainstream<br />press.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/jewel-v-nsa-roundup-media-obamas-position" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/jewel...obamas-position</a><br /><br />* Stanford Law School Machinima Conference, April 24-25<br />On April 24-25, 2009, Stanford Law School will be hosting<br />"Play Machinima Law," a timely conference examining<br />machinima copyright issues, where EFF's Fred von Lohmann<br />will be speaking.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/stanford-play-machinima-law-conference" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/stanf...-law-conference</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Which Congressman Was Wiretapped?<br />New reports that the NSA spied on a Congressman has people<br />wondering which one it might be.<br /><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/16/which-member-of-congress_n_187784.html" target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/16/w...s_n_187784.html</a><br /><br />~ Goldman Sachs v. Blogger<br />Goldman Sachs is trying to silence a blogger who has<br />criticized the bank.<br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/5137489/Goldman-Sachs-hires-law-firm-to-shut-bloggers-site.html" target="_blank">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbys...ggers-site.html</a><br /><br />~ Rachel Maddow MSNBC Clips Removed from YouTube<br />Clips from Rachel Maddow's show criticizing an anti-gay<br />groups' videos disappeared due to copyright claims.<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgC5ANURIYc" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgC5ANURIYc</a><br /><br />For more miniLinks:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/minilinks-2009-02-17" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/minilinks-2009-02-17</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* Come See EFF at RSA and MySQL!<br /><br />Come visit the EFF booth and grab some schwag at the RSA<br />conference on April 20-24, and/or the MySQL conference on<br />April 21-22.<br /><br />For more information on RSA:<br /><a href="http://www.rsaconference.com/2009/us/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.rsaconference.com/2009/us/index.htm</a><br /><br />For more information on MySQL:<br /><a href="http://www.mysqlconf.com/mysql2009" target="_blank">http://www.mysqlconf.com/mysql2009</a><br /><br />* Seth Schoen at LinuxFest Northwest<br /><br />EFF Technologist Seth David Schoen will be speaking at the<br />10th Anniversary of LinuxFest Northwest in Bellingham, WA!<br />Seth will be giving two talks (see below), so be sure to<br />stop by and find out what EFF is up to!  Event admission is<br />free and open to the public.<br /><br />Saturday, April 25: 1:30-2:15<br />"Information Security Discovers Physics"<br />Details: <a href="http://blug.org/fest2009/spkr-record.dxp?id=10" target="_blank">http://blug.org/fest2009/spkr-record.dxp?id=10</a><br /><br />Sunday, April 26: 1:30-2:15<br />"An EFF Update"<br />Details: <a href="http://blug.org/fest2009/spkr-record.dxp?id=81" target="_blank">http://blug.org/fest2009/spkr-record.dxp?id=81</a><br /><br />For more information: <a href="http://linuxfestnorthwest.org" target="_blank">http://linuxfestnorthwest.org</a><br /><br />* Send EFF to CFP!<br /><br />EFF is looking for donations of airline tickets for the<br />Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference and other<br />conferences and speaking engagements. We need at least one<br />round trip ticket from San Francisco to Washington, D.C.,<br />for CFP, and we'll certainly need additional tickets<br />throughout the year. If you have enough airline miles for a<br />free ticket and would like to send an EFF staffer to a<br />conference, let us know, and we will help you with the<br />process of making the reservation. Please note that at this<br />time, we are unable to combine miles from multiple<br />individuals.<br /><br />In exchange for a ticket, we can offer a free membership<br />and a mention in EFFector (if you'd like). Please contact<br />info@eff.org if you have a ticket to donate.<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br />secure.eff.org/donate<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:20:43 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19768</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.10: Obama Administration Embraces Bush Position on Warrantless Wiretapping</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19753</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 10  April 10, 2009 editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 505th issue:<br /><br />* THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION HAS EMBRACED BUSH'S POSITION ON<br />WARANTLESS WIRETAPPING, and goes one step further than the<br />previous administration. In a motion to dismiss Jewel v.<br />NSA, the Obama Administration's Department of Justice (DOJ)<br />made two deeply troubling arguments.<br /><br />First, they argued, exactly as the Bush Administration did<br />on countless occasions, that the state secrets privilege<br />requires the court to dismiss the issue out of hand. They<br />asserted that simply allowing the case to continue "would<br />cause exceptionally grave harm to national security." As in<br />the past, this is a blatant ploy to dismiss the litigation<br />without allowing the courts to consider the evidence.<br /><br />Second, the DOJ claimed that the U.S. Government is<br />completely immune from litigation for illegal spying<br />because the USA PATRIOT Act renders the U.S. immune from<br />suit under the two remaining key federal surveillance laws:<br />the Wiretap Act and the Stored Communications Act. This is<br />a radical assertion that is utterly unprecedented. No one<br />-- not the White House, not the Justice Department, not any<br />member of Congress, and not the Bush Administration -- has<br />ever interpreted the law this way.<br /><br />This isn't change we can believe in. This is change for the<br />worse.<br /><br />For the full blog post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/obama-doj-worse-than-bush" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/obama...worse-than-bush</a><br /><br />For the press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/05" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/05</a><br /><br />For Kevin Bankston on "Countdown With Keith Olbermann":<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/bankston-on-olbermann" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/bankston-on-olbermann</a><br /><br />For Keith Olbermann on Obama and Wiretapping:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/keith-olbermann-obama-and-wiretapping" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/keith...and-wiretapping</a><br /><br />* EFF AND OTHERS HAVE CALLED FOR OBAMA TO DIVERSIFY IP<br />APPOINTMENTS. Several of the president's recent appointees<br />to positions that oversee intellectual property policy have<br />represented the recording industry or other industries that<br />support overly broad IP protection. But many positions with<br />IP policy responsibilities have not yet been filled.<br /><br />The coalition urged the administration to appoint<br />individuals representing the diversity of stakeholders<br />involved in IP issues, and also called on the president to<br />create new positions dedicated to promoting innovation and<br />advancing the cause of progress in sciences and the useful<br />arts.<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/02" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/04/02</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* Disability Access Activists Gather to Protest Kindle DRM<br />Hundreds of people gathered in front of the headquarters of<br />The Authors Guild in New York City to protest the removal<br />of text-to-speech capabilities in Amazon's new Kindle 2.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/protest-kindle-drm" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/protest-kindle-drm</a><br /><br />* Michigan Rep. Calls for RFID Review<br />Michigan Rep. Paul Opsommer wants to know why Michigan is<br />set to issue new Enhanced Drivers' Licenses that include<br />long-range RFID technology.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/michigan-rep-calls-rfid-review" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/michi...lls-rfid-review</a><br /><br />* Stating the Case Against DRM to the FTC<br />EFF Staff Attorney Corynne McSherry testified at the FTC's<br />town hall meeting on DRM, recommending that the FTC study<br />DRM's effect on competition.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/stating-case-against-drm-ftc" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/stati...against-drm-ftc</a><br /><br />* AP Invokes DMCA Against Obama "Hope" Poster Artist<br />The AP claims that Shepard Fairey violated the Digital<br />Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in the creation of his<br />famous poster.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/ap-uses-dmca-intimidate-hope-artist" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/ap-us...ate-hope-artist</a><br /><br />* Court Expands Trademark Rights, Restricts Consumer Search<br />The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a<br />trademark owner can sue Google for trademark infringement<br />for selling its mark as a keyword as part of the AdWords<br />program.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/second-circuit-expands-trademark-rights-restricts-" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/secon...ghts-restricts-</a><br /><br />* EU Copyright Term Extension Battle Heats Up<br />At least eleven countries' COREPER representatives voted<br />against a proposal to extend sound copyright in the EU --<br />enough votes to block the proposal.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/every-vote-counts-eu-copyright-term-extension-batt" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/every...-extension-batt</a><br /><br />* Observations from the Three-Strikes Rumor Storm<br />Though there appears to be no need for immediate concern<br />that customers could be targeted for disconnection, the<br />rumors and subsequent responses from ISPs reveal important<br />information about the state of play for three strikes.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/observations-three-strikes-rumor-storm" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/obser...kes-rumor-storm</a><br /><br />* Warner Music Targeting More than YouTube<br />ZDNet columnist Jason Perlow reports that Warner Music came<br />after his wife's video slideshow on Vimeo, another video<br />hosting site.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/warner-music-targeting-more-youtube" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/warne...ng-more-youtube</a><br /><br />* iPods, First Sale, Obama, and the Queen of England<br />President Obama reportedly gave an iPod, loaded with 40<br />show tunes, to England's Queen Elizabeth II as a gift. Did<br />he violate the law when he did so?<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/first-sale-president-obama-and-queen-england" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/first...d-queen-england</a><br /><br />* More on Choruss, Pro and Con<br />The public debates about Choruss have begun, with those on<br />both sides contributing valuable thoughts about the<br />advantages and disadvantages of Choruss.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/more-choruss-pro-and-con" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/more-...uss-pro-and-con</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Social Network Sites "Monitored" in UK<br />The UK government proposed rules that would allow the use<br />of social networking sites to monitor criminal activity.<br /><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7962631.stm" target="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7962631.stm</a><br /><br />~ Freedom on the Net<br />Freedom House takes comprehensive look at government<br />tactics for controlling communications around the world.<br /><a href="http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=383&report=79&group=19" target="_blank">http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?p...79&group=19</a><br /><br />~ "Playmobil Priest" Faces Company's Wrath<br />A priest who transformed Playmobil figures into biblical<br />characters is facing copyright infringement claims.<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hJAL_5AKOH4SHJ1rzWy5w8q16Gig" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/artic...J1rzWy5w8q16Gig</a><br /><br />For more miniLinks:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/minilinks-2009-04-10" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/minilinks-2009-04-10</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* Come See EFF at RSA and MySQL!<br /><br />EFF will be at two conferences this April: RSA and MySQL.<br />Come and see us at RSA, April 20-24, or at MySQL, April<br />21-22. Whichever conference you attend, please visit our<br />booth and grab some EFF swag during exhibit hours. We look<br />forward to seeing you!<br /><br />For more information on RSA:<br /><a href="http://www.rsaconference.com/2009/us/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.rsaconference.com/2009/us/index.htm</a><br /><br />For more information on MySQL:<br /><a href="http://www.mysqlconf.com/mysql2009" target="_blank">http://www.mysqlconf.com/mysql2009</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br />secure.eff.org/donate<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:16:56 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19753</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.7, 8 April 2009</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19748</link>
		<description><![CDATA[============================================================<br /><br />            EDRi-gram<br /><br /> biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe<br /><br />     Number 7.7, 8 April 2009<br /><br /><br />============================================================<br />Contents<br />============================================================<br /><br />1. EP needs to protect users' rights in the Telecom Package!<br />2. French National Assembly votes for the three strikes law<br />3. European Parliament asks for respect of human rights on the Internet<br />4. Extended copyright term for sound recordings pushed back<br />5. Behavioural targeting at the European Consumer Summit<br />6. Second PrivacyOS Conference<br />7. Phorm - under scrutiny at the European level<br />8. ISPs asked to block child porn sites on the Internet<br />9. Big Brother Awards France 2009<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />11. Agenda<br />12. About<br /><br />============================================================<br />1. EP needs to protect users' rights in the Telecom Package!<br />============================================================<br /><br />The new developments on the Telecom Package over the last two weeks,<br />with the approval of a new text in the IMCO (Internal Market Committee) of<br />the European Parliament (EP) and the initiation of the trialogue between EU<br />Council, the European Commission and the Parliament in order to reach an<br />agreement on the final text, shows the worst situation for Internet users.<br /><br />Although much of the MEPs seem happy with the new text that allows<br />"simplifying life for telecom users", they seem to forget that other<br />articles are raising much bigger problems for Internet users, especially<br />related to the 3 strikes proposal or to privacy on the Internet. And facing<br />the June 2009 Euro-elections, MEPs need to support the users' rights also<br />for the second reading of the text, which will probably take place during<br />the first week of May.<br /><br />Thus, the much praised Amendment 138 adopted by a large majority of the MEPs<br />in the first instance has been turned up-side-down by the COREPER (Committee<br />of Permanent Representatives), which transformed it from a substantive law<br />provision (an amendment to the directive) into a simple recital and<br />completly change it in a pro-copyright amendment. Thus the new text says "no<br />restriction may be imposed on the fundamental rights of end-users, without a<br />prior decision taken by legally competent authorities".<br /><br />By changing the initial text: "judicial authorities", the new text opens the<br />backdoor for the recently adopted 3 strikes law in France and shows the<br />weaknesses of the European Parliament rapporteur, Catherine Trautmann, that<br />gave in to pressure from the UK and France.<br /><br />And this is not the only case where the EP has given in. In relation with<br />the  scope of the data breach notification obligation for the providers of<br />telephony and Internet access services, this has been radically limited<br />comparing with the initial text adopted in the first reading by the EP. It<br />seems that the new text already negotiated in the trialogue discussions will<br />apply only for the the data breaches by electronic communication providers,<br />which is a major hold-back taking into consideration that most of the<br />"headlines" data breaches belonged to Government services, banks and online<br />services. The new text just forgets the excellent points made by Article 29<br />Working Group and the European Data Protection Supervisor, that pushed for a<br />larger constituency for this obligation.<br /><br />Even though the European Parliament's Telecoms Package rapporteur, Catherine<br />Trautmann, and the European Commissioner of Information Society, Viviane<br />Reding had been publicly supportive of  the net neutrality principle, it<br />seems that the negotiations might accept an amendment that will not give<br />users "unrestricted rights" of access to the Internet.<br /><br />The new situation prompted a response from several Internet communications<br />companies such as Google, Microsoft and Skype that, gathered as the Voice on<br />the Net Coalition Europe urged "the European decision-makers to adopt<br />principles to allow consumers to access the services, applications and<br />content of their choice on any public network, regardless of the provider<br />that offers them." This move comes also after the announcement of T-Mobile<br />in Germany or Telefonica in Spain to block Skype on iPhones.<br /><br />There is also a glimpse of good news, after it has been decided by the IMCO<br />that "voluntary data retention" clause should to be deleted. It also seems<br />that this compromise amendment will survive the trialogue negotiations.<br /><br />Telecoms package: strengthening users' rights and internet security<br />(31.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/058-52901-089-03-14-909-20090330IPR52900-30-03-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/.../default_en.htm</a><br /><br />Distorted amendment 138 tries to present graduated response as legal<br />(2.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/distorted-amendment-138-tries-to-present-graduated-reponse-as-legal" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/en/distorted-a...eponse-as-legal</a><br /><br />European Parliament compromises on Internet rights (31.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=302&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...02&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />Trautmann deal wraps up Internet limitations (1.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=304&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...04&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />Leading Providers of Voice Solutions over the Internet Protest Against<br />Blocking or Degrading of VoIP applications over mobile networks, after<br />T-Mobile announcement (3.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/pdf/VON.europe.telecoms.package.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/pdf/VON.europe.telecoms.package.pdf</a><br /><br />Internet rights being written out as Spain blocks Skype (7.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=309&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...09&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram:Data protection authorities support civil society on the Telecom<br />Package (25.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.4/data-protection-telecom-package" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.4/da...telecom-package</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />2. French National Assembly votes for the three strikes law<br />============================================================<br /><br />An almost empty National Assembly voted on 2 April 2009 in favour of the<br />extremely controversial law introducing the graduate response system in<br />France, in spite of the fierce opposition from privacy campaigners,<br />individuals, associations and even some French deputies.<br /><br />The poor attendance of the Assembly at the vote is considered by some as one<br />of the reasons for the success of the draft law so strongly pushed by the<br />French Minister of Culture, Christine Albanel.<br /><br />The approved text has undergone some modifications during the discussion in<br />the assembly. One of the voted amendments is apparently amnestying all the<br />Internet users sued for downloading. Actually the text refers only to users<br />accused of counterfeiting in relation to related rights.<br /><br />One of the few victories of the opposition in the National Assembly was the<br />amendment allowing an Internet subscriber whose connection has been cut by<br />Hadopi to stop paying for the respective subscription related to the<br />Internet.<br /><br />A so called Hallyday clause was voted, stipulating that illegal downloading<br />will not be subject to sanction when the author of the downloaded work<br />resides in a tax haven, such as is the case of French artist Johnny Hallyday<br />(hence the name of the clause) who lives now in Switzerland and pays a<br />minimum amount of taxes for the fortune he has earned in France from his<br />works.<br /><br />Differently from the initial text where the sanctioned Internet user had<br />only 7 days to make an appeal to the court, the modified version allows now<br />a period of 30 days for the formulation of an appeal, after the notification<br />date.<br /><br />Rapporteur Franck Riester introduced the proposal that Hadopi applies a<br />label to the legal downloading sites thus favouring the legal offers. The<br />amendment says that the search engines should thus emphasize the authorised<br />sites. Faced with opposition arguments and questions related to whether this<br />would force sites like Google to point out such sites, the rapporteur<br />answered that Google should not be affected and that the proposal was only<br />to create lists of legal sites.<br /><br />The law gives entire freedom to Hadopi authority regarding the sanctions to<br />be taken against infringers. The authority may either cut the connection of<br />the user after three infringements or choose to ask the user to protect the<br />connection against downloading. The measure is to allow an institution, such<br />as a hospital, to keep its Internet connection. Therefore, a physical person<br />may have his connection cut but not an institution. Still, the decision will<br />belong to Hadopi authority which is free to choose the sanction according to<br />the user.<br /><br />On 2 April, the Culture Minister has also confirmed that the Internet users<br />that want to be sure that they will not be considered liable under the<br />Hadopi law, should install filtering software on their computers. This<br />software, approved by Hadopi, will need to communicate with a remote server<br />showing that the software is active at the moment the alleged infringement<br />takes place.<br /><br />Nicolas Maubert, attorney with Gide Loyrette Nouel, has argued that the<br />Hadopi law could be in breach of the protections provided by the French<br />Constitution and therefore might be challenged by the French judicial body.<br /><br />"When a law seems so risky in its application, so unpredictable and random<br />from the technical point of view, it is not a good law and it takes<br />something from Courteline, a little from Kafka and a lot from Alfred<br />Jarry", stated opposition deputy Christian Paul.<br /><br />Also, in view of the recent position of the European Parliament which has<br />voted for guaranteeing the Internet access to all citizens as a fundamental<br />human right, the French law may be is a critical position. However, during<br />the debates in the National Assembly, on 30 March, Christine Albanel, stated<br />that the European Parliament's votes against the graduate response had no<br />legal or political incidence.<br /><br />And even if the point related to the cutting off of the Internet user is<br />solved, Hadopi authority will still have the power to apply fines and other<br />penalties and pass injunctions. French users who frequently download content<br />illegally might soon find themselves severely fined.<br /><br />As last minute news, on 7 April, the Joint Mixed Commission (Commission Mixe<br />Paritaire - CMP), a commission including 7 deputies and 7 senators, supposed<br />to agree upon a compromise text on the draft law before the law is sent for<br />the final vote in the Parliament on 9 April, took its decision.<br /><br />The graduated response mechanism proposed now is that Hadopy authority sends<br />two electronic warnings, followed by a registered letter to the alleged<br />illegal Internet downloaders. In case of non-compliance during a period of a<br />year, the infringers' access will be cut off for 2 months to one year or up<br />to three months in case the user commits to stop the infringement. CMP<br />rejected the amendment which proposed that Internet users sanctioned for<br />alleged illegal downloading should stop paying their subscription. So,<br />besides having their access cut off, they would also continue to pay for a<br />service they will not be able to use. Furthermore, the commission rejected<br />the amendment proposing an amnesty for Internet users prosecuted for illegal<br />downloading before the entering into force of the law.<br /><br />The Commssion has also reduced the present period of 6 months to 4 months<br />from the issuing of a movie in cinema halls to the occurrence on DVDs.<br /><br />In case the text is finally voted by the French Parliament on 9 April, the<br />socialists, who consider the law as "inefficient, useless, technically<br />inapplicable and which will not bring any euro to the creation", will appeal<br />to the Constitutional Council.<br /><br />French pass 'three strikes' file-sharing law (3.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/03/french_three_strikes/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/03/fr..._three_strikes/</a><br /><br />How the Assembly modified the Hadopi (only in French, 3.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.20minutes.fr/article/317785/High-Tech-Comment-l-Assemblee-a-modifie-l-Hadopi.php" target="_blank">http://www.20minutes.fr/article/317785/Hig...ie-l-Hadopi.php</a><br /><br />The Création et Internet law adopted in a quasi empty Assembly (only in<br />French, 2.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.20minutes.fr/article/317513/High-Tech-La-loi-Creation-et-Internet-adoptee-dans-une-Assemblee-quasi-vide.php" target="_blank">http://www.20minutes.fr/article/317513/Hig...-quasi-vide.php</a><br /><br />Draft law favouring the distribution and protection of the creation on the<br />internet, modified by the National Assembly in first reading (only in<br />French, 2.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.assembleenationale.org/13/ta/ta0249.asp" target="_blank">http://www.assembleenationale.org/13/ta/ta0249.asp</a><br /><br />Hadopi adopted (only in French, 3.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ecrans.fr/Hadopi-adoptee,6848.html" target="_blank">http://www.ecrans.fr/Hadopi-adoptee,6848.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi debates: catching up session for the week-end (only in French,<br />3.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12532-Debats-Hadopi-seance-de-rattrapage-pour-le-week-end.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12532-Deb...e-week-end.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi: The Mixed Joint Commission (CMP) advanced for Tuesday (only in<br />French, 6.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12550-Hadopi-la-Commission-Mixte-Paritaire-CMP-avancee-a-mardi.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12550-Had...ee-a-mardi.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi law: the "double pain" re-established before the final vote (only in<br />French, 8.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.challenges.fr/actualites/high_tech/20090408.CHA2775/piratage__la_cmp_retablit_la_double_peine.html" target="_blank">http://www.challenges.fr/actualites/high_t...uble_peine.html</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: France: Three strikes law debated by the General Assembly<br />(25.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.6/3-strikes-france-assembly" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.6/3-...france-assembly</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />3. European Parliament asks for respect of human rights on the Internet<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 26 March 2009, the European Parliament voted with a large majority to<br />support Lambrinidis report concerning the protection of individual liberties<br />on the Internet, rejecting the amendments proposed by the French Government<br />and the copyright industry.<br /><br />The position of the EP is that "guaranteeing Internet access to all citizens<br />is the same as guaranteeing all citizens access to education" and that "such<br />access must not be refused in punishment by governments or private<br />organizations". The MEPs ask the Member States to "recognise that the<br />Internet can be an extraordinary opportunity to enhance active citizenship<br />and that, in this respect, access to networks and contents is one of the key<br />elements; recommend that this issue be further developed on the basis of the<br />assumption that everyone has a right to participate in the information<br />society and that institutions and stakeholders at all levels have a general<br />responsibility to assist in this development, thus attacking the twin new<br />challenges of e-illiteracy and democratic exclusion in the electronic age."<br /><br />The report adopted by the MEPs acknowledges the necessity of providing<br />safety measures for the protection of Internet users, especially children,<br />due to the risks users may be exposed on the Internet which can be used as a<br />tool for criminals or terrorists. The report proposes actions against<br />cybercriminals but at the same time, asks for a balance between security on<br />the Internet and the guarantee of the fundamental rights of Internet users'<br />privacy. The MEPs call to Member States to protect the "respect for private<br />life, data protection, freedom of speech and association, freedom of press,<br />political expression and participation, non-discrimination and<br />education.(...) Having in view the global character of the Internet, the<br />MEPs recommend that Member States and the European Commission should draw<br />regulations for data protection, security and freedom of speech in order to<br />protect the privacy of Internet users," says the EP recommendation.<br /><br />The EP also urges Member States to take due account of the "importance of<br />anonymity, pseudonymity and control of information flows for privacy and the<br />fact that users should be provided with, and educated about, the means to<br />protect it efficiently, for instance through various available<br />Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs)." The recommandation asks the Member<br />States to identify all entities which use Net Surveillance and to draw up<br />publicly accessible annual reports on Net Surveillance ensuring legality,<br />proportionality and transparency.<br /><br />In the EP's opinion, attention must be paid to "network neutrality,<br />interoperability, the global accessibility of all Internet nodes, and the<br />use of open formats and standards". EP also raises the issue of the Internet<br />users' consent for giving personal information to governments or private<br />companies, drawing the attention on the imbalance of the negotiating power<br />between users and institutions. The MEPs' position is that users should be<br />able to have the right to permanently delete any of their personal details<br />saved on "internet websites or on any third party data storage medium."<br /><br />By rejecting France's amendments to the report, the EP has rejected again<br />the graduate response scheme pushed so hard by France. The EP considers that<br />the IPR enforcement does not need to use "the systematic monitoring and<br />surveillance of all users activities on the Internet" and that the penalties<br />need to be proportionate to the infringements committed.<br /><br />The European Parliament also publicly supports the "Internet Bill of Rights"<br />and the promotion of the "privacy by design" principle.<br /><br />Recomamndation on Security and fundamental freedoms on the Internet<br />(26.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/017-52613-082-03-13-902-20090325IPR52612-23-03-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/.../default_en.htm</a><br /><br />EP recommendation on Strengthening security and fundamental freedoms on the<br />Internet (26.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2009-0194+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc...amp;language=EN</a><br /><br />Lambrinidis report: pro-copyright changes rejected (26.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=292&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...92&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />The European Parliament rejects "graduated response"... for the third time<br />(26.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/the-european-parliament-rejects-graduated-response-for-the-third-time" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/en/the-europea...-the-third-time</a><br /><br />Privacy and Fundamental Freedoms Put to Vote (27.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://lavasoft.com/mylavasoft/securitycenter/blog/privacy-and-fundamental-freedoms-put-to-vote?myattic" target="_blank">http://lavasoft.com/mylavasoft/securitycen...to-vote?myattic</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: EP wants a better balance between Internet security and privacy<br />rights (11.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.5/ep-balance-security-privacy" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.5/ep...ecurity-privacy</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />4. Extended copyright term for sound recordings pushed back<br />============================================================<br /><br />The proposal for the extension of the copyright terms for sound recordings<br />was rejected on 27 March 2009 by COREPER, which has the task to negotiate a<br />consensus before the EU Council of Ministers takes votes.<br /><br />To the great disappointment of the recording industry, COREPER rejected the<br />extension of the copyright term as there was no consensus of the Member<br />States on the matter. A sufficient number of states opposed the legislative<br />proposal to constitute a "blocking minority".<br /><br />So, the European Commission's intention to extend the term from the current<br />50 years to 95 years, although backed by the legal affairs committee in the<br />European Parliament is at least postponed. UK is one of the states having<br />changed its position in this matter, having reservations to the attempts of<br />industry lobbyists to oppose to a related retirement fund for future<br />musicians. The British government stated having voted against the proposal<br />because the "current text did not yet give sufficient benefit for<br />performers." UK would be in favour of a shorter extension of up to 70 years.<br /><br />"It is clear that today's outcome will not kill off the proposals to extend<br />copyright term, but rather that member states need more time to consider<br />that details of the proposal and reach an agreement," said John Denham,<br />British MP, UK secretary of state for innovation.<br /><br />The Featured Artists' Coalition (FAC) considers any extension of the<br />existing rights would only benefit record companies and that at the end of<br />the 50-year period, copyright should automatically transfer from record<br />labels to artists. "Record companies would simply gain another 45 years of<br />ownership, entrenching the terms of record contracts signed in an analogue<br />age," was FAC's statement.<br /><br />The FAC has set up a different set of policies on copyright and intellectual<br />property than that of the music industry lobbying groups and has launched<br />a "Charter for fair play". The Charter states that artists should have the<br />"ultimate ownership of thei music" and that "rights holders should have a<br />fiduciary duty of care to ther originator of those rights and must always<br />explain how any agreement may affect how their work is exploited."<br /><br />The coallition's opinion this will not be achieved by the extension of the<br />copyright term but by a change in the approach of the agreements between<br />artists and the music industry and in the up-dating of the legislation. "So<br />we will campaign for laws, regulations, business practices and policies that<br />protect artists' rights. We will stand up for all artists by engaging with<br />government, music and technology companies, and collection societies. We<br />will argue for fair play and will expose unfair practices," says the<br />Charter.<br /><br />The EU Czech presidency will continue working on the proposal in order to<br />prepare a second reading for a possible agreement in the future.<br /><br />EU governments vote against copyright extension in Brussels (1.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/04/01/eu-governments-vote-against-copyright-extension-in-brussels/" target="_blank">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/04/01/...on-in-brussels/</a><br /><br />Europe split on music copyright extension (28.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b1f9dd4e-1b0a-11de-8aa3-0000779fd2ac,dwp_uuid=bd2f85d2-8e90-11db-a7b2-0000779e2340.html" target="_blank">http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b1f9dd4e-1b0a-11...00779e2340.html</a><br /><br />Every Vote Counts: the EU Copyright Term Extension Battle Heats Up<br />(30.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/every-vote-counts-eu-copyright-term-extension-batt" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/every...-extension-batt</a><br /><br />U.K. Biz 'Disappointed' At EU Term Extension Rejection (27.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3ie96e4a3e8c042db2656e93200128bb91" target="_blank">http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_dis...56e93200128bb91</a><br /><br />Pop star union demands new kind of copyright extension (2.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9922" target="_blank">http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9922</a><br /><br />FAC - A charter for fair play in the digital age<br /><a href="http://www.featuredartistscoalition.com/our_charter.html" target="_blank">http://www.featuredartistscoalition.com/our_charter.html</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: Extension of copyright term postponed in the European Parliament<br />(25.03.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.6/copyright-extension-delayed" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.6/co...tension-delayed</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />5. Behavioural targeting at the European Consumer Summit<br />============================================================<br /><br />The European Commission Directorate - General for Health & Consumers<br />organized the European Consumer Summit on "Consumer Trust in the Digital<br />Market Place" held in Brussels on 1 and 2 April, 2009. The agenda featured<br />policy workshops on 'Consumer challenges and opportunities in the digital<br />world' and 'Consumer advocacy'. Within the first topic, the whole range of<br />consumer concerns in the digital market place considered to be major<br />obstacles to the full take-off of business to consumer e-commerce and<br />possible solutions to create consumer trust were discussed. Thematically,<br />the topic of consumer data collection, profiling and targeting was arching<br />out pointing the heavy reliance on personal information in the digital<br />environment; something which captured policy makers' attention in Europe<br />fairly recently.<br /><br />In a preceding 'Roundtable on Online Data Collection, Targeting and<br />Profiling' hosted by the Directorate-General for Health & Consumers on 31<br />March experts and stakeholders' input had been generated in order to feed<br />back into the main event. In her key note speech Commissioner Meglena Kuvena<br />observed that "personal data is the new oil of the Internet and the currency<br />of the digital world" - a reality to be accepted in exchange for free<br />content online. However, well established consumer protection principles,<br />including the applicable data protection regulations, are not fully complied<br />with in the "World Wide Web (...) turning out to be the world 'wild west'."<br /><br />In order to reassert the confidence of the users and consumers, Mrs. Kuneva<br />sees privacy policies as the key to implement fairness and transparency<br />standards as well as meaningful consumer control. Her message to the<br />participants of the roundtable showed determination to enforce existing<br />regulation on the Internet and to regulate where adequate response to<br />consumer concerns on the issue of data collection and profiling is missing.<br /><br />The roundtable proceeded with contributions from industry, lobbies and<br />consumer organizations as well as academics discussing the data collection<br />practices and business models as well as risks and opportunities for<br />consumers. The business model to (co)finance content and free services with<br />online advertisement that incorporates to a varying degree targeted<br />information and personal data is certainly pervasive also beyond gratis<br />offers. It is important however to tell apart the numerous online<br />advertising practices and assess whether and to what extent personal<br />information of users is involved. Companies and industry associations favour<br />good practice principles and self-regulation, and, inevitably, see consumer<br />control implemented with the opt-out mechanism. According to this spectrum,<br />users are empowered individually to control the use of their personal<br />information and collectively through the lever of brand value that would<br />caution companies. Critical interventions raised the need for special<br />protection of sensitive segments such as children and sensitive personal<br />data, a state of fairness in privacy policies and consent generation, and<br />the problem of multi-layered and networked data collection, leaving the user<br />largely unaware of who controls which personal information. Consumer<br />education about online advertising and the meaning of privacy policies and<br />consent emerged as a consensus from the discussion.<br /><br />Member of European Parliament Stavros Lambrinidis, rapporteur of the<br />recent report on strengthening security and fundamental freedoms on the<br />Internet, stressed the necessity to prescribe limits to the 'consent' that<br />can be obtained from users regarding the processing of their personal data<br />in the digital marketplace. As reflected in his report, the imbalance of<br />negotiating power and knowledge between individual users and data<br />processing industry and authorities bears the risk that "Big Brother" will<br />come stealthily and with our "consent".<br /><br />In the progress of the European Consumer Summit behavioral advertisement and<br />its consumer policy implications were prominently raised and wrapped up,<br />asking for:<br /><br />a. the evaluation of different online advertising practices,<br />b. ways to improve consumer control and information,<br />c. the role and robustness of standards and best practices, and<br />d. how the fairness concept can be best transposed from offline to online.<br /><br />In order to keep a channel for discussion open, the Directorate-General for<br />Health & Consumers proposed to set up a privacy blog on its webpage and<br />invited comments. The way forward was not specified and is further<br />complicated by the fact that online consumer data protection is situated at<br />the intersection of the tasks of  theree Directorates - General: Health and<br />Consumers, Freedom Security and Justice, and Information Society and Media.<br /><br />In the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) examined online behavioral<br />advertisement to some length and published in February 2009 a Staff Report<br />on Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Behavioral Advertising.<br /><br />Meglena Kuneva, European Consumer Commissioner, Keynote Speech (31.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/09/156&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en" target="_blank">http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction...;guiLanguage=en</a><br /><br />Report with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the<br />Council on strengthening security and fundamental freedoms on the Internet<br />(25.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A6-2009-0103+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc...+DOC+XML+V0//EN</a><br /><br />FTC Staff Report on Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Behavioral<br />Advertising (12.02.2009),<br /><a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/02/behavad.shtm" target="_blank">http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/02/behavad.shtm</a><br /><br />Center for Democracy & Technology, A Guide to Behavioral Advertising,<br /><a href="http://www.cdt.org/privacy/targeting/" target="_blank">http://www.cdt.org/privacy/targeting/</a><br /><br />Center for Democracy & Technology, Threshold Analysis for Online Advertising<br />Practices (28.01.2009)<br /><a href="http://cdt.org/press/20090128press.php" target="_blank">http://cdt.org/press/20090128press.php</a><br /><br />Internet Governance Forum (IGF), Workshop 83: The Future of Online Privacy:<br />"Online advertising and behavioral targeting" (5.12.2008),<br /><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/Contributions2009/Workshop-Report-IGF-vf.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/Contributio...port-IGF-vf.pdf</a><br /><br />(contribution by Kristina Irion - Central European University)<br /><br />============================================================<br />6. Second PrivacyOS Conference<br />============================================================<br /><br />Meetings between researchers from universities with representatives from<br />industry, data protection authorities, standardizers from W3C and ISO and<br />NGOs to discuss privacy challenges and develop privacy infrastructures<br />represent the idea behind the European Privacy Open Space. The second<br />PrivacyOS event was held in Berlin, 1-3 April at the same time as<br />Re:publica.<br /><br />As a PrivacyOS project partner, EDRI participated in conference with a<br />delegation of 4 persons representing its members: Andreas Krisch (Vibe!AT,<br />Austria), Leena Romppainen (Electronic Frontier Finland), Ralf Bendrath<br />(Netzwerk Neue Medien, Germany) and Filip Pospisil (Iuridicum Remedium,<br />Czech Republic). Other EDRI members, such as Metamorphosis (Macedonia) are<br />also partners in this project on their own. A huge number of presentations<br />were packed into the three day period, varying from eGovernment development<br />in Austria and Lithuania to UK database state and from Deep packet<br />inspection to eHealth. The presentations will be available from the<br />PrivacyOS web site in the near future.<br /><br />On the Re:publica side, Stanford Law School professor, founder of<br />Creative Commons and author Lawrence Lessig gave a presentation about<br />copyright issues, illustrating his ideas and urging people to resist the<br />copyright extension being processed in the European Parliament.<br /><br />Due to the events and presentations being on top of each other, it was<br />impossible to attend everything that was interesting, but PrivacyOS was<br />definitely worth going to for the wide variety of topics, forming contacts<br />and remixing ideas.<br /><br />PrivacyOS<br /><a href="http://www.privacyos.eu/" target="_blank">http://www.privacyos.eu/</a><br /><br />Re:publica (1-2.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.re-publica.de/09/" target="_blank">http://www.re-publica.de/09/</a><br /><br />Reject the Term Extension Directive<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/reject-term-extention-directive" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/reject-term-extention-directive</a><br /><br />Every Vote Counts: the EU Copyright Term Extension Battle Heats Up (03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/every-vote-counts-eu-copyright-term-extension-batt" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/every...-extension-batt</a><br /><br />Data Retention Austria - Second Attempt - Presentation by Andreas Krisch<br />(1.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/files/Krisch_PrivacyOS_DR_Austria_20090401_03.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/files/Krisch_PrivacyOS...20090401_03.pdf</a><br /><br />(contribution by Leena Romppainen- EDRi-member EFFi)<br /><br />============================================================<br />7. Phorm - under scrutiny at the European level<br />============================================================<br /><br />On the event on 31 March 2009, the European Commissioner for consumers,<br />Meglena Kuneva, warned on the transparency in the online environment: "We<br />must establish the principles of transparency, clear language, opt-in or<br />opt-out options that are meaningful and easy to use. (...) I am talking<br />about the right to have a stable contract and the right to withdraw."<br /><br />The concern of the Commission is related to Deep Packet Inspection (DPI)<br />technology experiments such as the profiling and ad-serving system Phorm<br />secret tests performed in UK by BT in 2006 and 2007.<br /><br />In a report issued in March 2009, Free Press advocacy group considers the<br />use of DPI technologies is a threat to the open nature of the Internet.<br />"Improper use of DPI (deep packet inspection) can change the Internet as we<br />know it--turning an open and innovative platform into just another form of<br />pay-for-play media. (...) When a network provider chooses to install DPI<br />equipment, that provider knowingly arms itself with the capacity to monitor<br />and monetize the Internet in ways that threaten to destroy Net Neutrality<br />and the essential open nature of the Internet" says the report.<br /><br />The report concludes that although DPI can help in solving network<br />congestion problems the "technology--the same electronics equipment, in<br />fact--also allows providers to monitor and monetize every use of the<br />Internet, and DPI vendors succeed by developing and marketing this<br />capability."<br /><br />EDRi-member Open Rights Group (ORG) has recently sent a letter to the major<br />websites such as Microsoft, Google, YouTube, Facebook, AOL, Bebo, Yahoo,<br />Amazon and eBay, urging them to opt out the controversial Phorm technology.<br />A petition initiated by the group, signed by about 21 000 people, is asking<br />for the investigation of Phorm and its banning if the system breaches<br />privacy laws.<br /><br />A spokeswoman for Phorm said most of the companies having received the ORG<br />letter were already using the targeted advertising offered by the system and<br />that many of them have proven "their commitment to user privacy as<br />signatories to the IAB UK's interest-based advertising good practice<br />principles".<br /><br />While the UK peers consider that in relation to behavioural targeting, the<br />Information Commissioner's Office, responsible for enforcing EU privacy<br />regulations, had failed in its duty to consumers (as in 2008, ICO accepted<br />Phorm provided it got permission from users if the data collected was used<br />for "value added services."), the UK Government plans however to employ<br />similar technologies to track UK Internet users' behaviour. Viviane Reding,<br />the European Commission's telecoms commissioner who is currently<br />investigating Phorm believes an agreement with the UK government might be<br />possible on this matter.<br /><br />In preparation of eventual regulatory measures, Kuneva's department is<br />initiating an informal investigation of online privacy and data collection.<br /><br />In the meantime, Phorm continues its tests. On 30 March 2009, Phorm<br />officially announced a trial of its technology by Korea Telecom.<br /><br />EU issues ultimatum on internet privacy (31.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9915" target="_blank">http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9915</a><br /><br />Major Websites Are Urged To Reject Phorm Profiling (24.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://news.digitaltrends.com/news-article/19554/major-websites-are-urged-to-reject-phorm-profiling" target="_blank">http://news.digitaltrends.com/news-article...phorm-profiling</a><br /><br />Report Warns Against DPI Technology (20.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=102487" target="_blank">http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=...;art_aid=102487</a><br /><br />EU Extends Deep Packet Inspection Technology Investigation (30.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2009/03/30/eu-extends-deep-packet-inspection-technology-investigation.html" target="_blank">http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2009/03/3...estigation.html</a><br /><br />Deep Packet Inspection - The end of the Internet as we know it? (03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.freepress.net/files/Deep_Packet_Inspection_The_End_of_the_Internet_As_We_Know_It.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.freepress.net/files/Deep_Packet..._We_Know_It.pdf</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: UK Government ignores the European Commission regarding Phorm<br />(25.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.4/phorm-uk-ec" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.4/phorm-uk-ec</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />8. ISPs asked to block child porn sites on the Internet<br />============================================================<br /><br />In Germany, based on the initiative of the Federal Ministry of Family<br />Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (BMFSFJ), the government has had<br />discussions for several months now on how to block child pornography sites<br />hosted on servers outside of the country. The German Government announced on<br />25 March 2009 a draft law that would cover rights and obligations of<br />telecommunication media content providers and would include the obligation<br />to block access to child pornography sites listed by a government agency.<br /><br />According to BMFSFJ Minister Ursula von der Leyen who has been pushing for<br />some time for an agreement with big ISPs, "The rights of children carry more<br />weight than unhindered mass communication."<br /><br />However, some members of the German Parliament and Justice Minister Brigitte<br />Zypries have shown reservations to a contractual solution considering a<br />regular law should cover the filtering regime as such measures could impact<br />on fundamental rights of citizens. Policies should be put in place in order<br />to deal with the liabilities in cases of errors.<br /><br />The movement is criticised by the industry and non-governmental<br />organisations, which consider that blocking only makes access more difficult<br />but is not able to entirely prevent it. The EDRi-member FITUG (Förderverein<br />Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft) Germany has also warned on the fact<br />that, until now, blocking has been useless in fighting child pornography and<br />such measures might lead to blocking sites that have no relation to child<br />pornography as it has happened in other countries.<br /><br />Blocking systems exist now in several European countries. The CIRCAMP<br />system, developed in Norway in 2004, which blocks entry to known child<br />pornography sites by a red stop sign graphic and a message, is used in nine<br />European countries among which the Netherlands, Denmark, Belgium,<br />Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.<br /><br />In UK, 95% of the main UK ISPs have already adopted a similar service via<br />the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF). A system developed by BT, called<br />Cleanfeed, checks IP addresses against the child pornography blocklist<br />created by IWF and blocks users from accessing their content.<br /><br />Malcolm Hutty, president of EuroISPA, representing ISPs from across Europe<br />at the EU, considers the EU plans to block sites will "increase risks to the<br />security, resilience and interoperability of the internet" and also stated:<br />"For technical reasons, blocking simply cannot provide the level of<br />protection that is necessary, and simple morality demands that we take<br />strong collective action to get child pornography removed from the Internet,<br />rather than simply hiding behind national firewalls," he added.<br /><br />All the national plans seem to be in line with the new EU proposal to<br />legally bind all broadband ISPs in Europe to block "access by Internet users<br />to Internet pages containing or disseminating child pornography."<br /><br />With the view to "combating the sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of<br />children and child pornography", the proposal for an EU framework decision<br />on prevention and settlement of conflicts of jurisdiction in criminal<br />procedures of 20 January 2009 asks that: "Each Member State shall take the<br />necessary measures to enable the competent judicial or police authorities to<br />order or similarly obtain the blocking of access by internet users to<br />internet pages containing or disseminating child pornography, subject to<br />adequate safeguards."<br /><br />Germany Opts For ISP Filtering Of Child Pornography; NGOs Warn Of Unintended<br />Impact (30.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/03/30/germany-opts-for-isp-filtering-of-child-pornography-ngos-warn-of-unintended-impact/" target="_blank">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/03/30/...ntended-impact/</a><br /><br />Germany Cracks Down on Child Porn Sites But Critics Want More Action<br />(25.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4126813,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4126813,00.html</a><br /><br />German Minister Announces Plans for Mandatory Web Filtering (16.01.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9960/german_minister_announces_plans_for_mandatory_web_filtering/" target="_blank">http://www.zeropaid.com/news/9960/german_m..._web_filtering/</a><br /><br />Germany to implement obligatory block on child porn sites (16.01.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20090116-16825.html" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20090116-16825.html</a><br /><br />UK.gov to get power to force ISPs to block child porn (2.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/02/eu_filtering_framework/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/02/eu...ring_framework/</a><br /><br />EU proposal for a Council Framework Decision on prevention and settlement of<br />conflicts of jurisdiction in criminal procedures (20.01.2009)<br /><a href="http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st05/st05208.en09.pdf" target="_blank">http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en...t05208.en09.pdf</a><br /><br />EU Proposal Could Force UK ISPs to Block Child Abuse Sites (2.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2009/04/02/eu-proposal-could-force-uk-isps-to-block-child-abuse-sites.html" target="_blank">http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2009/04/0...buse-sites.html</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />9. Big Brother Awards France 2009<br />============================================================<br /><br />The French Big Brother Awards ceremony, or 'Orwell Party', was held this<br />year on Saturday 4 April. The 2009 edition awarded 12 of the 35 nominees, in<br />6 categories, one of them being the positive 'Voltaire Award'. Armand<br />Mattelart, a renowned professor of Information and Communication Studies,<br />chaired the 2009 jury composed by 10 other members, among them academics,<br />artists, and representatives from French NGOs, including EDRI-member IRIS.<br /><br />Awarding almost one third of the nominees is a sign that the Jury task was<br />hard this year, with the increase of surveillance and social control in<br />France.<br /><br />The French ministry of Interior, Michèle Alliot-Marie, received the lifetime<br />menace award, for her 'immoderate taste for police files', which quantity<br />has increased by 70% in 3 years, as well as for her other 'qualities': her<br />'novlang' (video-surveillance is now called video-protection by French<br />officials), her 'incitements to denouncement', and her talent to construct<br />the 'internal enemy'.<br /><br />The French ministry of Budget, Eric Woerth, received the State award. The<br />Jury wanted to particularly alert against the centralised database RNCPS to<br />be created, massively interconnecting data from the social sector in view of<br />fraud fighting, using the social security number as identifier. This, of<br />course, reminds the SAFARI project scandal that led to the adoption of the<br />French Data Protection Act in 1978.<br /><br />The award for companies was given to the French mutual insurance system, a<br />not-for-profit organization, for 'its joint activism with private insurance<br />companies in order to access some medical data from the social security<br />administration'.<br /><br />Paris Mayor, Bertrand Delanoë, earned the local authorities award for 'his<br />conversion to video-surveillance', after he agreed to contribute to the<br />government efforts in this field, increasing by 4 times the number of<br />cameras in Paris, reaching 1200 of them in public areas.<br /><br />The Novlang award has two ex aequo recipients. The first one is Humabio, an<br />EC funded research project on multimodal biometrics, most notably relying on<br />behavioural biometrics to 'increase freedom of movement'. The second<br />recipient is the family benefits sector of the social security system, for<br />having trained its employee using a method, called IGGACE, which goes even<br />further than a simple lie detector, since it is supposed to detect 'lying<br />intent'. The method was originally developed for the police sector.<br /><br />Not only the jury gave an additional award as a 'special mention', but it<br />also awarded two ex aequo recipients. Frédéric Lefebvre, French MEP and<br />spokesperson of Nicolas Sarkozy's party, certainly deserved his award for<br />his 'incompetence and insistence to control the Internet', including by<br />supporting the French 'three strikes law'. The other recipients is the<br />'anonymous zealot': having seen the number of individual civil servants who<br />denounced irregular migrants, sometimes in breach of the professional<br />secret, decided to highlight this phenomenon through a generic category.<br /><br />Finally, the Voltaire award or positive prize was given to three ex aequo<br />recipients, actually three coalitions that have been particularly active and<br />gain some success: the coalition against the EDVIGE police file, the<br />coalition of elementary and primary school directors against the central<br />database of children (Base élèves), and the coalition against the use of<br />biometrics in schools. In addition, another Voltaire prize was awarded, as a<br />'special mention', to Mireille and Monique, two volunteers who help<br />irregular migrants based in Calais with the hope to reach the UK. This<br />simple humanitarian help is a highly risky activity in France, a country<br />where such help is now criminalized.<br /><br />2009 Big Brother Awards France (only in French, 05.04.2009)<br /><a href="http://bigbrotherawards.eu.org/Les-decorations-promotion-2009.html" target="_blank">http://bigbrotherawards.eu.org/Les-decorat...otion-2009.html</a><br /><br />(Contribution by Meryem Merzouki - EDRi-member IRIS France)<br /><br />============================================================<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />Annual report for 2008 on access to EU documents<br />The most popular area for requests in Justice and Home Affairs. Just over<br />73% of the documents listed on the Council register are accessible<br />full-text. But, of course, the remaining 27% include many documents<br />concerning measures under discussion. There has been an increase in the<br />number of documents classified as "Restricted", where disclosure would be<br />"disadvantageous" to the interests of the EU or its member states - in 2008<br />there were 505 "Restricted" documents some 40% of which concerned justice<br />and home affairs (around 200+).<br /><a href="http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/apr/eu-council-access-report-for-2008.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/apr/eu...rt-for-2008.pdf</a><br /><br />"The Economics of Intellectual Property. Suggestions for Further Research in<br />Developing Countries and Countries with Economies in Transition"<br />The series of papers in this publication were commissioned from renowned<br />international economists from all regions. They review the existing<br />empirical literature on six selected themes relating to the economics of<br />intellectual property, identify the key research questions, point out<br />research gaps and explore possible avenues for future research.<br /><a href="http://www.wipo.int/ip-development/en/economics/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.wipo.int/ip-development/en/economics/index.html</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />11. Agenda<br />============================================================<br /><br />21-23 April 2009, Winchester, UK<br />BILETA 2009 Annual Conference<br /><a href="http://www.winchester.ac.uk/?page=9871" target="_blank">http://www.winchester.ac.uk/?page=9871</a><br /><br />23-24 April 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />The future of intellectual property - Creativity and innovation in the<br />digital era<br /><a href="http://www.intellectualproperty-conference.eu" target="_blank">http://www.intellectualproperty-conference.eu</a><br /><br />23-24 April 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />Second European Licensing and Legal Workshop organized by Free Software<br />Foundation Europe<br /><a href="http://www.fsfeurope.org/news/2009/news-20090323-01.en.html" target="_blank">http://www.fsfeurope.org/news/2009/news-20090323-01.en.html</a><br /><br />22-23 May 2009, Florence, Italy<br />E-privacy: Towards total control<br />Call for papers deadline: 15 April 2009<br /><a href="http://e-privacy.winstonsmith.info/" target="_blank">http://e-privacy.winstonsmith.info/</a><br /><br />23 May 2009, Florence, Italy<br />Big Brother Award Italia 2009<br />Nominations by 17 April 2009<br /><a href="http://bba.winstonsmith.info/" target="_blank">http://bba.winstonsmith.info/</a><br /><br />11 May 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />GigaNet is organizing the 2nd international academic workshop on Global<br />Internet Governance: An Interdisciplinary Research Field in Construction.<br /><a href="http://giganet.igloogroups.org/publiclibr/giganetcos/2009brusse" target="_blank">http://giganet.igloogroups.org/publiclibr/...tcos/2009brusse</a><br /><br />13-14 May 2009 Uppsala, Sweden<br />Mashing-up Culture: The Rise of User-generated Content<br /><a href="http://www.counter2010.org/workshop_call" target="_blank">http://www.counter2010.org/workshop_call</a><br /><br />19-20 May 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />European Commission organizes a personal data protection conference to look<br />at new challenges for privacy<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/news/docs/pr_03_03_09_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...03_03_09_en.pdf</a><br /><br />24-28 May 2009, Venice, Italy<br />ICIMP 2009, The Fourth International Conference on Internet Monitoring<br />and Protection<br /><a href="http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html" target="_blank">http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html</a><br /><br />1-4 June 2009, Washington, DC, USA<br />Computers Freedom and Privacy 2009<br /><a href="http://www.cfp2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.cfp2009.org/</a><br /><br />5 June 2009, London, UK<br />The Second Multidisciplinary Workshop on Identity in the Information<br />Society (IDIS 09): "Identity and the Impact of Technology"<br /><a href="http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/" target="_blank">http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/</a><br /><br />28-30 June 2009, Torino, Italy<br />COMMUNIA Conference 2009: Global Science & Economics of Knowledge-Sharing<br />Institutions<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009</a><br /><br />2-3 July 2009, Padova, Italy<br />3rd FLOSS International Workshop on Free/Libre Open Source Software<br /><a href="http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/manenti/floss/floss09.html" target="_blank">http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/...ss/floss09.html</a><br /><br />13-16 August 2009, Vierhouten, The Netherlands<br />Hacking at Random<br /><a href="http://www.har2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.har2009.org/</a><br /><br />23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy<br />World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and<br />Council: "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage"<br /><a href="http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm</a><br /><br />10-12 September 2009, Potsdam, Germany<br />5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam<br />Section: Protest Politics<br />Panel: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property<br /><a href="http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp</a><br /><br />16-18 September 2009, Crete, Greece<br />World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2009<br /><a href="http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/" target="_blank">http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/</a><br /><br />21-23 October 2009, Istanbul, Turkey<br />eChallenges 2009<br /><a href="http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp</a><br /><br />16 October 2009, Bielefeld, Germany<br />10th German Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 15 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/</a><br /><br />15-18 November 2009, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt<br />UN Internet Governance Forum<br /><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/" target="_blank">http://www.intgovforum.org/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />12. About<br />============================================================<br /><br />EDRI-gram is a biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe.<br />Currently EDRI has 29 members based or with offices in 18 different<br />countries in Europe. European Digital Rights takes an active interest in<br />developments in the EU accession countries and wants to share knowledge and<br />awareness through the EDRI-grams.<br /><br />All contributions, suggestions for content, corrections or agenda-tips are<br />most welcome. Errors are corrected as soon as possible and visibly on the<br />EDRI website.<br /><br />Except where otherwise noted, this newsletter is licensed under the<br />Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See the full text at<br /><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</a><br /><br />Newsletter editor: Bogdan Manolea &lt;edrigram@edri.org&gt;<br /><br />Information about EDRI and its members:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/</a><br /><br />European Digital Rights needs your help in upholding digital rights in the<br />EU. If you wish to help us promote digital rights, please consider making a<br />private donation.<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram subscription information<br /><br />subscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: subscribe<br /><br />You will receive an automated e-mail asking to confirm your request.<br />unsubscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: unsubscribe<br /><br />- EDRI-gram in Macedonian<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available partly in Macedonian, with delay. Translations<br />are provided by Metamorphosis<br /><a href="http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php" target="_blank">http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram in German<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available in German, with delay. Translations are provided<br />Andreas Krisch from the EDRI-member VIBE!AT - Austrian Association for<br />Internet Users<br /><a href="http://www.unwatched.org/" target="_blank">http://www.unwatched.org/</a><br /><br />- Newsletter archive<br /><br />Back issues are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram</a><br /><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:45:30 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19748</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.09: New Look for EFFector!</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19744</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol 22, No. 09 April 1, 2009 editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />In the 1,000,000th EFFector:<br />* New Look for EFFector!<br />* Congress Passes "Mickey's Law"<br />* FBI Announces Operation Liar Liar Pants Oon Fire<br />* NSAdvice:  Kinder, Gentler NSA Hires Advice Columnists to<br />Assist Spied-On Americans<br />* AP Sues Artist for Being Unable to Draw From Memory<br />* Google Offers Free, Ad-Supported Kitchen Appliances<br />* Amazon Gives in to Author's Guild -- Again<br />* EFF Offers Award for Large Composite Numbers<br />* PM Brown Announces the Permanent High Office of Hacking<br />and Tinkering in the Chancellory of the Exchequer<br />* minilinks<br />* Changes to EFF's Privacy Policy<br />* Administrivia and EULA<br /><br />For more information on EFF activities & alerts:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/</a><br /><br />Make a donation and become an EFF member today!<br /><a href="http://eff.org/support/" target="_blank">http://eff.org/support/</a><br /><br />Tell a friend about EFF:<br /><a href="http://action.eff.org/site/Ecard?ecard_id=1061" target="_blank">http://action.eff.org/site/Ecard?ecard_id=1061</a><br /><br />effector: n, Computer Sci. A pretentious word you should<br />never use in conversation.<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* New Look for EFFector!<br /><br />As part of our policy to keep on the "frontier" of exciting<br />new Internet developments, starting next week we'll be<br />sending a special "effktr" edition to all subscribers from<br />whose personal information we can derive their Twitter<br />accounts and/or cellphone numbers. Effktr has all the news<br />and analysis you expect from EFFector, but with most of the<br />vowels taken out and the remaining text compressed to 140<br />characters or less. To give you an idea of what to expect,<br />here's what our "beta" effktr readers received last week:<br /><br />OMG EFF GREP FBI, TSA, NSL! NIX TOR JAIL +! NIX CELL LOG<br />GANK! CNET AX SGHN! AXL N /- WTF? WRNR DMCA KIDS LOL! NO<br />MIL CYBER! ATT GET ACTA!<br /><br />Our new service is opt-out: if you'd like to not receive<br />our new format, please email "tl;dr" to april1@eff.org by<br />the end of today.<br /><br />For this complete post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* Congress Passes "Mickey's Law"<br /><br />It was the story that stirred a nation: one mouse,<br />kidnapped from his corporate family and ruthlessly<br />exploited by infringers, pirates, and decorative birthday<br />cake designers.<br /><br />But after an unprecedented campaign by concerned<br />rightsholders across the nation, Mickey's experience has a<br />happy ending of sorts: "Mickey's Law," a new bill that will<br />make children's media safe from our most despicable<br />elements in society.<br /><br />The law will protect innocent cartoon characters by<br />creating a national registry of "copyright offenders" to be<br />run jointly by the RIAA and MPAA. Anyone accused of<br />repeatedly downloading copyrighted files without permission<br />will be required to register themselves immediately and<br />notify the registry within 2 weeks each time they move IP<br />addresses. The law also bars them from residing in any<br />domicile located within 1000 feet of an open wifi<br />connection.<br /><br />Mickey's Law was passed with bi-partisan support. Harry<br />Reid, Senate leader, introduced the bill with a moving<br />description of its intent: "We're not just doing this for<br />Mickey. We're doing it for the children. No, wait, we're<br />doing it *to* the children, as a result of enforcing the<br />children's contractually limited rights to their purchased<br />media."<br /><br />For this complete post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* FBI Announces Operation Liar Liar Pants on Fire<br />Targeting Myspace Terms of Service Violators<br /><br />Washington, D.C. - The Federal Bureau of Investigation<br />(FBI) today announced action against untold numbers of<br />Americans who have violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse<br />Act by providing false information to ySpace, Facebook,<br />Match.com and other Web 2.0 companies.  These companies<br />require users to click through an agreement obligating them<br />to provide accurate, current and complete information when<br />registering and using the services.  Earlier this year, the<br />Department of Justice successfully prosecuted Missouri<br />resident Lori Drew in federal court in Los Angeles for<br />unauthorized access to MySpace for providing false<br />information. In the aftermath of that conviction, the FBI<br />learned that hundreds, or thousands, or potentially<br />hundreds of thousands, are defrauding social networks and<br />ripping the social fabric by lying about themselves online.<br /><br />The ongoing initiative, known as Operation Liar Liar Pants<br />on Fire, "reflects the FBI's mission and effort to<br />identify, target, disrupt and dismantle criminal fraud<br />schemes that target our nation's social networks," said<br />Assistant Director Prudence Macgillicutty, FBI Criminal<br />Investigative Division.<br /><br />&gt;From its inception until today, Operation Liar Liar has<br />successfully apprehended many offenders who have provided<br />false information in violation of terms of service. One<br />recent success put a 145 lb woman behind bars aftershe told<br />a potential suitor on Match.com that she only weighed 135.<br />Facebook user Joe Malone was sentenced to 16 months in<br />prison for fraudulently sending a chat message stating that<br />he could not attend a film date because he had to wash his<br />hair that evening. Subsequent investigation revealed the<br />truth -- he "just wasn't that into" his<br />"friend." Operation<br />Liar Liar also uncovered the latest chilling trend among<br />youth -- unauthorized access to the Google search engine,<br />which prohibits users under the age of legal consent. Even<br />the Obama administration has not escaped the fair<br />administration of justice. It turns out that Facebook's<br />"Barack Obama" was actually a junior aide in the White<br />House Communications Department.<br /><br />For this complete press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* NSAdvice:  Kinder, Gentler NSA Hires Advice Columnists to<br />Assist Spied-On Americans<br /><br />Under the Obama Administration, the NSA hopes to soften its<br />image and improve public opinion concerning its warrantless<br />dragnet spying program--with a little help from Ann<br />Landers. The NSA has contracted with Landers and dozens of<br />other personal advice columnists, many of whom have been<br />laid off from their newspaper jobs as that media sector<br />continues to lag, to help provide advice to the millions of<br />ordinary Americans whose communications are continually<br />being intercepted by the secretive agency.<br /><br />"Many Americans don't realize that the NSA is only<br />intercepting all of their phone calls, faxes, emails, IMs,<br />SMS messages, and web traffic in order to *protect* them,<br />and we hope that the new 'NSAdvice' program will help<br />educate the people about our protective mission," said NSA<br />Director Keith B. Alexander. "As our supercomputers sift<br />through all of your private communications for hints of a<br />terror plot, they can also spot when you're going through a<br />rough patch in your marriage, facing off with a serious<br />illness, or trying to decide whether to buy that new house.<br />Now, with our army of under-employed advice columnists, we<br />can act on that intelligence--and send you professional<br />advice targeted at your most private problems. Whether<br />you're struggling with personal debt, trying to lose<br />weight, or starting to suspect that your spouse may be<br />cheating, the NSA is here to help!"<br /><br />For more on the NSA's illegal spying program:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/issues/nsa-spying" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/issues/nsa-spying</a><br /><br />For this complete post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* AP Sues Artist for Being Unable to Draw from Memory<br /><br />The AP has brought a suit against the artist Shepard Fairey<br />for calling himself a political artist while being unable<br />to draw a realistic likeness of public figures from memory.<br /><br />Fairey had previously sued AP to establish his fair use<br />rights to an AP news photograph he used as the basis for<br />his iconic "Hope" poster of then-presidential candidate<br />Barack Obama. AP has now filed counter-suit, claiming<br />Fairey has no right to produce posters in support of<br />politicians that he cannot draw without reference.<br /><br />"Mr Fairey claims he is an artist with the right to comment<br />on public issues such as the presidential election," said<br />AP attorney Skip Stones. "But Mr. Fairey apparently<br />requires a photo to work from in order to create a lifelike<br />image of a public figure such as Mr. Obama. Clearly, he has<br />no business engaging in graphic political commentary of any<br />kind."<br /><br />Mr. Fairey says that he attended the Pasadena College of<br />the Arts where he did in fact learn to draw from memory,<br />but his training was limited to Republican politicians then<br />in office. "I had never seen or heard of Barack Obama<br />before 2006, so I hadn't memorized his face yet," said the<br />artist.<br /><br />However, Mr. Stones said Fairey was welcome to license an<br />image from the AP, so long as he could afford to do so.<br />"The next time he wants to comment on political events, he<br />should get permission from the subject of the work first<br />and request a photo shoot," said Stones. "If the politician<br />is somehow not available, Mr. Fairey can ask the AP<br />politely for permission to work from one of our photos --<br />along with a sizable licensing fee."<br /><br />For more on Shepard Fairey and the AP:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/ap-uses-dmca-intimidate-hope-artist" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/ap-us...ate-hope-artist</a><br /><br />For this complete post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* Google Offers Free, Ad-Supported Kitchen Appliances<br /><br />Google today announced a new line of high performance<br />kitchen appliances, available to US customers for free. The<br />catch? The announced range, refrigerator, and dishwasher<br />all include built in web-enabled cameras that monitor the<br />contents of each device and touch-screen LCD displays that<br />provide a stream of "relevant" advertisements. "Over the<br />lifetime of the appliance, we expect the advertising will<br />more than cover the cost of the product," said Google's<br />manager of advertising products Eileen Over. "Moreover,<br />because these are all Energy Star certified," added<br />Google's head of green initiatives Charlton Soylent, "this<br />new offering will move us toward the Obama Administration's<br />vision of a greener America."<br /><br />When asked about privacy concerns, Ms. Over pointed out<br />that the cameras only monitor the contents of the<br />appliances (a camera-enabled range hood to monitor what's<br />cooking is reportedly in the works). As a result, no<br />information about what goes on in the kitchen would be<br />transmitted to Google. "This is no different than the<br />cameras we're putting inside the glove box of your<br />automobile," said Ms. Over. "Nothing to worry about."<br /><br />For more on Google's behavioral advertising program:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/google-begins-behavioral-targeting-ad-program" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/googl...ting-ad-program</a><br /><br />For this complete post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* Amazon Gives in to Author's Guild -- Again<br /><br />Amazon's Kindle has once again stoked the ire of the<br />powerful Author's Guild with their recent addition of<br />public domain works to the list of titles now available to<br />Kindle readers. Lawyers for the Author's Guild said the<br />Kindle's ability to read non-copyrighted works is harming<br />the ability of living authors to profit from their works.<br /><br />"If a Kindle owner can choose from the entire library of<br />human literature, with access to every book ever written,<br />how will living artists ever get read?" posited Author's<br />Guild lawyer John Dewey. "The Kindle's ability to read<br />works in the public domain is clearly a threat to living<br />authors' ability to make a living from their works."<br /><br />Fortunately for living authors and the Author's Guild,<br />Amazon quickly backtracked. New versions of the Kindle's<br />operating software contain features that prevent works that<br />are not protected by copyright from being read on the<br />device.<br /><br />Earlier this year, Amazon offered licensing fees to authors<br />whose works can be read by the the Kindle -- despite the<br />fact that no copyright laws were broken by the device's<br />text reading functions.<br /><br />For more on Amazon's Kindle and the Author's Guild:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/does-authors-guild-want-sue-you-reading-aloud-your" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/does-...ding-aloud-your</a><br /><br />For this complete post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* EFF Offers Awards for Large Composite Numbers<br /><br />Inspired by the attention its Cooperative Computing Awards<br />has brought to the power of collaboration to solve<br />difficult mathematics problems, EFF today announced a new<br />award. EFF will offer three increasing rewards of $6, $8,<br />and $12 to the persons or team who, working<br />collaboratively, can discover a world-record composite<br />number.<br /><br />Composite numbers are those which are divisible by some<br />whole number other than themselves and one. Familiar<br />examples include 8, 100, 525, and 4294967296. Notably, all<br />even numbers greater than 2 are composite. Composite<br />numbers have important applications in engineering,<br />scientific research and even finance, where they are often<br />used to measure enormously large values with a high degree<br />of precision. Composite numbers are surprisingly common --<br />indeed, most numbers are composite -- but naming extremely<br />large composite numbers can become a daunting task.<br /><br />However, throughout human history, the largest known<br />composite number has consistently been larger than the<br />largest known prime number. Indeed, this trend is likely to<br />continue. The world's largest known primes have for some<br />time been Mersenne primes; but to every Mersenne number<br />2^p-1 where p is a prime, there corresponds a larger<br />composite number 2^p-1+1.<br /><br />In 2007, two philosophers competed in an event under the<br />auspices of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to<br />see who could name the largest number using only an<br />ordinary chalkboard. The winning number, found by Prof.<br />Adam N. Elga, was almost certainly composite.<br /><br />"Huge composite numbers are all around us, but very few<br />people have ever even tried to name a number larger than a<br />googol," said EFF Staff Technologist Seth Schoen.<br />"Hopefully this contest will remedy that and maybe even set<br />a few records in the process."<br /><br />A proof attributed to the Greek mathematician Euclid shows<br />that there is no largest composite number. Euclid suggests<br />multiplying all known whole numbers together and then<br />failing to add one. The result will be divisible by "lots<br />of stuff," and hence composite.<br /><br />EFF's new awards program was established with funds found<br />under a couch cushion one day here at the EFF office.<br />Prospective claimants will -- as with EFF's Cooperative<br />Computing Awards -- need to publish their results in a<br />peer-reviewed scientific journal, including rigorous proof<br />that the numbers they are claiming are not prime. The proof<br />must also show that a claimed composite number is larger<br />than Prof. Elga's 2007 record. EFF also reserves the right<br />to require that claimants explicitly identity at least one<br />specific divisor of a claimed composite number.<br /><br />For this complete post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* Commonwealth of Kentucky Fails to Control Internet<br /><br />The Commonwealth of Kentucky, rebuffed by a state court in<br />its unsuccessful attempt to assert control over the<br />Internet by trying to seize the domain names of<br />international web sites it doesn't like, has withdrawn its<br />lawsuit. This is the latest in a recent series of failed<br />technology-related initiatives by the Commonwealth,<br />including:<br /><br />* An attempt to scuttle the rumored agreement that would<br />make the catalog of that hippie band "The Beatles"<br />available for digital purchase on iTunes.<br /><br />* A proposed requirement that, for the love of God,<br />teenagers stop using confusing abbreviations and other<br />shorthand writing styles in their electronic communications<br />that state officials can't understand.<br /><br />* A mandate that only one social networking site can be<br />"cool" in any calendar given year, and that state officials<br />be told by January 1st (a) what site that is, and (<img src="http://www.bluetack.co.uk/forums/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="B)" border="0" alt="cool.gif" /> what<br />they should do with it.<br /><br />For more on the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the Internet:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/cases/commonwealth-kentucky-v-141-internet-domain-names" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/cases/commonwealth-kent...et-domain-names</a><br /><br />For this complete post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* PM Brown Announces the Permanent High Office of Hacking<br />and Tinkering in the Chancellory of the Exchequer<br /><br />What with all the hubbub over President Barack Obama's DVD<br />box set naff gift to Prime Minister Gordon Brown being<br />region-coded and locked-out, Her Majesty's Government has<br />responded with the announcement of the Permanent High<br />Office of Hacking and Tinkering in the Chancellory of the<br />Exchequer (hereby known as PHOHTCE). Brown warned that this<br />was an urgent matter to be resolved by Thursday, at which<br />time the G-20 movie night will take place, adding<br />emphatically "and there's no need to bish bash bosh about<br />it."<br /><br />The controversy made the papers when it was revealed that<br />"King Ralph," one of the classic American films included<br />in<br />the set, was not available in a Region 2 coded DVD, since<br />none of the discs were readable with the UK DVD players<br />available at 10 Downing Street. To avoid diplomatic<br />embarrassment as transatlantic relations grew tense over<br />differences in approach to economic stimulus, the Prime<br />Minister's office simply purchased new UK copies of all the<br />DVDs. Her Majesty the Queen's office, who had similarly<br />inquired about the availability of the movie in British<br />format when she was offered it as a gift from President<br />George W. Bush in 2004, had subsequently received a VHS<br />copy complementary from the London offices of the Motion<br />Picture Association (MPA).<br /><br />Concerned about criticism over the narrow focus of the new<br />office, Prime Minister Brown reminded the press corps that<br />both Afghanistan and Iraq will be implementing<br />anti-circumvention provisions in their copyright laws in<br />the coming year as a priority of the United States Trade<br />Representative for the region. "This is the time for the<br />new generation to continue the heroic work of Bletchley<br />Park," referring to the World War II British codebreakers.<br /><br />For this complete post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />minilinks<br /><br />~ YouTube Blocks China in Response to China Blocking<br />YouTube<br />According to YouTube general counsel Zahavah Levine, "They<br />started it!"<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />~ Uninteresting Boston Man Foils Google's New<br />"Interest-based Advertising" System<br />In a slow, lethargic deadpan, man claims to have seen only<br />one ad, stating "Error! Error! Does not compute!" prior to<br />a catastrophic computer crash in Mountain View, California.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />~ ACTA "Laundry List" of Rightsholder Industry Demands Is<br />Actually a Laundry List<br />Items on the list include "plaid hipster jacket" and<br />"enormous brassiere."<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />~ Wikileaks Leaks All Over Itself<br />Staying true to its principles, the whistleblowing website<br />posted a link to a leak of its own sensitive donor<br />information.<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/02/wikileaks-posts-leaked-list-of-wikileaks-donors.ars" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/02/wi...eaks-donors.ars</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* Changes to EFF's Privacy Policy<br /><br />To better serve our clients, customers, supporters, and<br />benefactors, EFF will from time to time alter our Privacy<br />Policy. As of April 1, 2009, the following minor changes<br />have been made:<br /><br />1) In pages 1-30 of our Privacy Policy, delete "never" and<br />replace with "within a matter of hours."<br /><br />2) For "sole and exclusive right throughout the universe,"<br />please substitute "multiverse" throughout.<br /><br />3) Where "session cookie" appears, delete and replace with<br />"lloigor." "Deleted" should be replaced with "clumsily<br />re-animated."<br /><br />4) In section 14.4, "shared with third-parties" should read<br />"sacrificed to Yog-Sothoth, Key and Guardian of the Gate."<br />"From time to time" is a typo and should read "For all ye<br />time immemorial."<br /><br />5) Our Website no longer supports the Konqueror 3 browser.<br /><br />Please update your own local copies, and destroy any<br />previous versions you may have made. If you have forwarded<br />our Privacy Policy and Website Terms of Service to other<br />individuals, please contact them and ask them to destroy<br />their outstanding versions. If they ask why, have them<br />killed. Our Privacy Policy and Website Terms of Service are<br />&copy; 1989-2009 the Electronic Frontier Foundation AG<br />(Offshore Holdings), Principality of Liechtenstein.<br /><br />For this complete post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/pages/04/01</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />* Administrivia and EULA<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Kodi, EFF Mascot<br />kodi@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />To unsubscribe or change your subscription preferences:<br /><a href="http://action.eff.org/site/CO?i=4SApobns9ouZBNVAywsx9wnmJCSEUdQC&cid=1041" target="_blank">http://action.eff.org/site/CO?i=4SApobns9o...QC&cid=1041</a><br /><br />To change your email address:<br /><a href="http://action.eff.org/addresschange" target="_blank">http://action.eff.org/addresschange</a><br /><br />End User License Agreement (EULA):<br /><br />We've given up trying to explain the rules to you. Our team<br />of lawyers labors over every turn of phrase, deliberating<br />over each carefully chosen "if," "and," and "therefore" in<br />our EULA. But do you care? Do you even bother to read our<br />lovingly written fine, fine print? No, you don't.<br /><br />Well, we're tired of it. It seems no matter how clear we<br />try to be with our long sentences and even longer<br />paragraphs in perfect legalese, you -- the public --<br />continue to ignore the small type and do whatever you damn<br />well please.<br /><br />So if, after reading EULAs for most of your adult life, you<br />still believe you have the right to simply cut and paste<br />this text and use it for whatever devious purpose you can<br />come up with, then just go ahead. Really. GO RIGHT AHEAD!<br />We won't stop you. That's our new EULA. Just do it!<br /><br />Were throwing in the towel. Because no matter how many<br />times we tell you that you CAN'T COPY, that it is ILLEGAL<br />to do so, that our ownership over the content covers the<br />work, secondary works, derivative works and all<br />interpretations of the work, throughout the universe in<br />perpetuity in any and all media, now known or hereafter<br />developed, you continue to trample on our IP rights.<br /><br />So just go ahead, copy this EFFector and paste the bits you<br />want into your email browser or your blog or your Facebook<br />profile or what have you and share with your friends. Go<br />ahead, take our ideas and run with them. Make them your<br />own. See if we care.<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:47:45 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19744</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.6, 25 March 2009</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19725</link>
		<description><![CDATA[============================================================<br /><br />            EDRi-gram<br /><br /> biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe<br /><br />     Number 7.6, 25 March 2009<br /><br /><br />============================================================<br />Contents<br />============================================================<br /><br />1. Telecom Package in second reading - dangerous amendments<br />2. Extension of copyright term postponed in the European Parliament<br />3. German Police searches the homes of the wikileaks.de domain owner<br />4. Data sharing legislation pulled by the UK government<br />5. France: Three strikes law debated by the General Assembly<br />6. European Parliament wants more transparency on ACTA<br />7. Germany: Data retention is disproportionate<br />8. Irish ISP Association rejects the copyright industry threats<br />9. Coalition of musicians against criminalizing downloaders<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />11. Recommended Action<br />12. Agenda<br />13. About<br /><br />============================================================<br />1. Telecom Package in second reading - dangerous amendments<br />============================================================<br /><br />Several alarming amendments to the Telecom Package second reading in the<br />European Parliament are to be voted on 31 March 2009 by ITRE/IMCO committee.<br />The amendments are meant to give additional control to the entertainment<br />industry, telecoms and IT security companies over the Internet.<br /><br />An agreement on several delicate issues of the telecom package is sought in<br />a trialogue between the European Parliament, the European Council and<br />the European Commission to agree on a resolution regarding politically<br />sensitive and technically difficult aspects of the Telecoms Package.<br />Although the European Parliament is supposed to represent the interests and<br />rights of the users, it seems it is trying to make compromises in agreeing<br />upon the limitations of the users' rights pushed by the UK and France in the<br />Council.<br /><br />One of the most controversial issues is that of the three-strikes strongly<br />and continuously pushed by France in the EU Council .<br />Although most of the dispositions introducing the graduate response system<br />were rejected in first reading of the Telecom Package, there are still some<br />alarming ones persisting. France is trying hard to get rid of Amendment 138<br />which seeks to protect users' rights against the three-strikes sanctions and<br />which, until now, has stopped the EU from applying the three-strikes policy.<br />Also, some new amendments reintroduce the notion of lawful content, which<br />will impose the obligation on ISPs to monitor content going through their<br />networks.<br /><br />The UK government is pushing for the "wikipedia amendments" (so-called<br />because one of them has been created by cutting and pasting a text out of<br />the wikipedia) in order to allow ISPs to make limited content offers. The UK<br />amendments eliminate the text that gives users rights to access and<br />distribute content, services and applications, replacing it with a text that<br />says  "there should be transparency of conditions under which services are<br />provided, including information on the conditions to and/or use of<br />applications and services, and of any traffic management policies ."<br /><br />"In a context where markets like mobile telecommunication or entertainment<br />industries, merging with<br />telecommunication operators, are controlled by oligopolies, relying on the<br />only information of the consumer leaves the consumer without any choice.<br />Competition law would be the only remedy, and they proved to be totally<br />inefficient against Microsoft or mobile operators cartels. Therefore, it is<br />essential to define a positive guarantee of access to services without<br />discrimination," stated Jérémie Zimmermann, co-founder of La Quadrature du<br />Net.<br /><br />Also a very dangerous amendment to the ePrivacy directive is introduced<br />by the UK, allowing the telecommunications industry to collect a potentially<br />unlimited amount of users' sensitive and confidential communications data<br />including telephone and e-mail contacts, geographic position of mobile<br />phones and websites visited on the Internet.<br /><br />As a result of the amendments pushed by the AT&T industry, network<br />discrimination practices could be included by the use of Traffic Management<br />Systems, leading to a discriminative way in which users can access content,<br />services and applications, therefore giving complete control of the network<br />to the operators who will be able to decide who and what can access. The<br />pretext for this movement is the necessity of preventing a collapse of the<br />network due to congestion and of a diversified range of offers by the<br />operators. "Such practices would discourage investment in network capacity<br />as well as competition and innovation, and could pose serious threats to<br />freedom of speech" states La Quadrature du Net which has published an<br />analysis of the tabled amendments and recommendations for the votes to be<br />taken by ITRE/IMCO committee.<br /><br />La Quadrature du Net believes the time left before the vote in the ITRE/IMCO<br />committee must be used to urge MEPs from IMCO and ITRE to protect the<br />citizens' freedoms by voting against all amendments allowing net<br />discrimination, three strikes schemes and privacy breaches. "The second<br />reading on the Telecoms Package means a second round of intense lobbying,<br />where corporate interests try to go back on citizen's basic freedom in order<br />to gain more control over the network. However, the European Parliament has<br />a unique chance of showing citizens its commitment into protecting freedom<br />and equity, since it is only 3 months until the European elections, in June"<br />states the group.<br /><br />BEUC, the European Consumers' Organisation, also issued a press release on<br />18 March appealing for the net neutrality of the Internet. "Over the coming<br />days, the European Parliament, Commission and the Council are holding<br />informal trialogue discussions on the third telecom package. We urge them to<br />keep the principle of "net neutrality" in the final text, ensuring that<br />consumers will still have access to an open Internet. Consumers should be<br />able to choose their own content, application and services online - this<br />right needs to be enforced by national telecom regulators".<br /><br />The next key dates after the vote by ITRE/IMCO committee are 15 April 2009,<br />the deadline for plenary amendments, and 22<br />April 2009- the date estimated for the EP plenary vote.<br /><br />Lion of France on the attack against Amendment 138 (22.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=284&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...84&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />Telecoms Package 2nd Reading ITRE IMCO Amendments<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Telecoms_Package_2nd_Reading_ITRE_IMCO_Draft_Amendments#Amendment_85_--_2" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Telecoms_...endment_85_--_2</a><br /><br />UK government pushes for discriminated Internet (7.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/uk-government-pushes-for-discriminated-internet" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/en/uk-governme...inated-internet</a><br /><br />EU citizens: Save Internet from being turned into a TV! (22.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/eu-citizens-save-internet-from-being-turned-into-a-tv" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/en/eu-citizens...urned-into-a-tv</a><br /><br />UK Proposed Amendments<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/files/UK_PROPOSED_AMENDMENTS_on_net_neutrality_DRAFT_20090223_print.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/files/UK_PROPO...90223_print.pdf</a><br /><br />How the EU is bargaining away the Internet (23.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=287&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...87&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />Unblock the Internet for consumers: BEUC's fight for net neutrality<br />(18.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://docshare.beuc.org/docs/1/GOCCADAAPAOEOHHKPKMALAKIPDBG9DBYEG9DW3571KM/BEUC/docs/DLS/2009-00269-01-E.pdf" target="_blank">http://docshare.beuc.org/docs/1/GOCCADAAPA...-00269-01-E.pdf</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: Open letter to the European Parliament - Telecom Package<br />(17.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/campaigns/open-letter-telecom-package" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/campaigns/ope...telecom-package</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />2. Extension of copyright term postponed in the European Parliament<br />============================================================<br /><br />As a result of the very large controversy and lack of consensus among MEPs,<br />in a meeting of the presidents of the political groups in the European<br />Parliament on 17 March 2009, the vote on the extension of the copyright<br />term, which was due for 23 March 2009, was postponed for the end of April<br />2009.<br /><br />The proposed directive, introduced by Commissioner McCreevy, was to extend<br />copyright from 50 to 90 years and was allegedly meant to support performers<br />during their old age. As the many opponents to the proposal have emphasized<br />and as several studies have shown, the extension would mostly benefit the<br />major multinational companies and would negatively affect the economy and<br />culture of Europe.<br /><br />Professor Martin Kretschmer, Director of the Centre for Intellectual<br />Property Policy & Management Bournmemouth considered the measure would be<br />beneficial to the four multinational record companies Universal, Sony BMG,<br />Warner Music and EMI owning almost all the key records to be covered by the<br />extension, a few major artists and the collecting societies.<br /><br />According to the calculation of the European Commission's own figures, most<br />of the performers would only receive about 52 euro/year while according to<br />the EDRi-member Open Rights Group's estimation, 80% of the performers would<br />receive only 0.5 to 27 euro/year. Even if we take into consideration the<br />Commission's figure, the amount is far from helping aging performers.<br /><br />The Association for Fair Audiovisual Copyright in Europe ("A Face"), a group<br />including individuals and associations of the European audiovisual<br />community, has joined other voices against the directive and initiated a<br />petition against it. "We regard the proposed Directive, and any other one<br />based on similar principles and affecting the audiovisual world, as<br />detrimental to the development and dissemination of European culture and<br />economy, which are among the basic missions of the European Parliament. For<br />this reason, we intend to actively oppose their approval and call everybody<br />to support this cause" is the statement of the group. Face's goal is to make<br />sure copyright does not deviate from its initial purpose of "protecting the<br />interest of right holders only to the extent a general progress of culture<br />is assured."<br /><br />At the end of March, a discussion between the European Commission, European<br />Council and the European Parliament will decide whether the directive will<br />be allowed to be furthers discussed in the European Parliament.<br /><br />MEPs back off from copyright term extension vote! (19.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/03/19/meps-back-off-from-copyright-term-extension-vote/" target="_blank">http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/03/19/...extension-vote/</a><br /><br />Copyright extension debate: We must not inhibit digital creators<br />(16.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/shane_richmond/blog/2009/03/16/copyright_extension_debate_we_must_not_inhibit_digital_creators_" target="_blank">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/shane_richmon...gital_creators_</a><br /><br />Association for Fair Audiovisual Copyright in Europe Petition of the<br />european audiovisual community against the proposed directive for a<br />copyright term Extension for sound recordings<br /><a href="http://aface.eu/" target="_blank">http://aface.eu/</a><br /><br />EDRI- gram: Reject the Term Extension Directive (21.01.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/reject-term-extention-directive" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/reject-term-extention-directive</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />3. German Police searches the homes of the wikileaks.de domain owner<br />============================================================<br /><br />The German Police searched the homes of Theodor Reppe, the owner of the<br />domain name wikileaks.de, alleging he was under investigation for<br />"distribution of pornographic material" and "discovery of evidence"<br /><br />The seven police officers in Dresden and four in Jena having performed the<br />searches in the evening of 24 March 2009 claimed the raid was initiated due<br />to Mr. Reppe's position as the Wikileaks.de domain owner.<br /><br />However, it is not clear what exact documents were targeted, because the<br />German Police did not want to give any further information to Mr. Reppe and<br />no contact was made with Wikileaks before or after the search. But the<br />search is considered to be related with the publication of Wikileaks of the<br />censorship lists for Australia, Thailand, Denmark and other countries. The<br />lists include to sites alleged to contain pornography, including child<br />pornography. However, Wikileaks has not published any images from the sites.<br /><br />Wikileaks also speculated on the search: "The raid appears to be related to<br />a recent German social hysteria around child pornography and the political<br />battle for a national censorship system under the German family Minister<br />Ursula von der Leyen. It comes just a few weeks after a member of<br />parliament, SPD Joerg Tauss had his office and private house searched by<br />police. German bloggers discussing the subject were similarly raided. "<br /><br />According to information from Reppe, the Police asked for the passwords to<br />the wikileaks.de domain and asked. for the entire domain to be disabled. But<br />Wikileaks.de and other Wikileaks domains were unaffected by the raid.<br /><br />Reppe is just a volunteer who sponsors the domain for Wikileaks, but is not<br />involved in the day-to-day-operation of wikileaks and just mirrors a<br />collection of Wikileaks US Congressional Research Service reports.He also<br />maintains one of the most popular Tor servers in Germany.<br /><br />Police raid home of Wikileaks.de domain owner over censorship lists<br />(24.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Police_raid_home_of_Wikileaks.de_domain_owner_over_censorship_lists" target="_blank">http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Police_raid_home...ensorship_lists</a><br /><br />Police raid Wikileaks.de domain owner Theodor Reppe's home over 'censorship<br />lists' (25.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.news.com.au/technology/story/0,28348,25240192-5014239,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.news.com.au/technology/story/0,...5014239,00.html</a><br /><br />House searches for owners of the domain wikileaks.de (only in German<br />25.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Hausdurchsuchung-bei-Inhaber-der-Domain-wikileaks-de-Update--/meldung/135147" target="_blank">http://www.heise.de/newsticker/Hausdurchsu.../meldung/135147</a><br /><br />Danish police mobilized Blocked list (only in German, 2.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.lawblog.de/index.php/archives/2009/03/02/danische-sperrliste-mobilisiert-polizei/" target="_blank">http://www.lawblog.de/index.php/archives/2...isiert-polizei/</a><br /><br />Australia secretly censors Wikileaks press release and Danish Internet<br />censorship list (16.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://wikileaks.de/wiki/Australia_secretly_censors_Wikileaks_press_release_and_Danish_Internet_censorship_list%2C_16_Mar_2009" target="_blank">http://wikileaks.de/wiki/Australia_secretl...%2C_16_Mar_2009</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />4. Data sharing legislation pulled by the UK government<br />============================================================<br /><br />The campaign of Privacy International and of other civil liberties groups<br />against data sharing legislation in UK resulted in the UK Government<br />decision to abandon Clause 152 of the Coroners and Justice Bill.<br /><br />The respective clause was giving a "designated authority" the power to sign<br />an order allowing the sharing of information between any two agencies in the<br />public and private sector.<br /><br />The proposed legislation raised concerns related to the possible misuse of<br />personal data and created a large opposition movement. In a campaign led by<br />Privacy International and other NGOs, an open letter addressed to Justice<br />Secretary Jack Straw, signed by thirty organisations on 28 February 2009<br />condemned the proposal as a dangerous threat to privacy, and called for the<br />withdrawal of clause 152 from the Coroners & Justice Bill. "In view of the<br />extraordinary powers conferred by clause 152, the information sharing<br />provisions in the Bill may constitute the gravest threat to data protection<br />in the history of the Data Protection Act, and are among the most<br />wide-ranging and potentially intrusive proposals ever laid before<br />Parliament," stated the letter.<br /><br />On 9 March 2009, a spokesman for Straw announced the "rethinking" of the<br />legislative initiative as a result of the "strength of feeling" against it.<br />The spokesmen stated Justice Secretary recognized that the clause had been<br />drafted in too wide a manner and the reason for the "rethink and a<br />re-consultation" was to "try to strike a balance between the positive<br />elements of data-sharing and ensuring that sensitive data is protected".<br /><br />Although the proposal was entirely stricken out from the Coroners and<br />Justice Bill, a new attempt will be made to introducing an adjusted version<br />in an undetermined future.<br /><br />"This is an extraordinary U-turn but we cannot be led into a false sense of<br />security. We congratulate the Government on its decision, but it was<br />inevitable given how badly the clause have been drafted and how morally<br />corrupt its outcome would have been. Nobody should be under the illusion<br />that the Government has changed its colours with regard to its zeal for<br />surveillance. This could be merely a blip, so we all have to remain vigilant<br />for the next assault of privacy" said Simon Davies, director of Privacy<br />International.<br /><br />Privacy campaigner Phil Booth, director of No2ID was also pleased by the<br />decision. "People realized that their information could be taken and used<br />and abused for other purposes" he said, adding: "The public backlash against<br />Clause 152 has been phenomenal. NO2ID has been working closely with Privacy<br />International and others to focus grassroots and organisational opposition,<br />but the reality is that people just won't put up with the hypocrisy of<br />politicians who want to keep their own details secret, or who support<br />shadowy police databases on protestors, yet who clearly still think that the<br />state can do just as it wants with our personal information. It can't - the<br />people have spoken. Let's hope the scrapping of Clause 152 is the first nail<br />in the coffin of the database state."<br /><br />However, just as Davies, he expressed some reservations, thinking the<br />government might disregard Straw's position.<br /><br />Straw will launch a public consultation in view of implementing more limited<br />proposals to allow government bodies to share information in cases when<br />there is clear benefit.<br /><br />"We will talk to interested groups to get the balance right so that we have<br />the right policy issues reflected in any future legislation and at the same<br />time avoid worrying people unnecessarily that their data is being abused"<br />stated Straw's spokesmen.<br /><br />UK Government backs down on data sharing legislation after PI campaign<br />(8.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd" target="_blank">http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd</a>[347]=x-347-563879<br /><br />Government abandons data-sharing scheme (7.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/4954058/Government-abandons-data-sharing-scheme.html" target="_blank">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics...ing-scheme.html</a><br /><br />Straw bows to pressure over data sharing (8.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/mar/08/data-sharing-civil-liberties" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/...civil-liberties</a><br /><br />UK govt to rethink data-sharing plans (10.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/security/0,39044215,62052042,00.htm?scid=rss_z_nw" target="_blank">http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/security/0,3...m?scid=rss_z_nw</a><br /><br />Civil society joins key professional bodies to demand removal of data<br />sharing powers (28.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd" target="_blank">http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd</a>[347]=x-347-563710<br /><br />EDRIgram:UK Government proposes increased data sharing (11.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/uk-govt-more-sharing-data" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/uk...re-sharing-data</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />5. France: Three strikes law debated by the General Assembly<br />============================================================<br /><br />The debates on the French three strikes law (so called Hadopi law) started<br />on 11 March 2009 in the General Assembly only to be suspended at the end of<br />the second day, to be continued on 31 March.<br /><br />While the law was adopted by the Senate in less than a day, it appears the<br />deputies will need a much longer time for the debates. Several deputies have<br />shown their opposition to the project considering it as a mechanism to<br />suppress rights and liberties, a "legal monster" as deputy Patrick Bloche<br />expressed himself.<br /><br />However, several amendments to the law were rejected during these two days.<br />Besides the debates related to the financial costs incurred by the creation<br />of Hadopi authority, many discussions referred to the respect of the right<br />to defence raised by the graduated response. At the request of<br />the Minister of Culture and some rapporteurs, the deputies rejected the<br />amendment stipulating that "the right to an equitable procedure must be<br />observed in all cases by the High Authority" and that "attached to this<br />fundamental principles are the audi alteram partem right, the right of<br />defence, the presumption of innocence and imputability rights".<br /><br />The deputies also rejected the modified version of the global licence<br />despite the arguments brought by the opponents of the graduate response.<br />Didier Mathus brought the argument of the revenue showing that with a 2<br />euro/month contribution from the Internet users, 400 millions euro would go<br />to the music industry while the three strikes system would bring nothing.<br />Jean Dionis du Séjour's proposal of an extended collective licence<br />for the commercial platforms wishing to have access to the catalogues of the<br />record companies was also rejected as well as the amendment introduced by<br />the majority deputy Suguenot that referred to a tax on all advertising<br />revenue from the web, in favour of performers.<br /><br />Another rejected amendment requested a report to be submitted to the<br />Parliament before 31 October 2009 for the implementation of a fund for music<br />creation. The financing of the fund should be included as a part of the tax<br />payed by operators of electronic communications.<br /><br />So, basically, Christine Albanel succeeded in influencing the votes of the<br />deputies in many of the issues under the debate. She also reaffirmed her<br />intention to continue to defend the draft law.<br /><br />However, there is still some time before the debates are resumed which could<br />be used to try and influence the final result.<br /><br />La Quadrature du Net has launched an initiative in this sense meant to make<br />all deputies aware of the consequences of their position regarding the<br />Hadopi law. The "Memoire Politique" (Political Memory) is a wiki including<br />all texts and comments of the deputies that will allow the citizens to<br />verify the position of each deputy in various national and european legal<br />debates.<br /><br />La Quadrature du Net team, has decided to thus improve the democratic<br />information and to "concretely apply the fundamental principle of the<br />representative democracy" by the Memoire Politique".<br /><br />The Memoire Politique will collect the declarations and positions of the<br />deputies during the sessions on Hadopi law, also providing their assessment.<br />This will give the citizens the possibility to verify whether the deputies<br />they elected really represent their interests. This will also help in<br />providing the citizens with the counter-arguments that they may present to<br />their deputies in requiring the refusal of amendments that may affect their<br />rights.<br /><br />Internet and Creation Law (day 2): suspended until 31 March... minimum (only<br />in French, 13.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12301-Loi-Creation-et-Internet-jour-2-suspendue-jusqu-au-31-mars-minimum.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12301-Loi...rs-minimum.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi (day 2) : the deputies rejected the global licence - version 2009<br />(only in French, 12.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12299-Hadopi-jour-2-les-deputes-rejettent-la-licence-globale-version-2009.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12299-Had...rsion-2009.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi (day 1): The right wing divided by the suspension of the access to<br />Internet (only in French, 12.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12285-Hadopi-jour-1-la-droite-divisee-sur-la-suspension-de-l-acces-a-Internet.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12285-Had...a-Internet.html</a><br /><br />Hadopi : National Assembly massively rejects the exception of<br />non-admisability (only in French, 11.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12281-Hadopi-l-Assemblee-Nationale-rejette-massivement-l-exception-d-irrecevabilite.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12281-Had...cevabilite.html</a><br /><br />La Quadrature du Net sets up the Mémoire Politique (only in French,<br />23.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12387-La-Quadrature-du-Net-met-en-place-une-Memoire-Politique.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12387-La-...-Politique.html</a><br /><br />Mémoire Politique<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Political_Memory" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Political_Memory</a><br /><br />Hadopi amendements - National Assembly<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Hadopi_amendements_assemblee_nationale" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Hadopi_am...mblee_nationale</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: HADOPI law close of creating a dangerous precedent (25.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.4/hadopi-law-france" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.4/hadopi-law-france</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />6. European Parliament wants more transparency on ACTA<br />============================================================<br /><br />The European Parliament has included in the Draft Regulation regarding<br />public access to the European Parliament, Council and Commission documents a<br />reference asking for more transparency in the current negotiations on the<br />Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA)<br /><br />A recital in the text adopted by the European Parliament says:<br />"In accordance with Article 255(1) of the EC Treaty, the Commission should<br />immediately make all documents related to the ongoing international<br />negotiations on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) publicly<br />available."<br /><br />The new regulation considers that the basic principle of the new policy on<br />access to documents should be: "No legislative documents should be kept<br />secret." MEPs adopted amendments to the draft proposal but postponed the<br />vote on the legislative resolution, leaving the door open for further<br />negotiations and a first-reading agreement.<br /><br />The regulation foresees also the disclosure of the documents originating<br />from a Member State and received by the EU institutions, after the<br />consultation of the Member state, but without giving it a right of veto.<br />Also Member States shall seek to ensure that an equivalent level of<br />transparency is granted in relation to national measures implementing<br />normative acts of the EU.<br /><br />The MEPs concluded that transparency should be extended also to the<br />international agreements where EU is participating. Special reference was<br />made to the agreement with the USA on the PNR that "must not give a non-EU<br />country or an international organisation the right to prevent the European<br />Parliament from accessing confidential information."<br /><br />Also, MEPs asked the Commission to make available all the documents related<br />to ACTA that might create a new international benchmark on intellectual<br />property right enforcement.<br /><br />This decision came as a breath of fresh air for all international civil<br />rights activists that have asked several times for the publication of the<br />documents related to this international treaty. Especially after in US a<br />Freedom of Information Act request by Jamie Love, director of the non-profit<br />group Knowledge Ecology International, was denied by the chief FOIA officer<br />in the White House's Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. The subject of<br />the request were 7 specific documents, referenced by their exact title and<br />date. These documents are the proposals for ACTA text. The requested<br />documents "are being widely circulated to corporate lobbyists in Europe,<br />Japan, and the U.S. There is no reason for them to be secret from the<br />American public."<br /><br />However, the answer of the Obama administration was that the discussion<br />draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and related materials are<br />"classified in the interest of national security pursuant to Executive Order<br />12958."<br /><br />A document published by Michael Geist in Canada reveals that also the<br />Canadian Government might be favourable to an early release of draft ACTA<br />".. the Canadian delegation plans to argue for a transparent approach. . .<br />This approach would result in an earlier release of the text, which would<br />serve to alleviate domestic concerns about the scope of the agreement and<br />the perceived secrecy surrounding the process. The draft text could then<br />serve as the basis for broad-based public consultations. "<br /><br />Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council<br />regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission<br />documents (11.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2009-0114+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc...amp;language=EN</a><br /><br />Access to documents: The European Parliament demands more transparency<br />(11.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/019-51409-068-03-11-902-20090310IPR51408-09-03-2009-2009-false/default_es.htm" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/.../default_es.htm</a><br /><br />Copyright treaty is classified for 'national security' (12.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10195547-38.html" target="_blank">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10195547-38.html</a><br /><br />Obama Administration Rules Texts of New IPR Agreement are State Secrets<br />(12.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-love/obama-administration-rule_b_174450.html" target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-love/o...e_b_174450.html</a><br /><br />Canada Favours Early Release of ACTA Text (14.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/3751/125/" target="_blank">http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/3751/125/</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: EU pushes for an international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade<br />Agreement (7.11.2007)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.21/acta-eu" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.21/acta-eu</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: BitTorrent tracker sites threatened by draft ACTA agreement<br />(4.06.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.11/bittorent-acta-agreement" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.11/bi...-acta-agreement</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />7. Germany: Data retention is disproportionate<br />============================================================<br /><br />The German Working Group on Data Retention (AK Vorrat) announced that the<br />Administrative Court of Wiesbaden found the blanket recording of the entire<br />population's traffic data on telephone, mobile phone, e-mail and Internet<br />usage is disproportionate.<br /><br />The decision of the court is "that data retention violates the fundamental<br />right to privacy. It is not necessary in a democratic society. The<br />individual does not provoke the interference but can be intimidated by the<br />risks of abuse and the feeling of being under surveillance (...) The<br />directive (on data retention) does not respect the<br />principle of proportionality guaranteed in Article 8 ECHR, which is why it<br />is invalid."<br /><br />AK Vorrat, that has also initiated the Constitutional complaint against the<br />German Data retention law, used this opportunity to address another digital<br />civil rights fear: a government project to allow Internet service providers<br />to record everybody's Internet surfing habits. The project was debated<br />on 19 March by the German Bundestag in the first reading.<br /><br />Started as a project to better protect the computer networks against any<br />cyber-attacks, the new draft has been criticized by the Privacy<br />Commissioner of the Federal Government, Peter Schaar, who considered that<br />the draft needed to be revised and several law provisions needed to be<br />clarified.<br /><br />The draft also contains an amendment to the Telemedia Act, which allows<br />service providers, using data they are allowed to store and process for<br />legal purposes, to use the information for identifying surfing habits. The<br />amendemnt is justified by the necessity of the protection against malicious<br />software and other similar threats.<br /><br />"We call on all citizens to contact their MPs now in order to protest<br />against the proposed retention of web surfing habits," says Werner Hülsmann,<br />member of the board of the forum of computer scientists for peace and social<br />responsibility, actively working in the Working Group on Data Retention.<br /><br />"The recent criticism by Federal Minister of the Interior Wolfgang Schäuble<br />(CDU) of the Constitutional Court's preliminary decision on data retention<br />proves that his surveillance mania is limitless", criticizes Patrick Breyer<br />of the Working Group on Data Retention. "It is not 'a matter for the<br />legislature' to keep eroding our constitutional guarantees protecting us<br />from errors and abuses by the authorities. We urgently need to establish a<br />Fundamental Rights Agency to have all existing powers and programs of the<br />security authorities systematically and scientifically reviewed as to their<br />effectiveness, cost, adverse effects, alternatives and compatibility with<br />our fundamental rights."<br /><br />Despite all the different European attempts to stop data retention, the day<br />of 15 March 2009, imposed by the EU data retention directive, marks the<br />starting point for ISPs to collect and store traffic data in several<br />European countries.<br /><br />Administrative Court: Data retention is "invalid" (16.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/content/view/301/1/lang,en/" target="_blank">http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/cont.../301/1/lang,en/</a><br /><br />Video: Bundestag debates draft law (only in German, 25.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/content/view/302/1/lang,de/" target="_blank">http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/cont.../302/1/lang,de/</a><br /><br />Protection against hackers, surveillance fears (only in German, 19.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.tagesschau.de/inland/ueberwachung/bsigesetz100.html" target="_blank">http://www.tagesschau.de/inland/ueberwachu...igesetz100.html</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />8. Irish ISP Association rejects the copyright industry threats<br />============================================================<br /><br />After several weeks of silence in the the Eircom deal with IRMA (Irish<br />Recorded Music Association), the Irish ISP Association (ISPAI) has reacted<br />considering the legal threats as spurious and that there is no evidence of<br />wrong-doing by Internet Service Providers.<br /><br />The Irish ISP scandal has started with the major Irish ISP Eircom agreement<br />to a "three strikes" approach, following the settlement of the court case<br />with IRMA. In terms of this agreement, the evidence of illegal downloads<br />will be provided by IRMA and Eircom will take action without a court<br />hearing. The agreement also means that Eircom is not to oppose any<br />application blocking file-sharing websites from their network.<br /><br />IRMA tried to extend the agreement to other ISPs by sending them letters<br />threatening legal action from solicitors representing four major music<br />recording companies.<br /><br />ISPAI, where Eircom is also a member, published a statement approved by "a<br />majority" of its members that claims that two years ago they initiated<br />meetings with the music representatives to explore these aspects, but the<br />matter was not followed up by the industry.<br /><br />"The ISPAI and its members have never condoned the use of its members'<br />services for theft of copyrighted works of any kind, and continue to operate<br />within the existing legal framework which has provisions for taking action<br />where appropriate," says the statement explaining that the present Irish<br />copyright law provides remedies and means of action for breaching copyright<br />through the courts and that "ISPAI members will continue to co-operate fully<br />within these existing legal parameters."<br /><br />ISPAI also supports the privacy of its users' communications and underlines<br />its importance through this statement:<br />"Privacy of user communications is protected in European and Irish<br />legislation. ISPs can not be expected to ignore these merely because it does<br />not suit another private party. To do so would breach the privacy of our<br />users as well as having serious implications for the continued location of<br />international e-business in this country and the jobs these generate. "<br /><br />ISPAI - Position statement (13.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ispai.ie/docs/20090313copyright.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.ispai.ie/docs/20090313copyright.pdf</a><br /><br />Irish ISPs rally against record label anti-piracy threat (17.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/17/irish_isps_rally_against_irma_threats/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/17/ir...t_irma_threats/</a><br /><br />Irish ISPs reject music industry's file-sharer demands (18.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9887" target="_blank">http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9887</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: Irish ISP settled to introduce 3 strikes (11.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/3-strikes-ireland" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/3-strikes-ireland</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: IRMA tries to block websites (11.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.5/irma-blocks-websites" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.5/irma-blocks-websites</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />9. Coalition of musicians against criminalizing downloaders<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 11 March 2009, during its inaugural meeting, the Featured Artists<br />Coalition (FAC) including 140 of UK biggest rock and pop stars, expressed<br />concern about actions taken against fans involved in file-sharing.<br /><br />FAC expressed the intention to fight for a fairer deal for musicians "at a<br />time when they can use the internet to forge direct links with their fans."<br />The members of the coalition want to campaign for effective laws and<br />regulations and for transparent and equitable business practices. They<br />believe that companies such as MySpace and YouTube should be required to<br />remunerate the artists when using their music for advertising. At the same<br />time, they want to dissociate themselves from the industry in its move to<br />criminalize individuals for illegally downloaded music.<br /><br />The artists discussed on a response to the interim version of the Digital<br />Britain report which proposes a Rights Agency to enforce anti-piracy<br />measures. Although the interim report does not propose a three-strikes<br />system like in France, it proposes measures requiring ISPs to give up<br />information about customers sharing music on P2P networks to rights-holders.<br />This would make it easier to take actions against the most significant<br />infringers.<br /><br />"What I said at the meeting was that the record industry in Britain is still<br />going down the road of criminalising our audience for downloading illegal<br />MP3s," said musician Billy Bragg who added that "Artists should own their<br />own rights and they should decide when their music should be used for free,<br />or when they should have payment."<br /><br />Ed O'Brien, member of Radiohand band, considered that during a "defining<br />time for the industry (...) a lot of the rights and revenue streams are<br />being carved up, and we need a voice... I think all the major players want<br />to hear what we have to say."<br /><br />It's not a crime to download, say musicians (12.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/its-not-a-crime-to-download-say-musicians-1643217.html" target="_blank">http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertai...ns-1643217.html</a><br /><br />Featured Artists Opposed To Cutting Off File-Sharers (12.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3iffcfe0c0b0255a5af3401db90f5dd412" target="_blank">http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_dis...3401db90f5dd412</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />10. Recommended Action<br />============================================================<br /><br />Document Freedom Day - 25.03.2009<br />For the second time, in 2009, the Document Freedom Day is orgganized as a<br />global day for Document Liberation with the participation of<br />roughly 250 active teams worldwide. It is a day of grassroots effort around<br />the world to promote and build awareness for the relevance of Free Document<br />Formats in particular and Open Standards in general.<br /><a href="http://www.documentfreedom.org/" target="_blank">http://www.documentfreedom.org/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />11. Recommended Reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />Database State - a comprehensive map of UK government databases<br />By Ross Anderson, Ian Brown, Terri Dowty, Philip Inglesant, William Heath,<br />Angela Sasse, Foundation for Information Policy Research (March 2009)<br /><br />Database State - full report<br /><a href="http://www.jrrt.org.uk/uploads/Database%20State.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.jrrt.org.uk/uploads/Database%20State.pdf</a><br /><br />Database State - Executive Summary<br /><a href="http://www.jrrt.org.uk/uploads/Database%20State%20-%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.jrrt.org.uk/uploads/Database%20...e%20Summary.pdf</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />12. Agenda<br />============================================================<br /><br />26-27 March 2009, London, UK<br />5th Communia Workshop: Accessing, Using, Reusing Public Sector Content and<br />Data<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/ws05" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/ws05</a><br /><br />27-29 March 2009, Manchester, UK<br />Oekonux Conference: Free Software and Beyond The World of Peer Production<br /><a href="http://www.oekonux-conference.org/" target="_blank">http://www.oekonux-conference.org/</a><br /><br />28 March 2009, London, UK<br />Open Knowledge Conference (OKCon) 2009<br /><a href="http://www.okfn.org/okcon/" target="_blank">http://www.okfn.org/okcon/</a><br /><br />29-31 March 2009, Edinburgh, UK<br />Governance Of New Technologies: The Transformation Of Medicine, Information<br />Technology And Intellectual Property - An International Interdisciplinary<br />Conference<br /><a href="http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/conference09/" target="_blank">http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/conference09/</a><br /><br />1-3 April 2009, Berlin, Germany<br />re:publica 2009 "Shift happens"<br /><a href="http://www.re-publica.de/09/" target="_blank">http://www.re-publica.de/09/</a><br />Subconference: 2nd European Privacy Open Space<br /><a href="http://www.privacyos.eu/" target="_blank">http://www.privacyos.eu/</a><br /><br />4 April 2009, Paris, France<br />French 2009 Big Brother Awards<br /><a href="http://bigbrotherawards.eu.org/" target="_blank">http://bigbrotherawards.eu.org/</a><br /><br />21-23 April 2009, Winchester, UK<br />BILETA 2009 Annual Conference<br /><a href="http://www.winchester.ac.uk/?page=9871" target="_blank">http://www.winchester.ac.uk/?page=9871</a><br /><br />23-24 April 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />The future of intellectual property - Creativity and innovation in the<br />digital era<br /><a href="http://www.intellectualproperty-conference.eu" target="_blank">http://www.intellectualproperty-conference.eu</a><br /><br />23-24 April 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands<br />Second European Licensing and Legal Workshop organized by Free Software<br />Foundation Europe<br /><a href="http://www.fsfeurope.org/news/2009/news-20090323-01.en.html" target="_blank">http://www.fsfeurope.org/news/2009/news-20090323-01.en.html</a><br /><br />11 May 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />GigaNet is organizing the 2nd international academic workshop on Global<br />Internet Governance: An Interdisciplinary Research Field in Construction.<br />Deadline for abstracts submissions is 20 March 2009.<br /><a href="http://giganet.igloogroups.org/publiclibr/giganetcos/2009brusse" target="_blank">http://giganet.igloogroups.org/publiclibr/...tcos/2009brusse</a><br /><br />13-14 May 2009 Uppsala, Sweden<br />Mashing-up Culture: The Rise of User-generated Content<br /><a href="http://www.counter2010.org/workshop_call" target="_blank">http://www.counter2010.org/workshop_call</a><br /><br />19-20 May 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />European Commission organizes a personal data protection conference to look<br />at new challenges for privacy<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/news/docs/pr_03_03_09_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...03_03_09_en.pdf</a><br /><br />24-28 May 2009, Venice, Italy<br />ICIMP 2009, The Fourth International Conference on Internet Monitoring<br />and Protection<br /><a href="http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html" target="_blank">http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html</a><br /><br />1-4 June 2009, Washington, DC, USA<br />Computers Freedom and Privacy 2009<br /><a href="http://www.cfp2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.cfp2009.org/</a><br /><br />5 June 2009, London, UK<br />The Second Multidisciplinary Workshop on Identity in the Information<br />Society (IDIS 09): "Identity and the Impact of Technology"<br /><a href="http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/" target="_blank">http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/</a><br /><br />28-30 June 2009, Torino, Italy<br />COMMUNIA Conference 2009: Global Science & Economics of Knowledge-Sharing<br />Institutions<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009</a><br /><br />2-3 July 2009, Padova, Italy<br />3rd FLOSS International Workshop on Free/Libre Open Source Software<br />Paper submission by 31 March 2009<br /><a href="http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/manenti/floss/floss09.html" target="_blank">http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/...ss/floss09.html</a><br /><br />13-16 August 2009, Vierhouten, The Netherlands<br />Hacking at Random<br /><a href="http://www.har2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.har2009.org/</a><br /><br />23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy<br />World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and<br />Council: "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage"<br /><a href="http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm</a><br /><br />10-12 September 2009, Potsdam, Germany<br />5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam<br />Section: Protest Politics<br />Panel: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property<br /><a href="http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp</a><br /><br />16-18 September 2009, Crete, Greece<br />World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2009<br /><a href="http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/" target="_blank">http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/</a><br /><br />October 2009,  Istanbul, Turkey<br />eChallenges 2009<br /><a href="http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp</a><br /><br />16 October 2009, Bielefeld, Germany<br />10th German Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 15 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/</a><br /><br />15-18 November 2009, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt<br />UN Internet Governance Forum<br /><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/" target="_blank">http://www.intgovforum.org/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />13. About<br />============================================================<br /><br />EDRI-gram is a biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe.<br />Currently EDRI has 29 members based or with offices in 18 different<br />countries in Europe. European Digital Rights takes an active interest in<br />developments in the EU accession countries and wants to share knowledge and<br />awareness through the EDRI-grams.<br /><br />All contributions, suggestions for content, corrections or agenda-tips are<br />most welcome. Errors are corrected as soon as possible and visibly on the<br />EDRI website.<br /><br />Except where otherwise noted, this newsletter is licensed under the<br />Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See the full text at<br /><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</a><br /><br />Newsletter editor: Bogdan Manolea &lt;edrigram@edri.org&gt;<br /><br />Information about EDRI and its members:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/</a><br /><br />European Digital Rights needs your help in upholding digital rights in the<br />EU. If you wish to help us promote digital rights, please consider making a<br />private donation.<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram subscription information<br /><br />subscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: subscribe<br /><br />You will receive an automated e-mail asking to confirm your request.<br />unsubscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: unsubscribe<br /><br />- EDRI-gram in Macedonian<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available partly in Macedonian, with delay. Translations<br />are provided by Metamorphosis<br /><a href="http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php" target="_blank">http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram in German<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available in German, with delay. Translations are provided<br />Andreas Krisch from the EDRI-member VIBE!AT - Austrian Association for<br />Internet Users<br /><a href="http://www.unwatched.org/" target="_blank">http://www.unwatched.org/</a><br /><br />- Newsletter archive<br /><br />Back issues are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:16:40 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19725</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.08: EFF Launches Search Tool for Uncovered Government Documents</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19711</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 08  March 20, 2009  editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 503rd issue:<br /><br />* EFF LAUNCHED A SEARCH TOOL FOR UNCOVERED GOVERNMENT<br />DOCUMENTS as part of our celebration of Sunshine Week. The<br />search tool is sophisticated technology that allows the<br />public to closely examine thousands of pages of documents<br />we have pried loose from secretive government agencies. In<br />addition, we're posting scores of never-before seen<br />documents on several controversial government initiatives,<br />including the FBI's Investigative Data Warehouse and DCS<br />3000 surveillance program, and the Department of Homeland<br />Security's Automated Targeting System and ADVISE<br />data-mining project.<br /><br />Over the past two and a half years, EFF has filed hundreds<br />of FOIA requests and made thousands of pages of once-secret<br />documents available to the public on our website. Our FOIA<br />work has revealed details about the FBI's improper use of<br />National Security Letters, uncovered the Department of<br />Homeland Security's internal policies on searching and<br />interrogating travelers at the border, and revealed<br />information about the technology the government uses to<br />wiretap cell phones.<br /><br />The release of these new documents is just one step in the<br />ongoing fight for greater government transparency. EFF will<br />continue to pressure the government to remember its<br />obligations to transparency and to the public.<br /><br />To support EFF's FOIA work:<br />secure.eff.org/foia<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/16" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/16</a><br /><br />More on our celebration of Sunshine Week:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/foia" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/foia</a><br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/sunshine-week-commonsense-transparency-readthebill" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/sunsh...ncy-readthebill</a><br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/sunshine-week-october-11-2002-nsa-surveillance-mem" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/sunsh...urveillance-mem</a><br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/sunshine-week-february-8-2002-nsa-surveillance-mem" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/sunsh...urveillance-mem</a><br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/sunshine-week-missing-documents-nsa-surveillance" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/sunsh...sa-surveillance</a><br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/sunshine-week-traffic-analysis-fall-2004" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/sunsh...lysis-fall-2004</a><br /><br />* ANONMYITY AND PRIVACY SHOULD NOT ADD UP TO PRISON TIME,<br />EFF argued before the United States Sentencing Commission<br />this week.  EFF urged the court to reject modifications to<br />federal sentencing guidelines that would require extra<br />prison time for people who use technology that hides one's<br />identity or location. Under current rules, a criminal<br />defendant can get additional time added to a prison<br />sentence if he used "sophisticated means" to commit the<br />offense.<br /><br />In its testimony before the commission, EFF argued that<br />sentencing courts should not assume that using proxies --<br />technologies that can anonymize users or mask their<br />location -- is a mark of sophistication. In fact, proxies<br />are widely employed by corporate IT departments and public<br />libraries and, like many computer applications, can be used<br />with little or no knowledge on the part of the user.<br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/17" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/17</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* EFF Urges Court to Block Ploy for Cell Phone Location<br />EFF urged a U.S. appeals court Monday to block the<br />government's repeated attempts to seize cell phone location<br />information -- a record of where the cell phone user<br />travels throughout each day -- without a warrant in<br />violation of communications privacy statutes and the<br />Constitution.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/17-0" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/17-0</a><br /><br />* Attorney General Sets New FOIA Policy<br />The new FOIA guidelines released this week by Eric Holder<br />express strong support for government transparency and<br />establish a presumption in favor of disclosure of<br />information requested under FOIA.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/attorney-general-sets-new-foia-policy-its-impact-r" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/attor...cy-its-impact-r</a><br /><br />* CNET Axes Blogger Who Exposed Whitehouse.gov Privacy<br />Issue<br />CNET will no longer carry Surveillance State by Chris<br />Soghoian, an blogger who produced some of the best coverage<br />on the issue of privacy for users of government websites.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/cnets-fails-stand-blogger" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/cnets...s-stand-blogger</a><br /><br />* DOJ Seeks Jail Time for Music Sharing<br />The government asked for a six-month prison sentence for<br />Kevin Cogill, who recently plead guilty to a pre-release<br />leak of the Guns N' Roses album Chinese Democracy.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/doj-seeks-jail-time-music-sharing" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/doj-s...e-music-sharing</a><br /><br />* The Fair Use Massacre Continues<br />Thanks to the good folks at YouTomb, we've learned that<br />Warner Music's automated takedown net has now caught two<br />videos of little kids being little kids.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/fair-use-massacre-continues-now-warner-s-going-aft" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/fair-...ner-s-going-aft</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Pentagon Official Warns of Risk of Cyber Attacks<br />An Air Force general made the case that the US is<br />vulnerable to attack, but says the military has not been<br />asked to defend Internet infrastructure.<br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/17/AR2009031702715.html" target="_blank">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...9031702715.html</a><br /><br />~ Partial List of Corporations Allowed to See ACTA<br />The public and activist groups don't have access to the<br />secret copyright treaty, but these corporations do.<br /><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/03/14/partial-list-of-corp.html" target="_blank">http://www.boingboing.net/2009/03/14/parti...st-of-corp.html</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* You're Invited to a "Geek Reading" with Authors Cory<br />Doctorow, Rudy Rucker, Annalee Newitz, and Charlie Anders<br />at 111 Minna Gallery<br /><br />Join EFF on Monday, March 23rd, for a fundraising event<br />featuring award-winning writer Cory Doctorow.  Cory will be<br />reading from his novel, "Little Brother," a story of<br />high-tech teenage rebellion set in the familiar world of<br />San Francisco.  As he currently calls the UK home, this is<br />a rare opportunity to to hear Cory read from his work in<br />person.  He will be joined by fellow writers Rudy Rucker,<br />Annalee Newitz and Charlie Anders reading from their latest<br />works.<br /><br />WHEN:<br /><br />Monday, March 23rd, at 7:30 p.m.<br /><br />WHO:<br /><br />Cory Doctorow (craphound.com) is a science fiction<br />novelist, blogger and technology activist.  He is the<br />co-editor of the popular weblog Boing Boing<br />(boingboing.net), and a contributor to Wired, Popular<br />Science, Make, the New York Times, and many other<br />newspapers, magazines and websites.  Cory is an EFF fellow<br />and the former Director of European Affairs at EFF.  He has<br />won the Locusand Sunburst Awards and been nominated for the<br />Hugo, Nebula and British Science Fiction Awards.  His<br />latest novel, New York Times Bestseller "Little Brother,"<br />was published in May 2008, and his latest short story<br />collection is "Overclocked: Stories of the Future Present."<br /><br />Rudy Rucker is a popular science fiction and nonfiction<br />writer.  Born in Kentucky in 1946, Rudy studied<br />mathematics, earning a Ph.D. from Rutgers University in the<br />theory of infinite sets.  After working 15 years as a<br />mathematics professor on the East Coast, Rudy moved to<br />Silicon Valley in 1986 to become a computer science<br />professor at San Jose State University, also working as a<br />software engineer at Autodesk, Inc.  After some 20 years at<br />SJSU, Rudy retired from teaching.  Rudy has published 29<br />books, including five non-fiction popular science books on<br />such topics as relativity, infinity, the fourth dimension,<br />and information.  "The Lifebox, the Seashell, and the<br />Soul"--his most recent nonfiction book--is about the<br />meaning of computation.<br /><br />Annalee Newitz is a journalist who covers the cultural<br />impact of science and technology, covering such topics as<br />open source software and hacker subcultures.  Annalee<br />writes for many periodicals, including Popular Science and<br />Wired, and since 1999 has had a syndicated weekly column<br />called Techsploitation.  From 2004-2005, Annalee was a<br />policy analyst for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.  She<br />is the editor of io9, a Gawker-owned science fiction blog.<br /><br />Charlie Jane Anders blogs about science fiction at io9.com.<br />She organizes the Writers With Drinks reading series and is<br />starting a weekly podcast called "I Am So Smart."  Her<br />writing has appeared most recently in "The McSweeney's Joke<br />Book Of Book Jokes," Mother Jones magazine, and the<br />upcoming "Science Fiction: The Best of the Year, 2009<br />Edition."  Charlie wrote a novel called "Choir Boy" and<br />co-edited an anthology called "She's Such a Geek."  Find<br />her on Twitter as "charliejane."<br /><br />WHERE:<br /><br />111 Minna Gallery<br />111 Minna St. @ 2nd<br />San Francisco, CA 94105<br /><br />Admission is $25.  No one turned away for lack of funds.<br />Must be 21 or older to attend.<br /><br />RSVP to: events@eff.org<br /><br />111 Minna Gallery is accessible via BART.  Get off at the<br />Montgomery station and use the exit marked 2nd and Market.<br />Walk south on 2nd Street until you reach 111 Minna Gallery<br />on the right.  It's also walking distance from the Caltrain<br />station.<br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br />secure.eff.org/donate<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:20:39 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19711</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector Vol. 22, No. 07  March 13, 2009  editor@eff.org</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19707</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 07  March 13, 2009  editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 502nd issue:<br /><br />* GOOGLE LAUNCHED A BEHAVORIAL TARGETING AD PROGRAM this<br />week, which it calls "interest-based advertising." EFF is<br />concerned about behavioral targeting, because it means that<br />information about how you use the web is collected, stored<br />and associated with a cookie on your browser, which can<br />track you across different websites and online services.<br />The program'soriginal opt-out option -- using cookies to<br />opt-out of tracking cookies -- was not adequate, because<br />the very users who care most about privacy are the ones<br />most likely to delete cookies, thus removing them from the<br />opt-out protection.<br /><br />We worked with Google to seek a new solution, and the<br />result is the Advertising Cookie Opt-Out Plug-in, which<br />allows users to keep their opt-out status for a particular<br />browser even when they clear all cookies. If you are a user<br />who shares our concerns about privacy, we encourage you to<br />opt-out of tracking by downloading the plug-in and keep<br />regularly deleting your cookies.<br /><br />For the full post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/google-begins-behavioral-targeting-ad-program" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/googl...ting-ad-program</a><br /><br />* GOOGLE HAS DECIDED TO MATCH LOOPT'S POLICY for dealing<br />with law enforcement demands in regards to Latitude,<br />Google's new cell phone-based friend-finding service. The<br />gist of the Latitude and Loopt policies? "Come back with a<br />warrant."<br /><br />Like Loopt, Google's Latitude doesn't (currently) keep a<br />historic log of its users' locations; both companies<br />overwrite the old data each time you report a new location.<br />Google has confirmed that its policy will be to require a<br />wiretap order -- sometimes called a "super-warrant" since<br />it's even harder to get than a regular search warrant --<br />before tracking a Latitude user's location for law<br />enforcement.<br /><br />Of course, it remains to be seen how far Google and Loopt<br />will go if faced with a court order that isn't the required<br />super-warrant. But the public commitment alone is an<br />important step forward, and to the extent either Google or<br />Loopt is faced with a law enforcement demand that they<br />don't think is up to snuff legally, the lawyers at EFF<br />stand ready and waiting to help.<br /><br />For the full post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/exclusive-google-takes-stand-location-privacy-alon" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/exclu...on-privacy-alon</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* Seer Systems Threatens EFF with Defamation Lawsuit<br />Seer Systems, Inc. and Stanley Jungleib have issued a<br />written litigation threat to EFF over statements made as<br />part of EFF's Patent Busting Project.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/seer-systems-threatens-eff-defamation-lawsuit" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/seer-...amation-lawsuit</a><br /><br />* Additional Details about Choruss on Campuses<br />EDUCAUSE, the nonprofit for information technology in<br />higher education, posted a one hour conversation with Jim<br />Griffin, the head of Choruss (and member of EFF's advisory<br />board).<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/additional-details-choruss-collective-licensing-ca" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/addit...ve-licensing-ca</a><br /><br />* Why Irish ISPs Should Stand with Their Customers<br />The Irish Recorded Music Association (IRMA) recently wrote<br />to all Irish ISPs requiring that the ISPs instigate a<br />"three strikes" policy with their customers within 7 days.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/irish-blackout" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/irish-blackout</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Whitehouse.gov Continues YouTube Use<br />The White House appears to have ended its "experiment" with<br />hosting its own videos and has returned to using YouTube.<br />Will user info be harvested for Google's targeted<br />advertising?<br /><a href="http://paranoia.dubfire.net/2009/03/white-house-ends-experiment-goes-back.html" target="_blank">http://paranoia.dubfire.net/2009/03/white-...-goes-back.html</a><br /><br />~ Court Tosses Gibson's Guitar Hero Suit<br />Gibson Guitar's patent infringement suit against the Guitar<br />Hero game was thrown out of court as "frivolous."<br /><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10187151-1.html" target="_blank">http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10187151-1.html</a><br /><br />~ Senator's Donor Data Leaked<br />Wikileaks revealed that information on donors to MN Senator<br />Norm Coleman's campaign, including credit card numbers, was<br />accidently leaked over the Internet.<br /><a href="http://government.zdnet.com/?p=4456" target="_blank">http://government.zdnet.com/?p=4456</a><br /><br />For more miniLinks:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/minilinks-2009-03-12" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/minilinks-2009-03-12</a><br /><br />For global miniLinks:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/global-minilinks-2009-03-05" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/globa...inks-2009-03-05</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* You're Invited to a "Geek Reading" with Authors Cory<br />Doctorow, Rudy Rucker, Annalee Newitz, and Charlie Anders<br />at 111 Minna Gallery<br /><br />Join EFF on Monday, March 23rd, for a fundraising event<br />featuring award-winning writer Cory Doctorow.  Cory will be<br />reading from his novel, "Little Brother," a story of<br />high-tech teenage rebellion set in the familiar world of<br />San Francisco.  As he currently calls the UK home, this is<br />a rare opportunity to to hear Cory read from his work in<br />person.  He will be joined by fellow writers Rudy Rucker,<br />Annalee Newitz and Charlie Anders reading from their latest<br />works.<br /><br />WHEN:<br /><br />Monday, March 23rd, at 7:30 p.m.<br /><br />WHO:<br /><br />Cory Doctorow (craphound.com) is a science fiction<br />novelist, blogger and technology activist.  He is the<br />co-editor of the popular weblog Boing Boing<br />(boingboing.net), and a contributor to Wired, Popular<br />Science, Make, the New York Times, and many other<br />newspapers, magazines and websites.  Cory is an EFF fellow<br />and the former Director of European Affairs at EFF.  He has<br />won the Locusand Sunburst Awards and been nominated for the<br />Hugo, Nebula and British Science Fiction Awards.  His<br />latest novel, New York Times Bestseller "Little Brother,"<br />was published in May 2008, and his latest short story<br />collection is "Overclocked: Stories of the Future Present."<br /><br />Rudy Rucker is a popular science fiction and nonfiction<br />writer.  Born in Kentucky in 1946, Rudy studied<br />mathematics, earning a Ph.D. from Rutgers University in the<br />theory of infinite sets.  After working 15 years as a<br />mathematics professor on the East Coast, Rudy moved to<br />Silicon Valley in 1986 to become a computer science<br />professor at San Jose State University, also working as a<br />software engineer at Autodesk, Inc.  After some 20 years at<br />SJSU, Rudy retired from teaching.  Rudy has published 29<br />books, including five non-fiction popular science books on<br />such topics as relativity, infinity, the fourth dimension,<br />and information.  "The Lifebox, the Seashell, and the<br />Soul"--his most recent nonfiction book--is about the<br />meaning<br />of computation.<br /><br />Annalee Newitz is a journalist who covers the cultural<br />impact of science and technology, covering such topics as<br />open source software and hacker subcultures.  Annalee<br />writes for many periodicals, including Popular Science and<br />Wired, and since 1999 has had a syndicated weekly column<br />called Techsploitation.  From 2004-2005, Annalee was a<br />policy analyst for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.  She<br />is the editor of io9, a Gawker-owned science fiction blog.<br /><br />Charlie Jane Anders blogs about science fiction at io9.com.<br />She organizes the Writers With Drinks reading series and<br />is starting a weekly podcast called "I Am So Smart."  Her<br />writing has appeared most recently in "The McSweeney's Joke<br />Book Of Book Jokes," Mother Jones magazine, and the<br />upcoming "Science Fiction: The Best of the Year, 2009<br />Edition."  Charlie wrote a novel called "Choir Boy" and<br />co-edited an anthology called "She's Such a Geek."  Find<br />her on Twitter as "charliejane."<br /><br />WHERE:<br /><br />111 Minna Gallery<br />111 Minna St. @ 2nd<br />San Francisco, CA 94105<br /><br />Admission is $25.  No one turned away for lack of funds.<br />Must be 21 or older to attend.<br /><br />RSVP to: events@eff.org<br /><br />111 Minna Gallery is accessible via BART.  Get off at the<br />Montgomery station and use the exit marked 2nd and Market.<br />Walk south on 2nd Street until you reach 111 Minna Gallery<br />on the right.  It's also walking distance from the Caltrain<br />station.<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br />secure.eff.org/donate<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:46:56 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19707</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.5, 11 March 2009</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19706</link>
		<description><![CDATA[============================================================<br /><br />            EDRi-gram<br /><br /> biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe<br /><br />     Number 7.5, 11 March 2009<br /><br /><br />============================================================<br />Contents<br />============================================================<br /><br />1. Nokia Law approved<br />2. IRMA tries to block websites<br />3. No e-voting in Germany<br />4. EP wants a better balance between Internet security and privacy rights<br />5. At Large Structures in ICANN get together for the first time<br />6. Swedish Pirate Bay trial waiting now for the decision<br />7. Biometric passports law - upheld by the Romanian authorities<br />8. Yahoo penalised in Belgium for not disclosing personal data<br />9. UK Tribunal wants the Gateway reviews on ID scheme made public<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />11. Agenda<br />12. About<br /><br />============================================================<br />1. Nokia Law approved<br />============================================================<br /><br />The snooping law, also called Lex Nokia, was approved in the Finnish<br />Parliament two weeks ago. EDRi-member Electronic Frontier Finland has<br />appealed to Tarja Halonen, the President of Finland, to intervene:  before<br />signing it President Halonen should request the Supreme Court's opinion on<br />whether the amended Act on the Protection of Privacy in Electronic<br />Communications clashes with the constitution.<br /><br />Member of Parliament, Jaakko Laakso (Left Alliance) suggested that the<br />Parliament should request a statement on the constitutionality of the law<br />from the Venice Commission. Some parliamentarians, for example Heli<br />Järvinen (Greens), also agreed with professor Tuomas Ojanen, who has advised<br />that some organizations should  take the matter up with the European Court<br />of Human Rights.<br /><br />Other EDRi-members have confirmed that the situation can be worst in other<br />European countries. In Spain there is no specific law, but based on a<br />sentence from the Spanish Supreme Court, employers can inspect data and<br />communications at work under the condition that the employer previously<br />declares a policy for the use of computers and Internet at work, e.g. what<br />digital communications and files are going to be inspected. Therefore,<br />employers can establish the level of privacy at work, as for the Supreme<br />Court the usage of computers and Internet is not covered by the law on<br />worker's rights.<br /><br />In France there is a decision from 9 July 2008 by the Cassation Court<br />concluding that "connections established by an employee to Internet<br />websites during his working time and thanks to the computer provided by his<br />employer to execute his work are presumed to have a professional character,<br />such that the employer may search them in order to identify them, in the<br />absence of the employee". In other words, the whole navigation history of an<br />employee can be searched by the employer.<br /><br />Previously, a decision of 2006 by the same court in a different case,<br />established that all computer files of an employee are presumed<br />as professional, unless they are explicitely marked as "personal",<br />and can thus be searched in his absence.<br /><br />For email messages, the same court ruled in a third case in 2001 that<br />email should obey the same regime (professional, unless marked as<br />"personal").<br /><br />In summary, in France anything unmarked as "personal" is searchable by the<br />employer, in the absence of the employee.<br /><br />Parliament Passes "Lex Nokia" Bill (4.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.yle.fi/uutiset/news/2009/03/parliament_passes_quotlex_nokiaquot_bill_589012.html" target="_blank">http://www.yle.fi/uutiset/news/2009/03/par...ill_589012.html</a><br /><br />Finnish Parliament approves e-mail tracking law (5.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jRG7d99c10vDp52Lh3KNxJKz83ugD96NBDJG0" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/articl...Kz83ugD96NBDJG0</a><br /><br />EFFI urges Finnish president to intervene in Lex Nokia (5.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://newsroom.finland.fi/stt/showarticle.asp?intNWSAID=21122&group=Politics" target="_blank">http://newsroom.finland.fi/stt/showarticle...;group=Politics</a><br /><br />Spanish Supreme Court Decision on snooping (only in Spanish, 26.09.2007)<br /><a href="http://www.habeasdata.org/Sentencia-TS-sobre-control-empresarial-del-correo-electronico" target="_blank">http://www.habeasdata.org/Sentencia-TS-sob...reo-electronico</a><br /><br />Cybersurveillance at work in France (only in French, 28.07.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.legalbiznext.com/droit/Cybersurveillance-du-salarie-dans" target="_blank">http://www.legalbiznext.com/droit/Cybersur...du-salarie-dans</a><br /><br />French DPA (CNIL) - Guide for employers and employees (only in French, 2008)<br /><a href="http://www.cnil.fr/fileadmin/documents/La_CNIL/publications/CNIL_GuideTravail.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.cnil.fr/fileadmin/documents/La_...uideTravail.pdf</a><br /><br />Venice Commission<br /><a href="http://www.venice.coe.int/site/main/Presentation_E.asp" target="_blank">http://www.venice.coe.int/site/main/Presentation_E.asp</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: Lex Nokia storms into the Finnish Parliament (25.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.4/lex-nokia-finland" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.4/lex-nokia-finland</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />2. IRMA tries to block websites<br />============================================================<br /><br />IRMA, the Irish Recorded Music Association, wants to block Irish Internet<br />users' access to certain websites. In February 2009, after having reached<br />the deal with Eircom, the association sent letters to Irish Internet<br />providers asking them to block the sites that it indicated, under threat of<br />legal action.<br /><br />Eircom has already agreed to a "three strikes" approach and IRMA was to take<br />the same approach with all other Irish ISPs. In terms of the agreement, the<br />evidence of illegal downloads will be provided by IRMA and Eircom will take<br />action without a court hearing. Unfortunately, the agreement also means that<br />Eircom is not to oppose any application blocking file-sharing websites from<br />their network.<br /><br />Apparently, IRMA will monitor peer-to-peer networks using DtecNet. Any<br />allegedly suspicious IP addresses will be passed on to IRMA which will<br />"present the evidence" to Eircom, without the necessity of a court hearing<br />and in the absence of the accused.<br /><br />"While IrelandOffline doesn't condone illegal file-sharing, this move is not<br />a proper solution to the problem, and impedes on legal and legitimate<br />internet access in the process," said Eamonn Wallace, spokesperson for<br />broadband lobby group IrelandOffline.<br /><br />According to Damien Mulley, former chairman of IrelandOffline, IRMA will<br />start by blocking The Pirate Bay, then Mininova, IsoHunt, YouTube and "I<br />don't think they'll stop there too, any site that links to The Pirate Bay<br />and the others on the hate list will probably be added to the list too. (..)<br />this is what it is in my view an attack on our freedom to read, our freedom<br />to write, our freedom to move around the web".<br /><br />Those who will suffer most will the users, who will be cut off based on<br />allegations made by the association without any involvement of the court and<br />the websites which could be blocked, based on a court hearing where they<br />will have no say.<br /><br />Blackout Ireland, a group of Irish Internet users, believes that this scheme<br />not only is inefficient in combating piracy but it is also a serious breach<br />of civil liberties. At the same time, blocking websites never works as<br />pirates can easily circumvent any blockage and only legitimate users will<br />actually suffer from it. "Censorship is not a solution. It is avoiding the<br />issue. It does not pay artists for their work," says Blackout Ireland.<br /><br />Blackout Ireland is also organizing a blackout that started on 5 March and<br />will last for one week encouraging people to set their picture on sites like<br />Facebook, Bebo, Twitter, MSN, etc black and to take a stand on this issue by<br />blog posts, letters to newspapers or any form of communication.<br /><br />Irish Blackout: Why Irish ISPs Should Stand with Their Customers (4.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/irish-blackout" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/irish-blackout</a><br /><br />Blackout Ireland - Some Questions (28.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://andyaz.ie/blackout-ireland-some-questions/" target="_blank">http://andyaz.ie/blackout-ireland-some-questions/</a><br /><br />Lobby group calls for stop to censorship plans (26.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/article/12374/digital-life/lobby-group-calls-for-stop-to-censorship-plans" target="_blank">http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/articl...ensorship-plans</a><br /><br />Music industry pushing for internet filtering as well as "three strikes" -<br />what can you do about it?(26.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/02/26/music-industry-pushing-for-internet-filtering-as-well-as-three-strikes-what-can-you-do-about-it/" target="_blank">http://www.digitalrights.ie/2009/02/26/mus...ou-do-about-it/</a><br /><br />Blackout Ireland<br /><a href="http://www.blackoutireland.com/" target="_blank">http://www.blackoutireland.com/</a><br /><br />IRMA letter to ISPs (13.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://blog.blacknight.com/images/irmaletter.pdf" target="_blank">http://blog.blacknight.com/images/irmaletter.pdf</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: Irish ISP settled to introduce 3 strikes (11.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/3-strikes-ireland" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/3-strikes-ireland</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />3. No e-voting in Germany<br />============================================================<br /><br />The German Federal Constitutional Court decided on 3 March 2009 that<br />electronic voting used for the last 10 years, including for the 2005 general<br />elections, was unconstitutional and therefore not to be used for the next<br />elections in September 2009.<br /><br />The court ruled that the use of the electronic machines contradicts the<br />public nature of elections and the equipment used in 2005 had some<br />shortcomings. However, as there has been no evidence of errors in the<br />past, the results of the previous elections remain valid.<br /><br />The use of e-voting was challenged by political scientist Joachim Wiesner<br />and his son, physicist Ulrich Wiesner who complained that the system was not<br />transparent because the voter could not check what actually happened to his<br />vote, being actually asked to blindly trust the technology. The voting<br />machines which are manufactured by the Dutch firm Nedap, do not print out<br />receipts. In the plaintiffs' opinion, the results could be manipulated.<br /><br />A petition signed by over 45 000 people in 2005, trying to ban e-voting, had<br />been rejected by the German Government. Now, the court ruled that the<br />Federal Voting Machines Ordinance having introduced e-voting was<br />unconstitutional because it did not "ensure that only such voting machines<br />are permitted and used which meet the constitutional requirements of the<br />principle of the public nature of elections."<br /><br />Also the court considered that, differently from the traditional voting<br />system where manipulations and frauds are much more difficult involving a<br />high degree of effort and a high risk of detection, "programming errors in<br />the software or deliberate electoral fraud committed by manipulating the<br />software of electronic voting machines can be recognised only with<br />difficulty." Also, in the court's opinion, the electors should be able to<br />verify how their vote is recorded without having to possess detailed<br />computer knowledge. "If the election result is determined through<br />computer-controlled processing of the votes stored in an electronic memory,<br />it is not sufficient if merely the result of the calculation process carried<br />out in the voting machine can be taken note of by means of a summarising<br />printout or an electronic display."<br /><br />A campaign against electronic voting has been initiated by EDRi member Chaos<br />Computer Club together with the Dutch foundation Wij vertrouwen<br />stemcomputers niet (We don't trust voting computers) because of the risk of<br />electronic errors and the potential for abuse.<br /><br />After a group of hackers had succeeded in tampering with similar machines in<br />the Netherlands in 2006, the Dutch Government imposed a moratorium on the<br />use of electronic voting machines and Ireland also has banned electronic<br />voting.<br /><br />German Court Rules E-Voting Unconstitutional (3.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4069101,00.html" target="_blank">http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4069101,00.html</a><br /><br />Federal Constitutional Court - Press release on Use of voting computers in<br />2005 Bundestag election unconstitutional (3.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/en/press/bvg09-019en.html" target="_blank">http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/en/...vg09-019en.html</a><br /><br />Voting machines unconstitutional in Germany (3.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://able2know.org/topic/129942-1" target="_blank">http://able2know.org/topic/129942-1</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: Electronic voting machines eliminated in the Netherlands<br />(24.10.2007)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.20/e-voting-machines-netherlands" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.20/e-...nes-netherlands</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />4. EP wants a better balance between Internet security and privacy rights<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 5 March 2009, during a hearing of the Civil Liberties and Home Affairs<br />(LIBE) Committee focused on the strengths and weaknesses of the current<br />framework on security and privacy on the Internet, Members of the European<br />Parliament (EP) and experts agreed on the necessity to create a better<br />balance between Internet security and the protection of online personal<br />data.<br /><br />The participants, including the European Data Protection Supervisor,<br />academics, representatives of the Commission and of the Czech Presidency,<br />supported a report drafted by Stavros Lambridinis proposing recommendations<br />aimed at providing "adequate protection of fundamental freedoms while<br />delivering also an enhanced security."<br /><br />The report calls on the Member States and the European Commission to draft<br />proposals defining global standards for data protection, security and<br />freedom of expression. The rapporteur believes the access to the internet<br />should be treated just like the access to education and should never be<br />blocked by governments or private companies. He also considers that the<br />user's consent to share data should be clearly defined to create a fairer<br />balance of powers between users and governments and private companies.<br /><br />EDPS Peter Hustinx said that as the Internet has become an integral part of<br />our everyday life, "we must apply the same values as we do in our society<br />(...), fundamental rights must apply and that's that. (...) In the old world<br />it was fairly simple.  On the internet there is a system of layers,<br />responsibility is more complex and therefore tends to vanish.  This must be<br />clarified".<br /><br />Hustinx emphasized the fact that the present European regulatory framework<br />applying to the Internet is a holistic one and that a horizontal approach<br />was needed. In his opinion, the Data Protection Directive applying to the<br />Internet does not give a very clear definition of personal data on the<br />Internet and that the current responsibility and control mechanisms should<br />be also clarified and improved. He believes a key issue is that of the<br />user's consent for data sharing. Presently, there is a large range of types<br />of online consents which leads to a complex regulatory environment. It is<br />also difficult now to reach transparency of the data processing. The EDPS<br />added that he did not want to see "an environment of permanent surveillance"<br />(making reference to three-strikes schemes), that international cooperation<br />and self-regulation should be promoted and children awareness-raising should<br />be increased.<br /><br />During the hearing, Gus Hosein of Privacy International expressed his<br />concern related to the fact that the EU seems to have followed Bush<br />administration as regards data retention. "Is that what you want to export<br />to the rest of the world?  The EU should be a ray of light for human rights<br />but at the moment it's the opposite (...) we must change course and the<br />Lambrinidis report is the opportunity to turn things round," he said.<br /><br />Jim Killock, executive director of the Open Rights Group, warned about<br />potential dangers of an uncontrolled use of personal data by<br />the governments and public institutions and asked the EU for a close<br />monitoring and the issue. In his opinion, transparency and user consent must<br />be clear rules and strict regulation should apply to protect personal data.<br />He believes it is important "to ensure that a charter of rights comes into<br />being very soon".<br /><br />Professor Steve Peers from University of Essex, the author of "Strengthening<br />security and fundamental freedoms on the Internet - An EU Policy on the<br />fight against cybercrime" study commissioned by the EP, also made some<br />recommendations. He believes in the necessity of adopting a non-binding<br />Internet Bill of Rights, drawn up by the EP and supported by industry<br />players, NGOs, Member States, EU institutions and national public<br />authorities. He also recommended that the EU criminal law should be brought<br />in line with the provisions of the different Council of Europe Conventions<br />regarding offences related to data interception, breach of confidentiality<br />and data security, spam or child pornography.<br /><br />As final remarks of the hearing, the Presidency representative, Mr Ondrej<br />Veselský, Head of International Law Department at the Ministry of Interior<br />of the Czech Republic, stated that a balance between privacy and security<br />should be achieved, that the rules of the "real world" should apply to the<br />Internet as well, that access to the Internet should be open and that a<br />larger cooperation is necessary in the fight against cybercrime. He stated<br />that one of the priorities of the Czech Presidency was the protection of<br />minors and the presidency intended to improve the cooperation between the<br />different police of the Member States.<br /><br />Stavros Lambridinis's report will be put to the vote at the Strasbourg full<br />plenary session of the European Parliament on 23 March 2009.<br /><br />Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs - Streanghening<br />Fundamental Freedoms and Security on the Internet (5.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/oj/770/770844/770844en.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/200...44/770844en.pdf</a><br /><br />EP Press Release - Protecting citizens' rights on the internet (6.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/019-50634-061-03-10-902-20090302IPR50633-02-03-2009-2009-false/default_en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/.../default_en.htm</a><br /><br />Europeans push for more online rights to privacy (6.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/139244/privacy.html" target="_blank">http://www.macworld.com/article/139244/privacy.html</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />5. At Large Structures in ICANN get together for the first time<br />============================================================<br /><br />For the first time in ICANN history, at the 34th International ICANN meeting<br />in Mexico City the representatives of 88 At-Large Structures (ALS) from five<br />Regional At-Large Organizations representing ICANN's global At-Large<br />community came together to discuss the main ICANN policies and ALS's role in<br />ICANN institutions.<br /><br />The first-ever gathering of the representatives of individual Internet users<br />(At Large Summit - ATLAS) participating in ICANN was an opportunity to<br />make direct recommendations in relation with ICANN policy, by developing a<br />public statement on 5 key-areas where five working groups with ALS members<br />have identified the major issues as brought up by the Internet user<br />representatives. Four EDRi-members (Netzwerk Neue Medien - Germany, FITUG-<br />Germany, ISOC Bulgaria and APTI Romania) part of the European At Large<br />Organization (EURALO) participated in the working groups.<br /><br />The first working group focused on engagement in ICANN recommending the<br />consultation of regional ALSes for the most effective ways to reach<br />communities and end users and to use the multilingualism best practices of<br />other international organizations, such as the UN.<br /><br />The second working group discussed the future structure and governance of<br />ICANN, as capture, internationalization and the continued funding of ICANN<br />are among the more important governance issues now facing the institution.<br />The group suggested a number of actions to provide safeguards against<br />capture. They have also underlined that "given the economic and social<br />importance globally of a safe and stable Internet, the process of<br />internationalization of ICANN must safeguard the global/worldwide role of<br />ICANN regarding domain names and numbers identifiers and promote larger<br />participation from all stakeholders globally."<br /><br />The new gTLDS (generic Top Level Domains) and IDNs (internationalized domain<br />name) was the main focus of the third working group, highlighting that the<br />current fee schedule for the new gTLDs is a clear barrier to the entry of<br />potential applicants, especially those who have no interest in monetizing<br />the TLD and those initiated in the developing and least developed countries.<br />The group also suggested opening a third round of gTLD applications, with a<br />fixed deadline, that will be subject to the string contention dispute<br />mechanisms described in the current guide. The ALSes expressed their concern<br />that the proposed "Legal Rights" objection protocol exceeded the existing<br />territorial and class-of-goods limitations contained in the current<br />international trademark treaties. They suggested that ICANN should not<br />engage in any trademark protection regime which extends beyond existing<br />international treaties; doing so in effect turns ICANN into an unauthorized<br />treaty organization.<br /><br />Working group four debated the hot topics of transparency and accountability<br />and issued reconsiderations regarding the development of a budget for each<br />ICANN entity (including At-Large) according to their mandates including<br />staff costs. The budgets should be made public with the annotation of<br />substantive ICANN documents under consultation to indicate the origin of<br />support or dissent for specific proposals.<br /><br />The members of ALSes also envisaged "that in order to give ICANN a clearer<br />image of a multi-stakeholder organisation, including Civil Society, the<br />composition of the Board should be re-balanced to afford a greater<br />visibility and representation of the Civil Society as represented by the At<br />Large Community. ALAC proposes that the ICANN Board should include two<br />voting Directors nominated by the At Large Community."<br /><br />New DNS security issues that fall within the ICANN's Mandate formed the core<br />of the debates in the fifth working group and urged ICANN to support the<br />industry efforts to accommodate DNSSEC and its provision in a more secure<br />environment and to proceed in the process of having the root signed in a way<br />that provides integrity and is globally accepted.<br /><br />The ALSes also initiated a series of thematic sessions on the topics<br />interesting for its members, but also other ICANN constituencies. The<br />session on the Internet rights and principles noted that "ICANN still<br />lacks a coherent and systemic approach to evaluate the impact that its<br />policy decisions have on rights in general, be them human rights, consumer<br />rights or other founding principles, as internationally recognized and/or<br />defined in the major national legislations."<br /><br />A hot topic was privacy and the Whois database, where the Internet users<br />representatives highlighted the ICANN's inability to progress and to make<br />policies compatible with the various national laws. It was suggested<br />that ICANN should cease aiming at a single global policy and accommodate<br />national differences instead, depending on the country of the registrar and<br />registrant, explaining the differences in privacy regulation between Europe<br />and US.<br /><br />The sessions discussed the issue of respecting freedom of expression when<br />selecting new gTLDs. The ongoing policy provision that allows ICANN to<br />reject applications based on morality-based objections was criticized.<br /><br />The participants supported the idea of a standardized statement of<br />registrant rights (Registrants Rights Charter) to be compulsorily shown by<br />registrars (and resellers as well) when a registrant buys a domain name.<br />Participants agreed to work further on a proposal for its substance as well<br />as means to include the charter into ICANN's policy body as a follow-up to<br />the meeting. The process is open and anyone can join.<br /><br />Another Thematic Session highlighted the failure of ccTLDs as regards the<br />identity control of registrants and registrars. A second aspect was the<br />abuse of the weakness of registrars in the GTLD space giving the spammers<br />and other criminals, free way to do what they want.<br /><br />At the end of this ICANN meeting, the announcement of Dr Paul<br />Twomey, the President and Chief Executive Officer of ICANN that he would not<br />seek renewal of his contract at the end of 2009, was acknowledged by<br />the ALSes as a starting point for further activities and challenges.<br /><br />At Large Summit (Atlas) Declaration Mexico (4.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/files/atlarge/correspondence-05mar09-en.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.atlarge.icann.org/files/atlarge...-05mar09-en.pdf</a><br /><br />At-Large Summit Successfully Concluded (5.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/announcements/announcement-05mar09-en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.atlarge.icann.org/announcements...-05mar09-en.htm</a><br /><br />Registrants Rights Charter - draft<br /><a href="http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/node/74" target="_blank">http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/node/74</a><br /><br />ICANN's President and CEO Announces Departure (2.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-02mar09-en.htm" target="_blank">http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/anno...-02mar09-en.htm</a><br /><br />Briefing Note - Overall Summary of the Mexico City Meeting (5.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://mex.icann.org/briefing-note" target="_blank">http://mex.icann.org/briefing-note</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />6. Swedish Pirate Bay trial waiting now for the decision<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Pirate Bay trial in Sweden continued until 3 March 2009 with the<br />hearings of the prosecution and defence witnesses. The earlier events of the<br />trial were covered in the previous EDRi-gram.<br /><br />While a day before, the representatives of the music industry tried to<br />convince the jury that The Pirate Bay was responsible for half of the losses<br />the industry had suffered during the last years because of illegal<br />downloadings, the defence witnesses tried to show BitTorrent was not a bad<br />thing and file-sharing was actually beneficial.<br /><br />One of the witnesses, Kristoffer Schollin from Gothenburg University, an IT<br />lecturer with interest in file sharing, made a special witness report for<br />the court and explained that torrent files were a more sophisticated type of<br />Internet link (such as an http hyperlink) and that The Pirate Bay was an<br />"open database" of torrent files, a type of Bulletin Board. He also stated<br />that there were other large companies using the same technology and besides.<br />He also admitted that while searching for torrents via Google, more results<br />could be found than with The Pirate Bay.<br /><br />Regarding the issue of whose actual tracker is used when a torrent file is<br />activated, Schollin said that a torrent being available on The Pirate Bay,<br />doesn't automatically mean that the file uses The Pirate Bay's tracker. He<br />explained also how to make a torrent file which links to content. In the<br />creation stage, an Internet connection is not even necessary everything<br />being done on a user's PC with a torrent client, not on The Pirate Bay. The<br />torrent file thus created can be uploaded on the Internet and it is further<br />on indexed by Google, which then allows anyone to access the torrent via a<br />Google search.<br /><br />One of the points he emphasized was that actually he believed the popularity<br />of The Pirate Bay was mostly due to the many discussions and mediatization<br /><br />Contradicting the music industry representatives who declare that sales of<br />CDs have decreased due to illegal downloading, Roger Wallis, a media<br />professor, composer and Chairman of the Swedish Composers of Popular Music,<br />confirmed that downloading caused an increase in sales of live event tickets<br />and that there were also other reasons for the CD sales decrease, such as<br />the growth of computer games.<br /><br />During the same day, a film was played to show how a torrent is created. and<br />how torrent files can be shared through MSN, Skype, through blogs like<br />Wordpress.<br /><br />The last two days of the trial were dedicated to the closing arguments of<br />the prosecution and of the defence. Prosecutor Håkan Roswall said The Pirate<br />Bay should not be treated as a service provider to get a "common carrier"<br />status, and that the Supreme Court had already previously ruled that someone<br />running a BBS could be found guilty of assisting copyright infringement and<br />The Pirate Bay should be viewed as such. He said he was not asking the court<br />to rule on the legality of BitTorrent itself, but on what the defendants did<br />with the technology. Roswall called for the confiscation of The Pirate Bay<br />hardware and demanded for one year jail for all four defendants.<br /><br />Peter Danowsky of the IFPI claimed that The Pirate Bay was a commercial<br />operation and that the defendants had contributed to copyright infringement.<br />Therefore the record labels had to be compensated for the losses caused by<br />the operation of The Pirate Bay.<br /><br />Henrik Pontén from Antipiratbyrån argued that the defendants clearly knew<br />that what they were doing was illegal, and The Pirate Bay clearly operated<br />as a business, making money from advertising revenue. He asked for damages<br />for the entertainment industry and for jail for the defendants so as to give<br />an example to others who wics to infringe copyright.<br /><br />Monique Wadsted, representing the movie companies, also called for a "very<br />significant" prison sentence because the defendants were aware of their<br />criminal acts and made money from it. "They have made more than 10 million<br />Swedish crowns in revenue during one year. And they continue to run the<br />operation in spite of being convicted in other countries. Furthermore, they<br />spit on the rights holders and tell them to go to hell," she said.<br /><br />During the last day of the trial, the four defence lawyers made their<br />closing statements arguing that the Pirate Bay site acted just as a search<br />engine. They considered the prosecution had failed in revealing any<br />uploaders or downloaders from The Pirate Bay, and in establishing that most<br />of the links on the Pirate Bay were to copyright material. Linking to<br />copyright material wasn't specific to The Pirate Bay, it was an Internet<br />problem. Carl Lundström's lawyer, Per E Samuelson, argued that attacking The<br />Pirate Bay was like going against car manufacturers for the problems<br />experienced on the roads.<br /><br />Regarding the financial issues of the matter, in the defence opinion, the<br />prosecution had exaggerated regarding the amount of money the site made.<br />Gottfrid Svartholm's lawyer Ola Salomonsson said there were only four<br />adverts on The Pirate Bay, not 64 as the prosecution had claimed. The<br />revenues therefore were less than the costs. The defence approach in the<br />court was that of "I am not Responsible".<br /><br />The verdict is due on 17 April 2009.<br /><br />The Pirate Bay Trial Day 9: BitTorrent Is Not Evil (26.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-trial-day-9-bittorrent-is-not-evil-090226/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-trial-d...ot-evil-090226/</a><br /><br />A good day for the roses: Pirate Bay trial, day 9 (26.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/feb/26/pirate-bay-trial-roses" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/...bay-trial-roses</a><br /><br />The Pirate Bay Trial Day 10: Calls for Jail Time (02.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-trial-day-10-calls-for-jail-time-090302/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-tri...il-time-090302/</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay Day 11: trial ends, verdict awaited (3.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/mar/03/pirate-bay-last-day" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/...te-bay-last-day</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: The trial of The Pirate Bay in Sweden (25.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.4/pirate-bay-trial-sweden" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.4/pi...ay-trial-sweden</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />7. Biometric passports law - upheld by the Romanian authorities<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Emergency Government Ordinance introducing biometric passports in<br />Romania remains applicable as the Legal Commission of the Senate advised it<br />favourably on 3 March 2009 and the Romanian Appeal Court rejected on 18<br />February the appeal made by several NGOs for its suspension.<br /><br />The ordinance had been resent on the 28 February to the legal commission by<br />the Romanian Senate after heavy debates and concerns. Besides the very hot<br />debate around the "malefic figure 666" allegedly occurring in the chip of<br />the passports, the discussions in the Senate addressed also concerns related<br />to the lack of a proper security system for the data stored for biometric<br />passports.<br /><br />"If a hacker with a laptop passes by you and captures the frequency of your<br />passport chip, he can change you, in a few hours, from a criminal record<br />free person into a drug or weapon dealer for example" stated Georgian Pop,<br />deputy in the defence commission.<br /><br />The ordinance has been heavily contested, the opponents arguing that it<br />breaches the rights provided by the Constitution of Romania, the right to<br />private life and the right to religion. It was also argued that the<br />Government had not announced this act publicly, with the intention to meet<br />EU requirements without taking into consideration the public opinion.<br /><br />A big debate turned around the religious aspect of the matter. A lawyer at<br />the case opened by the NGOs stated that "the introduction of chips into<br />passports affects the right to religion because it changes the name given by<br />God into a figure" and the procedure affects human freedom by surveillance<br />and control measures.<br /><br />Recently, the Saint Synod, the Romanian Orthodox Church highest board has<br />agreed with the introduction of the biometric passports, but required the<br />implementation of an alternative for those who do not wish to have biometric<br />passports with chips.<br /><br />"As some people are reluctant towards the biometric passports, an<br />intervention will be made to the institutions of the Romanian State<br />(Presidency, Parliament, Government) with the request to adopt the necessary<br />measures to modify and complete the legislation in force by extending the<br />provisions regarding the emergency cases (temporary passport) and for cases<br />when, due to conscience or religious reasons, the person does not want an<br />electronic passport including biometric data" says the press release of the<br />Romanian Patriarchy.<br /><br />The head of the General Division of passports Aurel-Vasile Sime stated that<br />figure 666 did not occur anywhere and that the passports would not be<br />biometric but electronic, including two biometric elements: face image and<br />fingerprints. He also added that these new passports would not be mandatory,<br />the Romanian citizens being able to choose temporary passports valid for one<br />year that do not include biometric elements.<br /><br />Since the end of 2008 many protests have taken places in several cities in<br />the country against the introduction of electronic passports in Romania and<br />they continued even after the favourable advice of the Legal Commission of<br />the Senate and the rejection by the Bucharest Appeal Court of the NGOs<br />appeal. About 300 members from several protested on 7 March in front of the<br />Romanian Patriarchy. The participants stated that the measure meant all<br />Romanians are considered potential criminals and that was an attack to their<br />identity. They also protested against the lack of firmness from the Orthodox<br />Church in this matter.<br /><br />Romania is one of the first country to introduce biometric passports that<br />include fingerprints, while even in the EU countries a strategy for the<br />personal data protection in this respect is still unclear.<br /><br />Favourable advice for the EGO introducing electronic passports with<br />biometric identification elements (only in Romanian, 3.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-ultima_ora-5464136-aviz-favorabil-pentru-oug-prin-care-introduc-pasapoarte-electronice-elemente-indentificare-biometrica.htm" target="_blank">http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-ultima_ora-546...-biometrica.htm</a><br /><br />The senators decided to resend the ordinance on the introduction of<br />biometric passports to the Legal Commission (only in Romanian, 25.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-politic-5448158-senatorii-decis-retrimiterea-comisia-juridica-ordonantei-privind-introducerea-pasapoartelor-biometrice.htm" target="_blank">http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-politic-544815...-biometrice.htm</a><br /><br />The Ordinance on biometric passports goes forward (Video) (only in Romanian,<br />18.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.mediafax.ro/social/ordonanta-privind-pasapoartele-biometrice-merge-inainte-video.html?1688;3944786" target="_blank">http://www.mediafax.ro/social/ordonanta-pr...ml?1688;3944786</a><br /><br />The biometric passports advised by the defence commission of the Deputy<br />Chamber (only in Romanian, 10.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.mediafax.ro/social/pasapoartele-biometrice-avizate-de-comisia-de-aparare-din-camera.html?1688;3891638" target="_blank">http://www.mediafax.ro/social/pasapoartele...ml?1688;3891638</a><br /><br />Saint Synod requires an alternative to the biometric passports (only in<br />Romanian, 28.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.realitatea.net/sfantul-sinod-solicita-alternativa-la-pasapoartele-biometrice--boojaa-comentati_466017.html" target="_blank">http://www.realitatea.net/sfantul-sinod-so...ati_466017.html</a><br /><br />The request regarding the suspension of the effects of the ordinance on the<br />introduction of biometric passports rejected by the court (only in Romanian,<br />18.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-esential-5428486-cererea-privind-suspendarea-efectelor-ordonantei-introducere-apasapoartelor-biometrice-respinsa-instanta.htm" target="_blank">http://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-esential-54284...sa-instanta.htm</a><br /><br />EDRIgram: Romania: Protests against biometric passports (11.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/romania-biometric-passports-protests" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/ro...sports-protests</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />8. Yahoo penalised in Belgium for not disclosing personal data<br />============================================================<br /><br />Yahoo was fined by a Belgian court on 2 March 2009 for refusing to hand over<br />to the Belgium authorities personal data of people involved in a cyber-crime<br />investigation.<br /><br />The Belgium authorities had required Yahoo to disclose detailed account<br />information for a number of e-mail addresses used by alleged cons under<br />pseudonyms. Yahoo refused, arguing that such a request should have followed<br />the proper channels and should have been addressed to US authorities and not<br />to them as a commercial company. They would be willing to offer the<br />information at the request of the US authorities.<br /><br />However, the prosecution claimed that the company should hand over the<br />required data as the company has operation services in Belgium and therefore<br />they should comply with the laws of the country.<br /><br />The court ruled in favour of the prosecution and fined the American company<br />55 000 euro plus 10 000 euro for each day it keeps refusing to hand over the<br />requested users' data. The judge said that the procedure for requesting data<br />"poses absolutely no problem with Google and Microsoft".<br /><br />The official statement of the company was that it strongly disagreed with<br />the court's ruling and that it would file an appeal. "Yahoo! Inc., a U.S.<br />corporation, does not have business operations in Belgium and does not<br />maintain the customer information at issue in Belgium. The United States and<br />Belgium have a formal international treaty which the prosecutor should have<br />followed to properly seek information from a U.S. company. Yahoo! is not<br />withholding information from the Belgium government. We have a legal and<br />policy basis for not disclosing information in this type of case until the<br />recognized international legal process is followed. We have raised this<br />issue with the U.S. Government," was the company statement.<br /><br />Yahoo seems to be more cautious after fierce criticism as it happened in<br />2007 after having complied with the request of the Chinese authorities and<br />gave up personal account information which led to the imprisonment of a<br />political dissident back. Since then, the company has signed up for the<br />Global Network Initiative (GNI), an organisation aimed at preserving free<br />speech on the Internet. GNI members are bound to challenge requests for<br />disclosure of private data from governments in case these requests are<br />considered to be in breach of international human rights laws.<br /><br />Belgium condemns Yahoo! for its refusal to communicate personal data (only<br />in French, 3.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/actualites/medias/multimedia/20090303.OBS7047/la_belgique_condamne_yahoo_pour_son_refus_de_communique.html" target="_blank">http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/actualites/...communique.html</a><br /><br />Yahoo Fined By Belgian Court For Refusing To Give Up E-Mail Account Info<br />(2.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/02/yahoo-fined-by-belgian-court-for-refusing-to-give-up-e-mail-account-info/" target="_blank">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/03/02/yahoo...l-account-info/</a><br /><br />EDRIgram: Internet giants gather for freedom of speech - Global Network<br />Initiative (5.11.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.21/global-network-initiative" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.21/gl...work-initiative</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />9. UK Tribunal wants the Gateway reviews on ID scheme made public<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 19 February, the UK tribunal ordered the disclosure of two internal<br />reviews called the Gateway reviews regarding the national identity card<br />scheme of the government.<br /><br />The Gateway reviews are independent and expert reviews carried out at key<br />decision points of significant programmes or programs of those deemed risky.<br /><br />The reviews are performed by independent practitioners from outside the<br />programme/project by using a series of interviews, documentation reviews and<br />their expertise to provide valuable additional perspective on the respective<br />programmes/projects and on the external challenge of the processes.<br /><br />The ID government programme was subjected to two "Gateway zero" reviews, in<br />2003 and 2004. The Treasury's Office of Government Commerce (OGC) operating<br />the Gateway system did not wish to disclose the reports stating that it was<br />in the public interest to maintain them out of the public eyes and argueing<br />that making the reports public would make them "bland and anodyne".<br /><br />The tribunal refuted OGC argument considering OGC had to prove a "real and<br />weighty" causal relationship between disclosure and damage and as OGC failed<br />to do so, secrecy would be far from being in the public interest. The<br />tribunal concluded that "disclosure of the requested information would<br />clearly add to the public's knowledge in this respect and therefore to the<br />public interest which sought to ensure that schemes as complex albeit as<br />sensitive as the ID cards scheme were properly scrutinised and implemented."<br /><br />OGC claimed that the disclosures of the report might have "adverse press<br />reactions ... if any form of criticism were contained in the report in<br />question" and that the reviews should be kept away from citizens because<br />they might seem "uninformative or hard to understand". It also argued that<br />the respective information did not bring any valuable addition to the debate<br />on the merits of identity cards as a whole.<br /><br />The tribunal considered that none of the arguments presented was OGC's<br />problem. "It is not for the tribunal, let alone the OGC or the (information)<br />commissioner, to second-guess the scope and content of the possible public<br />debate."<br /><br />In the UK, the Freedom of Information Act 2000 which came into force in 2005<br />requires 100 000 public authorities to respond promptly to requests for<br />information and provide that information, including emails, meeting minutes,<br />research and reports, with a series of exceptions. These exemptions range<br />from sensible data (personal data, national security) to materials deemed to<br />be commercially sensitive. An authority can deny requests considered<br />vexatious or too expensive to carry out.<br /><br />The tribunal decision was promulgated on 19 February, giving the OGC 28 days<br />to comply.<br /><br />Public interest is not served by secrecy (3.03.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/mar/03/identity-cards-freedom-of-information" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/li...-of-information</a><br /><br />What is an OGC Gateway Review? - OGC Gateway Review for Programmes &<br />Projects<br /><a href="http://www.ogc.gov.uk/what_is_ogc_gateway_review.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ogc.gov.uk/what_is_ogc_gateway_review.asp</a><br /><br />Explainer: Freedom of information (24.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2009/feb/24/freedomofinformation-civil-liberties" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/li...civil-liberties</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />10. Recommended Reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />Article 29 Working Group - Opinion 2/2009 on the protection of children's<br />personal data  (General Guidelines and the special case of schools)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2009_en.htm" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...ocs/2009_en.htm</a><br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2009_de.htm" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...ocs/2009_de.htm</a><br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2009_fr.htm" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...ocs/2009_fr.htm</a><br /><br />Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of<br />human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Martin<br />Scheinin<br /><a href="http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/terrorism/rapporteur/docs/A.HRC.10.3.pdf" target="_blank">http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/terro.../A.HRC.10.3.pdf</a><br /><br />Report: Leading Jurists Call for Urgent Steps to Restore Human Rights in<br />efforts to counter terrorism<br /><a href="http://ejp.icj.org/hearing2.php3?id_article=167&lang=en" target="_blank">http://ejp.icj.org/hearing2.php3?id_article=167&lang=en</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />11. Agenda<br />============================================================<br /><br />17 March 2009,  Brussels, Belgium<br />Conference on the European patent system organised by the Science and<br />Technology Options Assessment (STOA) panel of the European Parliament<br /><a href="http://cordis.europa.eu/search/index.cfm?fuseaction=events.document&EV_LANG=EN&EV_RCN=30540" target="_blank">http://cordis.europa.eu/search/index.cfm?f...mp;EV_RCN=30540</a><br /><br />18-20 March 2009, Prague, Czech Republic<br />The Responsibilities of Content Providers and Users<br /><a href="http://www.media-conference.cz" target="_blank">http://www.media-conference.cz</a><br /><br />18-20 March 2009, Athens, Greece<br />WebSci'09: Society On-Line<br /><a href="http://www.websci09.org/" target="_blank">http://www.websci09.org/</a><br /><br />23 March 2009, Berlin, Germany<br />German-French Experts Meeting on Technologies for<br />Electronic Identification<br /><a href="http://www.e-identify-df.de/" target="_blank">http://www.e-identify-df.de/</a><br /><br />26-27 March 2009, London, UK<br />5th Communia Workshop: Accessing, Using, Reusing Public Sector Content and<br />Data<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/ws05" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/ws05</a><br /><br />27-29 March 2009, Manchester, UK<br />Oekonux Conference: Free Software and Beyond The World of Peer Production<br /><a href="http://www.oekonux-conference.org/" target="_blank">http://www.oekonux-conference.org/</a><br /><br />28 March 2009, London, UK<br />Open Knowledge Conference (OKCon) 2009<br /><a href="http://www.okfn.org/okcon/" target="_blank">http://www.okfn.org/okcon/</a><br /><br />29-31 March 2009, Edinburgh, UK<br />Governance Of New Technologies: The Transformation Of Medicine, Information<br />Technology And Intellectual Property - An International Interdisciplinary<br />Conference<br /><a href="http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/conference09/" target="_blank">http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/conference09/</a><br /><br />1-3 April 2009, Berlin, Germany<br />re:publica 2009 "Shift happens"<br /><a href="http://www.re-publica.de/09/" target="_blank">http://www.re-publica.de/09/</a><br />Subconference: 2nd European Privacy Open Space<br /><a href="http://www.privacyos.eu/" target="_blank">http://www.privacyos.eu/</a><br /><br />4 April 2009, Paris, France<br />French 2009 Big Brother Awards<br /><a href="http://bigbrotherawards.eu.org/" target="_blank">http://bigbrotherawards.eu.org/</a><br /><br />21-23 April 2009, Winchester, UK<br />BILETA 2009 Annual Conference<br /><a href="http://www.winchester.ac.uk/?page=9871" target="_blank">http://www.winchester.ac.uk/?page=9871</a><br /><br />23-24 April 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />The future of intellectual property - Creativity and innovation in the<br />digital era<br /><a href="http://www.intellectualproperty-conference.eu" target="_blank">http://www.intellectualproperty-conference.eu</a><br /><br />11 May 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />GigaNet is organizing the 2nd international academic workshop on Global<br />Internet Governance: An Interdisciplinary Research Field in Construction.<br />Deadline for abstracts submissions is 20 March 2009.<br /><a href="http://giganet.igloogroups.org/publiclibr/giganetcos/2009brusse" target="_blank">http://giganet.igloogroups.org/publiclibr/...tcos/2009brusse</a><br /><br />13-14 May 2009 Uppsala, Sweden<br />Mashing-up Culture: The Rise of User-generated Content<br /><a href="http://www.counter2010.org/workshop_call" target="_blank">http://www.counter2010.org/workshop_call</a><br /><br />19-20 May 2009, Brussels, Belgium<br />European Commission organizes a personal data protection conference to look<br />at new challenges for privacy<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/news/docs/pr_03_03_09_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...03_03_09_en.pdf</a><br /><br />24-28 May 2009, Venice, Italy<br />ICIMP 2009, The Fourth International Conference on Internet Monitoring<br />and Protection<br /><a href="http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html" target="_blank">http://www.iaria.org/conferences2009/ICIMP09.html</a><br /><br />1-4 June 2009, Washington, DC, USA<br />Computers Freedom and Privacy 2009<br /><a href="http://www.cfp2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.cfp2009.org/</a><br /><br />5 June 2009, London, UK<br />The Second Multidisciplinary Workshop on Identity in the Information<br />Society (IDIS 09): "Identity and the Impact of Technology"<br />Call for papers deadline: 13 March 2009<br /><a href="http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/" target="_blank">http://is2.lse.ac.uk/idis/2009/</a><br /><br />28-30 June 2009, Torino, Italy<br />COMMUNIA Conference 2009: Global Science & Economics of Knowledge-Sharing<br />Institutions<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/conf2009</a><br /><br />2-3 July 2009, Padova, Italy<br />3rd FLOSS International Workshop on Free/Libre Open Source Software<br />Paper submission by 31 March 2009<br /><a href="http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/manenti/floss/floss09.html" target="_blank">http://www.decon.unipd.it/personale/curri/...ss/floss09.html</a><br /><br />13-16 August 2009, Vierhouten, The Netherlands<br />Hacking at Random<br /><a href="http://www.har2009.org/" target="_blank">http://www.har2009.org/</a><br /><br />23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy<br />World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and<br />Council: "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage"<br /><a href="http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm" target="_blank">http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm</a><br /><br />10-12 September 2009, Potsdam, Germany<br />5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam<br />Section: Protest Politics<br />Panel: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property<br /><a href="http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp</a><br /><br />16-18 September 2009, Crete, Greece<br />World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2009<br /><a href="http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/" target="_blank">http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/</a><br /><br />October 2009,  Istanbul, Turkey<br />eChallenges 2009<br /><a href="http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp" target="_blank">http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp</a><br /><br />16 October 2009, Bielefeld, Germany<br />10th German Big Brother Awards<br />Deadline for nominations: 15 July 2009<br /><a href="http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/" target="_blank">http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/</a><br /><br />15-18 November 2009, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt<br />UN Internet Governance Forum<br /><a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/" target="_blank">http://www.intgovforum.org/</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />12. About<br />============================================================<br /><br />EDRI-gram is a biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe.<br />Currently EDRI has 29 members based or with offices in 18 different<br />countries in Europe. European Digital Rights takes an active interest in<br />developments in the EU accession countries and wants to share knowledge and<br />awareness through the EDRI-grams.<br /><br />All contributions, suggestions for content, corrections or agenda-tips are<br />most welcome. Errors are corrected as soon as possible and visibly on the<br />EDRI website.<br /><br />Except where otherwise noted, this newsletter is licensed under the<br />Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See the full text at<br /><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_blank">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</a><br /><br />Newsletter editor: Bogdan Manolea &lt;edrigram@edri.org&gt;<br /><br />Information about EDRI and its members:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/</a><br /><br />European Digital Rights needs your help in upholding digital rights in the<br />EU. If you wish to help us promote digital rights, please consider making a<br />private donation.<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram subscription information<br /><br />subscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: subscribe<br /><br />You will receive an automated e-mail asking to confirm your request.<br />unsubscribe by e-mail<br />To: edri-news-request@edri.org<br />Subject: unsubscribe<br /><br />- EDRI-gram in Macedonian<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available partly in Macedonian, with delay. Translations<br />are provided by Metamorphosis<br /><a href="http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php" target="_blank">http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php</a><br /><br />- EDRI-gram in German<br /><br />EDRI-gram is also available in German, with delay. Translations are provided<br />Andreas Krisch from the EDRI-member VIBE!AT - Austrian Association for<br />Internet Users<br /><a href="http://www.unwatched.org/" target="_blank">http://www.unwatched.org/</a><br /><br />- Newsletter archive<br /><br />Back issues are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:41:04 -0500</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19706</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EFFector 22.06: EFF Releases Surveillance Self Defense</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19682</link>
		<description><![CDATA[EFFector Vol. 22, No. 06  March 4, 2009  editor@eff.org<br /><br />A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />ISSN 1062-9424<br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />In our 501st issue:<br /><br />* EFF RELEASES SURVEILLANCE SELF DEFENSE -- an online<br />how-to guide for protecting your private data against<br />government spying. EFF created the site with the help of<br />the Open Society Institute in order to educate Americans<br />about the law and technology of communications surveillance<br />and computer searches and seizures, and to provide the<br />information and tools necessary to keep their private data<br />out of the government's hands. The guide includes tips on<br />assessing the security risks to your personal computer<br />files and communications, strategies for interacting with<br />law enforcement, and articles on specific defensive<br />technologies such as encryption that can help protect the<br />privacy of your data<br /><br />For the full press release:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/03" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/03</a><br /><br />For Surveillance Self Defense:<br /><a href="http://ssd.eff.org" target="_blank">http://ssd.eff.org</a><br /><br />* WARNER MUSIC GROUP IS CENSORING A MYRIAD OF FAIR USES by<br />using YouTube's Video Identification tool to send blanket<br />takedown notices, and very few YouTubers are willing to<br />challenge the takedowns. Why? Because our broken copyright<br />system leaves them facing the prospect of paying outrageous<br />statutory damages and even possibly Warner's attorneys'<br />fees if they stand up, fight back and, despite overwhelming<br />odds in their favor, lose.<br /><br />It's time for Warner to take some responsibility and stop<br />the censorship. The best thing would be for Warner to go<br />back to how it treated videos before. At a minimum, Warner<br />should assure YouTubers that the company won't escalate<br />straight to lawsuit after a content ID takedown is disputed<br />without first availing itself of the DMCA takedown option.<br /><br />If Warner doesn't stop on its own, EFF is interested in<br />bringing a good case to challenge this behavior. If you<br />made a fair use video and you want to fight back, we want<br />to hear from you.<br /><br />For our YouTube removal primer:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/issues/intellectual-property/guide-to-youtube-removals" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/issues/intellectual-pro...outube-removals</a><br /><br />For fair use video takedowns, contact: info@eff.org<br /><br />For the full blog post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/hey-warner-leave-those-kids-alone" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/hey-w...hose-kids-alone</a><br /><br />For examples of fair use videos taken off YouTube:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/victims-warner-censorship-literal-videos" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/victi...-literal-videos</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />EFF Updates<br /><br />* "Open Access" Policies Threatened by Copyright Bill<br />The poorly named Fair Copyright in Research Works Act would<br />foreclose on all the public publishing requirements of<br />National Institutes of Health research and prevent the<br />government from expanding the open access approach to<br />research funded by other agencies.<br />Original post:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/open-access-policies-threatened-copyright-bill" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/open-...-copyright-bill</a><br />Additional information:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/maplight-org-illuminates-anti-open-access-bill-mon" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/mapli...access-bill-mon</a><br /><br />* Yes We Scan: Carl Malamud for Public Printer<br />On President Obama's first day in office, he announced his<br />commitment to "an unprecedented level of openness in<br />Government." Appointing Carl Malamud to Public Printer<br />would be an excellent step towards that goal.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/yes-we-scan" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/yes-we-scan</a><br /><br />* EFF Urges Court to Reject Warrantless GPS Tracking<br />EFF and the ACLU urged a U.S. appeals court today to reject<br />government claims that federal agents have an unfettered<br />right to install a Global Positioning System (GPS)<br />location-tracking device on anyone's car without a search<br />warrant.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/03-0" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2009/03/03-0</a><br /><br />* DOJ Releases Secret Bush Era OLC Memos<br />The Obama Administration has released two previously<br />undisclosed OLC memoranda and seven previously undisclosed<br />OLC opinions written by the Department of Justice's Office<br />of Legal Counsel during the Bush Administration.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/doj-releases-bush-era-olc-memos" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/doj-r...h-era-olc-memos</a><br /><br />* Bush Admin. Claimed 4th Amendment Didn't Apply to NSA<br />It turns out that the Bush Administration did think it<br />could spy on Americans in the U.S. without regard to the<br />Constitution.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/bush-administration-asserted-fourth-amendment-did-" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/bush-...-amendment-did-</a><br /><br />* Court Denies Government Appeal in Al-Haramain Case<br />The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the government's<br />appeal of Chief Judge Vaughn Walker's January 5, 2009,<br />decision in Al-Haramain v. Obama (formerly known as<br />Al-Haramain v. Bush).<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/ninth-circuit-appeals-court-denies-government-appe" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/ninth...government-appe</a><br /><br />* PTO to Reissue Narrowed Version of NeoMedia Patent<br />Thanks to EFF's Patent Busting Project, last July, the<br />USPTO released an initial opinion invalidating a NeoMedia<br />patent that broadly claimed to cover database lookups using<br />things like barcodes. This week, the PTO announced that it<br />intends to reissue a narrower patent to Neomedia.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/patent-office-reissue-narrowed-version-neomedia-pa" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/paten...ion-neomedia-pa</a><br /><br />* White House Responds to Privacy Complaints?<br />The White House has quietly shifted from using<br />YouTube-hosted videos to Flash-based videos hosted on<br />government servers, eliminating the need for viewers to<br />allow third party cookies to be installed on their<br />computers in order to access government-released videos.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/white-house-responds-privacy-complaints" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/white...vacy-complaints</a><br /><br />* Last.fm and the Diabolical Power of Data Mining<br />Websites that collect and republish seemingly innocuous<br />facts about their users are often vulnerable to data<br />mining.<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/last-fm-and-the-diabolical-power-of-data-mining" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/last-...-of-data-mining</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />miniLinks<br /><br />~ Judge Orders Defendent to Decrypt Laptop<br />A federal judge in Vermont ordered a criminal defendant to<br />provide his PGP passphrase so that prosecutors can examine<br />his computer.<br /><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10172866-38.html" target="_blank">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10172866-38.html</a><br /><br />~ Applying the 4th Amendment to the Internet<br />Orin Kerr presents some general principals for a<br />technology-neutral translation of 4th Amendment principals<br />from physical space to cyberspace.<br /><a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1235671894.shtml" target="_blank">http://volokh.com/posts/1235671894.shtml</a><br /><br />~ RIAA Layoffs<br />Is the coming "bloodbath" the beginning of the end for the<br />organization?<br /><a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5162747/riaa-layoffs-bloodbath-may-be-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-the-evil-organization" target="_blank">http://i.gizmodo.com/5162747/riaa-layoffs-...il-organization</a><br /><br />For more miniLinks:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/minilinks-2009-03-03" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/03/minilinks-2009-03-03</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Announcements<br /><br />* Come See EFF at eTech!<br /><br />EFF be at the O'Reilly Emerging Technologies Conference<br />March 9 - 12 in San Jose, California. Stop by to say hello,<br />and update your membership!<br /><br />Use code et09sed40 to get a 40% discount on registration<br />for eTech.<br /><br />For more information on eTech:<br /><a href="http://en.oreilly.com/et2009/public/content/home" target="_blank">http://en.oreilly.com/et2009/public/content/home</a><br /><br />* New Staff Members at EFF<br /><br />Two new staff members have joined the EFF team. For a quick<br />introduction to EFF's new Systems Administrator and<br />Membership Coordinator:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/effs-two-new-staff-members" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/effs-...w-staff-members</a><br /><br />: . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :<br /><br />Administrivia<br /><br />EFFector is published by:<br />The Electronic Frontier Foundation<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/about" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/about</a><br /><br />Editor:<br />Sara Bassett, Membership Services Assistant<br />sara@eff.org<br /><br />Membership & donation queries:<br />membership@eff.org<br /><br />To support EFF:<br />secure.eff.org/donate<br /><br />General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:<br />information@eff.org<br /><br />Back issues of EFFector are available at:<br /><a href="http://www.eff.org/effector/" target="_blank">http://www.eff.org/effector/</a><br /><br />Sabu]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:58:24 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19682</guid>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.4, 25 February 2009</title>
		<link>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19671</link>
		<description><![CDATA[============================================================<br /><br />            EDRi-gram<br /><br /> biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe<br /><br />     Number 7.4, 25 February 2009<br /><br /><br />============================================================<br />Contents<br />============================================================<br /><br />1. Data protection authorities support civil society on the Telecom Package<br />2. The trial of The Pirate Bay in Sweden<br />3. Lex Nokia storms into the Finnish Parliament<br />4. Italy to enforce a global censorship legislation?<br />5. Norwegian group joins Sweden-based Justice Center against Swedish FRA law<br />6. European Commission disbanded data protection experts group<br />7. Romanian data retention law suspendend by the Government<br />8. HADOPI law close of creating a dangerous precedent<br />9. UK Government ignores the European Commission regarding Phorm<br />10. EDRi participates in European project on raising privacy awareness<br />11. ENDitorial: Privacy in the Czech Republic - nothing to celebrate<br />12. Recommended Action<br />13. Recommended Reading<br />14. Agenda<br />15. About<br /><br />============================================================<br />1. Data protection authorities support civil society on the Telecom Package<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Article 29 Working Group and the European Data Protection Supervisor<br />have issued public statement supporting some of the arguments of the civil<br />society, including EDRi, made in the recent open letter sent to the European<br />Parliament on 17 February 2009 and in the campaign against "voluntary data<br />retention".<br /><br />The open letter underlines the signatories' concerns related to those<br />amendments of the Telecoms Package which might affect the Internet and<br />Internet users, by targeting the open and non-discriminatory access<br />features. Thus the fundamental users' rights such as privacy and freedom of<br />speech are put in jeopardy.<br /><br />The Article 29 adopted on 10 February Opinion 1/2009 on the<br />proposals amending the e-Privacy Directive, acknowledging its concerns<br />regarding the present article 6 a) that "might lend legitimacy to large<br />scale deployment of deep packet inspection both in the network and in user<br />equipment such as ADSL boxes, while the current legal framework already<br />details the cases in which traffic data may be processed for security<br />purposes."<br /><br />Considering that "the wording proposed by the Commission establishes beyond<br />all doubt that the processing of traffic data falls within the scope of the<br />Data Protection Directive", the working group decided that the Article 6(6a)<br />is unnecessary.<br /><br />A similar opinion is supported by the European Data Protection Supervisor's<br />comments on some issues in the review of the Universal Service<br />Directive. According to the text "he is concerned about the implementation<br />of traffic management policies that require the monitoring of Internet usage<br />and interception without appropriate data protection safeguards," and<br />concludes that "Article 5 of the ePrivacy Directive applies whenever traffic<br />management policies entail interception or surveillance of Internet usage.<br />Therefore, to avoid confusion, it seems only just and reasonable to<br />recognise that pursuant to this article informed consent from users is<br />necessary."<br /><br />In the same document, EDPS tackles the 3 strikes procedure and considers as<br />unfortunate its possible introduction in the Telecom package and notes that<br />"it would have been preferable if the European Parliament had not given up<br />to pressure by laying down the foundation for a three strikes approach and<br />if all these issues had been addressed separately in different legal<br />instruments, after careful analysis and debate."<br /><br />The EDPS supports the civil society in calling upon decision makers to<br />re-introduce Amendment 138 and Article 32a of the Universal Service<br />Directive that would strengthen the safeguards towards ensuring the<br />protection of individuals' rights, including the right to data protection<br />and privacy and due process.<br /><br />The Article 29's Opinion also tackles other aspects regarding the<br />e-Privacy directive. Thus the document strongly supports "an extension of<br />personal data breach notifications to Information Society Services (...)<br />given the ever increasing role these services play in the daily lives of<br />European citizens." This resonates with the initial Amendments of the<br />European Parliament or with Peter Hustinx's public comments, who explains<br />why the position of the Commission and the Council is not enough to protect<br />the citizens in the online world:<br />"That restriction means European citizens would only be alerted if their<br />internet access or telephone company suffers security breaches. If their<br />online bank is hacked or its security systems are cracked, enabling the<br />unauthorised access to bank account information, citizens might not be<br />notified.<br />So, unless the amendments proposed by the European Parliament are adopted by<br />the Council, online banks and other e-businesses would be off the hook."<br /><br />The Article 29 Working Group has also re-emphasised its earlier opinion<br />"that unless the service provider is in a position to distinguish with<br />absolute certainty that the data correspond to users that cannot be<br />identified, it will have to treat all IP information as personal data, to be<br />on the safe side". Thus the WG agrees with the Commission that a substantive<br />provision of a directive is not the most suitable way of addressing this<br />issue, and that a reporting obligation referring to "purposes not covered by<br />this Directive" is not appropriate.<br /><br />Open letter to the European Parliament - Telecom Package (17.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/campaigns/open-letter-telecom-package" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/campaigns/ope...telecom-package</a><br /><br />EU proposal puts confidential communications data at risk (28.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/campaigns/no-voluntary-data-retention" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/campaigns/no-voluntary-data-retention</a><br /><br />All data breaches must be made public (29.01.2009)<br /><a href="http://resources.zdnet.co.uk/articles/comment/0,1000002985,39603777,00.htm" target="_blank">http://resources.zdnet.co.uk/articles/comm...39603777,00.htm</a><br /><br />Opinion 1/2009 on the proposals amending Directive 2002/58/EC on privacy and<br />electronic communications (e-Privacy Directive) (10.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2009/wp159_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...09/wp159_en.pdf</a><br /><br />EDPS comments on some issues in the review of the Directive 2002/22/EC<br />(Universal Service) (16.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/Consultation/Comments/2009/09-02-16_Comments_ePrivacy_EN.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/s...ePrivacy_EN.pdf</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: Data breach notification - different opinions in EU bodies ?<br />(19.11.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number6.22/data-breach-ec" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number6.22/data-breach-ec</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />2. The trial of The Pirate Bay in Sweden<br />============================================================<br /><br />The big, long and extremely mediatized trial filed on 31 January 2008 by<br />Swedish prosecutors against the four Pirate Bay founders for "promoting<br />other people's infringements of copyright laws" started at Stockholm's<br />District Court, on 16 February 2009.<br /><br />The first day of the trial was dedicated to the opening statements of<br />the prosecution and the defendants, the latter denying any criminal act.<br />Prosecutor Håkan Roswall presented the claims of the plaintiffs Warner Bros,<br />MGM, EMI, Colombia Pictures, 20th Century Fox, Sony BMG and Universal and<br />spent most of the morning trying to describe how the Pirate Bay works<br />suggesting it was a commercial organization with Carl Lundström as a<br />shareholder and financier of the company. The prosecutor made a presentation<br />of a series of movie, music and game downloads "coordinated by The Pirate<br />Bay" before 2006. He continued trying to explain the change from a seed<br />status to that of a peer as part of the evidence previously gathered by the<br />plaintiffs.<br /><br />The civil parties represented by IFPI and MPAA expressed the intention to<br />ask for 11 million euro damages.<br /><br />The second day of the trial started with a big victory for The Pirate Bay<br />founders with the dropping out of most part of the accusations against them.<br />The prosecutor announced the defendants would not be accused of "assisting<br />copyright infringement" changing the accusation into "assisting making<br />available copyright material".<br /><br />The prosecutor was unable to prove that the .torrent files introduced as<br />evidence were actually using The Pirate Bay's tracker. Furthermore, he has<br />shown to be technically unprepared and failed to explain the function of DHT<br />which allows for so called "trackerless" torrents. This means the<br />screenshots the prosecution provided as evidence did not necessarily<br />belong to The Pirate Bay's tracker. Pirate Bay claimed it did not break the<br />law because it did not host or disseminate copyright-infringing content but<br />only links to that content and reproached the prosecution, the police and<br />the music industry of not understanding the technology. According to Fredrik<br />Neij, the entire accusation was based on a technical misunderstanding.<br /><br />On 18 February, the prosecution asked for about 11 million euro compensation<br />and damages on the basis that the defendants should have obtained worldwide<br />licences for the content it distributed. The defence rejected any discussion<br />related to damages considering there had been no damage. "EU directive<br />2000/31/EC says that he who provides an information service is not<br />responsible for the information that is being transferred. In order to be<br />responsible, the service provider must initiate the transfer. But the admins<br />of The Pirate Bay don't initiate transfers. It's the users that do and they<br />are physically identifiable people. They call themselves names like King<br />Kong," was defence lawyer Samuelsson's statement to the court.<br /><br />"According to legal procedure, the accusations must be against an individual<br />and there must be a close tie between the perpetrators of a crime and those<br />who are assisting. This tie has not been shown. The prosecutor must show<br />that Carl Lundström personally has interacted with the user King Kong, who<br />may very well be found in the jungles of Cambodia," the lawyer added.<br /><br />The plaintiffs insited on The Pirate Bay's behaviour that refused to<br />withdraw the .torrent links from their index, except for the cases when the<br />content did not correspond with the one announced by the user placing the<br />torrent file. In the prosecution's opinion, this would make The Pirate Bay<br />more than a simple technical intermediary.<br /><br />The defense argued that uploading a torrent does not imply that the<br />copyrighted files are actually 'available', as the torrent has to also be<br />seeded and that, on the other hand, torrent files are not linked exclusively<br />on The Pirate Bay and can be found through other search engines, including<br />Google.<br /><br />Two of the defendents were heard on the fourth day, the technician Frederik<br />Neij and the administrator Gottfrid Svartholm Warg who were both pretty much<br />sticking to their initial position. The day did not bring very much change.<br />Neij proved that it was possible to create a torrent file and host it<br />somewhere else, like on TorrentSpy using the trackers opened by The Pirate<br />Bay to distribute the files, in which case The Pirate Bay cannot know what<br />is exchanged. In his opinion, the prosecusion had not succeeded in proving<br />that the incriminated files had been actually downloaded on The Pirate Bay.<br /><br />The lawyer of the movie industry tried to show that The Pirate Bay had an<br />active role in the choice of the content presented by its users and asked<br />Gottfrid Svartholm Warg whether the site had withdrawn content related to<br />child pornography. The administrator replied that they had notified the<br />police on such torrent files and they had retired them at the request of the<br />police. "We can't do investigations of our own. And if the police say we<br />should remove a torrent, we will," he said.<br /><br />Peter Sunde was interrogated on Friday morning. The strategy of the<br />prosecusion seemed to be clearer than during the first days being focused on<br />trying to prove that The Pirate Bay had been created with the purpose of<br />gaining money from "pirating". The prosecutor tried to show that The Pirate<br />Bay was actually managed by a hierarchical organization with a commercial<br />purpose. However no material evidence was brought to support this idea. When<br />asked what the purpose of The Pirate Bay was Sunde answered: "It is to<br />enable users to share their material with others." "Even though it is<br />copyrighted?" questioned Danowsky. "That can sometimes be the sad<br />consequences," Peter replied.<br /><br />The defendant stated to the court that in his opinion the entire trial was a<br />political one and that the reason for which the plaintiffs brought the case<br />against The Pirate Bay was not the fight against illegal downloading of<br />their works but a a fight to preserve the monopoly on the distribution<br />means.<br /><br />The trial started again on 24 February when the prosecutor also added to the<br />charges that the site allowed its users to upload torrents that it further<br />on stored. Magnus Mårtensson, a lawyer for the IFPI testified during the<br />morning but the evidence brought by him consisted only of screenshots and<br />the witness also admitted having difficulties in answering some technical<br />questions.<br /><br />Both him and policeman Magnus Nilsson of the Anti-Piracy Office who was the<br />next witness for the prosecution were unable to bring forth any real<br />evidence that the Pirate Bay trackers were actually used for the downloads<br />investigated.<br /><br />Mårtensson admited that he had no evidence of having any contact with The<br />Pirate Bay's tracker during the downloading he was claiming to have made<br />from the site. Nilsson was made to admit that the actual downloading of the<br />pirated files happened outside of The Pirate Bay.<br /><br />The trial is supposed to last until the 4 March 2009. We will present the<br />conclusions of the trial in our next newsletter.<br /><br />The Pirate Bay trial: 1st day under the sign of boredom (only in French,<br />16.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12023-Proces-de-The-Pirate-Bay-1ere-journee-sous-le-signe-de-l-ennui.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12023-Pro...de-l-ennui.html</a><br /><br />Half of Pirate Bay case dropped in courtroom drama (17.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9803" target="_blank">http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9803</a><br /><br />The Pirate Bay cries victory after the dropping out of some charges ! (only<br />in French, 17.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12041-The-Pirate-Bay-crie-victoire-apres-l-abandon-de-certaines-charges.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12041-The...es-charges.html</a><br /><br />The Pirate Bay (day 3): "We are winning on legal principles" (only in<br />French, 18.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12066-The-Pirate-Bay-jour-3-Nous-gagnerons-sur-des-principes-juridiques.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12066-The...juridiques.html</a><br /><br />Day 3 - The Pirate Bay's 'King Kong' Defense (18.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/g-defense-090218/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/g-defense-090218/</a><br /><br />The Pirate Bay (day 4): "Are you a coward, Fredrik Neij ?" (only in French,<br />19.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12087-The-Pirate-Bay-jour-4-Etes-vous-un-lache-Fredrik-Neij.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12087-The...edrik-Neij.html</a><br /><br />Day 4 - Pirate Bay Defense Calls Foul Over Evidence (19.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/day-4-pirate-bay-defense-calls-foul-over-evidence-090219/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/day-4-pirate-bay-d...vidence-090219/</a><br /><br />The Pirate Bay (day 5): Peter Sunde counter-attacks (only in French,<br />20.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12100-The-Pirate-Bay-jour-5-Peter-Sunde-contre-attaque.html" target="_blank">http://www.numerama.com/magazine/12100-The...re-attaque.html</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay Trial Day 5: Peter's "Political Trial" (20.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-trial-day-5-peters-political-trial-090220/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-trial-d...l-trial-090220/</a><br /><br />Pirate Bay Trial Day 7: Screenshots for Evidence (24.02.3009)<br /><a href="http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-trial-day-7-screenshots-for-evidence-090224/" target="_blank">http://torrentfreak.com/pirate-bay-trial-d...vidence-090224/</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: Pirate Bay in legal battle with IFPI (11.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/piratebay-ifpi-battle" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/pi...bay-ifpi-battle</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />3. Lex Nokia storms into the Finnish Parliament<br />============================================================<br /><br />Government bill dubbed as Lex Nokia, also known as the snooping law, entered<br />the Parliament for debate on 24 February 2009. The bill has been widely<br />criticized for heavy-handed treatment of fundamental rights, granting<br />companies more rights than the police, suspicion of undue corporate pressure<br />and vagueness and unclarity.<br /><br />The proponents of the law have continued making embarrassing gaffes:<br />Communications Minister Suvi Lindén has said in an interview in Tampere<br />newspaper Aamulehti that an employer currently has the right to order a<br />strip-search of an employee if there is suspicion that the employee is<br />leaking company secrets. Furthermore, Finance Minister Jyrki Katainen, has<br />stated that he is not familiar with the contents of the bill, but supports<br />it firmly, regardless.<br /><br />Yesterday's parliamentary debate consisted mainly of opponents of the law<br />raising various concerns regarding fundamental rights, usefulness of the<br />bill, increasing surveillance, bad drafting process etc. The defenders of<br />the law kept repeating how opponents of the bill are ill-informed of its<br />actual implications and how the bill improves the status of employee rights.<br />The Left Alliance and the Social Democrats were calling for rejecting the<br />bill and sending it back for a complete overhaul.<br /><br />TV news on 24 February reported about the law, stating that it is meant to<br />prevent three things:<br />* leakage of trade secrets<br />* copying of copyrighted materials<br />* disruption of corporate networks with attachments and malware.<br /><br />Unless this is some kind of mistake made by the news, this sheds a new light<br />on the purpose of the bill.<br /><br />Government party lines seem to be holding, only the Greens (14 seats) are<br />split on the issue. If the lines are not broken any further, the bill will<br />pass even if all Greens vote against it, since the National Coalition (51<br />seats), the Centre (51) and the Swedish People's Party (10) have a majority<br />in the 200-member strong parliament.<br /><br />The Greens have proposed limiting the bill so that the email log data is<br />allowed to be examined only in cases where a company is investigating<br />leakage of trade secrets. The content of the law is expected to be voted<br />upon today, 25 February. The final vote, whether to pass or reject the bill,<br />is expected next week.<br /><br />Lex Nokia Debate Ignites Parliament (24.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://yle.fi/uutiset/news/2009/02/lex_nokia_debate_ignites_parliament__569512.html?origin=rss" target="_blank">http://yle.fi/uutiset/news/2009/02/lex_nok...html?origin=rss</a><br /><br />Labour Ministry official confirms threat of Nokia leaving Finland over law<br />on electronic communications (24.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Labour+Ministry+official+confirms+threat+of+Nokia+leaving+Finland+over+law+on+electronic+communications/1135243785748" target="_blank">http://www.hs.fi/english/article/Labour+Mi...s/1135243785748</a><br /><br />Lex Nokia furore fuelled further by minister´s strip-search remark<br />(13.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.hs.fi/english/article/iLex+Nokiai+furore+fuelled+further+by+ministers+strip-search+remark/1135243506947" target="_blank">http://www.hs.fi/english/article/iLex+Noki...k/1135243506947</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: Snooping law, "Lex Nokia", proceeding slowly but surely in<br />Finland (17.12.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number6.24/nokia-law-finland-snooping" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number6.24/n...inland-snooping</a><br /><br />(Contribution by Leena Romppainen - EDRi-member Electronic Frontier Finland)<br /><br />============================================================<br />4. Italy to enforce a global censorship legislation?<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Italian Senate approved - and the Camera dei deputati (Italian "Low<br />Chamber") is ready to finally pass - draft law 733 named Pacchetto<br />sicurezza - "Security Package", a series of (supposely) coordinated<br />provisions aimed at improve, whatever that means, police bodies and public<br />prosecutor powers.<br /><br />Of course, the law wouldn't have been complete without "taking care" of<br />the Internet, and legislators didn't loose the chance. Under sect. 50 bis<br />of this forthcoming law, a public prosecutor which is given "serious<br />circumstantial evidence" that an online activity of inciting crime has<br />been committed, is allowed to ask the Minister of Home Affair to order the<br />ISP's to shut down the "concerned" network resource. ISP refusal to comply<br />with Minister's order should be fined with a penalty up to 250 000 Euros.<br /><br />The provision is clearly flawed from a constitutional standpoint. The<br />basis of every western democracy, indeed, is separation of power, thus is<br />not legally possible to have such a cross-jurisdiction mess between the<br />public prosecutor (the judiciary power) and a Ministership (the executive<br />power). Further more, there would be a double trial for the same fact, one<br />of which (the Home Affair Ministership one), done without the legal<br />guarantee of a criminal trial (fair process, etc.).<br /><br />But this is only the tip of the iceberg. Crime-inciting wrongdoing is very<br />difficult to handle, since the border between free-speech and law<br />violation is often blurred (would a website supporting freedom rebel of a<br />country be - per se - inciting to commit crimes?). Further more, if ISP's<br />must prevent access to a network resource located outside their network<br />(abroad, for instance) this would mean that the result will be achieved<br />through deep-packet inspection, or similar, privacy threathning<br />techniques. Thus - with the excuse of "protecting" Italian citizens - the<br />D'Alia amendment (named after the MP that proposed it) is likely to be the<br />first step toward a global censorship system. A Cassinelli amendment<br />(again, from the MP name of its author) that followed the D'Alia one,<br />tried to circumvent the above mentioned problems, but with no real changes<br />in the substance of the matter and the political, net-phobic approach.<br /><br />Italy had a "sound" tradition in trying to enforce citizen's global<br />surveillance systems through ISP's and telco operators, adopting every<br />sort of justifications (from copyright, to child pornography, to online<br />gambling and now to crime-inciting actions). Oddly enough, nevertheless,<br />these "good intentions" fell always on innocent citizens' shoulders, while<br />true criminals stay absolutely free. Or, to put it straight: to (maybe)<br />catch a few criminals, the whole nation network usage will be subjected to<br />"third parties" - namely, ISP's - systematic scrutiny. So long, human<br />rights.<br /><br />(Contribution by Andrea Monti - EDRi-member ALCEI -Italy)<br /><br />============================================================<br />5. Norwegian group joins Sweden-based Justice Center against Swedish FRA law<br />============================================================<br /><br />The Norwegian organisation of the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)<br />has filed a petition, known as a Third Party Intervention, in support of the<br />case brought to the European Court of Human Rights challenging the Sweden's<br />FRA law that authorizes the Sweden's National Defence Radio Establishment<br />(Försvarets radioanstalt - FRA) to wiretap all telephone and Internet<br />traffic that crosses Sweden's borders.<br /><br />The legislative package which was passed by the Parliament of Sweden on 18<br />June 2008 and took effect on 1 January 2009, was fiercely criticized and<br />opposed in Sweden by the public, opposition parties, the appeal courts for<br />Skåne and Blekinge, Sweden's Customs Agency, the Data Inspection Board and<br />even politicians belonging to the alliance government.<br /><br />A case was filed in July 2008 by the Sweden-based Justice Center (Centrum<br />för Rättvisa - CFR), which argued FRA's expanded powers to monitor<br />cross-border communications traffic violated Article 8 and Article 13 of the<br />European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing the citizens' right to<br />privacy and ensuring the citizens with the possibility to hold national<br />authorities to account for possible human rights violations.<br /><br />According to Lawyer Robin Lööf of the European University Institute in<br />Florence who reported the Swedish law to the European Commission in August<br />2008, the law is in clear breach of fundamental rights governing the<br />movement of goods and services in the European Union.<br /><br />Clarence Crafoord, head attorney with CFR welcomed the Third Party<br />Intervention of the Norwegian group considering the initiative "offers<br />additional perspectives about the problems with the FRA-law and it's good<br />that it makes clear to the European Court of Human Rights that the law<br />affects both Swedes and citizens in other countries."<br /><br />The Norwegian petition cites a report issued by the Norwegian Postal and<br />Telecoms Agency in November 2008 which showed that most electronic<br />communications traffic into and out of Norway as well as a large part of the<br />domestic traffic passes through Sweden, the Swedish law therefore affecting<br />the privacy rights of Norwegian citizens.<br /><br />Although the Swedish government brought some changes to the law with an<br />amendment in September 2008, in ICJ-Norway's opinion the changes apply<br />only to Swedish citizens or people residing in Sweden. The group believes<br />that Norwegian citizens' communications are the "explicit target for the<br />secret monitoring by Swedish authorities".<br /><br />"Norwegian citizens are still left lawless under the present<br />legislation.(...) They are faced with the constant risk that their private<br />communications which happen to pass Sweden's borders could be subject to<br />interception and be subsequently stored, distributed, and misused by and at<br />the absolute discretion of the Swedish authorities," writes ICJ-Norway in<br />its petition.<br /><br />ICJ-Norway points out a series a deficiencies in the formulation of the law<br />which includes vague definitions of the targeted communications, the lack of<br />clear regulations on information storing, the lack of independent judicial<br />control and the lack of possibility of response for the citizens whose<br />communications are intercepted.<br /><br />Norwegian group joins case against Sweden's wiretapping law (13.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/17578/20090213/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/17578/20090213/</a><br /><br />Swedish surveillance law 'breaks EU rules' (13.08.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/13664/20080813/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/13664/20080813/</a><br /><br />Goverment getting closer to surveillance law compromise (25.09.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/14554/20080925/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/14554/20080925/</a><br /><br />Snoop law to be tried in European court (15.07.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.thelocal.se/13052/20080715/" target="_blank">http://www.thelocal.se/13052/20080715/</a><br /><br />EDRI-gram: ENDitorial: Wiretapping - the Swedish way (27.08.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.16/wiretapping-swedish-way" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.16/wi...ing-swedish-way</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />6. European Commission disbanded data protection experts group<br />============================================================<br /><br />The European Commission has decided to dismantle a group of experts that<br />needed to review the European Data Protection Directive.<br /><br />The group was formed after a tendering process and included: Peter<br />Fleischer, global privacy counsel for Google, David Hoffman, director of<br />security policy and global privacy officer for Intel; Henriette Tielemans a<br />privacy lawyer from a US law firm, Christopher Kuner, a privacy lawyer with<br />another US law firm; and Jacob Kohnstamm, chairman of the Dutch data<br />protection authority.<br /><br />Alex Türk, the French Data Protection Authority President and the Chairman<br />of Article 29 Working Party, has complained about the biased structure of<br />the group explaining to a French Senate committee that the group was<br />composed "four-fifths of personalities representing American interests." The<br />committee submitting a resolution stating it was "unacceptable" that four<br />members of the group "are either from American companies or law firms whose<br />principal establishment is in the U.S."<br /><br />The group had just one meeting at the end of the last year and even though<br />they were gathered for a one-year mandate the Commissioner Barrot, who is<br />also a French, decided to disband the group and to broaden the consultation<br />on the review of the 1995 data protection directive.<br /><br />In fact Türk asked Barrot to look into the matter, and the latter<br />acknowledged that "the situation was abnormal". Türk explained that part of<br />the problem was that there were major conceptual differences between the EU<br />and US data protection principles: "Europeans must note that the gap is big<br />between the American vision and the European vision."<br /><br />Draft Resolution regarding the nomination by the European Commission of an<br />expert group on data protection. (6.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.senat.fr/leg/ppr08-203.html" target="_blank">http://www.senat.fr/leg/ppr08-203.html</a><br /><br />European Commission Disbands Privacy Group (17.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.clickz.com/3632816" target="_blank">http://www.clickz.com/3632816</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />7. Romanian data retention law suspendend by the Government<br />============================================================<br /><br />In a sudden and unexpected move, the Romanian Government has decided on 25<br />February 2009 to suspend the application of the data retention law until the<br />end of the year - 31 December 2009.<br /><br />The official reason from the press release of the Ministry of Communications<br />and Information Society are related to the:<br />- complications that the law brings to the penal cases, especially in the<br />initial phases of information gathering;<br /><br />- the area of the crimes for which the retained data is accessible is<br />contested (by whom? -n.a.);<br /><br />- not all of the communications providers may ensure the management of the<br />retained data;<br /><br />- not all the providers are ready to respect the legal provisions regarding<br />the confidentiality of the accessed data.<br /><br />Even though the law was in a public consultation (but dormant-type phase)<br />for almost 9 months, it seems that the Government is realizing that they<br />didn't get the "perfect text". The privacy concerns do not appear in the<br />press release, but a better "information campaign" on the law and its<br />consequences is mentioned somewhere in a work plan.<br /><br />It is still unclear how the "suspension" will work. It seems that the<br />Government would like to issue a new emergency ordinance that will postpone<br />the application of the law. It remains to be seen if the new text of the law<br />supported by the Ministry will be better or worst than the present one.<br /><br />Application of the data retention law - postponed until the end of 2009<br />(only in Romanian, 25.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://economie.hotnews.ro/stiri-telecom-5447913-aplicarea-legii-stocare-datelor-convorbirilor-telefonice-internet-suspendata-pana-sfarsitul-lui-2009.htm" target="_blank">http://economie.hotnews.ro/stiri-telecom-5...ul-lui-2009.htm</a><br /><br />Minsitry of Communications and Information Society (only in Romanian,<br />25.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://media.hotnews.ro/media_server1/document-2009-02-25-5447934-0-comunicat-mcsi.doc" target="_blank">http://media.hotnews.ro/media_server1/docu...unicat-mcsi.doc</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />8. HADOPI law close of creating a dangerous precedent<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 18 February 2009, Christine Albanel, French Minister of Culture,<br />presented to the Chamber of Deputies the controversial Création et Internet<br />draft law (so called Hadopi law) calling for the creation of a<br />government agency to manage the graduated response (or three-strike)<br />process.<br /><br />The law which was passed by the Senate in October 2008 was discussed by the<br />deputies in the legal commissions with amendments to be presented during the<br />debates starting on 4 March. As previously during the long discussions<br />having taken place for some years now, during the debates in the legal<br />commissions, any amendment proposed in the direction of a global license,<br />such as the "creative contribution" proposed by the socialist Patrick Bloche<br />was rejected. The proposed mechanism would have implied a fee paid by the<br />Internet subscribers to their ISP for legal downloading of copyrighted<br />material. The fees collected could be used to remunerate artists for their<br />work. "With a universal licence, the money recuperated will not uniquely go<br />into the pockets of the producers, which is definitely the case now. Today,<br />artists' royalty payments are significantly less, while the (media<br />companies') royalty payments are considerably more," said Bloche.<br /><br />According to Nicolas Maubert, an attorney with law firm Gide Loyrette Nouel,<br />if voted in the present form, the law might still be challenged by France's<br />judicial body. Blocking Internet access as a sanction might breach<br />constitutional protections guaranteed by the French Constitutional body<br />(Conseil Constitutionnel) said Maubert, who added that a graduated response<br />initiative is not a necessarily a bad thing in itself:<br />"It still seems legitimate to question whether blocking the access to the<br />internet is indeed a 'proportionate measure.' Especially these days, just<br />imagine yourself without access to the internet, with no e-mails, no<br />information."<br /><br />In the meantime, as a positive balance, according to reports from the<br />European Parliament, the also very controversial Medina report containing a<br />range of measures in support of copyright enforcement, including increased<br />liability for ISPs, secondary liability for peer-to-peer sites and graduated<br />response, has been postponed and apparently even removed from the European<br />Parliament's agenda.<br /><br />Having in view the very strong opposition reaction from citizens all over<br />Europe, it appears the socialist group in the European Parliament blocked<br />the report for fear of losing votes at the next elections. If the Medina<br />report had been pushed to the plenary, it would have also created a problem<br />for the Telecoms Package.The Parliament miight not have passed it,<br />supporting Amendment 138 which is against graduate response.<br /><br />"Thousands of emails and phone calls from concerned citizens reached the<br />parliament. The outcome proves that informed citizens can altogether become<br />stronger than a small obscurantist industry pressure group. We must<br />consolidate this victory by guaranteeing, through the second reading of the<br />Telecoms Package, that Internet remains the most fantastic advance for our<br />societies since the invention of the printing press."declared Jérémie<br />Zimmermann, co-founder of La Quadrature du Net.<br /><br />Antipiracy Law: "the creative contribution" of the Socialist Party rejected<br />(only in French, 20.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.01net.com/editorial/403824/loi-antipiratage-la-contribution-creative-du-ps-ecartee/" target="_blank">http://www.01net.com/editorial/403824/loi-...-du-ps-ecartee/</a><br /><br />French Legislature Puts Finishing Touches On Ambitious File-Sharing Law<br />(23.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/02/23/french-legislature-puts-finishing-touches-on-ambitious-file-sharing-law/" target="_blank">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/2009/02/23/...le-sharing-law/</a><br /><br />Medina report indefinitely abandoned (22.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=259&Itemid=9" target="_blank">http://www.iptegrity.com/index.php?option=...59&Itemid=9</a><br /><br />Copyright dogmatism temporarily kicked out of European Parliament<br />(19.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/copyright-dogmatism-temporarily-kicked-out-european-parliament" target="_blank">http://www.laquadrature.net/en/copyright-d...pean-parliament</a><br /><br />Christine Albanel defends the antipiracy law in front of the deputies (only<br />in French, 18.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.01net.com/editorial/403753/christine-albanel-defend-la-loi-antipiratage-face-aux-deputes/" target="_blank">http://www.01net.com/editorial/403753/chri...ce-aux-deputes/</a><br /><br />EDRi-gram: One more step for France in adopting the graduated response<br />(5.11.2008)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.21/french-senate-adopts-3-strikes" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.21/fr...dopts-3-strikes</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />9. UK Government ignores the European Commission regarding Phorm<br />============================================================<br /><br />On 12 February 2009, the European Commission warned it would take formal<br />action against the UK Government for not providing the requested information<br />on the past trials of the Phorm ad-serving technology.<br /><br />The Commission has sent three letters until now requesting information on<br />the secret trials by BT of Phorm, the latest having been sent at the end of<br />January 2009. No satisfactory answers have been received so far, the<br />response having focused only on future deployments without addressing the<br />question of the past trials.<br /><br />The trials, conducted in 2006 and 2007, tracking the browsing behaviour of<br />BT customers without their consent, resulted in complaints from privacy<br />campaigners, peers, and politicians who argued that the actions were in<br />breach of UK interception and data-protection laws. In July 2008, technology<br />campaigner Alexander Hanff made a complaint to the police force considering<br />the BT trials were not in compliance with RIPA and the Data Protection Act<br />as the customers' consent had not been required.<br /><br />However, the City of London police informed Hanff in September 2008 that<br />they would not continue the investigation for "lack of criminal intent".<br /><br />"One of the main reasons for this decision is the lack of criminal intent on<br />behalf of BT and Phorm in relation to the tests. It is also believed that<br />there would have been a level of implied consent from BT's customers in<br />relation to the tests, as the aim was to enhance their products," wrote<br />detective sergeant Barry Murray.<br /><br />Although UK regulators have provided rules for the future deployments of<br />Phorm which require the company to not retain website history data, exclude<br />sensitive search topics and obtain the customer's agreement also providing<br />information of the respective technology, according to UK's EDRi-member Open<br />Rights Group, it is not yet clear whether the consent of both the users and<br />the visited websites is required.<br /><br />"Unless the ISPs employing Phorm's technology to intercept the<br />communications between their customers and the owners of the websites their<br />customers are visiting have the explicit consent of both parties, they are<br />likely to be committing an offence under the Regulation of Investigatory<br />Powers Act (RIPA), the legislation that governs interception of<br />communications in the UK," stated the group.<br /><br />In spite of the repeated questions and investigations and disregarding the<br />European Commission's warning, Phorm goes on. The company's CEO stated<br />during an interview on 9 February that the system would be active in the UK<br />by the end of 2009. The company has also signed deals with another two big<br />UK ISPs, Carphone Warehouse and Virgin Media.<br /><br />EC warns gov't over Phorm foot-dragging (12.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39615480,00.htm" target="_blank">http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000...39615480,00.htm</a><br /><br />BT finishes trial, expects to use Phorm (15.12.2008)<br /><a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/communications/0,1000000085,39578006,00.htm" target="_blank">http://news.zdnet.co.uk/communications/0,1...39578006,00.htm</a><br /><br />Police drop investigation into BT's Phorm trials (23.09.2008)<br /><a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000189,39492793,00.htm" target="_blank">http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1000000...39492793,00.htm</a><br /><br />Phorm: damn the EU, full speed ahead! (11.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/02/phorm-damn-the-eu-full-speed-ahead.ars" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/20...speed-ahead.ars</a><br /><br />EU calls phoul over ad company Phorm's invasive snooping (15.08.2008)<br /><a href="http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2008/08/eu-calls-phoul-over-ad-company-phorms-invasive-snooping.ars" target="_blank">http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2008/08...ve-snooping.ars</a><br /><br />EDRIgram: UK: Phorm threat (28.01.2009)<br /><a href="http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.2/phorm-uk" target="_blank">http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.2/phorm-uk</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />10. EDRi participates in European project on raising privacy awareness<br />============================================================<br /><br />EDRi is one of the partners in a new European project initiated by the<br />French Human Rights League (LDH), which aims to raise awareness on the<br />privacy aspects, especially among the young generation.<br /><br />The project initiated by LDH and started on 1 January 2009 comprises,<br />besides EDRI, another European Human Rights Network - European Association<br />for the Defense of Human Rights (EAHR) and two national members - Pangea (in<br />Spain) and Iuridicum Remedium (in Czech Republic). The project is funded by<br />the European Commision within the framework of the Program on fundamental<br />rights and citizenship - transnational projects.<br /><br />This project aims to help a large group of young people, teenagers and young<br />adults to become vigilant about the protection of their personal data, to<br />sensitise them on subjects which may seem trivial.<br /><br />A first meeting was held on 13-14 February 2009 when all project members met<br />for the first time to better define the main two objectives:<br /><br />a) The analysis and comparison of some privacy invasive technologies in the<br />selected countries, the identification of good and worst practices,<br />applicable legislation and its implementation, relevant awareness<br />campaigns.<br /><br /><img src="http://www.bluetack.co.uk/forums/style_emoticons/default/cool.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid="B)" border="0" alt="cool.gif" /> The production of an awareness tool aimed at young adults dealing with<br />sensitive subjects in all countries, which are not sufficiently handled or<br />specifically aimed at this target population. In this case our objective is<br />to influence these practices and go against the tendency which professes "I<br />have nothing to hide therefore nothing to fear, so no problem" with an<br />accent upon "why should they care and how to do it".<br /><br />Human Rights League France<br /><a href="http://www.ldh-france.org/" target="_blank">http://www.ldh-france.org/</a><br /><br />European Association for the Defense of Human Rights<br /><a href="http://www.aedh.eu/?lang=en" target="_blank">http://www.aedh.eu/?lang=en</a><br /><br />Pangea<br /><a href="http://www.pangea.org/" target="_blank">http://www.pangea.org/</a><br /><br />Iuridicum Remedium<br /><a href="http://www.iure.org" target="_blank">http://www.iure.org</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />11. ENDitorial: Privacy in the Czech Republic - nothing to celebrate<br />============================================================<br /><br />For the third time the Council of Europe has proclaimed 28 January the<br />European Data Protection Day. EDRi-member Iuridicum Remedium (IuRe) reminds<br />that the safety of Czech citizens´ personal data is still seriously<br />endangered. Some of the most pressing issues are listed below.<br /><br />RFID based Opencard (or Praguer´s Universal Card) is now being promoted as<br />an electronic travel card for public transportation. However, the<br />contactless chip card formerly used for parking payment and as a library ID<br />is not secure. The contactless chip can be read remotely and the data stored<br />on it can be linked with the central database containing personal data. The<br />system thus allows for movement tracking, especially at the electronic gates<br />which are going to be introduced in Prague metro.<br /><br />In relation with the Opencard´s drawbacks, IuRe initiated a petition at the<br />beginning of September 2008, which demands the deletion of both Opencard<br />holder data and usage data from the central database after the card´s<br />expiration and an observance of database administrator´s duty to allow<br />user´s data deletion upon request. "We also demand an implementation of an<br />anonymous Opencard at the same price as an ordinary Opencard," reports Filip<br />Pospísil from IuRe. The petition has already been signed by almost 700<br />people.<br /><br />The Municipal authorities of Prague began to sell anonymous cards on<br />the 17 December 2008. However, there is an extra 8 EUR charge and since<br />only transferable season transport tickets can be purchased with such a<br />card, the price for the annual travel becomes significantly higher. The<br />Praguers effectively have to pay extra for their privacy protection and IuRe<br />will stand out for an implementation of non-discriminatory anonymous card,<br />i.e. the card allowing to use the service at the same price without<br />unnecessary disclosure of personal data. The Municipal Council of the city<br />of Prague received a Big Brother Award 2008 for the Opencard project in<br />"Worst Public Agency Privacy Intruder" category.<br /><br />Visa Waiver<br /><br />The term Visa Waiver refers to a set of agreements related to the abolition<br />of the visa requirement for Czech citizens traveling to the USA. These<br />agreements allow the American authorities access to personal data of the<br />Czech citizens in Czech state authorities´ databases, including biometric<br />data. The access is given as a compensation for the abolition of visa<br />requirements, but in fact the paper visa have been merely replaced by the<br />virtual visa - a system of detailed electronic questionnaires based on which<br />the applicant can still be refused entry to the USA.<br /><br />"In the case of the Czech Republic the agreements where not negotiated<br />properly with Czech Data Protection Agency and their comments were not<br />respected," points out Filip Pospísil from IuRe.<br /><br />The complementary Agreement on strengthening the cooperation for the<br />prevention and fight against serious crime was approved by the government on<br />the 4 December 2008. However, the Government disregarded the comments of the<br />Czech Data Protection Agency and other state authorities. At the beginning<br />of 2009, IuRe urged the MEPs and senators to not approve the proposed<br />agreement.<br /><br />IuRe has made an attempt to find out the scale of personal data which had<br />been promised by the Czech authorities to be handed over to the American<br />authorities as well as the conditions of the data protection. The official<br />request for information has been submitted to the Ministry of Internal<br />Affairs by the end of 2008. "The request was concerning another visa waiver<br />related memorandum on establishing of the Combating Terorism Center and the<br />Electronic System of Travelling Registration (ESTA)," specifies Filip<br />Pospísil from IuRe. However, the memorandum is classified as secret and thus<br />neither IuRe nor any other ordinary citizens know which of their personal<br />data is being handed over.<br /><br />Privacy and bank sector<br /><br />The new Police Law was negotiated and approved in 2008. IuRe together with<br />the bank sector and the Czech Bank Association have been criticizing the new<br />power of the Czech Police to request data about the location and time of<br />electronic card payments from banks, and particularly, the ability to access<br />bank information systems. "We have been submitting comments during the<br />negotiation of this law, but while some others have been accepted, our<br />objection against this competence was not" reports Helena Svatosová, a<br />lawyer from IuRe.<br /><br />According to IuRe, the government document named "The enhancement of the<br />communication system between financial institutions and state authorities"<br />introduces since the fall of 2008 the intention to create a central evidence<br />of financial institutions´ clients and their operations. The evidence would<br />then be available to an unspecified range of public administration<br />authorities. "In our opinion, it's very disturbing that despite the list of<br />related agencies being rather long, there is no mention of the involvement<br />of the Data Protection Office," interprets Helena Svatosová from IuRe who<br />plans to keep an eye on this issue in the future. IuRe has notified both the<br />Czech Data Protection Office and the Bank Association about the issue and<br />asked them for their opinion.<br /><br />Data retention<br /><br />EU directive 2006/24/EC on the retention of data generated or processed in<br />connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communication<br />services has been implemented into the national legislation since the<br />beginning of 2006. In November 2007, Minister of Industry and Trade Martin<br />Ríman proposed an amendment which would allow the secret service and the<br />military intelligence a direct access to those data. Although he has<br />abandoned the idea under the pressure from the media and politicians,<br />intelligence services gained access through the "backdoor" in the new Police<br />Law.<br /><br />There is a legal proceeding submitted by Ireland (suported by Slovakia)<br />going on against the directive at the European Court of Justice, as well as<br />at both Hungarian and German constitutional courts. IuRe has also been<br />preparing the trial of the "data retention" provision of a law in respect of<br />its constitutionality and compliance with human-right obligations of the<br />Czech Republic; the plan is to approach lawmakers with the proposal for an<br />annulment of a part of the law, and gather enough support to submit the<br />proposal to the Czech Constitutional Court.<br /><br />Video surveillance<br /><br />The volume of CCTVs has been on a sharp increase in recent years. However,<br />the Czech legislation has not reflected this development in any way. In<br />December last year the Government Council for Human Rights accepted a<br />proposal of a Committee for Civil and Political Rights. The proposal has<br />been initiated by IuRe and aims at introducing a conceptual regulation of<br />CCTV´s usage in public. IuRe has emphasised the necessity of such an<br />adjustment for several years. "Thus, the resolution of Council of Government<br />is a significant achievement of our campaign, which leads to a more<br />transparent usage of CCTV systems regulated by strict rules," declared Filip<br />Pospísil from IuRe.<br /><br />The proposal should allow private persons to use CCTV only in order to<br />protect their own property and family; public authorities should be allowed<br />to make a record only in the public interest and only for purposes defined<br />by the law. The proposal should also prevent the excessive personal data<br />processing  and stipulate a duty of the CCTV owner to inform about the CCTV<br />surveillance within its range. The aim of the proposal is also to strictly<br />regulate the retention of records, as well as the duty to clearly state and<br />document the exact purpose of each CCTV installation by the police or<br />another security agency.<br /><br />IuRe has already tried to pursue the legal regulation of CCTV through the<br />Police law approved in June 2008 with the help of MP Katerina Jacques.<br />Minister of Interior Ivan Langer has rejected the proposal, but has promised<br />that his ministry will, in cooperation with the MP and Czech Data Protection<br />Office, prepare amendments of the Act on Personal Data Protection containing<br />proposed amendments. Negotiations are still ongoing with IuRe participating.<br /><br />Passengers Name Records (PNR)<br /><br />Passengers Name Records (PNR), the database of information about airline<br />passengers has originally been used only by the aviation companies. But<br />after the 9/11, the American Security Authorities have started making<br />pressure on aviation companies to provide the detailed data of their<br />passengers.<br /><br />This practice did not have a legal ground in most countries and the<br />agreement between EU and the USA was found illegal by the European Court of<br />Justice. The provisional agreement, built on the same illegal base in summer<br />2007, was called back from negotiations in the Czech Parliament by Foreign<br />Affairs Minister after IuRe had sent a letter to MPs raising concerns<br />against the approval of the agreement.<br /><br />After difficult negotiations, the EU came up with a new agreement on PNR<br />data exchange with the USA in June 2007. In the Czech Republic the proposal<br />of the agreement has not gone through an ordinary legislative process and<br />only the Data Protection Office expressed its opinion:  the proposal brings<br />a deterioration of personal data protection level against previous<br />agreements, as US authorities will acquire access to personal data of people<br />without guaranteeing basic rights.( for example the right of correcting of<br />false statements, etc.)<br /><br />IuRe has also approached a number of parliamentarians expressing concerns<br />about the agreement and this resulted in the fact that the agreement did not<br />obtain the support of the Foreign Affairs committee of the Czech Parliament.<br />Also the Senate Standing Commission for Privacy Protection expressed its<br />negative position.<br /><br />IuRe believes that the Parliament will demonstrate its sovereign role and<br />will not approve this agreement at the forthcoming session.<br /><br />This article has been written as a part of the "Reclaim Your Rights in the<br />Digital Age" project supported by the Trust for Civil Society in Central and<br />Eastern Europe Foundation.<br /><br />(contribution by EDRi-member Iuridicum Remedium- Czech Republic)<br /><br />============================================================<br />12. Recommended Action<br />============================================================<br /><br />Announcement of the second Privacy Open Space Conference in Berlin, 1-3<br />April 2009.<br /><br />After the successful finish of the first year of the EU-funded project<br />Privacy Open Space (PrivacyOS) the project starts the New Year with the<br />announcement of the Second PrivacyOS Conference.<br /><br />As the first PrivacyOS Conference in October 2008 in the European Parliament<br />in Strasbourg was co-located with the International Conference of Privacy<br />and Data Protection Commissioners, also the second PrivacyOS Conference will<br />be held alongside with "re:publica", a conference to establish collective<br />interfaces with other EU projects as well as national and international<br />networks.<br /><br />After the positive feedback on the first conference, the second PrivacyOS<br />Conference will also follow the Open Space approach and therefore invites<br />all participants to bring topics to the agenda. "It leaves room for<br />spontaneous creation of new workshops during the conference which reflects<br />the dynamics of the discussion among participants" says Jan Schallaböck, the<br />project Manager of PrivacyOS. "Only a set of timeslots is predefined. The<br />topics for each of the slots are introduced and moderated by the<br />participants themselves." This approach ensures that all topics relevant to<br />the participants are included and that fields of common interest can be<br />detected and worked on, while taking into account different perspectives<br />across Europe and beyond.<br /><br />The second PrivacyOS Conference will focus on "Enabling Privacy on the Web".<br />Visitors of the "re:publica" are invited to partly join the Open Space slots<br />and to discuss with the PrivacyOS Project Partners about privacy issues or<br />their experiences on this field. Thereby, an opportunity to articulate and<br />exchange best practices, challenges and solutions is given.<br /><br />The conference primarily addresses legal and technical IT experts,<br />interested manufacturers of IT products or services as well as data<br />protection authorities. All persons interested in privacy or data protection<br />aspects are welcome to register for the event.<br /><br />Project website<br /><a href="http://www.privacyos.eu/" target="_blank">http://www.privacyos.eu/</a> .<br /><br />Invitation PrivacyOS - Berlin<br /><a href="https://www.privacyos.eu/images/111_PrivacyOS_Invitation_Berlin.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.privacyos.eu/images/111_Privacy...tion_Berlin.pdf</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />13. Recommended Reading<br />============================================================<br /><br />Report: The Abolition of Freedom Act 2009<br />This UCL SHRP research report, edited by the Guardian's Liberty Central<br />columnist Henry Porter, was complied for The Convention on Modern Liberty on<br />28 February and marks the beginning of a research project that seeks to<br />reflect on legislation since the Human Rights Act 1998 and the unintended<br />consequences it has had on rights and liberties in the UK.<br /><a href="http://www.uclshrp.com/exchange/report_the_abolition_of_freedom_act_2009/" target="_blank">http://www.uclshrp.com/exchange/report_the...eedom_act_2009/</a><br /><a href="http://www.uclshrp.com/images/uploads/pdf/Abolition_of_Freedom_Act_2009.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.uclshrp.com/images/uploads/pdf/...om_Act_2009.pdf</a><br /><br />The Article 29 Working Party - 69th plenary session - Search Engines<br />(10-11.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/news/docs/pr_12_02_09_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...12_02_09_en.pdf</a><br /><br />The Article 29 Working Party - 69th plenary session - Press Release<br />(11.02.2009)<br /><a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/news/docs/pr_11_02_09_final_en.pdf" target="_blank">http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/priva...09_final_en.pdf</a><br /><br />============================================================<br />14. Agenda<br />============================================================<br /><br />18-20 March 2009, Prague, Czech Republic<br />The Responsibilities of Content Providers and Users<br /><a href="http://www.media-conference.cz" target="_blank">http://www.media-conference.cz</a><br /><br />18-20 March 2009, Athens, Greece<br />WebSci'09: Society On-Line<br /><a href="http://www.websci09.org/" target="_blank">http://www.websci09.org/</a><br /><br />23 March 2009, Berlin, Germany<br />German-French Experts Meeting on Technologies for<br />Electronic Identification<br /><a href="http://www.e-identify-df.de/" target="_blank">http://www.e-identify-df.de/</a><br /><br />26-27 March 2009, London, UK<br />5th Communia Workshop: Accessing, Using, Reusing Public Sector Content and<br />Data<br /><a href="http://www.communia-project.eu/ws05" target="_blank">http://www.communia-project.eu/ws05</a><br /><br />27-29 March 2009, Manchester, UK<br />Oekonux Conference: Free Software and Beyond The World of Peer Production<br /><a href="http://www.oekonux-conference.org/" target="_blank">http://www.oekonux-conference.org/</a><br /><br />28 March 2009, London, UK<br />Open Knowledge Conference (OKCon) 2009<br /><a href="http://www.okfn.org/okcon/" target="_blank">http://www.okfn.org/okcon/</a><br /><br />29-31 March 2009, Edinburgh, UK<br />Governance Of New Technologies: The Transformation Of Medicine, Information<br />Technology And Intellectual Property - An International Interdisciplinary<br />Conference<br /><a href="http://w]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:12:41 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=19671</guid>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
